Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 717-741

  Fiorella, Logan ^a   Mayer, Richard E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Generative learning; Learning strategies; Transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947772343     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Ginns, P., Howard, S. J., Leahy, W., & Paas, F. (2015). Giving learning a helping hand: finger tracing of temperature graphs on an iPad. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 427–443. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9315-5.
2. Alesandrini, K. L. (1981). Pictorial-verbal and analytic-holistic learning strategies in science learning. Journal of Education and Psychology, 73, 358–368. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.3.358.
3. Aleven, V. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00061-7.
4. Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired-associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 8(4), 463–470. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80090-3.
5. Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension? Acta Psychologica, 128, 110–118. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.10.006.
6. Annis, L. F. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 2, 39–47.
7. Annis, L. F. (1985). Student-generated paragraph summaries and the information-processing theory of prose learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 54(1), 4–10.
8. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89–195.
9. Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Education and Psychology, 51, 267–272. doi:10.1037/h0046669.
10. Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Education and Psychology, 72(5), 593–604. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.593.
11. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
12. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders’ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16(4), 297–306.
14. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., & Vye, N. (2005). Learning by teaching: a new paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3–4), 363–392. doi:10.1080/08839510590910200.
15. Biazak, J. E., Marley, S. C., & Levin, J. R. (2010). Does an activity-based learning strategy improve preschool children’s memory for narrative passages? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 515–526. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.03.006.
16. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x.
17. Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(71)90019-3.
18. Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1979). Notetaking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 145–153. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(79)90069-9.
19. Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118–1133. doi:10.1037/a0019902.
20. Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Education and Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. doi:10.1037/a0031084.
21. Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 279–283. doi:10.1177/0963721412452728.
22. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: the dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology (pp. 161–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.
24. Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.
25. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1.
26. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
27. Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 248–263. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.001.
28. Coleman, E. B., Brown, A. L., & Rivkin, I. D. (1997). The effect of instructional explanations on learning from scientific texts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(4), 347–365. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0604_1.
29. Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching students about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Education and Psychology, 80(4), 448–456. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.448.
30. Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106, 1047–1058. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010.
31. Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Swller, J. (2001). Learning by imagining. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 7, 68–82. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.7.1.68.
32. Darabi, A. A., Nelson, D. W., & Palanki, S. (2007). Acquisition of troubleshooting skills in a computer simulation: worked example vs. conventional problem solving instructional strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1809–1819. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.001.
33. De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2011). Improved effectiveness of cueing by self-explanations when learning from a complex animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 183–194. doi:10.1002/acp.1661.
34. Dembo, M. H., & Junge, L. G. (2005). Learning strategies. In H. F. O’Neil (Ed.), What works in distance learning: guidelines (pp. 25–40). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
35. Doctorow, M., Wittrock, M. C., & Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Education and Psychology, 70(2), 109–118. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.70.2.109.
36. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: a brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228–232. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x.
37. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising direction from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science and the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266.
38. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 281–288. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001.
39. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). Role of expectations and explanations in learning by teaching. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 75–85. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.01.001.
40. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: eight learning strategies that promote understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107707085.
41. Fonseca, B. A., & Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Instruction based on self-explanation. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Learning and Instruction (pp. 296–319). New York, NY: Routledge.
42. Friend, R. (2001). Effects of strategy instruction on summary writing of college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 3–24. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1022.
43. Fujimura, N. (2001). Facilitating children’s proportional reasoning: a model of reasoning processes and effects of intervention on strategy change. Journal of Education and Psychology, 93(3), 589–603. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.589.
44. Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: a systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9249-3
45. Glenberg, A. M. (2008). Embodiment for education. In P. Calvo & T. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach (pp. 355–372). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
46. Glenberg, A. M., Goldberg, A. B., & Zhu, X. (2011). Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instructional Science, 39, 27–39. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9096-7.
47. Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Education and Psychology, 96(3), 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424.
48. Ginns, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When imagining information is effective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 229–251. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00016-4.
49. Gobert, J. D., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 39–53. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1.
50. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257–283. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802.
51. Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20(3), 267–272. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02297.x.
52. Grabowski, B. L. (2004). Generative learning contributions to the design of instruction and learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 719–743). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Hattie, J. (2011). Visible learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
54. Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Learning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: self-explaining examples helps. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 267–274. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.006.
55. Holley, C. D., & Dansereau, D. F. (Eds.). (1984). Spatial learning strategies. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
56. Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., McDonald, B. A., Garland, J. C., & Collins, K. W. (1979). Evaluation of a hierarchical mapping technique as an aid to prose processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 227–237. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(79)90043-2.
57. Hoogerheide, V., Loyens, S. M. M., & van Gog, T. (2014). Effects of creating video-based modeling examples on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 33, 108–119. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.005.
58. Hutto, D. D., Kirchhoff, M. D., & Abrahamson, D. (2015). The enactive roots of STEM: rethinking educational design in mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 371–389.
59. Jairam, D., Kiewra, K. A., Rogers-Kasson, S., Patterson-Hazley, M., & Marxhausen, K. (2014). SOAR versus SQ3R: a test of two study systems. Instructional Science, 42, 409–420.
60. Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Education and Psychology, 101(3), 621–629. doi:10.1037/a0015183.
61. Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1246–1252. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.025.
62. Juarez Collazo, N. A., Elen, J., & Clarebout, C. (2015). The multiple effects of combined tools in computer-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 51A, 82–95. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.050.
63. Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 528–558. doi:10.1080/09541440601056620.
64. Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 157–163. doi:10.1177/0963721412443552.
65. Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 317–326. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9309-3.
66. Karpicke, J. D., & Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: a perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 401–418. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9202-2.
67. Karpicke, J. D., Blunt, J. R., Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, S. S. (2014). Retrieval-based learning: the need for guided retrieval in elementary school children. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.008.
68. Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. I. I. I. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471–479. doi:10.1080/09658210802647009.
69. Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
70. Kiewra, K. A. (2005). Learn how to study and SOAR to success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
71. King, J. R., Biggs, S., & Lipsky, S. (1984). Students’ self-questioning and summarizing as reading study strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16(3), 205–218.
72. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368. doi:10.3102/00028312031002338.
73. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363.
75. Kontra, C., Lyons, D. J., Fischer, S. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Physical experience enhances science learning. Psychological Science, 26(6), 737–749. doi:10.1177/0956797615569355.
76. Kurby, C. A., Magliano, J. P., Dandotkar, S., Woehrle, J., Gilliam, S., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Changing how students process and comprehend texts with computer-based self-explanation training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(4), 429–459. doi:10.2190/EC.47.4.e.
77. Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2005). Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal, and element interactivity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 266––276. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.266.
78. Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2008). The imagination effect increases with an increased intrinsic cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273–283. doi:10.1002/acp.1373.
79. Leahy, W., Hanham, J., & Sweller, J. (2015). High element interactivity information during problem solving may lead to failure to obtain the testing effect. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9296-4.
80. Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2012). Science text comprehension: drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 27, 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.005.
81. Leopold, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). An imagination effect in learning from scientific text. Journal of Education and Psychology, 107, 47–63. doi:10.1037/a0037142.
82. Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & Sumfleth, E. (2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: effects of drawing and mental imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 284–289. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.010.
83. Leutner, D., & Schmeck, A. (2014). The drawing principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (Second Editionth ed., pp. 433–448). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547369.
84. Lin, L., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(4), 345–391. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0972.
85. Little, J. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text. Memory & Cognition, 43(1), 85–98. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0453-7.
86. Marley, S. C., & Carbonneau, K. J. (2014). Future directions for theory and research with instructional manipulatives: commentary on the special issue papers. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 91–100. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9259-1.
87. Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2010). What cognitive benefits does an activity-based reading strategy afford young Native American readers? Journal of Experimental Education, 78(3), 395–417. doi:10.1080/00220970903548061.
88. Marley, S. C., & Szabo, Z. (2010). Improving children’s listening comprehension with a manipulation strategy. Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 227–238. doi:10.1080/00220670903383036.
89. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
90. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (Second Editionth ed., pp. 43–71). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547369.
91. Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2010). Adding instructional features that promote learning in a game-like environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(3), 241–265. doi:10.2190/EC.42.3.a.
92. Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem solving and transfer. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 45–61). New York, NY: Macmillan.
93. Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (2006). Problem solving. In P. Alexander, P. Winne, & G. Phye (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 287–303). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 494–513. doi:10.1080/09541440701326154.
95. McDaniel, M. A., Wildman, K. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2012). Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: an experimental study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.10.001.
96. McNeil, N. M., & Fyfe, E. R. (2012). “Concreteness fading” promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 22, 440–448. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.001.
97. Merrill, M. D. (2012). First principles of instruction. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
98. Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Chevrier, M., Leo, I. D., & Lajoie, S. P. (2015a). Learning by preparing to teach: Fostering self-regulatory processes and achievement during complex mathematics problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/edu0000071.
99. Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Leo, I. D., & Chevrier, M. (2015b). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172–185.
100. Nesbit, J. C., & Adelsope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448. doi:10.3102/00346543076003413.
101. Nist, S. L., & Holschuh, J. L. (2000). Comprehension strategies at the college level. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 75–104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
102. Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
103. Novack, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). Learning from gesture: how our hands change our minds. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 405–412. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9325-3.
104. Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 27–45. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2.
105. Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. doi:10.1177/0956797615571017.
106. Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Company.
107. Ponce, H. R., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). Qualitatively different cognitive processing during online reading primed by different study activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 121–130. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.054.
108. Pouw, W. T. J. L., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). An embedded and embodied cognition review of instructional manipuluatives. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 51–72. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9255-5.
109. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.
110. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Education and Psychology, 78(1), 34–38. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.34.
111. Pressley, M., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Snyder, B. L. (1995). Reading comprehension strategies. In M. Pressley & V. Woloshyn (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (pp. 57–100). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
112. Rawson, K. A. (2015). The status of the testing effect for complex materials: still a winner. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 327–331. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9308-4.
113. th graders. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 262–270. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.007.
114. Renkl, A. (2014). The worked examples principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (Second editionth ed., pp. 391–412). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547369.
115. Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: the effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90–108. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0959.
116. Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
117. Roscoe, R. D. (2014). Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching. Instructional Science, 42, 327–351. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9283-4.
118. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574. doi:10.3102/0034654307309920.
119. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science, 36(4), 321–350. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9034-5.
120. Ross, S. M., & Kirby, F. J. (1976). Oral summary as a review strategy for enhancing recall of textual material. Journal of Education and Psychology, 68(6), 686–695. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.68.6.689.
121. Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. doi:10.1037/a0037559.
122. Schwamborn, A., Mayer, R. E., Thillmann, H., Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2010). Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Education and Psychology, 102, 872–879. doi:10.1037/a0019640.
123. Selcuk, G. S., Sahin, M., & Acikgoz, K. U. (2011). The effects of learning strategy instruction on achievement, attitude, and achievement motivation in a physics course. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 39–62. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9145-x.
124. Selig, J. P., Preacher, K. J., & Little, T. D. (2012). Modeling time-dependent association in longitudinal data: a lag as moderator approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 697–716. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715557.
125. Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
126. Stieff, M., Dixon, B. L., Ryu, M., Kumi, B. C., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Strategy training eliminates sex differences in spatial problem solving in a STEM domain. Journal of Education and Psychology, 106(2), 390–402. doi:10.1037/a0034823.
127. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
128. Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2), 134–146. doi:10.2307/747358.
129. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 129–160. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00011-5.
130. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Education and Psychology, 95(1), 66–73. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66.
131. Uttal, D. H., Liu, L. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1999). Taking a hard look at concreteness: do concrete objects help young children learn symbolic relations? In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonde (Eds.), Child psychology: a handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 177–192). New York: Psychology Press.
132. Van Gog, T., & Kester, L. (2012). A test of the testing effect: acquiring problem-solving skills from worked examples. Cognitive Science, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12002
133. Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2015). Not new, but nearly forgotten: the testing effect decreases or even disappears as the complexity of learning materials increases. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 247–264. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9310-x.
134. Van Gog, T., Kester, L., Dirkx, K., Hoogerheide, V., Boerboom, J., & Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. (2015). Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9297-3.
135. Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Education and Psychology, 69, 129–140. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.129.
136. Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 285–325. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3.
137. Van Meter, P. (2013). Cognitive model of drawing construction: learning through the construction of drawings. In G. Schraw, M. T. McCrudden, & D. Robinson (Eds.), Learning through visual displays (pp. 247–280). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
138. Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 142–166. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.001.
139. Webb, N. M. (1982). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Education and Psychology, 74(5), 642–655. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.5.642.
140. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.
141. Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
142. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. doi:10.3758/BF03196322.
143. Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87–95. doi:10.1080/00461520903433554.
144. Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24(4), 345–376. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2404_2.
145. Wittrock, M. C. (1991). Educational psychology, literacy, and reading comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 26, 109–116. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2602_3.
146. Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative processes of the brain. Educational Psychologists, 27, 531–541. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2704_8.
147. Wittrock, M. C., & Alesandrini, K. (1990). Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 489–502.
148. Wylie, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (2014). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (Second editionth ed., pp. 413–432). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547369.