The worked examples principle in multimedia learning

The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 391-412

  Renkl, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941931803     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.020     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Ainsworth, S. E. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning & Instruction,16, 183-198.
2. Atkinson, R. K., Catrambone, R., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Aiding transfer in statistics: Examining the use of conceptually oriented equations and elaborations during subgoal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 762-773.
3. Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Combining fading with prompting fosters learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 774-783.
4. Baker, R., Walonoski, J., Heffernan, N., Roll, I., Corbett, A., & Koedinger, K. (2008). Why students engage in “gaming the system” behavior in interactive learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research,19, 185-224.
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science,37, 345-363.
7. Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). Instructional aides to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations. Journal of Educational Psychology,101, 70-87.
8. Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2010). How to foster active processing of explanations in instructional communication. Educational Psychology Review,22, 25-40.
9. Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning & Instruction,25, 24-34.
10. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education,24, 61-100.
11. Catrambone, R. (1996). Generalizing solution procedures learned from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,22, 1020-1031.
12. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 355-376.
13. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science(pp. 161-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Toward computer-based support of meta-cognitive skills: A computational framework to coach self-explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,11, 398-415.
15. Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology,79, 347-362.
16. Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learning by imagining procedures and concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,7, 68-82.
17. Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. O., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., Walker, D. F., & Weiner, S. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning & Instruction,22, 206-214.
19. Eysink, T. H. S., de Jong, T., Berthold, K., Kolloffel, B., Opfermann, M., & Wouters, P. (2009). Learner performance in multimedia learning arrangements: An analysis across instructional approaches. American Educational Research Journal,46, 1107-1149.
20. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 393-408.
21. Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal coni gurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist,38, 33-41.
22. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2004). Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instructional Science,32, 33-58.
23. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Can learning from molar and modular worked-out examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? Learning & Instruction,16, 104-121.
24. Ginns, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When imagining information is effective. Contemporary Educational Psychology,28, 229-251.
25. Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Effects of multiple solution methods in mathematics learning. Learning & Instruction,16, 122-138.
26. Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and i xing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? Learning & Instruction,17, 612-634.
27. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
28. Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Learning how to use a computer-based conceptmapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps. Computers in Human Behavior,25, 267-274.
29. Hilbert, T. S., Renkl, A., Kessler, S., & Reiss, K. (2008). Learning to prove in geometry: Learning from heuristic examples and how it can be supported. Learning & Instruction,18, 54-65.
30. Hilbert, T. S., Renkl, A., Schworm, S., Kessler, S., & Reiss, K. (2008). Learning to teach with worked-out examples: A computer-based learning environment for teachers. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning,24, 316-332.
31. Hilbert, T. S., Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2004). Learning from worked-out examples: The transition from instructional explanations to self-explanation prompts. In P. Gerjets, J. Elen, R. Joiner, & P. Kirschner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning(pp. 184-192). Tübingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
32. Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning(pp. 234-259). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Hübner, S., & Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Writing learning journals: Instructional support to overcome learning-strategy dei cits. Learning & Instruction,20, 18-29.
34. Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology,17, 329-343.
35. Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509-539.
36. Kalyuga, S, (2010). Schema acquisition and sources of cognitive load. In J. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory(pp. 48-64). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors,40, 1-17.
38. Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology,96, 558-568.
39. Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences(pp. 61-77). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. LeFevre, J.-A., & Dixon, P. (1986). Do written instructions need examples? Cognition & Instruction,3, 1-30.
41. Magner, U., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Renkl, A. (2014). Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning & Instruction, 29, 141-152.
42. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2d ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist,38, 43-52.
44. Nievelstein, F., van Gog, T., van Dijck, G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2013). The worked example and expertise reversal effect in less structured tasks: Learning to reason about legal cases. Contemporary Educational Psychology,38, 118-125.
45. Paas, F., & van Gog, T. (2006). Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load. Learning & Instruction,16, 87-91.
46. Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology,88, 144-161.
47. Recker, M., & Pirolli, P. (1994). Modeling individual differences in students’ learning strategies. Journal of the Learning Sciences,4, 1-38.
48. Reed, S. K., Corbett, A., Hoffman, B., Wagner, A. & McClaren, B. (2013). Effect of worked examples and Cognitive Tutor training on constructing equations. Instructional Science,41, 1-24.
49. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science,21, 1-29.
50. Renkl, A. (2002). Learning from worked-out examples: Instructional explanations supplement self-explanations. Learning & Instruction,12, 529-556.
51. Renkl, A. (2011). Instruction based on examples. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction(pp. 272-295). New York: Routledge.
52. Renkl, A. (2014). Towards an instructionally-oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science,38, 1-37.
53. Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skills acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist,38, 15-22.
54. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. Journal of Experimental Education,70, 293-315.
55. Renkl, A., Berthold, K., Große, C. S., & Schwonke, R. (2013). Making better use of multiple representations: How fostering metacognition can help. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies(pp. 397-408). New York: Springer.
56. Renkl, A., Gruber, H., Weber, S., Lerche, T., & Schweizer, K. (2003). Cognitive Load beim Lernen aus L ö sungsbeispielen [Cognitive load during learning from worked examples]. Zeitschrift für P ä dagogische Psychologie,17, 93-101.
57. Renkl, A., Hilbert, T., & Schworm, S. (2009). Example-based learning in heuristic domains: A cognitive load theory account. Educational Psychology Review,21, 67-78.
58. Renkl, A., & Schwonke, R. (2013). Static visual displays for deeper understanding: How to support learners to make use of them. In G. Schraw, M. McCrudden, & D. Robinson (Eds.), Learning through visual displays(pp. 165-185). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
59. Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from workedout examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology,23, 90-108.
60. Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: Inl uences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology,101, 836-852.
61. Ross, B. H., & Kilbane, M. C. (1997). Effects of principle explanation and superi-cial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 427-440.
62. Rourke, A., & Sweller, J. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-dei ned problems: Learning to recognize designers’ styles. Learning & Instruction,19, 185-199.
63. Rummel, N., Spada, H., & Hauser, S. (2009). Learning to collaborate while being scripted or by observing a model. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,4, 69-92.
64. Salden, R., Aleven, V., Renkl, A., & Schwonke, R. (2009). Worked examples and tutored problem solving: Redundant or synergistic forms of support? Topics in Cognitive Science,1, 203-213.
65. Salden, R., Koedinger, K. R., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Accounting for benei cial effects of worked examples in tutored problem solving. Educational Psychology Review,22, 379-392.
66. Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2004). Supporting coherence formation in multimedia learning. In P. Gerjets, P. Kirschner, J. Elen, & R. Joiner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning. Proceedings of the i rst joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers(pp. 138-147). Tübingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
67. Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Applied Cognitive Psychology,23, 1227-1243.
68. Schwonke, R., Ertelt, A., Otieno, C., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. (2013). Metacognitive support promotes an effective use of instructional resources in intelligent tutoring. Learning & Instruction,23, 136-150.
69. Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, K., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. (2009). The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior,25, 258-266.
70. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology,99, 285-296.
71. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Inl uencing children’s self-eficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly,23, 7-25.
72. Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., & van Merri ë nboer, J. J. G. (2012). Segmentation of worked examples: Effects on cognitive load and learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology,26, 352-358.
73. Stark, R. (2004). Implementing example-based learning and teaching in the context of vocational school education in business administration. Learning Environments Research,7, 134-163.
74. Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning & Instruction,16, 165-169.
75. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
76. Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition & Instruction,2, 59-89.
77. Sweller, J., van Merri ë nboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review,10, 251-296.
78. Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology,80, 424-436.
79. van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review,22, 155-174.
80. van Loon-Hillen, N., van Gog, T., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2012). Effects of worked examples in a primary school mathematics curriculum. Interactive Learning Environments,20, 89-99.
81. Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition & Instruction,7, 1-39.
82. Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2010). How effective are instructional explanations in example-based learning? A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review,22, 393-409.
83. Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2009). Observational learning from animated models: Effects of modality and rel ection on transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology,34, 1-8.
84. Zhu, X., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition & Instruction,4, 137-166.