Effects of Strategy Instruction on Summary Writing of College Students

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 3-24

  Friend, Rosalie ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346609800     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1022     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brown A. L., Day J. D. Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 22:1983;1-14.
2. Byrd, M. 1990, May, Summary writing strategies of junior college students. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, Atlanta, GA.
3. Casazza M. E. Using a model of direct instruction to teach summary writing in a college reading class. Journal of Reading. 37:1993;202-208.
4. Day, J. D. 1980, Training summarization skills: A comparison of teaching methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
5. Descriptive test of language skills. 1989;The Educational Testing Service and The College Board, Princeton.
6. Dole J. A., Duffy G. G., Roehler L. R., Pearson P. D. Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research. 61:1991;239-264.
7. Friend, R. 1987, Teaching summarization as a study technique. Paper presented at the meeting of the Professional Organization of the Higher Education Opportunity Program, Syracuse, NY.
8. Garner R., McCaleb J. L. Effects of text manipulations on quality of written summaries. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 10:1985;139-149.
9. Hill M. Writing summaries promotes thinking and learning across the curriculum - But why are they so difficult to write? Journal of Reading. 34:1991;536-539.
10. Hormann H. To mean - to understand: Problems of psychological semantics. 1981;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
11. Johnston P., Afflerbach P. The process of constructing main ideas from text. Cognition and Instruction. 2:1985;207-232.
12. Kintsch, E. 1989, Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. (Tech. Rep. No, 89-5), Boulder, Univ. of Colorado, Institute of Cognitive Science.
13. Kintsch W. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review. 95:1988;163-182.
14. Kintsch W., van Dijk T. A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review. 85:1978;363-394.
15. Lorch R. F., van den Broek P. Understanding reading comprehension: Current and future contributions of cognitive science. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 22:1997;213-246.
16. Meyer B. J. F. Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. Britton B. K., Black J. B. Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. 1985;11-64 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
17. Miller J. R. A knowledge based model of prose comprehension: Applications to expository tests. Britton B. K., Black J. B. Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. 1985;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
18. Pressley M., Woloshyn V. Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. 1995;Brookline Books, Cambridge.
19. Rosenblatt L. Viewpoints: Transaction versus interaction - A terminological rescue operation. Research in the teaching of English. 19:1985;96-107.
20. Sherrard C. Summary writing: A topographical study. Written Communication. 3:1986;324-343.
21. van Dijk T. A., Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. 1983;Academic Press, New York.
22. Williams J. P. Categorization, macrostructure, and finding the main idea. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76:1984;874-879.
23. Winograd P. Strategic difficulties in summarizing text. Reading Research Quarterly. 19:1984;404-425.
24. Wittrock M. C. A constructive review of research on learning strategies. Weinstein C. E., Goetz E. T., Alexander P. A. Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. 1988;Academic Press, San Diego.
25. Wittrock M. C., Alesandrini K. Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities. American Educational Research Journal. 27:1990;489-502.