Strategy training eliminates sex differences in spatial problem solving in a STEM domain

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 390-402

  Stieff, Mike ^a   Dixon, Bonnie L ^b   Ryu, Minjung ^c   Kumi, Bryna C ^b   Hegarty, Mary ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Problem solving; Spatial ability; Spatial reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921774283     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: 19392176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0034823     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allen, M. J., & Hogeland, R. (1978). Spatial problem-solving strategies as functions of sex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 348-350. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.348.
2. Bosco, A., Longoni, A. M., & Vecchi, T. (2004). Gender effects in spatial orientation: Cognitive profiles and mental strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 519-532. doi:10.1002/acp.1000.
3. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2010). The mathematics of sex: How biology and society conspire to limit talented women and girls. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218-261. doi:10.1037/a0014412.
5. Dabbs, J. M., Chang, E., Strong, R. A., & Milun, R. (1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 89 -98. doi:10.1016/S1090- 5138(97)00107-4.
6. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Derman, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
7. Freedman, R. J., & Rovegno, L. (1981). Ocular dominance, cognitive strategy, and sex differences in spatial ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 651-654. doi:10.2466/pms.1981.52.2.651.
8. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2000). Differential roles for visuospatial and verbal working memory in situation model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 61-83. doi:10.1037/0096-3445 .129.1.61.
9. Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.). (2005). Visualization in science education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3613-2.
10. Guay, R. B., & McDaniel, E. D. (1976). The visualization of viewpoints. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.
11. Halpern, D. F. (2007). Science, sex, and good sense: Why women are underrepresented in some areas of science and math. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 121-130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11546-010.
12. Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1-51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.
13. Harle, M., & Towns, M. (2011). A review of spatial ability literature, its connection to chemistry, and implications for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 351-360. doi:10.1021/ed900003n.
14. Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 280-285. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.001.
15. Hegarty, M. (2010). Components of spatial intelligence. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 52, pp. 265-297). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079- 7421(10)52007-3.
16. Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684-689. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684.
17. Hegarty, M., Stieff, M., & Dixon, B. L. (2013). Cognitive change in mental models with experience in the domain of organic chemistry. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 220 -228. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012 .725044.
18. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. A. (2006). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121-169). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Heil, M., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Sex differences in mental rotation with polygons of different complexity: Do men utilize holistic processes whereas women prefer piecemeal ones? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 683-689. doi:10.1080/17470210701822967.
20. Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 151-158. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00278.x.
21. Hugdahl, K., Thomsen, T., & Ersland, L. (2006). Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: An fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1575-1583. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026.
22. Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250-261. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.250.
23. Jordan, K., Wustenberg, T., Heinze, H.-J., Peters, M., & Jäncke, L. (2002). Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2397-2408. doi:10.1016/ S0028-3932(02)00076-3.
24. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, M. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137-172. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.137.
25. Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1984). Effects of aptitudes, strategy training, and task facets on spatial task performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 130-145. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.130.
26. Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765-779. doi:10.1007/BF01544230.
27. Lawton, C. A. (2010). Gender, spatial abilities, and wayfinding. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology: Vol. 1. Gender research in general and experimental psychology (pp. 317-341). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1- 4419-1465-1_16.
28. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of gender differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498. doi:10.2307/1130467.
29. Lowrie, T., & Kay, R. (2001). Relationship between visual and nonvisual solution methods and difficulty in elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 248-255. doi:10.1080/00220670109598758.
30. Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 344-351. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022.
31. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
32. Mayer, R. E., Stull, A. T., Campbell, J., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., & Knight, A. (2007). Overestimation bias in self-reported SAT scores. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 443-454. doi:10.1007/ s10648-006-9034-z.
33. Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141-152. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012.
34. National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
35. Peters, M., Chisholm, P., & Laeng, B. (1995). Spatial ability, student gender, and academic performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 69-73. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00148.x.
36. Pezaris, E., & Casey, M. B. (1991). Girls who use "masculine" problem-solving strategies on a spatial task: Proposed genetic and environmental factors. Brain and Cognition, 17, 1-22. doi:10.1016/ 0278-2626(91)90062-D.
37. Robert, M., & Chevrier, E. (2003). Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either seen or felt? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1136-1145. doi:10.3758/BF03196134.
38. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-497. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2004_1.
39. Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4-27. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.4.
40. Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.604.
41. Sorby, S. A. (2001). A course in spatial visualization and its impact on the retention of female engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 153-172.
42. Sorby, S. A. (2009). Education research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 459-480. doi:10.1080/09500690802595839.
43. Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science: A critical review. American Psychologist, 60, 950-958. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950.
44. Stieff, M. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction, 17, 219-234. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007 .01.012.
45. Stieff, M. (2011). When is a molecule three-dimensional? A task-specific role for imagistic reasoning in advanced chemistry. Science Education, 95, 310-336. doi:10.1002/sce.20427.
46. Stieff, M., Hegarty, M., & Deslongchamps, G. (2011). Identifying representational competence with multi-representational displays. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 123-145. doi:10.1080/07370008.2010.507318.
47. Stieff, M., Hegarty, M., & Dixon, B. (2010). Alternative strategies for spatial reasoning with diagrams. In A. K. Goel, M. Jamnik, & N. H. Narayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 115- 127). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_13.
48. Stieff, M., & Raje, S. (2008). Expertise and spatial reasoning in advanced scientific problem solving. In P. A. Kirschner, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 366-373). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Stieff, M., & Raje, S. (2010). Expert algorithmic and imagistic problem solving strategies in advanced chemistry. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 10, 53-81. doi:10.1080/13875860903453332.
50. Stieff, M., Ryu, M., & Dixon, B. L. (2010). Students' use of multiple strategies for scientific problem solving. In S. R. Goldman, J. Pellegrino, K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 765- 772). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Stieff, M., Ryu, M., Dixon, B. L., & Hegarty, M. (2012). The role of spatial ability and strategy preference for spatial problem solving in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 854-859. doi:10.1021/ ed200071d.
52. Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352-402. doi:10.1037/a0028446.
53. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations: A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604. doi:10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.
54. Voyer, D., (2011). Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 267-277. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0042-0.
55. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250.
56. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817-835. doi:10.1037/a0016127.
57. Weiss, E., Siedentopf, C. M., Hofer, A., Diesenhammer, E. A., Hoptman, M. J., Kremser, C. Delazer, M. (2003). Sex differences in brain activation pattern during a visuospatial cognitive task: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Neuroscience Letters, 344, 169-172. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00406-3.