The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 281-288

  Fiorella, Logan ^a   Mayer, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Explanation; Generative learning; Learning by teaching; Multimedia learning; Teaching expectancy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880362629     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allen V., Feldman R. Learning through tutoring: Low-achieving children as tutors. Journal of Experimental Education 1973, 42(1):1-5.
2. Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., Airasian P.W., Cruikshank K.A., Mayer R.E., Pintrich P., et al. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives 2001, Longman, New York.
3. Annis L.F. The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research and Applications 1983, 2(1):39-47.
4. Bargh J.A., Schul Y. On the cognitive effects of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology 1980, 72:593-604.
5. Benware C.A., Deci E.L. Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal 1984, 21:755-765.
6. Chi M., Siler S., Jeong H., Yamauchi T., Hausmann R. Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science 2001, 25:471-533.
7. Cloward R. Studies in tutoring. Journal of Experimental Education 1967, 36(1):14-25.
8. Cohen J. Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychology in the Schools 1986, 23:175-186.
9. Cohen P., Kulik J., Kulik C. Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal 1982, 19(2):237-248.
10. Coleman E.B., Brown A.L., Rivkin I.D. The effect of instructional explanations on learning from scientific texts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1997, 6(4):347-365.
11. Cook S., Scruggs T., Mastropieri M., Casto G. Handicapped students as tutors. Journal of Special Education 1986, 19(4):483-492.
12. Dunlosky J., Rawson K.A., Marsh E.J., Nathan M.J., Willingham D.T. Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions for cognitive and education psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2013, 14:4-58.
13. Ehly S., Keith T.Z., Bratton B. The benefits of tutoring: An exploration of expectancy and outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1987, 12:131-134.
14. Fantuzzo J., King J., Heller L. Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 1989, 81(2):173-177.
15. Galbraith J., Winterbottom M. Peer tutoring: What's in it for the tutor?. Educational Studies 2011, 37(3):321-332.
16. Gartner A., Kohler M.C., Riessman F. Children teach children: Learning by teaching 1971, Harper & Row, New York.
17. Ginsburg-Block M., Fantuzzo J. Reciprocal peer tutoring: An analysis of "teacher" and "student" interactions as a function of training and experience. School Psychology Quarterly 1997, 12(2):134-149.
18. Graesser A., Person N., Magliano J. Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1995, 9:495-522.
19. Greenwood C., Delquadri J., Hall R. Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology 1989, 81(3):371-383.
20. Griffin M.M., Griffin B.W. An investigation of the effects of reciprocal peer-tutoring on achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1998, 23:298-391.
21. Kafai Y., Harel I. Learning through design and teaching: Exploring social and collaborative aspects of constructionism. Constructionism 1991, Ablex, Norwood, NJ. I. Harel, S. Papert (Eds.).
22. King A., Staffieri A., Adelgais A. Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90(1):134-152.
23. Mastropieri M., Spencer V., Scruggs T., Talbott E. Students with disabilities as tutors: An updated research synthesis. Educational interventions: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities 2000, 247-279. JAI, Stamford, CT. T.E. Scruggs, M.A. Mastropieri (Eds.).
24. Mathes P., Fuchs L. The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading strategies for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. School Psychology Review 1994, 23(1):59-80.
25. Mayer R.E. Learning and instruction 2008, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2nd ed.
26. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
27. Mayer R.E. Applying the science of learning 2011, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
28. Mayer R.E. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 31-48. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
29. Mayer R.E., Wittrock M.C. Problem solving. Handbook of educational psychology 2006, 287-303. Erlbaum, Mahwah. NJ. P. Alexander, P. Winne, G. Phye (Eds.).
30. Mayer R.E., Wittrock M.C. Problem solving and transfer. Handbook of educational psychology 1996, 45-61. Macmillan, New York. D. Berliner, R. Calfee (Eds.).
31. Morgan R., Toy T. Learning by teaching: A student-to student compensatory tutoring program in a rural school system and its relevance to the educational cooperative. Psychological Record 1970, 20:159-169.
32. Palincsar A.S., Brown A.L. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1984, 1:117-175.
33. Ploetznerl R., Dillenbourg P., Praier M., Traum D. Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches 1999, 103-121. Elsevier, Oxford. P. Dillenbourg (Ed.).
34. Renkl A. Learning for later teaching: An exploration of meditational links between teaching expectancy and learning results. Learning and Instruction 1995, 5:21-36.
35. Robinson D., Schoefield J., Steers-Wentzell K. Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review 2005, 17(4):327-362.
36. Roediger H.L., Karpicke J.D. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science 2006, 17:249-255.
37. Rohrbeck C., Ginsburg-Block M., Fantuzzo J., Miller T. Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology 2003, 95(2):240-257.
38. Roscoe R.D., Chi M.T.H. Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(4):534-574.
39. Roscoe R.D., Chi M.T.H. Tutoring learning: The role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science 2008, 36:321-350.
40. Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research 1991, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
41. Slavin R.E. Cooperative learning 1983, Longman, New York.
42. Sweller J., Ayres P., Kalyuga S. Cognitive load theory 2011, Springer, New York.
43. Sweller J. Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, 19-30. Cambridge University Press, New York. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
44. Topping K., Ehly S. Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 2001, 12(2):113-132.
45. Webb N.M. Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982, 74(5):642-655.
46. Weinstein C.E., Mayer R.E. The teaching of learning strategies. Handbook of research on teaching 1985, 315-327. Macmillan, New York. 3rd ed. M.C. Wittrock (Ed.).
47. Wittrock M.C. Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist 1989, 24:345-376.