Cognitive theory of multimedia learning

The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 43-71

  Mayer, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922988228     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Human memory. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Baddeley, A. D., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2009). Memory. Hove: Psychology Press.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review,3, 149-210.
7. Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology,80, 448-456.
8. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning wiTheffective techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,14(1), 4-58.
9. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction,15, 313-332.
10. Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction,16, 511-525.
11. Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. M. (2013). Designing instructional text in a conversational style: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review,25, 445-472.
12. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York: Routledge.
13. Johnson, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,18, 178-191.
14. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology,81, 240-246.
16. Mayer, R. E. (1992). Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology,84, 405-412.
17. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist,32, 1-19.
18. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 41 (pp. 85-139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. L earning and Instruction,12, 125-141.
21. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist,63(8), 760-769.
23. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2d ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Mayer, R. E. (2011). Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
25. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction,24, 171-173.
26. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of the dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology,83, 484-490.
27. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,84, 444-452.
28. Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology,88, 64-73.
29. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 715-726.
30. Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology,93, 187-198.
31. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology,90, 312-320.
32. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist,38, 43-52.
33. Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 638-643.
34. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K., (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,86, 389-401.
35. Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research & Development,43, 31-43.
36. Miller, G. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review,63, 81-97.
37. Moreno, R. (2007). Optimising learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology,21, 765-781.
38. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology,92, 117-125.
39. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review,19, 309-326.
40. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
41. Paivio, A. (2006). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology,90, 25-36.
43. Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brunken, R. (Eds.) (2010). Cognitive load theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Scheiter, K., & van Gog, T. (2009). Using eye tracking in applied research to study and stimulate the processing of information from multi-representational sources. Applied Cognitive Psychology,23, 1209-1214.
45. Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction,13, 141-156.
46. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell: ACER Press.
47. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
48. Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2011). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,104, 485-498.
49. Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist,24, 345-376.