Applications of computational modeling in metabolic engineering of yeast

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Kerkhoven, Eduard J ^a   Lahtvee, Petri Jaan ^a   Nielsen, Jens ^a,b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b Chalmers University of Technology   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Genome scale model; Kinetic model; Synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

ENZYME KINETICS; GENOME SCALE MODEL; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLIC REGULATION; MODEL; NONHUMAN; SHORT SURVEY; THERMODYNAMICS; YEAST; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84943659706     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1567-1364.12199     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Abner K, Aaviksaar T, Adamberg K, Vilu R. Single-cell model of prokaryotic cell cycle. J Theor Biol 2013;341:78-87.
2. Achcar F, Kerkhoven EJ, Bakker BM, Barrett MP, Breitling R. Dynamic modelling under uncertainty: the case of Trypanosoma brucei energy metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002352.
3. Adamczyk M, WesterhoffHV. Engineering of self-sustaining systems: substituting the yeast glucose transporter plus hexokinase for the Lactococcus lactis phosphotransferase system in a Lactococcus lactis network in silico. Biotechnol J 2012;7:877-83.
4. Agren R, Liu L, Shoaie S, Vongsangnak W, Nookaew I, Nielsen J. The RAVEN toolbox and its use for generating a genomescale metabolic model for Penicillium chrysogenum. PLoS Comput Biol 2013;9:e1002980.
5. Agren R, Otero JM, Nielsen J. Genome-scale modeling enables metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for succinic acid production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2013;40:735-47.
6. Almario MP, Reyes LH, Kao KC. Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced tolerance to hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013;110:2616-23.
7. Almquist J, Cvijovic M, Hatzimanikatis V, Nielsen J, Jirstrand M. Kinetic models in industrial biotechnology-improving cell factory performance. Metab Eng 2014;24C:38-60.
8. Alvarez-Vasquez F, Sims KJ, Hannun YA, Voit EO. Integration of kinetic information on yeast sphingolipid metabolism in dynamical pathway models. J Theor Biol 2004;226:265-91.
9. Alvarez-Vasquez F, Riezman H, Hannun YA, Voit EO. Mathematical modeling and validation of the ergosterol pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 2011;6:e28344.
10. Annaluru N, Muller H, Mitchell LA, et al. Total synthesis of a functional designer eukaryotic chromosome. Science 2014;344:55-8.
11. Asadollahi MA, Maury J, Patil KR, Schalk M, Clark A, Nielsen J. Enhancing sesquiterpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through in silico driven metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 2009;11:328-34.
12. Avrahami-Moyal L, Engelberg D, Wenger JW, Sherlock G, Braun S. Turbidostat culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303-1A under selective pressure elicited by ethanol selects for mutations in SSD1 and UTH1. FEMS Yeast Res 2012;12:521-33.
13. Bailey J. Toward a science of metabolic engineering. Science 1991;252:1668-75.
14. Blank LM, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Large-scale 13C-flux analysis reveals mechanistic principles of metabolic network robustness to null mutations in yeast. Genome Biol 2005;6:R49.
15. Bordel S, Agren R, Nielsen J. Sampling the solution space in genome-scale metabolic networks reveals transcriptional regulation in key enzymes. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000859.
16. Bro C, Regenberg B, Förster J, Nielsen J. In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Metab Eng 2006;8:102-11.
17. Brochado AR, Matos C, Møller BL, Hansen J, Mortensen UH, Patil KR. Improved vanillin production in baker's yeast through in silico design. Microb Cell Fact 2010;9:84.
18. Bruggeman FJ, WesterhoffHV. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol 2007;15:45-50.
19. Buescher JM, Liebermeister W, Jules M, et al. Global network reorganization during dynamic adaptations of Bacillus subtilis metabolism. Science 2012;335:1099-103.
20. Burgard AP, Maranas CD. Optimization-based framework for inferring and testing hypothesized metabolic objective functions. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003;82:670-7.
21. Cakar ZP, Seker UOS, Tamerler C, Sonderegger M, Sauer U. Evolutionary engineering of multiple-stress resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2005;5:569-78.
22. Chakrabarti A, Miskovic L, Soh KC, Hatzimanikatis V. Towards kinetic modeling of genome-scale metabolic networks without sacrificing stoichiometric, thermodynamic and physiology constraints. Biotechnol J 2013;8:1043-57.
23. Chen WW, Niepel M, Sorger PK. Classic and contemporary approaches to modeling biochemical reactions. Genes Dev 2010;24:1861-75.
24. Chen N, Koumpouras GC, Polizzi KM, Kontoravdi C. Genomebased kinetic modeling of cytosolic glucose metabolism in industrially relevant cell lines: Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Chinese hamster ovary cells. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2012;35:1023-33.
25. Chen Y, Bao J, Kim I-K, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Coupled incremental precursor and co-factor supply improves 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 2014;22:104-9.
26. Choi J, Antoniewicz MR. Tandem mass spectrometry: a novel approach for metabolic flux analysis. Metab Eng 2011;13:225-33.
27. Christensen TS, Oliveira AP, Nielsen J. Reconstruction and logical modeling of glucose repression signaling pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Syst Biol 2009;3:7.
28. Chubukov V, Uhr M, Le Chat L, Kleijn RJ, Jules M, Link H, Aymerich S, Stelling J, Sauer U. Transcriptional regulation is insufficient to explain substrate-induced flux changes in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Syst Biol 2013;9:709.
29. Covert MW, Schilling CH, Palsson B. Regulation of gene expression in flux balance models of metabolism. J Theor Biol 2001;213:73-88.
30. Covert MW, Polakis P, Palsson BØ Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks. Nature 2004;429:92-6.
31. Covert MW, Xiao N, Chen TJ, Karr JR. Integrating metabolic, transcriptional regulatory and signal transduction models in Escherichia coli. Bioinformatics 2008;24:2044-50.
32. Cronwright GR, Rohwer JM, Prior BA. Metabolic control analysis of glycerol synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:4448-56.
33. Dantas G, Watters AL, Lundes BM, et al. Mis-translation of a computationally designed protein yields an exceptionally stable homodimer: implications for protein engineering and evolution. J Mol Biol 2006;362:1004-24.
34. Daran-Lapujade P, Jansen ML, Daran J-M, van Gulik W, de Winde JH, Pronk JT. Role of transcriptional regulation in controlling fluxes in central carbon metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A chemostat culture study. J Biol Chem 2004;279:9125-38.
35. Daran-Lapujade P, Rossell S, Van Gulik WM, et al. The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:15753-8.
36. Demeke MM, Dietz H, Li Y, et al. Development of a D-xylose fermenting and inhibitor tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high performance in lignocellulose hydrolysates using metabolic and evolutionary engineering. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013;6:89.
37. Dhar R, Sägesser R, Weikert C, Yuan J, Wagner A. Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to saline stress through laboratory evolution. J Evol Biol 2011;24:1135-53.
38. Dikicioglu D, Pir P, Onsan ZI, Ulgen KO, Kirdar B, Oliver SG. Integration of metabolic modeling and phenotypic data in evaluation and improvement of ethanol production using respiration-deficient mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:5809-16.
39. Duarte NC, Herrgård MJ, Palsson BØ Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. Genome Res 2004;14:1298-309.
40. Dymond JS, Richardson SM, Coombes CE, et al. Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. Nature 2011;477:471-6.
41. Elowitz MB, Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 2000;403:335-8.
42. Feder ME, Walser J-C. The biological limitations of transcriptomics in elucidating stress and stress responses. J Evol Biol 2005;18:901-10.
43. Feizi A, Österlund T, Petranovic D, Bordel S, Nielsen J. Genome-scale modeling of the protein secretory machinery in yeast. PLoS One 2013;8:e63284.
44. Fendt S-M, Oliveira AP, Christen S, Picotti P, Dechant RC, Sauer U. Unraveling condition-dependent networks of transcription factors that control metabolic pathway activity in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 2010;6:432.
45. Förster J, Famili I, Fu P, Palsson BØ, Nielsen J. Genome-scale re-construction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 2003;13:244-53.
46. Frick O, Wittmann C. Characterization of the metabolic shift between oxidative and fermentative growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by comparative 13C flux analysis. Microb Cell Fact 2005;4:30.
47. Galazzo J, Bailey J. Fermentation pathway kinetics and metabolic flux control in suspended and immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 1990;12:162-72.
48. Gardner TS, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 2000;403:339-42.
49. Gerosa L, Sauer U. Regulation and control of metabolic fluxes in microbes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2011;22:566-75.
50. Gianchandani EP, Oberhardt MA, Burgard AP, Maranas CD, Papin JA. Predicting biological system objectives de novo from internal state measurements. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9: 43.
51. Gombert AK, Moreira M, Christensen B, Nielsen J, Acteriol JB. Network identification and flux quantification in the central metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different conditions of glucose repression. J Bacteriol 2001;183:1441-51.
52. Gutenkunst RN, Waterfall JJ, Casey FP, Brown KS, Myers CR, Sethna JP. Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3: 1871-8.
53. Gutiérrez-Lomeĺ I.M, Torres-Guzman JC, González-Hernández GA, Cira-Chávez LA, Pelayo-Ortiz C, Ramírez-Córdova JDJ. Overexpression of ADH1 and HXT1 genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves the fermentative efficiency during tequila elaboration. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2008;93:363-71.
54. Hanly TJ, Henson MA. Dynamic model-based analysis of furfural and HMF detoxification by pure and mixed batch cultures of S. cerevisiae and S. stipitis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2014;111:272-84.
55. Hatzimanikatis V, Bailey JE. MCA has more to say. J Theor Biol 1996;182:233-42.
56. Hauf J, Zimmermann FK, Müller S. Simultaneous genomic over-expression of seven glycolytic enzymes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 2000;26:688-98.
57. Heijnen JJ. Approximative kinetic formats used in metabolic network modeling. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005;91:534-45.
58. Henriksen P, Bacinskaja G, Rehman M, Juffer AH, Walther TC, Lisby M, Choudhary C. Proteome-wide analysis of lysine acetylation suggests its broad regulatory scope in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012;11:1510-22.
59. Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, Frybarger PM, Linsay B, Stevens RL. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:977-82.
60. Herrgård MJ, Swainston N, Dobson P, et al. A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26:1155-60.
61. Hjersted JLL, Henson MA. Steady-state and dynamic flux balance analysis of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. IET Syst Biol 2009;3:167-79.
62. Hong K-K, Vongsangnak W, Vemuri GN, Nielsen J. Unravelling evolutionary strategies of yeast for improving galactose utilization through integrated systems level analysis. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:12179-84.
63. Hynne F, Danø S, Sørensen PG. Full-scale model of glycolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biophys Chem 2001;94:121-63.
64. Ishii N, Nakahigashi K, Baba T, et al. Multiple high-throughput analyses monitor the response of E. coli to perturbations. Science 2007;316:593-7.
65. Jol SJ, Kümmel A, Terzer M, Stelling J, Heinemann M. System-level insights into yeast metabolism by thermodynamic analysis of elementary flux modes. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002415.
66. Kacser H, Burns J. The control of flux. Symp Soc Exp Biol 1973;27:65-104.
67. Kacser H, Burns J. Molecular democracy: who shares the controls?. Biochem Soc Trans 1979;7:1149-60.
68. Kacser H, Burns J. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 1981;97:639-66.
69. Karr JR, Sanghvi JC, Macklin DN, Gutschow MV, Jacobs JM, Bolival B, Assad-Garcia N, Glass JI, Covert MW. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell 2012;150:389-401.
70. Klipp E, Nordlander B, Krüger R, Gennemark P, Hohmann S. Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock. Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:975-82.
71. Kohlstedt M, Sappa PK, Meyer H, et al. Adaptation of Bacillus subtilis carbon core metabolism to simultaneous nutrient limitation and osmotic challenge: a multi-omics perspective. Environ Microbiol 2014;16:1898-917.
72. Kotte O, Zaugg JB, Heinemann M. Bacterial adaptation through distributed sensing of metabolic fluxes. Mol Syst Biol 2010;6:1-9.
73. Kuepfer L, Sauer U, Blank LM. Metabolic functions of duplicate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res 2005;15:1421-30.
74. Lee KH, Park JH, Kim TY, Kim HU, Lee SY. Systems metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for L-threonine production. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:149.
75. Lewis NE, Nagarajan H, Palsson BO. Constraining the metabolic genotype-phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:291-305.
76. Liebermeister W, Klipp E. Bringing metabolic networks to life: convenience rate law and thermodynamic constraints. Theor Biol Med Model 2006;3:41.
77. Liebermeister W, Uhlendorf J, Klipp E. Modular rate laws for enzymatic reactions: thermodynamics, elasticities and implementation. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1528-34.
78. Link H, Kochanowski K, Sauer U. Systematic identification of allosteric protein-metabolite interactions that control enzyme activity in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:357-61.
79. Machado D, Herrgård M. Systematic evaluation of methods for integration of transcriptomic data into constraint-based models of metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10:e1003580.
80. Mendes P, Kell D. Non-linear optimization of biochemical pathways: applications to metabolic engineering and parameter estimation. Bioinformatics 1998;14:869-83.
81. Messiha H, Kent E, Malys N, Carroll K. Enzyme characterisation and kinetic modelling of the pentose phosphate pathway in yeast. PeerJ Prepr 2014;2:e146v4.
82. Moisset P, Vaisman D, Cintolesi A, Urrutia J, Rapaport I, Andrews BA, Asenjo JA. Continuous modeling of metabolic networks with gene regulation in yeast and in vivo determination of rate parameters. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012;109:2325-39.
83. Moreno-Sánchez R, Saavedra E, Rodríguez-Enríquez S, OlínSandoval V. Metabolic control analysis: a tool for designing strategies to manipulate metabolic pathways. J Biomed Biotechnol 2008;2008:597913.
84. Nissen TL, Schulze U, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 1997;143:203-18.
85. Nookaew I, Jewett MC, Meechai A, Thammarongtham C, Laoteng K, Cheevadhanarak S, Nielsen J, Bhumiratana S. The genomescale metabolic model iIN800 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its validation: a scaffold to query lipid metabolism. BMC Syst Biol 2008;2:71.
86. Oliveira AP, Sauer U. The importance of post-translational modifications in regulating Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. FEMS Yeast Res 2012;12:104-17.
87. Oliveira AP, Ludwig C, Picotti P, Kogadeeva M, Aebersold R, Sauer U. Regulation of yeast central metabolism by enzyme phosphorylation. Mol Syst Biol 2012;8:623.
88. Osterlund T, Nookaew I, Nielsen J. Fifteen years of large scale metabolic modeling of yeast: developments and impacts. Biotechnol Adv 2012;30:979-88.
89. Otero JM, Cimini D, Patil KR, Poulsen SG, Olsson L, Nielsen J. Industrial systems biology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae enables novel succinic acid cell factory. PLoS One 2013;8: e54144.
90. Paddon CJ, Westfall PJ, Pitera DJ, et al. High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature 2013;496:528-32.
91. Parachin NS, Bergdahl B, van Niel EWJ, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Kinetic modelling reveals current limitations in the production of ethanol from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 2011;13:508-17.
92. Patil KR, Rocha I, Förster J, Nielsen J. Evolutionary programming as a platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:308.
93. Peebo K, Valgepea K, Nahku R, Riis G, Oun M, Adamberg K, Vilu R. Coordinated activation of PTA-ACS and TCA cycles strongly reduces overflow metabolism of acetate in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014;98:5131-43.
94. Pfleger BF, Pitera DJ, Newman JD, Martin VJJ, Keasling JD. Microbial sensors for small molecules: development of a mevalonate biosensor. Metab Eng 2007;9:30-8.
95. Pitkänen E, Jouhten P, Hou J, Syed MF, Blomberg P, Kludas J, Oja M, Holm L, Penttilä M, Rousu J, Arvas M. Comparative genome-scale reconstruction of gapless metabolic networks for present and ancestral species. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10:e1003465.
96. Polisetty PK, Gatzke EP, Voit EO. Yield optimization of regulated metabolic systems using deterministic branch-and-reduce methods. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008;99:1154-69.
97. Savageau MA. Biochemical systems analysis: I. Some mathematical properties of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. J Theor Biol 1969;25:365-9.
98. Schellenberger J, Que R, Fleming RMT, et al. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat Protoc 2011;6:1290-307.
99. Schomburg I, Chang A, Placzek S, et al. brenda in 2013: integrated reactions, kinetic data, enzyme function data, improved disease classification: new options and contents in brenda. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D764-72.
100. Schuetz R, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:119.
101. Schuetz R, Zamboni N, Zampieri M, Heinemann M, Sauer U. Multidimensional optimality of microbial metabolism. Science 2012;336:601-4.
102. Segre D, Vitkup D, Church GM. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:15112-7.
103. Smallbone K, Simeonidis E, Swainston N, Mendes P. Towards a genome-scale kinetic model of cellular metabolism. BMC Syst Biol 2010;4:6.
104. Smallbone K, Messiha HL, Carroll KM, et al. A model of yeast glycolysis based on a consistent kinetic characterisation of all its enzymes. FEBS Lett 2013;587:2832-41.
105. Snoep JL, Bruggeman F, Olivier BG, WesterhoffHV. Towards building the silicon cell: a modular approach. Biosystems 2006;83:207-16.
106. Stanford NJ, Lubitz T, Smallbone K, Klipp E, Mendes P, Liebermeister W. Systematic construction of kinetic models from genome-scale metabolic networks. PLoS One 2013;8:e79195.
107. Teusink B, Passarge J, Reijenga CA, Esgalhado E, van der Weijden CC, Schepper M, Walsh MC, Bakker BM, van Dam K, WesterhoffHV, Snoep JL. Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing biochemistry. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:5313-29.
108. Tran LM, Rizk ML, Liao JC. Ensemble modeling of metabolic networks. Biophys J 2008;95:5606-17.
109. Valgepea K, Adamberg K, Seiman A, Vilu R. Escherichia coli achieves faster growth by increasing catalytic and translation rates of proteins. Mol BioSyst 2013;9:2344-58.
110. Van Eunen K, Kiewiet JAL, WesterhoffHV, Bakker BM. Testing biochemistry revisited: how in vivo metabolism can be understood from in vitro enzyme kinetics. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002483.
111. Van Gulik WM, Heijnen JJ. A metabolic network stoichiometry analysis of microbial growth and product formation. Biotechnol Bioeng 1995;48:681-98.
112. Vanrolleghem PA, de Jong-Gubbels P, van Gulik WM, Pronk JT, van Dijken JP, Heijnen S. Validation of a metabolic network for Saccharomyces cerevisiae using mixed substrate studies. Biotechnol Prog 1996;12:434-48.
113. Vaseghi S, Baumeister A, Rizzi M, Reuss M. In vivo dynamics of the pentose phosphate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 1999;140:128-40.
114. Visser D, Heijnen JJ. Dynamic simulation and metabolic redesign of a branched pathway using linlog kinetics. Metab Eng 2003;5:164-76.
115. Voit EO. Biochemical systems theory: a review. ISRN Biomath 2013;2013:1-53.
116. WesterhoffHV. The silicon cell, not dead but live!. Metab Eng 2001;3:207-10.
117. Wittig U, Kania R, Golebiewski M, et al. SABIO-RK-database for biochemical reaction kinetics. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D790-6.
118. Yeh BJ, Lim WA. Synthetic biology: lessons from the history of synthetic organic chemistry. Nat Chem Biol 2007;3:521-5.
119. Yuan Y, Zhao H. Directed evolution of a highly efficient cellobiose utilizing pathway in an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013;110:2874-81.
120. Zelezniak A, Sheridan S, Patil KR. Contribution of network connectivity in determining the relationship between gene expression and metabolite concentration changes. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10:e1003572.
121. Zhang F, Carothers JM, Keasling JD. Design of a dynamic sensorregulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:354-9.
122. Zhang M, Galdieri L, Vancura A. The yeast AMPK homolog SNF1 regulates acetyl coenzyme A homeostasis and histone acetylation. Mol Cell Biol 2013;33:4701-17.