Turbidostat culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303-1A under selective pressure elicited by ethanol selects for mutations in SSD1 and UTH1

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 521-533

  Avrahami Moyal, Liat ^a   Engelberg, David ^a   Wenger, Jared W ^b   Sherlock, Gavin ^b   Braun, Sergei ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell wall; Ethanol tolerance; SSD1; Turbidostat; UTH1

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL TOLERANCE; ARTICLE; CELL ISOLATION; CELL WALL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SSD1 GENE; STOP CODON; TURBIDITY; UTH1 GENE; YEAST CELL;

CELL WALL; CULTURE MEDIA; DNA MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; ETHANOL; GENOME, FUNGAL; GLUCAN ENDO-1,3-BETA-D-GLUCOSIDASE; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS; MUTATION, MISSENSE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84863633909     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00803.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Akao T, Yashiro I, Hosoyama A et al. (2011) Whole-genome sequencing of sake yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kyokai no. 7. DNA Res 18: 423-434.
2. Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S & Blondin B (2001) Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 498: 98-103.
3. Alper H, Moxley J, Nevoigt E, Fink GR & Stephanopoulos G (2006) Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science 314: 1565-1568.
4. Baerends RJS, Qiu JL, Rasmussen S, Nielsen HB & Brandt A (2009) Impaired uptake and/or utilization of leucine by Saccharomyces cerevisiae is suppressed by the SPT15-300 allele of the TATA-binding protein gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 6055-6061.
5. Bandara PDS, Flattery-O'Brien JA, Grant CM & Dawes IW (1998) Involvement of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae UTH1 gene in the oxidative-stress response. Curr Genet 34: 259-268.
6. Bennett WN & Boraas ME (1988) Isolation of a fast-growing strain of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas using turbidostat culture. Aquaculture 73: 27-36.
7. Bloom FR & Mcfall E (1975) Isolation and characterization of D-serine deaminase constitutive mutants by utilization of D-serine as sole carbon or nitrogen-source. J Bacteriol 121: 1078-1084.
8. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li JC, Hieter P & Boeke JD (1998) Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14: 115-132.
9. Brown SW & Oliver SG (1982) Isolation of ethanol-tolerant mutants of yeast by continuous selection. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 16: 119-122.
10. Camougrand NM, Mouassite M, Velours GM & Guerin MG (2000) The "SUN" family: UTH1, an ageing gene, is also involved in the regulation of mitochondria biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Biochem Biophys 375: 154-160.
11. Camougrand N, Grelaud-Coq A, Marza E, Priault M, Bessoule JJ & Manon S (2003) The product of the UTH1 gene, required for Bax-induced cell death in yeast, is involved in the response to rapamycin. Mol Microbiol 47: 495-506.
12. Chandler M, Stanley GA, Rogers P & Chambers P (2004) A genomic approach to defining the ethanol stress response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ann Microbiol 54: 427-454.
13. Chen CH & Engel SG (1990) The susceptibility of membrane-vesicles to interaction with ethanol. Chem Phys Lipids 52: 179-187.
14. Ding JM, Huang XW, Zhang LM, Zhao N, Yang DM & Zhang KQ (2009) Tolerance and stress response to ethanol in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85: 253-263.
15. Firon A, Aubert S, Iraqui I, Guadagnini S, Goyard S, Prevost MC, Janbon G & Enfert C (2007) The SUN41 and SUN42 genes are essential for cell separation in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol 66: 1256-1275.
16. Fujita K, Matsuyama A, Kobayashi Y & Iwahashi H (2006) The genome-wide screening of yeast deletion mutants to identify the genes required for tolerance to ethanol and other alcohols. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 744-750.
17. Gietz RD & Schiestl RH (2007) Quick and easy yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2: 35-37.
18. Hara S, Sasaki M, Obata T & Nojiro K (1976a) Isolation of ethanol-tolerant mutants from sake yeast Kyokai no. 7. J Brew Soc Jpn 71: 301-304.
19. Hara S, Yamamoto N, Fukuda Y, Obata T & Noshiro K (1976b) Comparison of physiological characteristics between sake yeast Kyokai no. 7 and its ethanol tolerant mutant. J Brew Soc Jpn 71: 564-568.
20. Harder W, Kuenen JG & Matin A (1977) Microbial selection in continuous culture. J Appl Bacteriol 43: 1-24.
21. Hirasawa T, Yoshikawa K, Nakakura Y, Nagahisa K, Furusawa C, Katakura Y, Shimizu H & Shioya S (2007) Identification of target genes conferring ethanol stress tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on DNA microarray data analysis. J Biotechnol 131: 34-44.
22. Hogan DJ, Riordan DP, Gerber AP, Herschlag D & Brown PO (2008) Diverse RNA-binding proteins interact with functionally related sets of RNAs, suggesting an extensive regulatory system. PLoS Biol 6: 2297-2313.
23. Jansen JM, Wanless AG, Seidel CW & Weiss EL (2009) Cbk1 regulation of the RNA-binding protein Ssd1 integrates cell fate with translational control. Curr Biol 19: 2114-2120.
24. Jimenez J & Benitez T (1988) Selection of ethanol-tolerant yeast hybrids in Ph-regulated continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 917-922.
25. Jo WJ, Loguinov A, Chang M, Wintz H, Nislow C, Arkin AP, Giaever G & Vulpe CD (2008) Identification of genes involved in the toxic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae against iron and copper overload by parallel analysis of deletion mutants (vol 101, pg 140, 2008). Toxicol Sci 102: 205.
26. Jorgensen P, Nelson B, Robinson MD, Chen YQ, Andrews B, Tyers M & Boone C (2002) High-resolution genetic mapping with ordered arrays of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants. Genetics 162: 1091-1099.
27. Jung WH, Wam P, Ragni E, Popolo L, Nunn CD, Turner MP & Stateva L (2005) Deletion of PDE2, the gene encoding the high-affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase, results in changes of the cell wall and membrane in Candida albicans. Yeast 22: 285-294.
28. Kaeberlein M & Guarente L (2002) Saccharomyces cerevisiae MPT5 and SSD1 function in parallel pathways to promote cell wall integrity. Genetics 160: 83-95.
29. Kaeberlein M, Andalis AA, Liszt GB, Fink GR & Guarente L (2004) Saccharomyces cerevisiae SSD1-V confers longevity by a Sir2p-independent mechanism. Genetics 166: 1661-1672.
30. Kao KC & Sherlock G (2008) Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 40: 1499-1504.
31. Kennedy BK, Austriaco NR, Zhang JS & Guarente L (1995) Mutation in the silencing gene Sir4 can delay aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 80: 485-496.
32. Kim J, Alizadeh P, Harding T, HefnerGravink A & Klionsky DJ (1996) Disruption of the yeast ATH1 gene confers better survival after dehydration, freezing, and ethanol shock: potential commercial applications. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 1563-1569.
33. Kissova I, Deffieu M, Manon S & Camougrand N (2004) Uth1p is involved in the autophagic degradation of mitochondria. J Biol Chem 279: 39068-39074.
34. Kopp M & Hermisson J (2009) The genetic basis of phenotypic adaptation II: the distribution of adaptive substitutions in the moving optimum model. Genetics 183: 1453-1476.
35. Kubota S, Takeo I, Kume K, Kanai M, Shitamukai A, Mizunuma M, Miyakawa T, Shimoi H, Iefuji H & Hirata D (2004) Effect of ethanol on cell growth of budding yeast: genes that are important for cell growth in the presence of ethanol. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68: 968-972.
36. Lang GI & Murray AW (2008) Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 178: 67-82.
37. Levin DE (2005) Cell wall integrity signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69: 262-291.
38. Li H & Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754-1760.
39. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G & Durbin R (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.
40. Lin Y & Tanaka S (2006) Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69: 627-642.
41. Ma MG & Liu ZL (2010) Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87: 829-845.
42. MartinezPastor MT, Marchler G, Schuller C, MarchlerBauer A, Ruis H & Estruch F (1996) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress-response element (STRE). EMBO J 15: 2227-2235.
43. Mouassite M, Camougrand N, Schwob E, Demaison G, Laclau M & Guerin M (2000) The 'SUN' family: yeast SUN4/SCW3 is involved in cell septation. Yeast 16: 905-919.
44. Nakazawa N, Harashima S & Oshima Y (1993) Genetic mechanism of incompetence of sporulation of Japanese sake yeast, Kyokai no. 7. J Brew Sci 88: 354-357.
45. Ogawa Y, Nitta A, Uchiyama H, Imamura T, Shimoi H & Ito K (2000) Tolerance mechanism of the ethanol-tolerant mutant of sake yeast. J Biosci Bioeng 90: 313-320.
46. Omi K, Sonoda H, Nagata K & Sugita K (1999) Cloning and characterization of psu1(+), a new essential fission yeast gene involved in cell wall synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 262: 368-374.
47. Ovalle R, Lim ST, Holder B, Jue CK, Moore CW & Lipke PN (1998) A spheroplast rate assay for determination of cell wall integrity in yeast. Yeast 14: 1159-1166.
48. Piper PW (1995) The heat shock and ethanol stress responses of yeast exhibit extensive similarity and functional overlap. FEMS Microbiol Lett 134: 121-127.
49. Reinke A, Anderson S, McCaffery JM, Yates J, Aronova S, Chu S, Fairclough S, Iverson C, Wedaman KP & Powers T (2004) TOR complex 1 includes a novel component, Tco89p (YPL180w), and cooperates with Ssd1p to maintain cellular integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 14752-14762.
50. Ritch JJ, Davidson SM, Sheehan JJ & Austriaco OPN (2010) The Saccharomyces SUN gene, UTH1, is involved in cell wall biogenesis. FEMS Yeast Res 10: 168-176.
51. Sanchez OJ & Cardona CA (2008) Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 99: 5270-5295.
52. Sharma SC (1997) A possible role of trehalose in osmotolerance and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 152: 11-15.
53. Sherman F & Hicks J (1991) Micromanipulation and dissection of Asci. Methods Enzymol 194: 21-37.
54. Shobayashi M, Ukena E, Fujii T & Iefuji H (2007) Genome-wide expression profile of sake brewing yeast under shaking and static conditions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71: 323-335.
55. Sikorski RS & Hieter P (1989) A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19-27.
56. Stanhill A, Schick N & Engelberg D (1999) The yeast Ras/cyclic AMP pathway induces invasive growth by suppressing the cellular stress response. Mol Cell Biol 19: 7529-7538.
57. Stanley D, Fraser S, Chambers PJ, Rogers P & Stanley GA (2010) Generation and characterisation of stable ethanol-tolerant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37: 139-149.
58. Sutton A, Immanuel D & Arndt KT (1991) The Sit4 protein phosphatase functions in late G1 for progression into S-phase. Mol Cell Biol 11: 2133-2148.
59. Takahashi T, Shimoi H & Ito K (2001) Identification of genes required for growth under ethanol stress using transposon mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Genet Genomics 265: 1112-1119.
60. Treco DA (1987) Preparation of yeast DNA. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel FM, ???? RB, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA & Struhl K, eds), pp. 13.11.11-13.11.14. Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York.
61. van Voorst F, Houghton-Larsen J, Jonson L, Kielland-Brandt MC & Brandt A (2006) Genome-wide identification of genes required for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol stress. Yeast 23: 351-359.
62. Watson TG (1972) Present status and future prospects of turbidostat. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 22: 229-????.
63. Wheeler RT, Kupiec M, Magnelli P, Abeijon C & Fink GR (2003) A Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with increased virulence. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 2766-2770.
64. Yamaji K, Hara S & Mizoguchi H (2003) Influence of ras function on ethanol stress response of sake yeast. J Biosci Bioeng 96: 474-480.
65. Yazawa H, Iwahashi H & Uemura H (2007) Disruption of URA7 and GAL6 improves the ethanol tolerance and fermentation capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 24: 551-560.
66. Yoshikawa K, Tanaka T, Furusawa C, Nagahisa K, Hirasawa T & Shimizu H (2009) Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 32-44.
67. Zhao XQ & Bai FW (2009) Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. J Biotechnol 144: 23-30.