Dynamic model-based analysis of furfural and HMF detoxification by pure and mixed batch cultures of S. cerevisiae and S. stipitis

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 272-284

  Hanly, Timothy J ^a   Henson, Michael A ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Flux balance analysis; Lignocellulosic hydrolysate; S. cerevisiae; S. stipitis

Indexed keywords

FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; INTRACELLULAR REDUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC HYDROLYSATES; METABOLIC RECONSTRUCTION; S. STIPITIS; S.CEREVISIAE; SCHEFFERSOMYCES STIPITIS; STOICHIOMETRIC EQUATION;

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; BATCH CELL CULTURE; DETOXIFICATION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FURFURAL; ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; YEAST;

ALDEHYDES;

2 FUROIC ACID; 5 HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; ALDEHYDE; ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; FURFURAL; FURFURYL ALCOHOL; GLUCOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE DEHYDROGENASE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; XYLOSE; 5-HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEIN;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ANALYTICAL RESEARCH; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BATCH FERMENTATION; CELL GROWTH; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DETOXIFICATION; DYNAMIC MODEL BASED ANALYSIS; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FUNGAL CELL CULTURE; GLUCOSE INTAKE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; GROWTH RATE; HYDROLYSIS; MICHAELIS MENTEN KINETICS; MONOCULTURE; NONHUMAN; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHEFFERSOMYCES STIPITIS; SUGAR TRANSPORT; SYNTHESIS; WILD TYPE; YEAST; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; BATCH CELL CULTURE; BIOTRANSFORMATION; DRUG EFFECTS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; BIOTRANSFORMATION; FURALDEHYDE; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84890802554     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25101     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Almeida J, Modig T, Roder A, Liden G, Gorwa-Grauslund M-F. 2008a. Pichia stipitis xylose reductase helps detoxifying lignocellulosic hydrolysate by reducing 5-hydroxymethyl-furfural (HMF). Biotechnol Biofuels 1(1):12.
2. Almeida JM, Röder A, Modig T, Laadan B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund M-F. 2008b. NADH- vs NADPH-coupled reduction of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) and its implications on product distribution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78(6):939-945.
3. Almeida JM, Bertilsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund M, Gorsich S, Lidén G. 2009a. Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82(4):625-638.
4. Almeida JM, Bertilsson M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund M-F. 2009b. Carbon fluxes of xylose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains are affected differently by NADH and NADPH usage in HMF reduction. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84(4):751-761.
5. Ask M, Bettiga M, Mapelli V, Olsson L. 2013. The influence of HMF and furfural on redox-balance and energy-state of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(1):22.
6. Bajwa PK, Shireen T, D'Aoust F, Pinel D, Martin VJJ, Trevors JT, Lee H. 2009. Mutants of the pentose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis with improved tolerance to inhibitors in hardwood spent sulfite liquor. Biotechnol Bioeng 104(5):892-900.
7. Balagurunathan B, Jonnalagadda S, Tan L, Srinivasan R. 2012. Reconstruction and analysis of a genome-scale metabolic model for Scheffersomyces stipitis. Microb Cell Fact 11(1):27.
8. Brenner K, You L, Arnold FH. 2008. Engineering microbial consortia: A new frontier in synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol 26(9):483-489.
9. Chandel AK, Singh OV, Narasu ML, Rao LV. 2011. Bioconversion of Saccharum spontaneum (wild sugarcane) hemicellulosic hydrolysate into ethanol by mono and co-cultures of Pichia stipitis NCIM3498 and thermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae-VS3. New Biotechnol 28(6):593-599.
10. Delgenes JP, Moletta R, Navarro JM. 1996. Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae. Enzyme Microb Technol 19(3):220-225.
11. Delgenes JP, Escare MC, Laplace JM, Moletta R, Navarro JM. 1998. Biological production of industrial chemicals, i.e. xylitol and ethanol, from lignocelluloses by controlled mixed culture systems. Ind Crops Prod 7(2-3):101-111.
12. Famili I, Förster J, Nielsen J, Palsson BO. 2003. Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(23):13134-13139.
13. Fireoved RL, Mutharasan R. 1986. Effect of furfural and ethanol on the growth and energetics of yeast under microaerobic conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 469(1):433-446.
14. Fonseca B, Moutta Rd, Ferraz Fd, Vieira E, Nogueira A, Baratella B, Rodrigues L, Hou-Rui Z, da Silva S. 2011. Biological detoxification of different hemicellulosic hydrolysates using Issatchenkia occidentalis CCTCC M 206097 yeast. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38(1):199-207.
15. Hanly T, Henson M. 2013. Dynamic metabolic modeling of a microaerobic yeast co-culture: Predicting and optimizing ethanol production from glucose/xylose mixtures. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(1):44.
16. Heer D, Heine D, Sauer U. 2009. Resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high concentrations of furfural is based on NADPH-dependent reduction by at least two oxireductases. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(24):7631-7638.
17. Heerde E, Radler F. 1978. Metabolism of the anaerobic formation of succinic acid by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Microbiol 117(3):269-276.
18. Hickert LR, da Cunha-Pereira F, de Souza-Cruz PB, Rosa CA, Ayub MAZ. 2013. Ethanogenic fermentation of co-cultures of Candida shehatae HM 52.2 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae ICV D254 in synthetic medium and rice hull hydrolysate. Bioresour Technol 131(0):508-514.
19. Hjersted JL, Henson MA. 2006. Optimization of fed-batch Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation using dynamic flux balance models. Biotechnol Progr 22(5):1239-1248.
20. Jones RP. 1989. Biological principles for the effects of ethanol. Enzyme Microb Technol 11(3):130-153.
21. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. 2004. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66(1):10-26.
22. Koppram R, Albers E, Olsson L. 2012. Evolutionary engineering strategies to enhance tolerance of xylose utilizing recombinant yeast to inhibitors derived from spruce biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 5(1):1-12.
23. Laplace JM, Delgenes JP, Moletta R, Navarro JM. 1991. Alcoholic fermentation of glucose and xylose by Pichia stipitis, Candida shehatae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; and Zymomonas mobilis: Oxygen requirement as a key factor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 36(2):158-162.
24. Laplace JM, Delgenes JP, Moletta R, Navarro JM. 1993. Effects of culture conditions on the co-fermentation of a glucose and xylose mixture to ethanol by a mutant of Saccharomyces diastaticus associated with Pichia stipitis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39(6):760-763.
25. Liu ZL, Slininger PJ, Dien BS, Berhow MA, Kurtzman CP, Gorsich SW. 2004. Adaptive response of yeasts to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2, 5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31(8):345-352.
26. Liu ZL, Moon J, Andersh BJ, Slininger PJ, Weber S. 2008. Multiple gene-mediated NAD(P)H-dependent aldehyde reduction is a mechanism of in situ detoxification of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81(4):743-753.
27. Lohmeier-Vogel EM, Sopher CR, Lee H. 1998. Intracellular acidification as a mechanism for the inhibition by acid hydrolysis-derived inhibitors of xylose fermentation by yeasts. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 20(2):75-81.
28. Ludovico P, Sousa MJ, Silva MT, Leão Cl, Côrte-Real M. 2001. Saccharomyces cerevisiae commits to a programmed cell death process in response to acetic acid. Microbiology 147(9):2409-2415.
29. Mo M, Palsson B, Herrgard M. 2009. Connecting extracellular metabolomic measurements to intracellular flux states in yeast. BMC Syst Biol 3(1):37.
30. Nilvebrant NO, Persson P, Reimann A, de Sousa F, Gorton L, Jönsson L. 2003. Limits for alkaline detoxification of dilute-acid lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 107(1):615-628.
31. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2000a. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: Inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour Technol 74(1):17-24.
32. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2000b. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: Inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 74(1):25-33.
33. Palmqvist E, Almeida JS, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 1999. Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 62(4):447-454.
34. Qian M, Tian S, Li X, Zhang J, Pan Y, Yang X. 2006. Ethanol production from dilute-acid softwood hydrolysate by co-culture. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 134(3):273-283.
35. Rieger M, Kappeli O, Fiechter A. 1983. The role of limited respiration in the incomplete oxidation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol 129(3):653-661.
36. Sárvári Horváth I, Franzén CJ, Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Lidén G. 2003. Effects of furfural on the respiratory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in glucose-limited chemostats. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(7):4076-4086.
37. Schneider H. 1996. Selective removal of acetic acid from hardwood-spent sulfite liquor using a mutant yeast. Enzyme Microb Technol 19(2):94-98.
38. Skoog K, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 1990. Effect of oxygenation on xylose fermentation by Pichia stipitis. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(11):3389-3394.
39. Slininger PJ, Gorsich SW, Liu ZL. 2009. Culture nutrition and physiology impact the inhibitor tolerance of the yeast Pichia stipitis NRRL Y-7124. Biotechnol Bioeng 102(3):778-790.
40. Slininger PJ, Thompson SR, Weber S, Liu ZL, Moon J. 2011. Repression of xylose-specific enzymes by ethanol in Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis and utility of repitching xylose-grown populations to eliminate diauxic lag. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(8):1801-1815.
41. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D. 2006. Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
42. Srilekha Yadav K, Naseeruddin S, Sai Prashanthi G, Sateesh L, Venkateswar Rao L. 2011. Bioethanol fermentation of concentrated rice straw hydrolysate using co-culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis. Bioresour Technol 102(11):6473-6478.
43. Taherzadeh MJ, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Lidén G. 2000. Physiological effects of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53(6):701-708.
44. Taniguchi M, Tohma T, Itaya T, Fujii M. 1997. Ethanol production from a mixture of glucose and xylose by co-culture of Pichia stipitis and a respiratory-deficient mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ferment Bioeng 83(4):364-370.
45. Tu M, Zhang X, Paice M, McFarlane P, Saddler JN. 2009. Effect of surfactants on separate hydrolysis fermentation and simultaneous saccharification fermentation of pretreated lodgepole pine. Biotechnol Prog 25(4):1122-1129.
46. Weigert B, Klein C, Rizzi M, Lauterbach C, Dellweg H. 1988. Xylose fermentation by yeasts. Biotechnol Lett 10(12):895-900.