Optimization-based framework for inferring and testing hypothesized metabolic objective functions

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 670-677

  Burgard, Anthony P ^a   Maranas, Costas D ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilevel programming; Flux balance analysis; Optimization in metabolic engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ISOMERS; ISOTOPES; OPTIMIZATION;

ISOTOPOMERS;

METABOLISM;

AEROBIC METABOLISM; ANAEROBIC METABOLISM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYPOTHESIS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; NONHUMAN; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION;

AEROBIOSIS; ALGORITHMS; ANAEROBIOSIS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; QUALITY CONTROL;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 0038293216     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.10617     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bertsimas D, Tsitsiklis JN. 1997. Introduction to linear optimization. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.
2. Bonarius PJB, Hatzimanikatis V, Meesters KPH, de Gooijer CD, Schmid G, Tramper J. 1996. Metabolic flux analysis of hybridoma cells in different culture media using mass balances. Biotechnol Bioeng 50: 299-318.
3. Burgard AP, Maranas CD. 2001. Probing the performance limits of the Escherichia coli metabolic network subject to gene additions or deletions. Biotechnol Bioeng 74:364-375.
4. Burgard AP, Vaidyaraman S, Maranas CD. 2001. Minimal reaction sets for Escherichia coli metabolism under different growth requirements and uptake environments. Biotechnol Progr 17:791-797.
5. Christensen B, Nielsen J. 1999. Isotopomer analysis using GC-MS. Metab Eng 1:282-290.
6. Christensen B, Nielsen J. 2000. Metabolic network analysis. A powerful tool in metabolic engineering. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 66: 209-231.
7. Darwin C. 1899. The origin of species by means of natural selection. New York: Crowell.
8. Dhurati PS, et al. 1985. A cybernetic view of microbial growth: modeling of cells as optimal strategists. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:1-9.
9. Edwards JS, Covert M, Palsson B. 2002. Metabolic modelling of microbes: the flux-balance approach. Environ Microbiol 4:133-140.
10. Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BO. 2001. In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nat Biotechnol 19:125-130.
11. Edwards JS, Palsson BO. 2000a. The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5528-5533.
12. Edwards JS, Palsson BO. 2000b. Robustness analysis of the Escherichia coli metabolic network. Biotechnol Progr 16:927-939.
13. Forbes NS, Clark DS, Blauch HW. 2001. Using isotopomer path tracing to quantify metabolic fluxes in pathway models containing reversible reactions. Biotechnol Bioeng 74:196-211.
14. Henriksen CM, Christensen LH, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 1996. Growth energetics and metabolic fluxes in continuous cultures of Penicillium chrysogenum. J Biotechnol 45:149-164.
15. Ingraham JL, et al. 1983. Growth of the bacterial cell. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
16. Jones KD, Kompala DS. 1999. Cybernetic model of the growth dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and continuous cultures. J Biotechnol 71:105-131.
17. Jørgensen H, et al. 1995. Metabolic flux distributions in Penicillium chrysogenum during fed-batch cultivations. Biotechnol Bioeng 46: 117-131.
18. Klapa MI, Park SM, Sinskey AJ, Stephanopoulos G. 1999. Metabolite and isotopomer balancing in the analysis of metabolic cycles: I. Theory. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:375-391.
19. Kompala DS, et al. 1986. Investigation of bacterial growth on mixed substrates: experimental evaluation of cybernetic models. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:1044-1055.
20. Kompala DS, et al. 1984. Cybernetic modeling of microbial growth on multiple substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:1272-1281.
21. Majewski RA, Domach MM. 1990. Simple constrained optimization view of acetate overflow in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 35: 732-738.
22. Palsson BO. 2002. E. coli central metabolic network. http://gcrg.ucsd.edu/downloads/Pathway_FBA/default.htm.
23. Park SM, Klapa MI, Sinskey AJ, Stephanopoulos G. 1999. Metabolite and isotopomer balancing in the analysis of metabolic cycles: II. Applications. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:392-401.
24. Pons A, Dussap CG, Pequignot C, Gros JB. 1996. Metabolic flux distribution in Corynebacterium melassecola ATCC 17965 for various carbon sources. Biotechnol Bioeng 51:177-189.
25. Price ND, Papin JA, Palsson BA. 2002. Determination of redundancy and systems properties of the metabolic network of Helicobacter pylori using genome-scale extreme pathway analysis. Genome Res 12:760-769.
26. Ramakrishna R, Edwards JS, McCulloch A, Palsson BO. 2001. Fluxbalance analysis of mitochondrial energy metabolism: consequences of systemic stoichiometric constraints. Am J Physiol Reg Integr Compr Physiol 280:R695-R704.
27. Ramakrishna R, Ramkrishna D, Konopka AE. 1996. Cybernetic modeling of growth in mixed, substitutable substrate environments: preferential and simultaneous utilization. Biotechnol Bioeng 52:141-151.
28. Ramkrishna D, et al. 1987. Are microbes optimal strategists? Biotechnol Progr 3:121-126.
29. Savinell JM, Palsson BO. 1992. Network analysis of intermediary metabolism using linear optimization. I. Development of mathematical formalism. J Theor Biol 154:421-454.
30. Schilling CH, Palsson BO. 2000. Assessment of the metabolic capabilities of Haemophilus influenzae Rd through a genome-scale pathway analysis. J Theor Biol 203:249-283.
31. Schmidt K, Nielsen J, Villadesen J. 1999a. Quantitative analysis of metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli, using two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy and complete isotopomer models. J Biotechnol 71:175-189.
32. Schmidt K, Norregaard LC, Pedersen B, Meissner A, Duus JO, Nielsen JO, Villadsen J. 1999b. Quantification of intracellular metabolic fluxes from fractional enrichment and 13C-13C coupling constraints on the isotopomer distribution in labeled biomass components. Metab Eng 12:166-179.
33. Szyperski T. 1995. Biosynthetically directed fractional 13C-labeling of proteinogenic amino acids. An efficient analytical tool to investigate intermediary metabolism. Eur J Biochem 232:433-448.
34. Tarantola A. 1987. Inverse problem theory: methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Varma A, et al. 1993a. Biochemical production capabilities of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:59-73.
36. Varma A, Boesch BW, Palsson BO. 1993b. Stoichiometric interpretation of Escherichia coli glucose catabolism under various oxygenation rates. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:2465-2473.
37. Varma A, Palsson B. 1993. Metabolic capabilities of Escherichia coli. II. Optimal growth patterns. J Theor Biol 165:503-522.
38. Varma A, Palsson BO. 1994. Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wildtype Escherichia coli W3110. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3724-3731.
39. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. 1999a. Metabolic engineering from a cybernetic perspective. 1. Theoretical preliminaries. Biotechnol Progr 15: 407-425.
40. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. 1999b. Metabolic engineering from a cybernetic perspective. 2. Qualitative investigation of nodal architechtures and their response to genetic perturbation. Biotechnol Progr 153:426-438.
41. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. 1999c. Metabolic engineering from a cybernetic perspective: aspartate family of amino acids. Metab Eng 11:88-116.
42. Wiechert W, de Graaf AA. 1996. In vivo stationary flux analysis by 13C labeling experiments. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 54:109-154.
43. Zupke C, Tompkins R, Yarmush D, Yarmush M. 1997. Numerical isotopomer analysis: Estimation of metabolic activity. Anal Biochem 2472: 287-293.