Understanding politeness

Understanding Politeness

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-295

  Kádáar, Dániel Z ^a   Haugh, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928305271     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139382717     Document Type: Book

References (266)

1. Arundale, Robert. B. 1999. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative politeness theory. Pragmatics 9(1): 119–53.
2. Arundale, Robert. B. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2(2): 193–216.
3. Arundale, Robert. B. 2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 231–60.
4. Arundale, Robert. B. 2009. Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: an alternative to Goffman. In: F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh (eds.) Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, 33–54.
5. Arundale, Robert. B. 2010a. Relating. In:M. A. Locher and S. L. Graham (eds.) Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 137–66.
6. Arundale, Robert. B. 2010b. Constituting face in conversation: face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8): 2078–105.
7. Arundale, Robert. B. 2012. On understandings of communication: a response to Wedgwood. Intercultural Pragmatics 9(2): 137–59.
8. Arundale, Robert. B. 2013. Conceptualising ‘interaction’ in interpersonal pragmatics: implications for understanding and research, Journal of Pragmatics (forthcoming).
9. Arundale, Robert B. and David A. Good 2002. Boundaries and sequences in studying conversation. In: A. Fetzer and C. Meierkord (eds.) Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–50.
10. Augoustinos, Martha, Iain Walker and Ngaire Donaghue 2006. Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction. London: Sage.
11. Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca and Michael Haugh (eds.) 2009. Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox.
13. Bassili, John N. and Rick D. Brown 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes: research, challenges, and theory. In: D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson and M. P. Zanna (eds.) The Handbook of Attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 543–74.
14. Bax, Marcel 1999. Ritual levelling. The balance between the eristic and the co-n-t-ractual motive in hostile verbal encounters in medieval romance and early mo-dern drama. In: A. H. Jucker, G. Fritz, and F. Lebsanft (eds.) Historical Dialogue Analysis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 35–80.
15. Bax, Marcel 2010a. Rituals. In: A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. 8: Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 483–519.
16. Bax, Marcel 2010b. Epistolary presentation rituals. Face-work, politeness, and ritual display in early modern Dutch letter-writing. In: J. Culpeper and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) Historical (Im)politeness. Bern: Peter Lang, 37–85.
17. Baxter, Judith 2004. Positioning Gender and Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Bayraktaroǧlu, Arin and Maria Sifianou 2012. The iron first in the velvet glove: how politeness can contribute to impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 8(2): 143–62.
19. Bell, Catherine 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford University Press.
20. Blitvich, Garcés-Conejos Pilar 2009. Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: the culture wars. Journal of Politeness Research 5: 273–304.
21. Blitvich, Garcés-Conejos Pilar 2010. Introduction: the status-quo and quo vadis of impoliteness. Intercultural Pragmatics 7(4): 535–59.
22. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11: 131–46.
23. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds.) 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24. Bodor, Péter and Virág Barcza 2011. Érzelmi fejlődés és a kicsinyítő képzők elsajátítása [Emotional development and the acquisition of diminuatives]. Pszichológia 31(3): 195–236.
25. Bolívar, Adriana 2008. Perceptions of (im)politeness in Venezuelan Spanish: the role of evaluation in interaction. Pragmatics 18(4): 605–33.
26. Bonnefon, Jean-Franc¸ois and Gaëlle Villejoubert 2006. Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases. Psychological Science 17(9): 747–51.
27. Bousfield, Derek 2010. Issues in impoliteness research. In: M. A. Locher and S. L. Graham (eds.) Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 101–34.
28. Boxer, Diana 1993. Speech behavior and social distance: the case of indirect complaints. Journal of Pragmatics 19(2): 103–25.
29. Brody, Elaine M. 1970. The etiquette of filial behaviour. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development 1(1): 87–94.
30. Brown, Penelope 2001. Politeness and language. In: N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Sciences, 11620–4.
31. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson 1978. Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In: E. Goody (ed.) Questions and Politeness. Cambridge University Press, 56–311.
32. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
33. Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: T. A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language. New York: MIT, 253–76.
34. Bucholtz, Mary 1999. ‘Why be normal?’: language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28: 203–23.
35. Butler, Judith 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
36. Chang, Wei-Lin Melody and Michael Haugh 2011a. Evaluations of im/politeness of an intercultural apology. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(3): 411–42.
37. Chang, Wei-Lin Melody and Michael Haugh 2011b. Strategic embarrasment and face threatening in business interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 43(12): 2948–63.
38. Chomsky, Noam 1957. Syntactic Structure. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
39. Chomsky, Noam 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Clift, Rebecca 1999. Irony in conversation. Language in Society 28: 523–53.
41. Clift, Rebecca 2001. Meaning in interaction: the case of ‘actually’. Language 77(2): 245–91.
42. Cook, Haruko Minagishi 2006. Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities. Introduction. G. Kasper (ed.), 260–91.
43. Copestake, Anne and Marina Terkourafi 2010. Conventional speech act formulae: from corpus findings to formalization. In: P. K¨uhnlein, A. Benz, and C. Sidner (eds.) Constraints in Discourse 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 125–40.
44. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth 2012. On affectivity and preference in responses to rejection. Text and Talk 32(4): 453–75.
45. Crystal, David 2003. English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press.
46. Culpeper, Jonathan 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35–72.
47. Culpeper, Jonathan 2008. In: D. Bousfield and M. Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in Language. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 17–44.
48. Culpeper, Jonathan 2009a. Historical sociopragmatics: an introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2): 153–60.
49. Culpeper, Jonathan 2009b. The metalanguage of impoliteness: explorations in theOxford EnglishCorpus. In: P. Baker (ed.) Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum, 64–6.
50. Culpeper, Jonathan 2011a. Impoliteness: Using Language to CauseOffence. Cambridge University Press.
51. Culpeper, Jonathan 2011b. Politeness and impoliteness. In: K. Aijmer and G. Andersen (eds.) Sociopragmatics, Vol. 5: Handbooks of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 391–436.
52. Culpeper, Jonathan 2011c. ‘It’s not what you said, it’s how you said it!’ Prosody and impoliteness. In: Linguistic Politeness Research Group (eds.) Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 57–83.
53. Culpeper, Jonathan 2012. (Im)politeness: three issues. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1128–33.
54. Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen 2011. Nineteenth-century English politeness: negative politeness, conventional indirect requests and the rise of the individual self. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1/2): 49–81.
55. Culpeper, Jonathan and Michael Haugh forthcoming. Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming.
56. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö 2000. Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)case as writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 4(2): 175–99.
57. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö 2010. Speech in Writing: Explorations in Early Modern English Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.
58. Curl, Traci and Paul Drew 2008. Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(2): 129–53.
59. Davies, Bethan 2011. Discursive histories, personalist ideology and judging intent: analysing the metalinguistic discussion of Tony Blair’s ‘slave trade apology’. In: Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.) Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 189–219.
60. Davies, Bethan, Andrew John Merrison and Michael Haugh 2011. Epilogue. In: B. L. Davies, M. Haugh and A. J. Merrison (eds.) Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, 270–7.
61. de Berg, Henk 1995. A systems theoretical perspective on communication. Poetics Today 16(4): 709–36.
62. de Zarobe, Leyre Ruiz and Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe 2012. Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
63. Deutschmann, Mats 2003. Apologising in British English. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University.
64. Drew, Paul. 1997. ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28 (1): 69–101.
65. Drew, Paul 1998. Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3–4): 295–325.
66. Durkheim, Émile 2001 [1915]. Carol Cosman trans. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford University Press.
67. Dury, Richard 2008. Handwriting and the linguistic study of letters. In: M. Dossena and I. Tieken-BoonVanOstade (eds.) Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data. Berne: Peter Lang, 113–33.
68. Dynel, Marta. 2011. ‘You talking to me?’ The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6): 1628–44.
69. Eelen, Gino 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.
70. Fienemann, Jutta and Jochen Rehbein 2004. Introductions: being polite in multilingual settings. In: J. House and J. Rehbein (eds.) Multilingual Communication. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 223–78.
71. Foley, William 1997. Anthropological Linguistics: An Introduction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
72. Foucault, Michel 1966 [1970] Les mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. [The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Sciences]. Gallimard: Paris (English translation: New York, NY: Pantheon).
73. Foucault, Michel 1973. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
74. Fraser, Bruce 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–36.
75. Fukushima, Saeko 2004. Evaluation of politeness: the case of attentiveness. Multilingua 23: 365–87.
76. Fukushima, Saeko 2011.Across-generational and cross-cultural study on demonstration of attentiveness. Pragmatics 21: 549–71.
77. Gagné, Nana Okura 2010. Reexamining the notion of negative face in the Japanese Socio linguistic politeness of request. Language and Communication 30(2): 123–38.
78. Garfinkel, Harold 1964. Studies in the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems 11(3): 225–50.
79. Garfinkel, Harold 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
80. Geyer, Naomi 2008. Discourse and Politeness: Ambivalent Face in Japanese. London: Continuum.
81. Goddard, Cliff 2006. Ethnopragmatics: a new paradigm. In: C. Goddard (ed.) Ethnopragmatics. Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context, 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
82. Goddard, Cliff 2009. Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(1): 29–53.
83. Goffman, Erving 1964. The neglected situation. In: J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.) Ethnography of Communication, American Anthropologist 66(6): 133–6.
84. Goffman, Erving 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.
85. Goffman, Erving 1979. Footing. Semiotica 25(1): 1–29.
86. Goffman, Erving 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
87. Goleman, Daniel 2011. Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. London: Random House.
88. Graham, Sage Lambert 2007. Disagreeing to agree: conflict, (im)politeness, and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4): 742–59.
89. Grainger, Karen 2011. ‘First-order’ and ‘second-order’ politeness: institutional and intercultural contexts. In: Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.) Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 167–88.
90. Grice, Herbert Paul 1957. Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66(3): 377–88.
91. Grice, Herbert Paul 1989 [1975]. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92. Gu, Yueguo 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237–57.
93. Harris, Sandra 2011. The limits of politeness re-visited: courtroom discourse as a case in point. In: Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.) Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 85–108.
94. Harris, Sandra 2003. Anticipated versus inferred politeness. Multilingua 22(4): 397–413.
95. Harris, Sandra 2004. Revisiting the conceptualisation of politeness in English and Japanese. Multilingua 23 (1/2): 85–109.
96. Harris, Sandra 2007a. The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation, Journal of Pragmatics 39(1): 84–110.
97. Harris, Sandra 2007b. Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities, Journal of Pragmatics 39(4): 657–80.
98. Harris, Sandra 2007c. The discursive challenge to politeness research: an interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3(2): 295–317.
99. Harris, Sandra 2008. Intention and diverging interpretings of implicature in the uncovered meat sermon. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2): 201–29.
100. Harris, Sandra 2010a. When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 7–31.
101. Harris, Sandra 2010b. Intercultural (im)politeness and the micro–macro issue. In: A. Trosborg (ed.) Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 139–66.
102. Harris, Sandra 2010c.Respect and deference. In: M. A. Locher and S. L.Graham (eds.) Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 271–88.
103. Harris, Sandra 2011. Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In: B. Davies, M. Haugh and A. Merrison (eds.) Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, 165–84.
104. Harris, Sandra 2012a. Epilogue: the first–second order distinction in face and politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 8(1): 111–34.
105. Harris, Sandra 2012b. On understandings of intention: a response toWedgwood. Intercultural Pragmatics 9(2): 161–94.
106. Harris, Sandra 2013a. Disentangling face, facework and politeness. Sociocultural Pragmatics 1(1): 46–73.
107. Harris, Sandra 2013b. Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 48(1): 41–56.
108. Harris, Sandra 2013c. Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics. Special issue on ‘Interpersonal pragmatics’, forthcoming.
109. Harris, Sandra 2013d. Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, forthcoming.
110. Haugh, Michael and Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini (eds.) 2010. Face in interaction. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8): 2073–171.
111. Haugh, Michael, Wei-Lin Melody Chang and Dániel Z. Kádár 2013. ‘Doing deference’: identities and relational practices in Chinese online discussion boards. Language@ Internet 9.
112. Haugh, Michael, Bethan Davies and Andrew Merrison 2011. Situating politeness. In: B. Davies, M.Haugh, andA.Merrison (eds.) Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, 1–23.
113. Haugh, Michael and Kasia M. Jaszczolt 2012. Speaker intentions and intentionality. In: K. M. Jaszczolt and K. Allan (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 87–112.
114. Haugh, Michael and Dániel Z. Kádár forthcoming. Politeness in Chinese and Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, forthcoming.
115. Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár and Sara Mills 2013. Interpersonal pragmatics: an introduction. In:M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár and S.Mills (eds.) Journal of Pragmatics: Special Issue–Interpersonal Pragmatics, forthcoming.
116. Haugh, Michael and Yasuko Obana 2011. Politeness in Japan. In: D. Z. Kádár and S. Mills (eds.) Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, 147–75.
117. Haugh, Michael and Klaus P. Schneider (eds.) 2012. Im/politeness across Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1017–1133.
118. He, Yun 2012. Different generations, different face? A discursive approach to naturally occurring compliment responses in Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research 8(1): 29–51.
119. Heidegger, Martin 1991 [1927]. Being and Time. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
120. Heritage, John 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall.
121. Heritage, John 1988. Explanations as accounts: a conversation analytic perspective. In: C. Antaki (ed.) Analyzing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods. London: Sage, 127–44.
122. Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra and Stephanie Schnurr 2008. Impoliteness and ethnicity: Māori and Pākehā discourse in New Zealand workplaces. Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 193–219.
123. Holmes, Janet, Marra Meredith and Bernadette Vine 2012. Politeness and impoliteness in ethnic varieties of New Zealand English. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1063–76.
124. Holtgraves, Thomas M. 1998. Interpreting indirect replies. Cognitive Psychology 37: 1–27.
125. Holtgraves, Thomas M. 2000. Preference organization and reply comprehension. Discourse Processes 30: 87–106.
126. Holtgraves, Thomas M. 2005. Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 73–94.
127. House, Juliane 2008. (Im)politeness in English as lingua franca discourse. In: M. Locher and J. Strässler (eds.) Standards and Norms in the English Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 351–66.
128. Hutchby, Ian 2008. Participants’ orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Politeness Research, Special Issue: ‘Impoliteness and Rudeness’ 4(2): 221–41.
129. Ide, Sachiko 1982. Japanese sociolinguistics: politeness and women’s language. Lingua 57(2–4): 357–85.
130. Ide, Sachiko 1989. Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2–3): 223–48.
131. Ide, Sachiko 2005. How and why honorifics can signify dignity and elegance: The indexicality and reflexivity of linguistic rituals. In: R. T. Lakoff and S. Ide (eds.) Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 45–64.
132. Ide, Sachiko, Beverly Hill, Yukiko Carnes, Tsunao Ogino and Akiko Kawasaki 2005 [1992]. The concept of politeness: an empirical study of American English and Japanese. In: R. J. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory, and Practice, 281–97.
133. Iggers, Georg G. 2007. Rationality and history. www.culturahistorica.es/iggers/rationality and history.pdf
134. Inagaki, Noriko 2011. Unpacking the hearer’s interpretation of situated politeness. In: B. Davies, M. Haugh and A. J. Merrison (eds.) Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, 147–64.
135. Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In A. H. Jucker (ed.) Historical Pragmatics–Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 3–36.
136. Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland and Dariusz Galasiński 2004. Metalanguage: why now? In: A. Jaworski, N. Coupland and D. Galasiński (eds.) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–9.
137. Jucker, Andreas H. 2010. ‘In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest’, politeness in Middle English. In: J. Culpeper and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) Historical (Im)Politeness. Berne: Peter Lang, 175–200.
138. Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. Positive and negative face as descriptive categories in the history of English. In: M. Bax and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 178–97.
139. Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle. In: R. Quirk and H. Widdowson (eds.) English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Cambridge University Press, 11–30.
140. Kachru, Braj B. 1992. Teaching world Englishes. In: B. B. Kachru, (ed.) The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 355–66.
141. Kádár, Dániel Z. 2007. Terms of (Im)Politeness: On the Communicational Properties of Traditional Chinese (Im)Polite Terms of Address. Budapest: Eotvos Lorand University Press.
142. Kádár, Dániel Z. 2010a. Exploring the historical Chinese denigration/elevation phenomenon. In: J. Culpeper and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) Historical (Im)Politeness. Berne: Peter Lang, 117–45.
143. Kádár, Dániel Z. 2010b. Historical Chinese Letter Writing. London: Continuum.
144. Kádár, Dániel Z. 2011. A graphic–semiotic analysis of the Chinese multimodal elevation and denigration phenomenon US–China Foreign Language 9(2): 77–88.
145. Kádár, Dániel Z. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming.
146. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini 2010. Introduction: politeness research in and across cultures. In: F. Bargiela-Chiappini and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) Politeness Across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–15.
147. Kádár, DánielZ. and Jonathan Culpeper 2010. Historical (im)politeness: an introduction. In: J. Culpeper and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) Historical (Im)Politeness. Berne: Peter Lang, 9–36.
148. Kádár, Dániel Z., Michael Haugh and W. Chang 2013. Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC discussion boards. Multilingua 32(3): 343–72.
149. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Sara Mills 2011. Politeness in East Asia: an introduction. In: D. Z. Kádár and S. Mills (eds.) Politeness in East Asia, Cambridge University Press, 1–17.
150. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Sara Mills (forthcoming). Bluntness and Yorkshire Identity.
151. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Yuling Pan 2011. Politeness in China. In:D. Z.Kádár and S.Mills (eds.) Politeness in East Asia, Cambridge University Press, 125–46.
152. Kasper, Gabriele 1990. Linguistic politeness: current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 193–218.
153. Kasper, Gabriele (ed.) 2006a. Politeness as a discursive phenomenon. Multilingua 25(3).
154. Kasper, Gabriele (ed.) 2006b. Introduction. In: G. Kasper (ed.), 243–8.
155. Kecskes, Istvan 2004. Lexical merging, conceptual blending, cultural crossing. Intercultural Pragmatics 1(1): 1–26.
156. Kienpointner, Manfred 1997. Varieties of rudeness: types and functions of impolite utterances. Functions of Language 4(2): 251–87.
157. Kohnen, Thomas 2008. Linguistic politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A study of Old English address terms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9(1): 140–58.
158. Kohnen, Thomas 2012. Understanding Anglo-Saxon ‘politeness’:Directive constraintswith ic wille/ic wolde. In: M. Bax and D. Z. Kádár (eds.) Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 230–54.
159. Kopytko, Roman 1995. Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare’s plays. In: A. H. Jucker (ed.) Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 515–40.
160. Koster, Jan 2003. Ritual performance and the politics of identity. On the functions and uses of ritual. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 4: 211–48.
161. Krippendorff, Klaus 1970. On generating data in communication research. Journal of Communication 20(3): 241–69.
162. Krippendorff, Klaus 1989. On the ethics of constructing communication. In: B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe and E. Wartella (eds.), Rethinking Communication: Paradigm Issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 66–96.
163. Kuno, Susumu 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
164. Lakoff, Robin T. 1973. The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s. In: C. Corum, T. Smith-Stark and A. Weiser (eds.) Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 292–305.
165. Lakoff, Robin T. 1977. What you can do with words: politeness, pragmatics, and performatives. In: A. Rogers, B. Wall and J. P. Murphy (eds.) Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implicatures, Arlington: Center of Applied Linguistics, 79–105.
166. Lakoff, Robin T. 2005. Civility and its discontents: or, getting in your face. In: R. T. Lakoff and S. Ide (eds.) Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 23–44.
167. Langlotz, Andreas 2010. Social cognition. In: M. A. Locher, and S. L. Graham (eds.) Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 167–202.
168. Langlotz, Andreas and Miriam A. Locher 2013. The role of emotions in a discursive approach to relational work. In:M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár and S.Mills (eds.) Journal of Pragmatics: Special Issue– Interpersonal Pragmatics, forthcoming.
169. Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.
170. Lett, James 1990. Emics and etics: notes on the epistimology of anthropology. In: T. N. Headland, K. L. Pike and M. Harris (eds.) Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate. Newbury Park: Sage, 127–42.
171. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
172. Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
173. Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.) 2011. Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
174. Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
175. Locher, Miriam A. 2006. Polite behaviour within relational work: the discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25(3): 249–67.
176. Locher, Miriam A. 2010. Introduction: politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 1–5.
177. Locher, Miriam A. and Andreas Langlotz 2008. Relational work: at the intersection of cognition, interaction and emotion. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée (VALS-ASLA) 88: 165–91.
178. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33.
179. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In: D. Bousfield, and M. A. Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–99.
180. Mao, Luming R. 1994. Beyond politeness theory: ‘face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451–86.
181. Matsui, Tomoko 2001. Kanrensei riron kara mita poraitonesu [Politeness from the Perspective of Relevance Theory]. Gengo 30: 52–9.
182. Matsumoto, Yoshiko 1989. Politeness and conversational universals– observations from Japanese, Multilingua 8(2/3): 207–21.
183. Miller, Laura 2004. You are doing burriko! Censoring/scrutinizing artificers of cute femininity in Japanese. In: O. Shigeko and J. Shibamoto-Smith (eds.) Japanese Gender and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People. Oxford University Press, 148–65.
184. Mills, Sara 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
185. Mills, Sara 2009. Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5): 1047–60.
186. Mills, Sara 2011a.Discursive approaches to politeness and impoliteness. In: Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.) Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 19–56.
187. Mills, Sara 2011b. Communities of practice and politeness. In: B. Davies, M. Haugh and A. Merrison (eds.) Situated Politeness. London: Continuum, 73–87.
188. Mills, Sara and Dániel Z. Kádár 2011. Culture and politeness. In: D. Z. Kádár and S. Mills (eds.) Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, 21–44.
189. Mills, Sara and Louise Mullany 2011. Language, Gender, and Feminism: Theory, Methodology, and Practice. London: Routledge.
190. Milroy, Lesley and James Milroy 1992. Social network and social class: toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society 21: 1–26.
191. Nevalainen, Terttu, and Tanskanen Sanna-Kaisa (eds.) 2007. LetterWriting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
192. Niedzielski, Nancy and Dennis Preston 2009. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
193. Nishida, Kitaro 1949. Basho [Place]. In: Nishida Kitaroo Zenshuu 4 [The Collected Works of Kitaro Nishida]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 208–89.
194. Norris, Sigrid 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.
195. O’Driscoll, Jim, 2013. Situational transformations: the offensive-izing of an email message and the public-ization of offensiveness. Pragmatics and Society 4(2), forthcoming.
196. Ohtsuka, Masayuki 2011. On ba (field) theory: ba-oriented language and thought. Paper presented at the 11th Korea–Japan Workshop on Linguistics and Language Processing, Waseda University, Tokyo, 10–11 December.
197. Okamoto, Shigeko 1999. Situated politeness: manipulating honorific and non-honorific expressions in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics 8(2): 51–74.
198. Ong, Walter 1984. Orality, literacy, and medieval textualization. Oral and Written Traditions in the Middle Ages 16(1): 1–12.
199. Pan, Yuling and Dániel Z. Kádár 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.
200. Paternoster, Annick 2012. Inappropriate inspectors: impoliteness and overpoliteness in Ian Rankin’s and Andrea Camilleri’s crime series. Language and Literature 21(3): 311–24.
201. Pike, Kenneth 1967. Language in Relation to aUnified Theory of the Structure ofHuman Behavior (2nd edn). The Hague: Mouton.
202. Pike, Kenneth 1990. ‘Pike’s final response’. In: T. N. Headland, K. L. Pike and M. Harris (eds.) Emics and Etics. The Insider/Outsider Debate. Sage, Newbury Park, 184–201.
203. Pizziconi, Barbara 2007. The lexical mapping of politeness in British English and Japanese. Journal of Politeness Research 3(2): 207–41.
204. Pizziconi, Barbara 2011. Honorifics: the cultural specificity of a universal mechanism in Japanese. In: D. Z. Kádár and S. Mills (eds.) Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press, 45–70.
205. Planchenault, Gaëlle 2010. Virtual community and politeness: the use of female markers of identity and solidarity in a transvestites’ website. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 83–104.
206. Pomerantz, Anita 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 57–101.
207. Potter, Jonathan 1998. Discursive social psychology: from attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology 9: 233–66.
208. Purdy, Charles 2004. Urban Etiquette: Marvelous Manners for the Modern Metropolis. Tulsa, OK: Wildcat Canyon Press.
209. Rasmussen, Susan J. 1992. Ritual specialists, ambiguity, and power in Tuareg society. Man 27(1): 105–28.
210. Raymond, Geoffrey 2004. Prompting action: the stand-alone ‘so’ in sequences of talkin- interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(2): 185–218.
211. Rehbein, Jochen and Jutta Fienemann 2004. Introductions. In: J. House and J. Rehbein (eds.) Multilingual Communication. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 223–78.
212. Rosenberg, Milton J. 1968. Hedonism, in-authenticity and other goals. In: R. Ableson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg and P. H. Tannenbaum (eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.
213. Ruhi, Şükriye 2009. A Place for Emotions in Conceptualizing Face and Relational Work. Plenary lecture, International Symposium on Face and Politeness, Griffith University, Brisbane.
214. Sacks, Harvey 1992[1964–72]. Lectures on Conversation, Vols. 1 and 2. G. Jefferson (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
215. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2006. On possibles. Discourse Studies 8(1): 141–57.
216. Schegloff, Emanuel A.2007a. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.
217. Schegloff, Emanuel A.2007b. A tutorial on membership categorisation. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 462–82.
218. Schermerhorn, John R., James G. Hunt and Richard N. Osborn 2011. Organizational Behaviour. New York: Wiley & Sons.
219. Schneider, Klaus P. and Anne Barron 2008. Variational Pragmatics:AFocus on Regional Varieties of Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
220. Searle, John 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
221. Searle, John 1975. Indirect speech acts. In: P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Act. New York: Academic Press, 59–82.
222. Sell, Roger. 1992. Literary texts and diachronic aspects of politeness. In: R. J. Watts, S. Ide and K. Erlich (eds.) Politeness in Language. Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–29.
223. Selting, Margaret 1996. Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: the case of so-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair initation. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.) Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge University Press, 231–70.
224. Selting, Margaret 2009. Communicative style. In: S. D’Hondt, J.-O. O¨ stman, and J. Verschueren (eds.) The Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 20–39.
225. Shimizu, Hiroshi 1995. Ba-principle: new logic for the real-time emergence of information. Holonics 5(1): 67–79.
226. Sifianou, Maria 1992. Politeness Phenomena in England And Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford: Calendron.
227. Sifianou, Maria 2012. Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 44(12): 1554–64.
228. Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In: K. H. Basso, and H. A. Selby (eds.) Meaning and Anthropology. Albuquerque: The University of New Mexico Press, 11–56.
229. Silverstein, Michael. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In: J. A. Lucy (ed.) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 33–58.
230. Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23: 193–229.
231. Spencer-Oatey, Helen 2005. (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 95–119.
232. Spencer-Oatey, Helen 2008[2000]. Introduction: language, culture and rapport management. In:H. Spencer- Oatey (ed.) Culturally Speaking. London: Continuum, 1–10.
233. Spencer-Oatey, Helen 2011. Conceptualising ‘the relational’ in pragmatics: insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3565–78.
234. Stivers, Tanya 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1): 31–57.
235. Sugimoto Naomi 1998. Norms of apology depicted in U.S. American and Japanese literature on manners and etiquette. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22(3): 251–76.
236. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker 2003. Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
237. Tannen, Deborah 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Bellentine Books.
238. Taylor, Stephanie 2007. Narrative as construction and discursive resource. In: M. Bamberg (ed.) Narrative– State of the Art. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 113–22.
239. Terkourafi, Marina 2001. The distinction between generalised and particularised implicatures and linguistic politeness. In: P. Kühnlein, R. Hannes and H. Zeevat (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on the Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Bielefeld: ZiF, 174–88.
240. Terkourafi, Marina 2005. Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 1(2): 237–62.
241. Terkourafi, Marina 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In: D. Bousfield and M. A Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 45–74.
242. Thornborrow, Joanna 2002. Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman (Pearson Education).
243. Truss, Lynne 2005. Talk to the Hand: The Utter Bloody Rudeness of Everyday Life (or Six Good Reasons to Stay Home and Bolt the Door). London: Profile Books.
244. Usami, Mayumi 2006. Discourse politeness theory and cross-cultural pragmatics. In Asako Yositomi, Tae Umino, andMasashi Negishi (eds.) Linguistic Informatics V: Studies in Second Language Teaching and Second Language Acquisition. Tokyo: Center of Usage-Based Linguistic Informatics, Graduate School of Area and Culture Studies, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 9–31.
245. van Gennep, Arnold 2004. The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge.
246. Verschueren, Jef 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
247. Walkers, Joel 1979. Strategies for requesting in Spanish and English: structural similarities and pragmatic differences. Language Learning 9: 277–94.
248. Wallace, Mari I. 2007. Experience, purpose, pedagogy, and theory: Ritual activities in the classroom. In: C. Bell (ed.) Teaching Ritual. Oxford University Press, 73–88.
249. Waters, Sophia 2012. ‘It’s rude to VP’: the cultural semantics of rudeness. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1051–62.
250. Watts, Richard J. 1989. Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behavior. Multilingua 8(2–3): 131–66.
251. Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic behaviour: reconsidering claims for universality. In: R. J. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in Language. Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 43–69.
252. Watts, Richard J. 1999. Language and politeness in early eighteenth century Britain. Pragmatics 9(1): 5–20.
253. Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
254. Watts, Richard J. 2005. Linguistic politeness research: quo vadis? In: R. J. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in Language. Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, xi–xlvii.
255. Watts, Richard J. 2008. Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relationalwork. Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 289–317.
256. Watts, Richard J. 2011. A socio-cognitive approach to historical politeness. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1/2): 104–32.
257. Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds.) 1992a. Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
258. Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds.) 1992b. Introduction. In:R. J.Watts, S. Ide andK.Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–17.
259. Wenger, Etienne 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
260. Wetzel, Patricia 2004. Keigo in Modern Japan: Polite Language from Meiji to Present. Manoa: The University of Hawaii Press.
261. Wierzbicka, Anna 2003 [1991]. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
262. Wierzbicka, Anna 2006. English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford University Press.
263. Wilson, Thomas P. 1970. Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation. American Sociological Review 35(4): 697–710.
264. Woods, John (ed.) 2010. Fictions and Models. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.
265. Ye, Zhendao 2004. Chinese categorization of interpersonal relationships and the cultural logic of Chinese social interaction: an indigenous perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics 1(2): 211–30.
266. Ye, Zhendao 2008. Returning to my mother tongue: Veronica’s journey continues. In: M. Besemeres, and A. Wierzbicka (eds.) Translating Lives: Living with Two Languages and Cultures. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press, 141–51.