Epilogue

Situated Politeness

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 270-278

  Davies, Bethan L ^a   Haugh, Michael ^b   Merrison, Andrew John ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c YORK ST JOHN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194297626     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Cook, H. (2006), ‘Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities’. Multilingua, 25, 269-91.
2. Culpeper, J. (2008), ‘Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power’, in D. Bousfield and M. A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17-44.
3. Davies, B. L. (2009), ‘Metadiscourses of race in the news: The Celebrity Big Brother row’, in S. Johnson and T. M. Milani (eds), Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Politics. London: Continuum, pp. 162-81.
4. Davies, B. L. (2011), ‘Discursive histories, personalist ideology and judging intent: Analyzing the metalinguistic discussion of Tony Blair’s “slave trade apology” ’, in Linguistic Politeness Research Group (eds), Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
5. Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (2007), ‘Putting communities of practice in their place’. Gender and Language, 1, 27-38.
6. Eelen, G. (2001), A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.
7. Grundy, P. (2000), DoingPragma.tics (2nd edn). London: Arnold.
8. Harris, S., Grainger, K. and Mullany, L. (2006), ‘The pragmatics of political apologies’. Discourse and Society, 17, 715-37.
9. Hill, J. (2007), ‘Crises of meaning: Personalist language ideology in US media discourse’, in S. Johnson and A. Ensslin (eds), Language in the Media: Representations, Identities, Ideologies. London: Continuum, pp. 70-88.
10. Hutchby, I. (2008), ‘Participants’ orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction’. Journal of Politeness Research, 4, 221-41.
11. Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (2008) Conversation Analysis (2nd edn). Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Ide, S. (1989), ‘Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness’. Multilingua, 8, 223-48.
13. Itakura, H. (2001), ‘Describing conversational dominance’. Journal of Pmgmatics, 33, 1859-80.
14. Jaworski, A., Coupland, N. and Galasínski, D. (eds) (2004), Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Jeffries, L. (2007), ‘Journalistic constructions of Blair’s “apology” for the intelligence leading to the Iraq war’, in S. Johnson and A. Ensslin (eds), La.nguage in the Media,: Representations, Identities, Ideologies. London: Continuum, pp. 48-69.
16. Kampf, Z. (2008), ‘The pragmatics of forgiveness: Judgments of apologies in the Israeli political arena’. Discourse and Society, 19, 577-98.
17. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Matsumoto, Y. (1988), ‘Re-examination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese’. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403-26.
19. Mills, S. (2003), (Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Pizziconi, B. (2003), ‘Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language’. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1471-506.
21. Watts, R. J. (1991), Power in Family Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Watts, R. J. (2003), Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Zhang, H. (2001), ‘Culture and apology: The Hainan island incident’. World Englishes, 20, 383-91.