On understandings of communication: A response to Wedgwood

Intercultural Pragmatics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 137-159

  Arundale, Robert B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867937869     PISSN: 1612295X     EISSN: 1613365X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ip-2012-0010     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Anscombe, G. E. M. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
2. Arundale, Robert B. 1999. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics 9(1). 119-153.
3. Arundale, Robert B. 2005. Pragmatics, conversational implicature, and conversation. In Kristine L. Fitch & Robert E. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction, 41-63. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Arundale, Robert B. 2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2). 229-258.
5. Arundale, Robert B. 2009. Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: An alternative to Goffman. In Francesca Bargiella-Chiappini & Michael Haugh (eds.), Face, communication, and social interaction, 33-54. London: Equinox.
6. Arundale, Robert B. 2010. Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8). 2078-2105.
7. Arundale, Robert B. & David Good. 2002. Boundaries and sequences in studying conversation. In Anita Fetzer & Christiane Meierkord (eds.), Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction, 121-150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, 56-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Clark, Herbert H. 1997. Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes 23(3). 567-598.
12. Conville, Richard L. & L. Edna Rogers (eds.). 1998. The meaning of 'relationship' in interpersonal communication. Westport, CT: Praeger.
13. Crotty, Michael. 1998. The foundations of social research. London: Sage.
14. Good, David A. 1989. The viability of conversational grammars. In M. M. Taylor, F. Neel, & Don G. Bouwhuis (eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue, 135-144. New York: Elsevier.
15. Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Ruth Kempson, Mathew Purver, Gregory J. Mills, Ronnie Cann, Wilfried Meyer-Viol, & Patrick G. T. Healey. 2011. Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing. Dialogue & Discourse 2(1). 199-233.
16. Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Haugh, Michael. 2008. The place in intention in the interactional achievement of implicature. In Istvan Kecskes & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground, and the egocentric speakerhearer, 45-85. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. Haugh, Michael. 2009. Intention(ality) and the conceptualization of communication in pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29(1). 91-113.
19. Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20. Krippendorff, Klaus. 1970. On generating data in communication research. Journal of Communication 20(3). 241-269.
21. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2009. On communicating: Otherness, meaning, and information (F. Bermejo, ed.). New York: Routledge.
22. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Lawrence, Samuel G. 1999. The preoccupation with problems of understanding in communication research. Communication Theory 9(3). 265-291.
24. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Levinson, Stephen C. 2006a. Cognition at the heart of human interaction. Discourse Studies 8(1). 85-93.
27. Levinson, Stephen C. 2006b. On the human "interaction engine." In Nick J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of human sociality, 39-69. Oxford: Berg.
28. Miller, James H. 1965. Living systems: Basic concepts. Behavioral Science 10(3). 193-237.
29. Pearce, W. Barnett. 1991. On comparing theories: Treating theories as commensurate or incommensurate. Communication Theory 1(2). 159-164.
30. Pearce, W. Barnett & Vernon C. Cronen. 1980. Communication, action, and meaning. New York: Praeger.
31. Reddy, Michael J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case study in frame conflict in our language about language. In Antony Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Sanders, Robert E. 1987. Cognitive foundations of calculated speech: Controlling understandings in conversation and persuasion. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
33. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 95(5). 1295-1345.
34. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sperber, Dan & Dierdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
36. Sperber, Dan & Dierdre Wilson. 1987. Précis of Relevance: Communication and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10(4). 697-754.
37. Stamp, Glen H. & Mark L. Knapp. 1990. The construct of intent in interpersonal communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 76(3). 282-299.
38. Suchman, Lucy A. 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Suchman, Lucy A. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. Beavin, & Don Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.
41. Wedgwood, Daniel. 2011. The individual in interaction: Why cognitive and discourse-level pragmatics need not conflict. Intercultural Pragmatics 8(4). 517-542.
42. Wright, Richard A. 1975. Meaning-nn and conversational implicature. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Volume 3: Speech acts, 363-382. New York: Academic Press.