Introduction: The status-quo and quo vadis of impoliteness research

Intercultural Pragmatics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 535-559

  Garcés Conejos Blitvich, Pilar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149480890     PISSN: 1612295X     EISSN: 1613365X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/IPRG.2010.025     Document Type: Editorial

References (98)

1. Arundale, Robert B. 1999. An alternative model and ideology on communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics 9(1). 119-153.
2. th International Pragmatics Association Conference, Riva del Garda, 10-15 July.
3. Arundale, Robert B. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2(2). 193-216.
4. Arundale, Robert. 2010. Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 2078-2105.
5. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca. 2003. Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1453-1469.
6. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca & Michael Haugh (Eds.). 2009. Face, communication and social interaction. London: Equinox.
7. Baxter, Leslie A. & Barbara M. Montgomery. 1996. Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford.
8. Beebe, Leslie M. 1995. Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness and pragmatic competence. In James E. Alatis, Carolyn A. Straehele, Maggie Ronkin & Brent Gallenberger (eds.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics, 154-168. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
9. Benwell, Bethan & Elizabeth Stokoe. 2006. Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Bousfield, Derek. 2007. Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 2185-2216.
12. Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. th International Symposium on Politeness. Basel, 30 June-2 July.
14. Bousfield, Derek & Jonathan Culpeper. 2008. Impoliteness: Eclecticism and diaspora. An introduction to the special edition. Journal of Politeness Research 4(2). 161-168.
15. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness. Strategies in Social Interaction, 56-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Brown, Penelope and Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals of language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: a socio-cultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4-5). 585-614.
18. Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Carston, Robyn. 2009. The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication. International Review of Pragmatics 1(1). 35-62.
20. Cashman, Holly. 2008. "You're screwed either way": An exploration of code-switching, impoliteness and power. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 255-279). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Christie, Christine. 2007. Relevance theory and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 3(2): 269-294.
22. Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 349-367.
23. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 35-72.
24. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2008. Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In Miriam A. Locher & Derek Bousfield (eds.), Impoliteness and power: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 17-44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. Impoliteness: Using and Understanding the Language of Offence. ESRC project website: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/ impoliteness/.
26. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield & Anne Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35(10-11). 1545-1579.
27. de Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin & Michael Bamberg (eds.). 2006. Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Domenici, Kathy & Stephen W. Littlejohn. 2006. Facework. London: Sage.
29. Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
30. Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
31. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar. 1993. La ira y la cortesía. Valencia: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valencia.
32. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar. 1995. Revisión crítica de algunos de los postulados de la teoría de la cortesía lingüística propugnada por Brown y Levinson. Quaderns de Filologia: Stvdia Lingvistica (Aspectes de la praxi interlingüística en l'ambit europeu) 1, 43-61.
33. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2009. Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: The "Culture Wars". Journal of Politeness Research 5(2). 273-304.
34. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010a. A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2. 46-94.
35. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010b. The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization. In Rotimi Taiwo (ed.), Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction (pp. 540-563). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
36. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar& Nuria Lorenzo-Dus. 2010. On-line community organizing: rapport and directness. A case study from the Obama presidential campaign. Issues in Political Discourse Analysis 3(1).
37. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus & Patricia Bou-Franch. 2009. Relational work in anonymous intercultural communication: A study of (dis)affiliation in YouTube. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication. University of London, 25-26 June.
38. Goffman, Ervin. 1981. Forms of talk. Blackwell: Oxford.
39. Gudykunst, William & Stella Ting-Toomey. 1988. Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Haugh, Michael. 2006. Emic perspectives on the positive-negative politeness distinction. Cultura, lenguaje y representación 3. 17-26.
41. Haugh, Michael. 2007. The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3(2). 95-317.
42. Haugh, Michael. 2008. Intention in pragmatics, Intercultural Pragmatics 5-2, 99-110.
43. Haugh, Michael. 2010a. When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1). 7-31.
44. th International Symposium on Politeness. Basel, 30 June-2 July.
45. Haugh, Michael & Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini. 2010. Editorial. Face in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 2073-2077.
46. Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra, & Stephanie Schnurr. 2008. Impoliteness and ethnicity: Maori and Pakeha discourses in New Zealand workplaces. Journal of Politeness Research 4(2). 193-220.
47. House, Juliane. 2005. Politeness in Germany-Politeness in Germany? In Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds.), Politeness in Europe, 13-29. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
48. Hutchby, Ian. 2008. Participants' orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Politeness Research 4. 221-241.
49. Joseph, John. 2004. Language and identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
50. Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 385-406.
51. Kecskes, Istvan. Forthcoming. Understanding the role of context in language use. In Pilar G. Blitvich & Marcia Macaulay (eds.), Pragmatics and context. Toronto: Antares.
52. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1-24.
53. Kienpointner, Manfred. 1997. Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances. Functions of Language 4. 251-287.
54. Kienpointner, Manfred. 2008. Impoliteness and emotional arguments. Journal of Politeness Research 4. 243-265.
55. Lachernicht, L. G. 1980. Aggravating language: A study of abusive and insulting language. International Journal of Human Communication 13(4). 607-688.
56. Lambert-Graham, Sage. 2007. Disagreeing to agree: Conflict (im)politeness and identity in a computer mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 742-759.
57. Limberg, Holberg. 2008. Threats in conflict talk: Impoliteness and manipulation. In M. Locher and D. Bousfield (eds.), Impoliteness and Power: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 155-179. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
58. Locher, Miriam. 2006. Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25 (3). 249-267.
59. Locher, Miriam. 2008. Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In Gerd Antos, Eija Ventola & Tilo Weber (eds.), Handbooks of Applied Linguistics. Issue 2: Interpersonal Communication (pp. 509-540). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
60. Locher, Miriam. 2010. Politeness research from past to future, with a special focus on the discursive approach. Plenary talk presented at the IV EPICS conference, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville. March 24-26.
61. Locher Miriam A. & Derek Bousfield. 2008. Introduction. Impoliteness and power in language. In Miriam A. Locher & Derek Bousfield (eds.), Impoliteness and power: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 1-13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
62. Locher, Miriam A. & Andreas Langlotz. 2008. Relational work: at the intersection of cognition, interaction and emotion. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 88. 165-191.
63. Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 9-33.
64. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behavior. In M. Locher and D. Bousfield (eds.) Impoliteness and Power: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 77-100. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
65. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria. 2009. 'You're barking mad, I'm out': Impoliteness and broadcast talk. Journal of Politeness Research 5(2). 159-187.
66. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich & Patricia Bou-Franch. 2009. 'Am I detecting some sarcasm from U???': Impoliteness in the responses to the Obama reggaeton YouTube video. Paper presented at the Conference Linguistic Impoliteness and Rudeness II, University of Lancaster, 30 June-2 July.
67. Miller, Carolyn. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70. 151-167.
68. Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Mills, Sara. 2009. Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics. 4. 1047-1060.
70. Mullany, Louise. 2005. Review of Mills (2003) Gender and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research. 1(2). 291-295.
71. Mullany, Louise. 2008. "Stop hassling me!" Impoliteness, power and gender identity in the professional workplace. In M. Locher and D. Bousfield (eds.), Impoliteness and Power: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp. 231-251). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
72. Ochs, Elinor. 1993. Constructing social identity: a language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26. 287-306.
73. O'Driscoll, Jim. 1996. About face: A defense and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics 25(1). 1-32.
74. Orlikowski, Wanda J. and JoAnne Yates. 1994. Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(4). 541-574.
75. Pizziconi, Barbara. 2007. The lexical mapping of politeness in British English and Japanese. Journal of Politeness Research 3(2). 207-243.
76. Recanati, François. 2004. Literal meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
77. Rees-Miller, Janie. 2000. Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics. 32(8). 1087-1111.
78. Reicher, Stephen, Russell Spears & Tom Postmes. 1995. A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology 6. 161-198.
79. Sifianou, María. 1992. Politeness phenomena in England and Greece: A cross-cultural perspective. Oxford: Clarendon.
80. Sifianou, Maria. 2010. Review of M. Locher and D. Bousfield (eds.), Impoliteness and Power: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Language in Society 39. 119-122.
81. Scollon Ron & Suzanne W. Scollon. 2001 [1995]. Intercultural communication 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
82. Schnurr, Stephanie, Meredith Marra & Janet Holmes. 2007. Being (im)polite in New Zealand workplaces: Māori and Pākehā leaders. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 712-729.
83. Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures, 11-46. London: Continuum.
84. Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics. 34. 529-545.
85. Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research. 1(1). 95-119.
86. Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics. 39. 639-656.
87. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
88. Terkourafi, Marina. 2005a. An argument for a frame-based approach to politeness: Evidence from the use of the imperative in Cypriot Greek. In Robin Lakoff and Sachiko Ide (Eds.), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness (pp. 99-117). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
89. Terkourafi, Marina. 2005b. Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 237-262.
90. Terkourafi, Marina. 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 45-74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
91. Ting-Toomey, Stella & Atsuko Kurogi. 1998. Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22(2). 187-225.
92. Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
93. Tracy, Karen. 2008. Reasonable hostility: situation appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research 4(2). 169-191.
94. Unger, Christoph. 2006. Genre, Relevance, and Global Coherence: The Pragmatics of Discourse Type. Basingtoke: Palgrave.
95. Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Watts, Richards J. 2008. Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 4(2). 289-317.
97. Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. Xie, Chaoqun, Xiran He & Dajin Lin. 2005. Politeness: Myth and truth. Studies in Language 29 (20). 431-461.