The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 84-110

  Haugh, Michael ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Co constitution; Implicature; Intention; Linguistic politeness

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750728461     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Arundale, Robert, 1991. Studies in the way of words: Grice's new directions in conceptualizing meaning in conversational interaction. Paper presented at International Communication Association Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
2. Arundale, Robert, 1997. Against (Grice's) intention. Paper presented at LSI Preconference on Language and Cognition, International Communication Association Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
3. Arundale R. An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics 9 (1999) 119-154
4. Arundale, Robert, 2004. Co-constituting face in conversation: An alternative to Brown and Levinson's politeness theory. Paper presented at 90th Annual National Communication Association Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
5. Arundale R. Pragmatics, conversational implicature, and conversation. In: Fitch K., and Sanders R. (Eds). Handbook of Language and Social Interaction (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 41-63
6. Arundale R., and Good D. Boundaries and sequences in studying conversation. In: Fetzer A., and Meierkord C. (Eds). Rethinking Sequentiality. Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction (2002), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 121-150
7. Bach, Kent, 2006. The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In: Birner, Betty, Ward, Gregory (Eds.), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honour of Laurence R. Horn. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
8. Bilmes J. Ethnomethodology, culture, and implicature: toward an empirical pragmatics. Pragmatics 3 (1993) 387-410
9. Brown P. Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: the case of Tzeltal irony. In: Goody E. (Ed). Social Intelligence and Interaction (1995), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 153-174
10. Brown P. Politeness and language. In: Smelser N., and Baltes P. (Eds). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (2001), Elsevier Science, Oxford 11620-11624
11. Brown P., and Levinson S. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage (1987), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Carston R. Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In: Kempson R. (Ed). Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 155-181
13. Carston R. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication (2002), Blackwell, Oxford
14. Carston R. Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction. In: Horn, Laurence, Ward, and Gregory (Eds). Handbook of Pragmatics (2004), Blackwell, Oxford 633-656
15. Carston R. Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature. In: Bianchi C. (Ed). The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction (2004), CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA
16. Carston R. Relevance theory, Grice and the neo-Griceans: a response to Laurence Horn's 'Current issues in neo-Gricean pragmatics'. Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (2005) 303-319
17. Clark H. Using Language (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Clark H. Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes 23 (1997) 567-598
19. Cooren F. The Organizing Property of Communication (2000), John Benjamins, Amsterdam
20. Cooren F. The contribution of speech act theory to the analysis of conversation: how pre-sequences work. In: Fitch K., and Sanders R. (Eds). Handbook of Language and Social Interaction (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 21-40
21. Cooren F., and Sanders R. Implicatures: a schematic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (2002) 1045-1067
22. Davis W. Implicature. Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Davis, Wayne, 2005. How normative is implicature? Paper presented at 9th International Pragmatics Association Conference, Riva del Garda, Italy.
24. Duranti A. Intentions, language, and social action in a Samoan context. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (1988) 13-33
25. Edwards D. Discourse and Cognition (1997), Sage, London
26. Fitzpatrick D. Searle and collective intentionality. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62 (2003) 45-66
27. Fukushima S. Evaluation of politeness: the case of attentiveness. Multilingua 23 (2004) 365-387
28. Gauker C. Situated inference versus conversational implicature. Nous 35 (2001) 163-189
29. Gauker C. Words Without Meaning (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
30. Gibbs R. Intentions in the Experience of Meaning (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31. Grice P. Studies in the Way of Words (1967 [1989]), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
32. Haugh M. The intuitive basis of implicature: relevance theoretic implicitness versus Gricean implying. Pragmatics 12 (2002) 117-134
33. Haugh M. Anticipated versus inferred politeness. Multilingua 22 (2003) 397-413
34. Haugh M. Revisiting the conceptualisation of politeness in English and Japanese. Multilingua 23 (2004) 85-109
35. Haugh M. The importance of 'place' in Japanese politeness: implications for cross-cultural and intercultural analyses. Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (2005) 41-68
36. Haugh M., and Hinze C. A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of 'face' and 'politeness' in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2003) 1581-1611
37. Heritage J. Intention, meaning and strategy: observations on constraints on interaction analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction 24 (1990) 311-322
38. Hopper R. A cognitive agnostic in conversation analysis: when do strategies affect spoken interaction?. In: te Molder H., and Potter J. (Eds). Conversation and Cognition (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 134-158
39. Horn L. Implicature. In: Horn L., and Ward G. (Eds). Handbook of Pragmatics (2004), Blackwell, Oxford 3-28
40. Horn L. Current issues in neo-Gricean pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (2005) 191-204
41. Kallia A. Linguistic politeness: the implicature approach. Multilingua 23 (2004) 145-169
42. Lee B. Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (2001) 21-44
43. Leech G. Principles of Pragmatics (1983), Longman, London
44. Leech G. Towards an anatomy of politeness in communication. International Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2003) 101-123
45. Leech G. Politeness: is there an East-West divide?. Journal of Foreign Languages (Shanghai International Studies University) 6 (2005) 3-30
46. Levine R. Properties of culture: an ethnographic view. In: Shweder R., and LeVine R. (Eds). Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self and Emotion (1984), Cambridge University Press, New York 67-84
47. Levinson S. Pragmatics and social dexis: reclaiming the notion of conventional implicature. Berkley Linguistics Society 5 (1979) 206-223
48. Levinson S. Pragmatics (1983), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
49. Levinson S. Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalised Conversational Implicature (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
50. Malle B., and Knobe J. The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33 (1997) 101-121
51. Marmaridou S. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition (2000), John Benjamins, Amsterdam
52. Meijers A. Can collective intention be individualized?. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62 (2003) 167-183
53. Miscevic N. Explaining collective intentionality. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62 (2003) 257-267
54. Ochs E. Clarification and culture. In: Schriffion D. (Ed). Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics (1984), Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C. 325-341
55. Okamoto, Shigeko, 1985. Ellipsis in Japanese Discourse. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
56. Potter J. Cognition and conversation. Discourse Studies 8 (2006) 131-140
57. Rosaldo M. The things we do with words: ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11 (1982) 203-237
58. Sadock J. On testing for conversational implicature. In: Cole P. (Ed). Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics (1978), Academic Press, New York 281-297
59. Sanders R. Cognitive Foundations of Calculated Speech (1987), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
60. Saul J. Critical studies: Wayne A. Davis, Conversational Implicature: Intention and Convention in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Nous 35 (2001) 630-641
61. Saul J. Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated. Nous 36 (2002) 228-248
62. Saul J. What is said and psychological reality: Grice's project and relevance theorists criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2002) 347-372
63. Sbisà M. Speech acts, effects and responses. In: Searle J., Parret H., and Verschueren J. (Eds). (On) Searle on Conversation (1992), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 101-111
64. Sbisà M. Intentions for the other side. In: Gosenza G. (Ed). Paul Grice's Heritage (2001), Brepols, Turnhout 185-206
65. Sbisà M., and Fabbri P. Models(?) for a pragmatic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 4 (1980) 301-319
66. Searle J. Speech Acts (1969), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
67. Searle J. Indirect speech acts. In: Morgan P., and Cole J. (Eds). Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts (1975), Academic Press, New York 59-82
68. Searle J. Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (1979), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
69. Searle J. Collective intentions and actions. In: Cohen P., Morgan J., and Pollack M. (Eds). Intentions in Communication (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass 401-416
70. Sperber D., and Wilson D. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. second ed. (1995), Blackwell, Oxford
71. Suzuki M. Kikite no shiteki ryooiki to teinei hyoogen [Personal boundaries of addressees and polite expressions]. Nihongogaku 8 (1989) 58-67
72. Suzuki M. Nihongo kyooiku ni okeru teineitai sekai to futsuutai sekai [The worlds of polite and non-polite forms and Japanese language education]. In: Takubo Y. (Ed). Shiten to Gengo Koodoo [Perspective and Linguistic Behaviour] (1997), Kuroshio, Tokyo 45-76
73. Terkourafi M. Generalised and particularised implicatures of linguistic politeness. In: Kuhnlein P., Rieser H., and Zeevat H. (Eds). Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium (2003), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 149-164
74. Terkourafi M. Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2005) 237-262
75. Tuomela R. We-intentions revisited. Philosophical Studies 125 (2005) 327-369
76. Uchito S. Kanrensei riron ni okeru hanashikotoba ni arawareru shoryakubun no bunseki [An analysis of elliptical sentences occurring in speech from the perspective of relevance theory]. Bunkyo Daigaku Kokubun 26 (1997) 24-33
77. Ueda M. Furiten-kun 19 (1995), Takeshoboo, Tokyo
78. Ueda M. Kobochan 45 (1998), Soyosha, Tokyo
79. Zaibert L. Collective intentions and collective intentionality. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62 (2003) 209-232