Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness

Journal of Politeness Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 193-216

  Arundale, Robert B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Communication; Face; Facework; Interaction; Politeness; Relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847109942     PISSN: 16125681     EISSN: 16134877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/PR.2006.011     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Arundale, Robert B. (1991). Studies in the way of words: Grice's new directions in conceptualizing meaning in conversational interaction. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL
2. Arundale, Robert B. (1999). An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics 9 (1): 119-153
3. Arundale, Robert B. (2004). Co-constituting face in conversation: An alternative to Brown and Levinson's politeness theory. Paper presented to the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL
4. Arundale, Robert B. (2005). Pragmatics, conversational implicature, and conversation. In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders (eds.), 41-63. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
5. Austin, John L. (1962). How to Do Tilings with Words. Oxford, UK: Clarendon
6. Bahktin, Mikhail M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bahktin (M. Holquist, ed.; C. Emerson and M. Holquist, trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press
7. Bahktin, Mikhail M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, eds.; V. McGee, trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press
8. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca (2003). Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10/11): 1453-1469
9. Bavelas, Janet Beavin (1991). Some problems with linking goals to discourse. In Understanding Face-to-face Interaction: Issues Linking Goals and Discourse, Karen Tracy (ed.), 119-130. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
10. Baxter, Leslie A. and Barbara M. Montgomery (1996). Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford
11. Bellah, Robert, Richard Madsen, William Sullivan, Ann Swindler, and Stephen Tipton (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
12. Brown, Penelope. (2001). Politeness and language. In The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 17, Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes (eds.), 11620-11624. Oxford, UK: Elsevier
13. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987 [1978]). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
14. Brown, Gillian and George Yule (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
15. Buber, Martin (1965). Between Man and Man (M. Friedman, ed.; R. G. Smith, trans.). New York: Macmillan
16. Chen, Victoria (1990/1991). Mien tze at the Chinese dinner table: A study of the interactional accomplishment of face. Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 109-140
17. Christie, Chris (2004). Introduction. Multilingua 23 (1): 1-11
18. Christie, Chris (2005). Editorial. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 1-7
19. Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
20. Condon, John (1984). With Respect to the Japanese: A Guide for Americans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press
21. Covarrubias, Patricia (2002). Culture, Communication, and Cooperation: Interpersonal Relations and Pronominal Address in a Mexican Organization. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
22. Culpeper, Jonathan (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349-367
23. Cupach, William R. and Sandra Metts (1994). Facework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
24. Duck, Steve (1994). Meaningful Relationships: Talking, Sense, and Relating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
25. Duck, Steve (1995). Talking relationships into being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 12 (4): 535-540
26. Eelen, Gino (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome
27. Fitch, Kristine L. (1994). Culture, ideology, and interpersonal communication research. In Communication Yearbook 17, Stanley A. Deetz (ed.), 104-135. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
28. Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1976). Philosophical Hermeneutics (D. Linge, ed., trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
29. Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
30. Goffman, Erving (1955). On face work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18 (3): 213-231
31. Goffman, Erving (1967). Interaction Ritual. Chicago: Aldine
32. Goffman, Erving (1971). Relations in Public. New York: Harper and Row
33. Halliday, Michael A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold
34. Harris, Roy (1996). The Language Connection: Philosophy and Linguistics. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes
35. Haugh, Michael (2005). The importance of "place" in Japanese politeness: Implications for cross-cultural and intercultural analyses. Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (1): 41-68
36. Hecht, Michael, Jennifer R. Warren, Eura Jung, and Janice L. Krieger (2005). A communication theory of identity: Development, theoretical perspective, and future directions. In Theorizing about Intercultural Communication, William B. Gudykunst (ed.), 257-278. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
37. Heidegger, Martin (1985). History of the Concept of Time (T. Kisiel, trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
38. Heritage, John (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodolgy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
39. Hernández-Flores, Nieves (1999). Politeness ideology in Spanish colloquial conversations: The case of advice. Pragmatics 9 (1): 37-49
40. Ide, Sachiko (1989). Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected universais of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8 (2/3): 233-248
41. Janney, Richard W. and Horst Arndt (1993). Universals and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: A historical perspective. Multilingua 12 (1): 13-50
42. Kasper, Gabriele (1990). Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 193-218
43. Kienpointner, Manfred (1997). Varieties of rudeness. Functions of Language 2 (2): 251-287
44. Kluckhohn, Florence R. and Fred L. Strodtbeck (1961). Variations in Value Orientation. New York: Row, Peterson
45. Krippendorff, Klaus (1970). On generating data in communication research. Journal of Communication 20 (3): 241-269
46. Krippendorff, Klaus (1984). An epistemological foundation for communication. Journal of Communication 34 (3): 21-36
47. Krippendorff, Klaus (1996). A second cybernetics of otherness. Systems Research 13 (3): 311-328
48. Lannaman, John W. (1994). The problem with disempowering ideology. In Communication Yearbook 17, Stanley A. Deetz (ed.), 136-147. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
49. Lerner, Gene H. (1996). Finding "face" in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (4): 303-321
50. Linell, Per (1998). Approaches to Dialogue: Talk, Interaction, and Contexts in Dialogical Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
51. Linell, Per (2005). The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. London: Routledge
52. Locher, Miriam A. (2004). Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
53. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9-33
54. MacMartin, Clare, Linda A. Wood, and Rolf O. Kroger (2001). Facework. In The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, W. Peter Robinson and Howard Giles (eds.), 221-237. New York: Wiley
55. Mead, George H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
56. O'Driscoll, Jim (1996). About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (1): 1-32
57. Okamoto, Shigeko (1997). Social context, ideology, and indexical expressions in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 28 (6): 795-817
58. Okamoto, Shigeko (1999). Situated politeness: Coordinating honorific and non-honorific expressions in Japanese. Pragmatics 9 (1): 51-74
59. Pearce, W. Barnett and Vemon E. Cronen (1980). Communication, Action and Meaning: The Creation of Social Realities. New York: Praeger
60. Pizziconi, Barbara (2003). Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10/11): 1471-1506
61. Pomerantz, Anita, and B. J. Fehr (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In Discourse as Social Interaction, vol. 2, Teun A. Van Dijk (ed.), 64-91. London: Sage
62. Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. (1940). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen and West
63. Rogers, L. Edna and Valentín Escudero (2004). Theoretical foundations. In Relational Communication, L. Edna Rogers and Valentín Escudero (eds.), 3-21. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
64. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton (eds.), 89-135. Boston: Northeastern University Press
65. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 161-216
66. Schiffrin, Deborah. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
67. Schutz, Alfred (1962). Collected Papers, vol. 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
68. Simmel, Georg (1950). The Sociology of Georg Siminel (K. Wolff, trans.) New York: Free Press
69. Spencer-Oatey, Helen (1996). Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics 26(1): 1-24
70. Spencer-Oatey, Helen (2005). (Im)politeness, face, and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95-119
71. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1995). Relevance: Cognition and Communication: Revised Edition. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell
72. Stewart, Edward C. and Milton J. Bennett (1991). American Cultural Patterns: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press
73. Stewart, John R. (1978). Foundations of dialogic communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 64 (2): 183-201
74. Stewart, John R. (1995). Philosophical features of social approaches to interpersonal communication. In Social Approaches to Communication, Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz (ed.), 23-45. New York: Guilford
75. Suchman, Lucy A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
76. Ting-Toomey, Stella (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face negotiation theory. In Theories in Intercultural Communication, Young Y. Kim and William B. Gudykunst (eds.), 213-235. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
77. Tracy, Karen (1990). The many faces of facework. In Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, Howard Giles and W. Peter Robinson (eds.), 209-223. Chichester, UK: Wiley
78. Tracy, Karen and Shirley Baratz (1994). The case for case studies of facework. In The Challenge of Facework, Stella Ting-Toomey (ed.), 287-305. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
79. Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich (1992). Introduction. In Politeness in Language, Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds.), 1-17. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
80. Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. Beavin, and Don Jackson (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton
81. th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill
82. Wilson, Thomas P. (1970). Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation. American Sociological Review 35 (4): 697-710