Complaints about transgressions and misconduct

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 31, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 295-325

  Drew, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032217026     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.
2. Austin, J. L. (1970). Philosophical papers. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Bergmann, J. R. (1998/this issue). Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 279-294.
4. Bergmann, J., & Wiltschek, S. (1992, August). The work of description in gynecological examinations. Workshop presentation on morality in medicine, conference on Discourse and the Professions, Uppsala, Sweden.
5. Besnier, N. (1990). Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 419-51.
6. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 366-415). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 470-520). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35, 398-417.
9. Goffman, E. (1981). Response cries. Forms of talk (pp. 78-123). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
10. Heritage, J. (1988). Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 127-144). London: Sage.
11. Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (pp. 359-417). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Holt, E. (1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 219-245.
13. Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Jefferson, G. (1984). On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social actions: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 191-222). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Jefferson, G. (1985). On the interactional unpackaging of a "gloss." Language in Society, 14, 435-466.
16. Jefferson, G. (1986, March). Colligation as a device for minimizing repair or disagreement. Paper presented at the conference on Talk and Social Structure, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
17. Jefferson, G. (1992, August). Is 'No' an acknowledgment token? Comparing British and American uses of (+)/(-) tokens. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Sociological Association Sociolinguistics section, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
18. Lawyer "battered wife to death" in hammer attack. (1993, February 24). Independent, p. 4.
19. Levinson, S. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp. 221-260). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text, 9, 7-25.
21. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Giving a source or a basis: The practice in conversation of 'telling how I know.' Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 607-625.
22. Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229.
23. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15-21). New York: Irvington.
24. Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and semantics (pp. 261-286). New York: Academic.
25. Watson, D. R. (1978). Categorization, authorization and blame. Sociology, 12, 105-113.