Data in historical pragmatics spoken interaction (re)cast as writing

Journal of Historical Pragmatics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 155-199

  Culpepr, Jonathan ^a   KytÖ, Merja ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989393444     PISSN: 15665852     EISSN: 15699854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bach, Ulrich. 1998. Early mass communication: Political pamphlets from 1642 to 1647. In: Raimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.). Anglistentag 1997 Gießen Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 97-111.
2. Barber, Charles. 1976. Early Modern English. London: André Deutsch.
3. Beaugrande, Robert de. 1994. Speech and writing in theory and in data. In: Svetla Cmejrkova, Frantisek Danes, and Eva Havlova (eds.) Writing vs Speaking: Language, Text, Discourse, Communication. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 23-46.
4. Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65:3, 487-517.
6. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1992. The linguistic evolution of five written and speech-based English genres from the 17th to the 20th centuries. In: Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen, and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.). History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 688-704.
7. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In: Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.). To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, 253-75.
8. Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18, 159-212.
9. Byrne, M. St. Clare. 1964. The foundations of Elizabethan language. Shakespeare Survey XVII, 223-39.
10. Caffi, Claudia, and Richard W. Janney. 1994. Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics 22, 325-73.
11. Chafe, Wallace L. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In: Deborah Tannen (ed.). Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. (Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol. IX). Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
12. Churchill, Ian. 1981. Hansard. London: HMSO.
13. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Merja Kytö. Forthcoming. Gender voices in the spoken interaction of the past: A pilot study based on Early Modern English trial proceedings. In: Dieter Kastovsky and Arthur Mettinger (eds.). The History of English in a Social Context. (Trends in linguistics). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
14. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Elena Semino. 2000. Constructing witches and spells: Speech acts and activity types in Early Modern England. Journal ofHistorical Pragmatics 1.1, 97-115.
15. Evans, B. Ifor. 1964. The Language of Shakespeare’s Plays. (3rd edn.). London: Methuen.
16. Fritz, Gerd. 1995. Topics in the history of dialogue forms. In: Jucker 1995: 469-98.
17. Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In: Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-58.
18. Grice, H. Paul. 1981. Presupposition and conversational implicature. In: Peter Cole (ed.). Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 183-98.
19. Hill, Christopher. 1982. Radical prose in 17th century England: From Marprelate to the Levellers. Essays in Criticism XXXII (2), 95-118.
20. Hope, Jonathan. 1993. Second-person singular pronouns in records of Early Modern ‘spoken’ English. NeuphilologischeMitteilungen XCIV, 83-100.
21. Hulme, Hilda M. [1958] 1987. The spoken language in the dramatic text: Some notes on the interpretation of Shakespeare’s language. In: Vivian Salmon and Edwina Burness (eds.). A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama. (Benjamins Paperpacks 7). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 145-152.
22. Jacobs, Andreas, and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In: Jucker 1995:3-33.
23. Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.). 1995. Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments inthe History of English. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35). Amsterdam/Phila-delphia: John Benjamins.
24. Kopytko, Roman. 1995. Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare’s plays. In: Jucker 1995. 515-40.
25. Nevalainen, Terttu, and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.). 1996. Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Early English Correspondence Corpus. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
26. Page, Norman. 1988. Speech in the English Novel. London: Macmillan Press.
27. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
28. Rissanen, Matti. 1986. Variation and the study of English historical syntax. In: David Sankoff (ed.). Diversity and Diachrony. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 97-109.
29. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest system-atics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:4, 696-735.
30. Salmon, Vivian. [1965] 1987a. Sentence structures in colloquial Shakespearean English. In: Vivian Salmon and Edwina Burness (eds.). A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama. (Benjamins Paperbacks 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 265-300.
31. Salmon, Vivian. [1967] 1987b. Elizabethan colloquial English inthe Falstaff plays. In: Vivian Salmon and Edwina Burness (eds.). A Reader in the Language of Shakespearean Drama. (Benjamins Paperbacks 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 37-70.
32. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1972. Sequencing in conversational openings. In: John J. Gumperz and Dell H. Hymes (eds.). Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 346-80.
33. Short, Mick. 1996. Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose. London and New York: Longman.
34. Short, Mick, Elena Semino, and Jonathan Culpeper. 1996. Using a corpus for stylistics research: Speech presentation. In: Jenny Thomas and Mick Short (eds.). Using Corpora in Language Research. London: Longman, 110-31.
35. Slembrouck, Stef. 1992. The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature 1 (2), 101-119.
36. Sperber, Dan, and Deidre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
37. Sprat, Thomas. 1966 [1667]. The History of the Royal-Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge, reprint with introduction by Jackson I. Cope and Harold W. Jones. St. Louis/London: Washington University Press/Routledge, Kegan and Paul.
38. Stein, Dieter. 1992. Cooperating with Written Texts: The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
39. Taavitsainen, Irma. 1993. Genre/subgenre styles in Late Middle English? In: Matti Rissanen, Merja Kyto, and Minna Palander-Collin (eds.). Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 171-200.
40. Taavitsainen, Irma. 1995. Interjections in Early Modern English: From imitation of spoken to conventions of written language. In: Jucker 1995: 439-65.
41. Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
42. Wolfson, Nessa. 1986. Research methodology and the question of validity. TESOL Quarterly 20, 689-99.
43. Wright, Laura. 1995. Syntactic structure of witnesses’ narratives from the sixteenth-century court minute books of the Royal Hospitals of Bridewell and Bedlam. NeuphilologischeMitteilungen XCVI, 93-105.