Anticipated versus inferred politeness

Multilingua

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 397-413

  Haugh, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750709841     PISSN: 01678507     EISSN: 16133684     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/mult.2003.020     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Brown, Penelope (1995). Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: The case of Tzeltal irony. In Goody, Esther (ed.), Social Intelligence and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153-174.
2. - (2001). Politeness and language. In Smelser, Neil and Paul Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Volume 17. Oxford: Pergamon, 11620-11624.
3. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson (1987). Politeness. Some Universale in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Carston, Robyn (2000). Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 1-44.
5. Coupland, Nikolas and Adam Jaworski (1997). Relevance, accommodation and conversation: modeling the social dimension of communication. Multilingua 16, 233-258.
6. Eelen, Gino (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
7. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria (1996). Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. Language Sciences 18, 629-650.
8. - (1998). Politeness: a relevant issue for relevance theory. Revista Alicanlina de Es-tudios Ingleses 11, 45-57.
9. Fraser, Bruce (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14, 219-236.
10. - (1999). Pragmatics, politeness, and perlocutions. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Linguistic Politeness: Theoretical Approaches and Intercul-tural Perspective, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
11. Haugh, Michael (2002). The intuitive basis of implicature. Pragmatics 12(2), 117-134.
12. Haugh, Michael and Carl Hinze (2003). A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of 'face' and 'politeness' in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 35,1581-1611.
13. Ide, Sachiko (1989). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universal of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8, 223-248.
14. Janney, Richard and Horst Arndt (1993). Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: A historical perspective. Multilingua 12, 13-50.
15. Jary, Mark (1998a). Relevance theory and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 30, 1-19.
16. - (1998b). Is relevance theory asocial? Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11, 157-169.
17. Jucker, Andreas (1988). The relevance of politeness. Multilingua 7, 375-384.
18. Kim, Jina (2000). Disukoosu poraitonesu no nichikan taishoo kenkyuu: supiichi reberu to supiichi reberu shifuto no kinoo ni kansuru koosatsu [Comparative research of discourse politeness in Japanese and Korean: Consideration of the functions of speech levels and speech level shift]. Unpublished Masters thesis, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
19. Kuiper, Koenraad (1997). The relevance of face calibration. Paper presented at the University of Hertfordshire Relevance Theory Workshop, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
20. Lee-Wong, Song Mei (2000). Politeness and Face in Chinese Culture. Bern: Peter Lang.
21. - (2002). Contextualising intercultural communication and sociopragmatic choices. Multilingua 21, 79-99.
22. Malinowski, Bronislaw (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. and I. Richards (eds.), The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 296-336.
23. Matsui, Tomoko (2001). Kanrensei riron kara mita poraitonesu [Politeness from the perspective of relevance theory]. Gengo 30(11), 52-59.
24. Matsumoto, Yoshiko (1989). Politeness and conversational universals - observations from Japanese. Multilingua 8, 207-221.
25. Mey, Jacob and Mary Talbot (1988). Computation and the soul. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 743-789.
26. Mursy, Ahmad and John Wilson (2001). Towards a definition of Egyptian complimenting. Multilingua 20, 133-154.
27. Nwoye, Onuigbo (1989). Linguistic politeness in Igbo. Multilingua 8, 259-275.
28. Pan, Yuling (2000). Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
29. nd International Communication Association conference, Seoul, Korea.
30. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1995). Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
31. - (1997). Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences. Multilingua 16, 145-151.
32. Terkourafi, Marina (2001a). The distinction between generalised and particularised implicatures and linguistic politeness. Paper presented at the BI-D1ALOG 2001. Fifth Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Bielefeld University, Germany.
33. - (2001b). Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cambridge University.
34. Usami, Mayumi (1998). Poraitonesu riron no tenkai: disukoosu poraitonesu to iu toraekata [Development of politeness theory: the concept of discourse politeness]. Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku Nihon Kenkyuu Kyooiku Nenpoo 1997 Nendopan 3, 145-159.
35. - (2001a). Danwa no poraitonesu - poraitonesu no danwa riron koosoo [Discourse politeness: Discourse theory of politeness - a preliminary framework]. In Mutsuro Kai (ed.), Danwa no Poraitonesu [Discourse Politeness J. Tokyo: The National Language Research Institute, 9-58.
36. - (2001b). Tainin komyunikeeshon no shakaishinrigaku - disukoosu poraitonesu to iu kanten kara [The social psychology of interpersonal communication - from the perspective of discourse politeness]. Gengo 30(6).
37. - (2002). Discourse Politeness in Japanese Conversation: Some Implications for a Universal Theory of Politeness. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
38. Watts, Richard (1989). Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behaviour. Multilingua 8, 131 - 166.
39. - (1992). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 43-69.
40. Xie, Yun (2001). Danwa reberu kara mita 'iraihatsuwa' no kiridashikata - Nihonjin daigakusei dooshi to Chugokujin daigakusei dooshi no irai danwa kara [The placing of utterances at the discourse level - a contrastive study of pre-request usage in discourse between Chinese and Japanese]. Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku Nihongo Kenkyuu Kyooiku Nenpoo 2000 nendo pan 5, 77-101.
41. Zegarac, Vladimir (1998). What is phatic communication? In Rouchota, Villy and Andreas Jucker (eds.), Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 327-361.
42. - (2000). Face and cognitive modularity. Paper presented at the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest, Hungary.