Nuclear pore proteins and the control of genome functions

Genes and Development

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 337-349

  Ibarra, Arkaitz ^a   Hetzer, Martin W ^a  

^a SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR PROTEIN; NUCLEOPORIN;

ANAPHASE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHROMOSOME DUPLICATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOKINESIS; DNA METABOLISM; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOME; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MACROMOLECULE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TELOPHASE; YEAST; ANIMAL; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; METABOLISM;

METAZOA;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME DUPLICATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS;

EID: 84923043962     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.256495.114     Document Type: Review

References (155)

1. Ahmed S, Brickner JH. 2010. A role for DNA sequence in controlling the spatial organization of the genome. Nucleus 1: 402–406.
2. Ahmed S, Brickner DG, Light WH, Cajigas I, McDonough M, Froyshteter AB, Volpe T, Brickner JH. 2010. DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nat Cell Biol 12: 111–118.
3. Akhtar A, Gasser SM. 2007. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 8: 507–517.
4. Babu JR, Jeganathan KB, Baker DJ, Wu X, Kang-Decker N, van Deursen JM. 2003. Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with Bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation. J Cell Biol 160: 341–353.
5. Bai XT, Gu BW, Yin T, Niu C, Xi XD, Zhang J, Chen Z, Chen SJ. 2006. Trans-repressive effect of NUP98–PMX1 on PMX1- regulated c-FOS gene through recruitment of histone deacetylase 1 by FG repeats. Cancer Res 66: 4584–4590.
6. Belgareh N, Rabut G, Baı¨ SW, van Overbeek M, Beaudouin J, Daigle N, Zatsepina OV, Pasteau F, Labas V, Fromont-Racine M, et al. 2001. An evolutionarily conserved NPC subcomplex, which redistributes in part to kinetochores in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 154: 1147–1160.
7. Belmont AS, Zhai Y, Thilenius A. 1993. Lamin B distribution and association with peripheral chromatin revealed by optical sectioning and electron microscopy tomography. J Cell Biol 123: 1671–1685.
8. Bermejo R, Capra T, Jossen R, Colosio A, Frattini C, Carotenuto W, Cocito A, Doksani Y, Klein H, Gómez-González B, et al. 2011. The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 146: 233–246.
9. Blasius M, Forment JV, Thakkar N, Wagner SA, Choudhary C, Jackson SP. 2011. A phospho-proteomic screen identifies substrates of the checkpoint kinase Chk1. Genome Biol 12: R78.
10. Blobel G. 1985. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 82: 8527–8529.
11. Blower MD, Nachury M, Heald R, Weis K. 2005. A Rae1- containing ribonucleoprotein complex is required for mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 121: 223–234.
12. Bolhy S, Bouhlel I, Dultz E, Nayak T, Zuccolo M, Gatti X, Vallee R, Ellenberg J, Doye V. 2011. A Nup133-dependent NPCanchored network tethers centrosomes to the nuclear envelope in prophase. J Cell Biol 192: 855–871.
13. Brickner DG, Brickner JH. 2011. Gene positioning is regulated by phosphorylation of the nuclear pore complex by Cdk1. Cell Cycle 10: 392–395.
14. Brickner JH, Walter P. 2004. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol 2: e342.
15. Brickner DG, Cajigas I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Ahmed S, Lee PC, Widom J, Brickner JH. 2007. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol 5: e81.
16. Brickner DG, Ahmed S, Meldi L, Thompson A, Light W, Young M, Hickman TL, Chu F, Fabre E, Brickner JH. 2012. Transcription factor binding to a DNA zip code controls interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. Dev Cell 22: 1234–1246.
17. Brown CR, Kennedy CJ, Delmar VA, Forbes DJ, Silver PA. 2008. Global histone acetylation induces functional genomic reorganization at mammalian nuclear pore complexes. Genes Dev 22: 627–639.
18. Buchwalter AL, Liang Y, Hetzer MW. 2014. Nup50 is required for cell differentiation and exhibits transcription-dependent dynamics. Mol Biol Cell 25: 2472–2484.
19. Cabal GG, Genovesio A, Rodriguez-Navarro S, Zimmer C, Gadal O, Lesne A, Buc H, Feuerbach-Fournier F, Olivo-Marin JC, Hurt EC, et al. 2006. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 441: 770–773.
20. Cai Y, Singh BB, Aslanukov A, Zhao H, Ferreira PA. 2001. The docking of kinesins, KIF5B and KIF5C, to Ran-binding protein 2 (RanBP2) is mediated via a novel RanBP2 domain. J Biol Chem 276: 41594–41602.
21. Campbell MS, Chan GK, Yen TJ. 2001. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J Cell Sci 114: 953–963.
22. Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer MW. 2010. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 140: 372–383.
23. Carmena M, Wheelock M, Funabiki H, Earnshaw WC. 2012. The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13: 789–803.
24. Casolari JM, Brown CR, Komili S, West J, Hieronymus H, Silver PA. 2004. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 117: 427–439.
25. Casolari JM, Brown CR, Drubin DA, Rando OJ, Silver PA. 2005. Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes. Genes Dev 19: 1188–1198.
26. Chakraborty A, Shen Z, Prasanth SG. 2011. ‘ORCanization’ on heterochromatin: linking DNA replication initiation to chromatin organization. Epigenetics 6: 665–670.
27. Chow K-H, Elgort S, Dasso M, Ullman KS. 2012. Two distinct sites in Nup153 mediate interaction with the SUMO proteases SENP1 and SENP2. Nucleus 3: 349–358.
28. Clever M, Funakoshi T, Mimura Y, Takagi M, Imamoto N. 2012. The nucleoporin ELYS/Mel28 regulates nuclear envelope subdomain formation in HeLa cells. Nucleus 3: 187–199.
29. Cross MK, Powers MA. 2011. Nup98 regulates bipolar spindle assembly through association with microtubules and opposition of MCAK. Mol Biol Cell 22: 661–672.
30. D’Angelo MA, Hetzer MW. 2008. Structure, dynamics and function of nuclear pore complexes. Trends Cell Biol 18: 456–466.
31. D’Angelo MA, Gomez-Cavazos JS, Mei A, Lackner DH, Hetzer MW. 2012. A change in nuclear pore complex composition regulates cell differentiation. Dev Cell 22: 446–458.
32. Davuluri G, Gong W, Yusuff S, Lorent K, Muthumani M, Dolan AC, Pack M. 2008. Mutation of the zebrafish nucleoporin elys sensitizes tissue progenitors to replication stress. PLoS Genet 4: e1000240.
33. Dawlaty MM, Malureanu L, Jeganathan KB, Kao E, Sustmann C, Tahk S, Shuai K, Grosschedl R, van Deursen JM. 2008. Resolution of sister centromeres requires RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of topoisomerase IIa. Cell 133: 103–115.
34. De Souza CP, Hashmi SB, Horn KP, Osmani SA. 2006. A point mutation in the Aspergillus nidulans sonBNup98 nuclear pore complex gene causes conditional DNA damage sensitivity. Genetics 174: 1881–1893.
35. De Souza CP, Hashmi SB, Nayak T, Oakley B, Osmani SA. 2009. Mlp1 acts as a mitotic scaffold to spatially regulate spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Biol Cell 20: 2146–2159.
36. Dieppois G, Stutz F. 2010. Connecting the transcription site to the nuclear pore: a multi-tether process that regulates gene expression. J Cell Sci 123: 1989–1999.
37. Dieppois G, Iglesias N, Stutz F. 2006. Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol Cell Biol 26: 7858–7870.
38. Dilworth DJ, Tackett AJ, Rogers RS, Yi EC, Christmas RH, Smith JJ, Siegel AF, Chait BT, Wozniak RW, Aitchison JD. 2005. The mobile nucleoporin Nup2p and chromatin-bound Prp20p function in endogenous NPC-mediated transcriptional control. J Cell Biol 171: 955–965.
39. Dou H, Huang C, Van Nguyen T, Lu L-S, Yeh ETH. 2011. SUMOylation and de-SUMOylation in response to DNA damage. FEBS Lett 585: 2891–2896.
40. Doucet CM, Talamas JA, Hetzer MW. 2010. Cell cycle-dependent differences in nuclear pore complex assembly in metazoa. Cell 141: 1030–1041.
41. Doye V. 2011. Mitotic phosphorylation of nucleoporins: dismantling NPCs and beyond. Dev Cell 20: 281–282.
42. Dultz E, Zanin E, Wurzenberger C, Braun M, Rabut G, Sironi L, Ellenberg J. 2008. Systematic kinetic analysis of mitotic disand reassembly of the nuclear pore in living cells. J Cell Biol 180: 857–865.
43. Fernandez AG, Piano F. 2006. MEL-28 is downstream of the Ran cycle and is required for nuclear-envelope function and chromatin maintenance. Curr Biol 16: 1757–1763.
44. Feuerbach F, Galy V, Trelles-Sticken E, Fromont-Racine M, Jacquier A, Gilson E, Olivo-Marin JC, Scherthan H, Nehrbass U. 2002. Nuclear architecture and spatial positioning help establish transcriptional states of telomeres in yeast. Nat Cell Biol 4: 214–221.
45. Franks TM, Hetzer MW. 2013. The role of Nup98 in transcription regulation in healthy and diseased cells. Trends Cell Biol 23: 112–117.
46. Galy V, Olivo-Marin JC, Scherthan H, Doye V, Rascalou N, Nehrbass U. 2000. Nuclear pore complexes in the organization of silent telomeric chromatin. Nature 403: 108–112.
47. Galy V, Askjaer P, Franz C, L_opez-Iglesias C, Mattaj IW. 2006. MEL-28, a novel nuclear-envelope and kinetochore protein essential for zygotic nuclear-envelope assembly in C. elegans. Curr Biol 16: 1748–1756.
48. Galy V, Antonin W, Jaedicke A, Sachse M, Santarella R, Haselmann U, Mattaj I. 2008. A role for gp210 in mitotic nuclear-envelope breakdown. J Cell Sci 121: 317–328.
49. Gao N, Davuluri G, Gong W, Seiler C, Lorent K, Furth EE, Kaestner KH, Pack M. 2011. The nuclear pore complex protein Elys is required for genome stability in mouse intestinal epithelial progenitor cells. Gastroenterology 140: 1547–1555. e10.
50. García-Oliver E, García-Molinero V, Rodriguez-Navarro S. 2012. mRNA export and gene expression: the SAGA–TREX-2 connection. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819: 555–565.
51. Gartenberg MR, Neumann FR, Laroche T, Blaszczyk M, Gasser SM. 2004. Sir-mediated repression can occur independently of chromosomal and subnuclear contexts. Cell 119: 955–967.
52. Gillespie PJ, Khoudoli GA, Stewart G, Swedlow JR, Blow JJ. 2007. ELYS/MEL-28 chromatin association coordinates nuclear pore complex assembly and replication licensing. Curr Biol 17: 1657–1662.
53. Gomez-Cavazos JS, Hetzer MW. 2012. Outfits for different occasions: tissue-specific roles of Nuclear Envelope proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 24: 775–783.
54. Green EM, Jiang Y, Joyner R, Weis K. 2012. A negative feedback loop at the nuclear periphery regulates GAL gene expression. Mol Biol Cell 23: 1367–1375.
55. Griffis ER, Altan N, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Powers MA. 2002. Nup98 is a mobile nucleoporin with transcription-dependent dynamics. Mol Biol Cell 13: 1282–1297.
56. Grossman E, Medalia O, Zwerger M. 2012. Functional architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biophys 41: 557–584.
57. Hashizume C, Kobayashi A, Wong RW. 2013a. Down-modulation of nucleoporin RanBP2/Nup358 impaired chromosomal alignment and induced mitotic catastrophe. Cell Death Dis 4: e854.
58. Hashizume C, Moyori A, Kobayashi A, Yamakoshi N, Endo A, Wong RW. 2013b. Nucleoporin Nup62 maintains centrosome homeostasis. Cell Cycle 12: 3804–3816.
59. Hediger F, Gasser SM. 2002. Nuclear organization and silencing: putting things in their place. Nat Cell Biol 4: E53–E55.
60. Hediger F, Dubrana K, Gasser SM. 2002. Myosin-like proteins 1 and 2 are not required for silencing or telomere anchoring, but act in the Tel1 pathway of telomere length control. J Struct Biol 140: 79–91.
61. Helmrich A, Ballarino M, Nudler E, Tora L. 2013. Transcriptionreplication encounters, consequences and genomic instability. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20: 412–418.
62. Hetzer MW. 2010. The nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000539.
63. Hoelz A, Debler EW, Blobel G. 2011. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biochem 80: 613–643.
64. Horigome C, Oma Y, Konishi T, Schmid R, Marcomini I, Hauer MH, Dion V, Harata M, Gasser SM. 2014. SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodelers contribute to DNA doublestrand break perinuclear anchorage site choice. Mol Cell 55: 626–639.
65. Ikegami K, Lieb JD. 2013. Integral nuclear pore proteins bind to Pol III-transcribed genes and are required for Pol III transcript processing in C. elegans. Mol Cell 51: 840–849.
66. Ishii K, Arib G, Lin C, Van Houwe G, Laemmli UK. 2002. Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast: the nuclear pore connection. Cell 109: 551–562.
67. Jeganathan KB, Malureanu L, van Deursen JM. 2005. The Rae1– Nup98 complex prevents aneuploidy by inhibiting securin degradation. Nature 438: 1036–1039.
68. Joseph J, Liu S-T, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ, Dasso M. 2004. The RanGAP1–RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubulekinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr Biol 14: 611–617.
69. Kalverda B, Fornerod M. 2010. Characterization of genomenucleoporin interactions in Drosophila links chromatin insulators to the nuclear pore complex. Cell Cycle 9: 4812–4817.
70. Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma VV, Fornerod M. 2010. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 140: 360–371.
71. Kasper LH, Brindle PK, Schnabel CA, Pritchard CE, Cleary ML, van Deursen JM. 1999. CREB binding protein interacts with nucleoporin-specific FG repeats that activate transcription and mediate NUP98–HOXA9 oncogenicity. Mol Cell Biol 19: 764–776.
72. Krull S, D€orries J, Boysen B, Reidenbach S, Magnius L, Norder H, Thyberg J, Cordes VC. 2010. Protein Tpr is required for establishing nuclear pore-associated zones of heterochromatin exclusion. EMBO J 29: 1659–1673.
73. Kurshakova MM, Krasnov AN, Kopytova DV, Shidlovskii YV, Nikolenko JV, Nabirochkina EN, Spehner D, Schultz P, Tora L, Georgieva SG. 2007. SAGA and a novel Drosophila export complex anchor efficient transcription and mRNA export to NPC. EMBO J 26: 4956–4965.
74. Lain_e JP, Singh BN, Krishnamurthy S, Hampsey M. 2009. A physiological role for gene loops in yeast. Genes Dev 23: 2604–2609.
75. Laurell E, Kutay U. 2011. Dismantling the NPC permeability barrier at the onset of mitosis. Cell Cycle 10: 2243–2245.
76. Laurell E, Beck K, Krupina K, Theerthagiri G, Bodenmiller B, Horvath P, Aebersold R, Antonin W, Kutay U. 2011. Phosphorylation of Nup98 by multiple kinases is crucial for NPC disassembly during mitotic entry. Cell 144: 539–550.
77. Lee SH, Sterling H, Burlingame A, McCormick F. 2008. Tpr directly binds to Mad1 and Mad2 and is important for the Mad1–Mad2-mediated mitotic spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 22: 2926–2931.
78. Lemaître C, Fischer B, Kalousi A, Hoffbeck A-S, Guirouilh- Barbat J, Shahar OD, Genet D, Goldberg M, Betrand P, Lopez B, et al. 2012. The nucleoporin 153, a novel factor in doublestrand break repair and DNA damage response. Oncogene 31: 4803–4809.
79. Lemaître C, Grabarz A, Tsouroula K, Andronov L, Furst A, Pankotai T, Heyer V, Rogier M, Attwood KM, Kessler P, et al. 2014. Nuclear position dictates DNA repair pathway choice. Genes Dev 28: 2450–2463.
80. L_en_art P, Rabut G, Daigle N, Hand AR, Terasaki M, Ellenberg J. 2003. Nuclear envelope breakdown in starfish oocytes proceeds by partial NPC disassembly followed by a rapidly spreading fenestration of nuclear membranes. J Cell Biol 160: 1055–1068.
81. Liang Y, Hetzer MW. 2011. Functional interactions between nucleoporins and chromatin. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23: 65–70.
82. Liang Y, Franks TM, Marchetto MC, Gage FH, Hetzer MW. 2013. Dynamic association of NUP98 with the human genome. PLoS Genet 9: e1003308.
83. Light WH, Brickner DG, Brand VR, Brickner JH. 2010. Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes H2A.Z incorporation and INO1 transcriptional memory. Mol Cell 40: 112–125.
84. Light WH, Freaney J, Sood V, Thompson A, D’Urso A, Horvath CM, Brickner JH. 2013. A conserved role for human Nup98 in altering chromatin structure and promoting epigenetic transcriptional memory. PLoS Biol 11: e1001524.
85. Lince-Faria M, Maffini S, Orr B, Ding Y, Florindo C, Sunkel CE, Tavares A, Johansen J, Johansen KM, Maiato H. 2009. Spatiotemporal control of mitosis by the conserved spindle matrix protein Megator. J Cell Biol 184: 647–657.
86. Liu J, Prunuske AJ, Fager AM, Ullman KS. 2003. The COPI complex functions in nuclear envelope breakdown and is recruited by the nucleoporin Nup153. Dev Cell 5: 487–498.
87. Loeillet S, Palancade B, Cartron M, Thierry A, Richard G-F, Dujon B, Doye V, Nicolas A. 2005. Genetic network interactions among replication, repair and nuclear pore deficiencies in yeast. DNA Repair 4: 459–468.
88. Loıödice I, Alves A, Rabut G, Van Overbeek M, Ellenberg J, Sibarita J-B, Doye V. 2004. The entire Nup107–160 complex, including three new members, is targeted as one entity to kinetochores in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 15: 3333–3344.
89. Lussi YC, Shumaker DK, Shimi T, Fahrenkrog B. 2010. The nucleoporin Nup153 affects spindle checkpoint activity due to an association with Mad1. Nucleus 1: 71–84.
90. Luthra R, Kerr SC, Harreman MT, Apponi LH, Fasken MB, Ramineni S, Chaurasia S, Valentini SR, Corbett AH. 2007. Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J Biol Chem 282: 3042–3049.
91. Mackay DR, Ullman KS. 2011. Coordinating postmitotic nuclear pore complex assembly with abscission timing. Nucleus 2: 283–288.
92. Mackay DR, Elgort SW, Ullman KS. 2009. The nucleoporin Nup153 has separable roles in both early mitotic progression and the resolution of mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1652–1660.
93. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, McDonald ER, Hurov KE, Luo J, Bakalarski CE, Zhao Z, Solimini N, Lerenthal Y, et al. 2007. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316: 1160–1166.
94. Mekhail K, Moazed D. 2010. The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 317–328.
95. Mendjan S, Taipale M, Kind J, Holz H, Gebhardt P, Schelder M, Vermeulen M, Buscaino A, Duncan K, Mueller J, et al. 2006. Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell 21: 811–823.
96. Mishra RK, Chakraborty P, Arnaoutov A, Fontoura BMA, Dasso M. 2010. The Nup107-160 complex and g-TuRC regulate microtubule polymerization at kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 12: 164–169.
97. Moorhead GBG, Trinkle-Mulcahy L, Nimick M, De Wever V, Campbell DG, Gourlay R, Lam YW, Lamond AI. 2008. Displacement affinity chromatography of protein phosphatase one (PP1) complexes. BMC Biochem 9: 28.
98. Moudry P, Lukas C, Macurek L, Neumann B, Heriche J-K, Pepperkok R, Ellenberg J, Hodny Z, Lukas J, Bartek J. 2012. Nucleoporin NUP153 guards genome integrity by promoting nuclear import of 53BP1. Cell Death Differ 19: 798–807.
99. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. 2007. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 379–393.
100. Nagai S, Dubrana K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Davidson MB, Roberts TM, Brown GW, Varela E, Hediger F, Gasser SM, Krogan NJ. 2008. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear poreassociated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322: 597–602.
101. Nagai S, Heun P, Gasser SM. 2010. Roles for nuclear organization in the maintenance of genome stability. Epigenomics 2: 289–305.
102. Natsume T, Tanaka TU. 2010. Spatial regulation and organization of DNA replication within the nucleus. Chromosome Res 18: 7–17.
103. O’Sullivan JM, Tan-Wong SM, Morillon A, Lee B, Coles J, Mellor J, Proudfoot NJ. 2004. Gene loops juxtapose promoters and terminators in yeast. Nat Genet 36: 1014–1018.
104. Olsson M, Sch_eele S, Ekblom P. 2004. Limited expression of nuclear pore membrane glycoprotein 210 in cell lines and tissues suggests cell-type specific nuclear pores in metazoans. Exp Cell Res 292: 359–370.
105. Orjalo AV, Arnaoutov A, Shen Z, Boyarchuk Y, Zeitlin SG, Fontoura B, Briggs S, Dasso M, Forbes DJ. 2006. The Nup107– 160 nucleoporin complex is required for correct bipolar spindle assembly. Mol Biol Cell 17: 3806–3818.
106. Oza P, Jaspersen SL, Miele A, Dekker J, Peterson CL. 2009. Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA doublestrand break to the nuclear periphery. Genes Dev 23: 912–927.
107. Palancade B, Liu X, Garcia-Rubio M, Aguilera A, Zhao X, Doye V. 2007. Nucleoporins prevent DNA damage accumulation by modulating Ulp1-dependent sumoylation processes. Mol Biol Cell 18: 2912–2923.
108. Pascual-Garcia P, Capelson M. 2014. Nuclear pores as versatile platforms for gene regulation. CurrOpin Genet Dev 25: 110–117.
109. Paulsen RD, Soni DV, Wollman R, Hahn AT, Yee MC, Guan A, Hesley JA, Miller SC, Cromwell EF, Solow-Cordero DE, et al. 2009. A genome-wide siRNA screen reveals diverse cellular processes and pathways that mediate genome stability. Mol Cell 35: 228–239.
110. Payne C, Rawe V, Ramalho-Santos J, Simerly C, Schatten G. 2003. Preferentially localized dynein and perinuclear dynactin associate with nuclear pore complex proteins to mediategenomic union during mammalian fertilization. J Cell Sci 116: 4727–4738.
111. Phillips JE, Corces VG. 2009. CTCF: master weaver of the genome. Cell 137: 1194–1211.
112. Pichler A, Gast A, Seeler JS, Dejean A, Melchior F. 2002. The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell 108: 109–120.
113. Platani M, Santarella-Mellwig R, Posch M, Walczak R, Swedlow JR, Mattaj IW. 2009. The Nup107–160 nucleoporin complex promotes mitotic events via control of the localization state of the chromosome passenger complex. Mol Biol Cell 20: 5260–5275.
114. Prunuske AJ, Liu J, Elgort S, Joseph J, Dasso M, Ullman KS. 2006. Nuclear envelope breakdown is coordinated by both Nup358/RanBP2 and Nup153, two nucleoporins with zinc finger modules. Mol Biol Cell 17: 760–769.
115. Rabut G, Doye V, Ellenberg J. 2004. Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nat Cell Biol 6: 1114–1121.
116. Rajanala K, Sarkar A, Jhingan GD, Priyadarshini R, Jalan M, Sengupta S, Nandicoori VK. 2014. Phosphorylation of nucleoporin Tpr governs its differential localization and is required for its mitotic function. J Cell Sci 127: 3505–3520.
117. Rasala BA, Orjalo AV, Shen Z, Briggs S, Forbes DJ. 2006. ELYS is a dual nucleoporin/kinetochore protein required for nuclear pore assembly and proper cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 17801–17806.
118. Regot S, de Nadal E, Rodriguez-Navarro S, Gonz_alez-Novo A, P_erez-Fernandez J, Gadal O, Seisenbacher G, Ammerer G, Posas F. 2013. The Hog1 stress-activated protein kinase targets nucleoporins to control mRNA export upon stress. J Biol Chem 288: 17384–17398.
119. Rodriguez-Bravo V, Maciejowski J, Corona J, Buch HK, Collin P, Kanemaki MT, Shah JV, Jallepalli PV. 2014. Nuclear pores protect genome integrity by assembling a premitotic and Mad1-dependent anaphase inhibitor. Cell 156: 1017–1031.
120. Rodriguez-Navarro S, Fischer T, Luo MJ, Ant_unez O, Brettschneider S, Lechner J, P_erez-Ort_ın JE, Reed R, Hurt E. 2004. Sus1, a functional component of the SAGA histone acetylase complex and the nuclear pore-associated mRNA export machinery. Cell 116: 75–86.
121. Rohner S, Kalck V, Wang X, Ikegami K, Lieb JD, Gasser SM, Meister P. 2013. Promoter- and RNA polymerase II-dependent hsp-16 gene association with nuclear pores in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 200: 589–604.
122. Rothballer A, Kutay U. 2012. SnapShot: the nuclear envelope II. Cell 150: 1084–1084.e1.
123. Ruben GJ, Kirkland JG, MacDonough T, Chen M, Dubey RN, Gartenberg MR, Kamakaka RT. 2011. Nucleoporin mediated nuclear positioning and silencing of HMR. PLoS ONE 6: e21923.
124. Salsi V, Ferrari S, Gorello P, Fantini S, Chiavolelli F, Mecucci C, Zappavigna V. 2014. NUP98 fusion oncoproteins promote aneuploidy by attenuating the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Cancer Res 74: 1079–1090.
125. Sarma NJ, Haley TM, Barbara KE, Buford TD, Willis KA, Santangelo GM. 2007. Glucose-responsive regulators of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function at the nuclear periphery via a reverse recruitment mechanism. Genetics 175: 1127–1135.
126. Sarma NJ, Buford TD, Haley T, Barbara-Haley K, Santangelo GM, Willis KA. 2011. The nuclear pore complex mediates binding of the Mig1 repressor to target promoters. PLoS ONE 6: e27117.
127. Savas JN, Toyama BH, Xu T, Yates JR, Hetzer MW. 2012. Extremely long-lived nuclear pore proteins in the rat brain. Science 335: 942.
128. Schermelleh L, Carlton PM, Haase S, Shao L, Winoto L, Kner P, Burke B, Cardoso MC, Agard DA, Gustafsson MGL, et al. 2008. Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science 320: 1332–1336.
129. Schmid M, Arib G, Laemmli C, Nishikawa J, Durussel T, Laemmli UK. 2006. Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol Cell 21: 379–391.
130. Schweizer N, Ferr_as C, Kern DM, Logarinho E, Cheeseman IM, Maiato H. 2013. Spindle assembly checkpoint robustness requires Tpr-mediated regulation of Mad1/Mad2 proteostasis. J Cell Biol 203: 883–893.
131. Siegel JJ, Amon A. 2012. New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28: 189–214.
132. Smith OK, Aladjem MI. 2014. Chromatin structure and replication origins: determinants of chromosome replication and nuclear organization. J Mol Biol 426: 3330–3341.
133. Soutoglou E, Misteli T. 2007. Mobility and immobility of chromatin in transcription and genome stability. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 435–442.
134. Splinter D, Tanenbaum ME, Lindqvist A, Jaarsma D, Flotho A, Yu KL, Grigoriev I, Engelsma D, Haasdijk ED, Keijzer N, et al. 2010. Bicaudal D2, dynein, and kinesin-1 associate with nuclear pore complexes and regulate centrosome and nuclear positioning during mitotic entry. PLoS Biol 8: e1000350.
135. Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Hediger F, Kalck V, Cubizolles F, Schober H, Gasser SM. 2006. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 441: 774–778.
136. Tan-Wong SM, Wijayatilake HD, Proudfoot NJ. 2009. Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev 23: 2610–2624.
137. Tan-Wong SM, Zaugg JB, Camblong J, Xu Z, Zhang DW, Mischo HE, Ansari AZ, Luscombe NM, Steinmetz LM, Proudfoot NJ. 2012. Gene loops enhance transcriptional directionality. Science 338: 671–675.
138. Texari L, Dieppois G, Vinciguerra P, Contreras MP, Groner A, Letourneau A, Stutz F. 2013. The nuclear pore regulates GAL1 gene transcription by controlling the localization of the SUMO protease Ulp1. Mol Cell 51: 807–818.
139. Therizols P, Fairhead C, Cabal GG, Genovesio A, Olivo-Marin JC, Dujon B, Fabre E. 2006. Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region. J Cell Biol 172: 189–199.
140. Therizols P, Illingworth RS, Courilleau C, Boyle S, Wood AJ, Bickmore WA. 2014. Chromatin decondensation is sufficient to alter nuclear organization in embryonic stem cells. Science 346: 1238–1242.
141. Toyama BH, Savas JN, Park SK, Harris MS, Ingolia NT, Yates JR, Hetzer MW. 2013. Identification of long-lived proteins reveals exceptional stability of essential cellular structures. Cell 154: 971–982.
142. Umlauf D, Bonnet J, Waharte F, Fournier M, Stierle M, Fischer B, Brino L, Devys D, Tora L. 2013. The human TREX-2 complex is stably associated with the nuclear pore basket. J Cell Sci 126: 2656–2667.
143. Vagnarelli P, Ribeiro S, Sennels L, Sanchez-Pulido L, de Lima Alves F, Verheyen T, Kelly DA, Ponting CP, Rappsilber J, Earnshaw WC. 2011. Repo-Man coordinates chromosomal reorganization with nuclear envelope reassembly during mitotic exit. Dev Cell 21: 328–342.
144. Van de Vosse DW, Wan Y, Wozniak RW, Aitchison JD. 2011. Role of the nuclear envelope in genome organization and gene expression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 3: 147–166.
145. Van de Vosse DW, Wan Y, Lapetina DL, Chen WM, Chiang JH, Aitchison JD, Wozniak RW. 2013. A role for the nucleoporin Nup170p in chromatin structure and gene silencing. Cell 152: 969–983.
146. Vaquerizas JM, Suyama R, Kind J, Miura K, Luscombe NM, Akhtar A. 2010. Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet 6: e1000846.
147. Wang X, Babu JR, Harden JM, Jablonski SA, Gazi MH, Lingle WL, de Groen PC, Yen TJ, van Deursen JM. 2001. The mitotic checkpoint protein hBUB3 and the mRNA export factor hRAE1 interact with GLE2p-binding sequence (GLEBS)-containing proteins. J Biol Chem 276: 26559–26567.
148. Wente SR, Rout MP. 2010. The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000562.
149. Wong RW, Blobel G, Coutavas E. 2006. Rae1 interaction with NuMA is required for bipolar spindle formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 19783–19787.
150. Woolcock KJ, Stunnenberg R, Gaidatzis D, Hotz HR, Emmerth S, Barraud P, B€uhler M. 2012. RNAi keeps Atf1-bound stress response genes in check at nuclear pores. Genes Dev 26: 683–692.
151. Wozniak R, Burke B, Doye V. 2010. Nuclear transport and the mitotic apparatus: an evolving relationship. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 2215–2230.
152. Yokoyama H, Koch B, Walczak R, Ciray-Duygu F, González-Sánchez JC, Devos DP, Mattaj IW, Gruss OJ. 2014. The nucleoporin MEL-28 promotes RanGTP-dependent g-tubulin recruitment and microtubule nucleation in mitotic spindle formation. Nat Commun 5: 3270.
153. Yoshida T, Shimada K, Oma Y, Kalck V, Akimura K, Taddei A, Iwahashi H, Kugou K, Ohta K, Gasser SM, et al. 2010. Actinrelated protein Arp6 influences H2A.Z-dependent and -independent gene expression and links ribosomal protein genes to nuclear pores. PLoS Genet 6: e1000910.
154. Zhang X, Chen S, Yoo S, Chakrabarti S, Zhang T, Ke T, Oberti C, Yong SL, Fang F, Li L, et al. 2008. Mutation in nuclear pore component NUP155 leads to atrial fibrillation and early sudden cardiac death. Cell 135: 1017–1027.
155. Zuccolo M, Alves A, Galy V, Bolhy S, Formstecher E, Racine V, Sibarita JB, Fukagawa T, Shiekhattar R, Yen T, et al. 2007. The human Nup107–160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J 26: 1853–1864.