The Nuclear Pore Regulates GAL1 Gene Transcription by Controlling the Localization of the SUMO Protease Ulp1

Molecular Cell

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 807-818

  Texari, Lorane ^a   Dieppois, Guennaëlle ^a   Vinciguerra, Patrizia ^a   Contreras, MarianaPardo ^a   Groner, Anna ^a   Letourneau, Audrey ^a   Stutz, Françoise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAL1 PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; SUMO PROTEIN; ULP1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SECRETION; SUMOYLATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

CYSTEINE ENDOPEPTIDASES; GALACTOKINASE; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SUMOYLATION; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION;

EID: 84884550965     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: 10974164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.047     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aitchison J.D., Rout M.P. The yeast nuclear pore complex and transport through it. Genetics 2012, 190:855-883.
2. Andrulis E.D., Neiman A.M., Zappulla D.C., Sternglanz R. Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature 1998, 394:592-595.
3. Blobel G. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82:8527-8529.
4. Brickner J.H., Walter P. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:e342.
5. Brickner D.G., Cajigas I., Fondufe-Mittendorf Y., Ahmed S., Lee P.C., Widom J., Brickner J.H. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e81.
6. Broach J.R. Nutritional control of growth and development in yeast. Genetics 2012, 192:73-105.
7. Cabal G.G., Genovesio A., Rodriguez-Navarro S., Zimmer C., Gadal O., Lesne A., Buc H., Feuerbach-Fournier F., Olivo-Marin J.C., Hurt E.C., Nehrbass U. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 2006, 441:770-773.
8. Capelson M., Liang Y., Schulte R., Mair W., Wagner U., Hetzer M.W. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 2010, 140:372-383.
9. Casolari J.M., Brown C.R., Komili S., West J., Hieronymus H., Silver P.A. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004, 117:427-439.
10. Casolari J.M., Brown C.R., Drubin D.A., Rando O.J., Silver P.A. Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1188-1198.
11. Chow K.H., Elgort S., Dasso M., Ullman K.S. Two distinct sites in Nup153 mediate interaction with the SUMO proteases SENP1 and SENP2. Nucleus 2012, 3:349-358.
12. D'Angelo M.A., Gomez-Cavazos J.S., Mei A., Lackner D.H., Hetzer M.W. A change in nuclear pore complex composition regulates cell differentiation. Dev. Cell 2012, 22:446-458.
13. DeRisi J.L., Iyer V.R., Brown P.O. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 1997, 278:680-686.
14. Dieppois G., Stutz F. Connecting the transcription site to the nuclear pore: a multi-tether process that regulates gene expression. J.Cell Sci. 2010, 123:1989-1999.
15. Dieppois G., Iglesias N., Stutz F. Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:7858-7870.
16. Felberbaum R., Wilson N.R., Cheng D., Peng J., Hochstrasser M. Desumoylation of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane VAP family protein Scs2 by Ulp1 and SUMO regulation of the inositol synthesis pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32:64-75.
17. Ferreira H.C., Luke B., Schober H., Kalck V., Lingner J., Gasser S.M. The PIAS homologue Siz2 regulates perinuclear telomere position and telomerase activity in budding yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:867-874.
18. Feuerbach F., Galy V., Trelles-Sticken E., Fromont-Racine M., Jacquier A., Gilson E., Olivo-Marin J.C., Scherthan H., Nehrbass U. Nuclear architecture and spatial positioning help establish transcriptional states of telomeres in yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:214-221.
19. Frolova E., Johnston M., Majors J. Binding of the glucose-dependent Mig1p repressor to the GAL1 and GAL4 promoters invivo: regulationby glucose and chromatin structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27:1350-1358.
20. Galy V., Olivo-Marin J.C., Scherthan H., Doye V., Rascalou N., Nehrbass U. Nuclear pore complexes in the organization of silent telomeric chromatin. Nature 2000, 403:108-112.
21. Galy V., Gadal O., Fromont-Racine M., Romano A., Jacquier A., Nehrbass U. Nuclear retention of unspliced mRNAs in yeast is mediated by perinuclear Mlp1. Cell 2004, 116:63-73.
22. Goeres J., Chan P.K., Mukhopadhyay D., Zhang H., Raught B., Matunis M.J. The SUMO-specific isopeptidase SENP2 associates dynamically with nuclear pore complexes through interactions with karyopherins and the Nup107-160 nucleoporin subcomplex. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:4868-4882.
23. Green D.M., Johnson C.P., Hagan H., Corbett A.H. The C-terminal domain of myosin-like protein 1 (Mlp1p) is a docking site for heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins that are required for mRNA export. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:1010-1015.
24. Green E.M., Jiang Y., Joyner R., Weis K. A negative feedback loop at the nuclear periphery regulates GAL gene expression. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23:1367-1375.
25. Hannich J.T., Lewis A., Kroetz M.B., Li S.J., Heide H., Emili A., Hochstrasser M. Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J.Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:4102-4110.
26. Hediger F., Neumann F.R., Van Houwe G., Dubrana K., Gasser S.M. Live imaging of telomeres: yKu and Sir proteins define redundant telomere-anchoring pathways in yeast. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:2076-2089.
27. Heun P., Laroche T., Shimada K., Furrer P., Gasser S.M. Chromosome dynamics in the yeast interphase nucleus. Science 2001, 294:2181-2186.
28. Hewitt S.L., High F.A., Reiner S.L., Fisher A.G., Merkenschlager M. Nuclear repositioning marks the selective exclusion of lineage-inappropriate transcription factor loci during T helper cell differentiation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34:3604-3613.
29. Johnson E.S. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73:355-382.
30. Johnston M. Feasting, fasting and fermenting. Glucose sensing in yeast and other cells. Trends Genet. 1999, 15:29-33.
31. Kalverda B., Pickersgill H., Shloma V.V., Fornerod M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 2010, 140:360-371.
32. Li S.J., Hochstrasser M. A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 1999, 398:246-251.
33. Li S.J., Hochstrasser M. The yeast ULP2 (SMT4) gene encodes a novel protease specific for the ubiquitin-like Smt3 protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:2367-2377.
34. Li S.J., Hochstrasser M. The Ulp1 SUMO isopeptidase: distinct domains required for viability, nuclear envelope localization, and substrate specificity. J.Cell Biol. 2003, 160:1069-1081.
35. Lohr D., Venkov P., Zlatanova J. Transcriptional regulation in the yeast GAL gene family: a complex genetic network. FASEB J. 1995, 9:777-787.
36. Luthra R., Kerr S.C., Harreman M.T., Apponi L.H., Fasken M.B., Ramineni S., Chaurasia S., Valentini S.R., Corbett A.H. Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J.Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:3042-3049.
37. Melchior F., Schergaut M., Pichler A. SUMO: ligases, isopeptidases and nuclear pores. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28:612-618.
38. Mendjan S., Taipale M., Kind J., Holz H., Gebhardt P., Schelder M., Vermeulen M., Buscaino A., Duncan K., Mueller J., et al. Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:811-823.
39. Menon B.B., Sarma N.J., Pasula S., Deminoff S.J., Willis K.A., Barbara K.E., Andrews B., Santangelo G.M. Reverse recruitment: the Nup84 nuclear pore subcomplex mediates Rap1/Gcr1/Gcr2 transcriptional activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:5749-5754.
40. Nathan D., Ingvarsdottir K., Sterner D.E., Bylebyl G.R., Dokmanovic M., Dorsey J.A., Whelan K.A., Krsmanovic M., Lane W.S., Meluh P.B., et al. Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:966-976.
41. Palancade B., Doye V. Sumoylating and desumoylating enzymes at nuclear pores: underpinning their unexpected duties?. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:174-183.
42. Palancade B., Liu X., Garcia-Rubio M., Aguilera A., Zhao X., Doye V. Nucleoporins prevent DNA damage accumulation by modulating Ulp1-dependent sumoylation processes. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18:2912-2923.
43. Panse V.G., Küster B., Gerstberger T., Hurt E. Unconventional tethering of Ulp1 to the transport channel of the nuclear pore complex by karyopherins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5:21-27.
44. Panse V.G., Hardeland U., Werner T., Kuster B., Hurt E. A proteome-wide approach identifies sumoylated substrate proteins in yeast. J.Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:41346-41351.
45. Papamichos-Chronakis M., Petrakis T., Ktistaki E., Topalidou I., Tzamarias D. Cti6, a PHD domain protein, bridges the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor and the SAGA coactivator to overcome repression at GAL1. Mol. Cell 2002, 9:1297-1305.
46. Papamichos-Chronakis M., Gligoris T., Tzamarias D. The Snf1 kinase controls glucose repression in yeast by modulating interactions between the Mig1 repressor and the Cyc8-Tup1 co-repressor. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5:368-372.
47. Pickersgill H., Kalverda B., de Wit E., Talhout W., Fornerod M., van Steensel B. Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:1005-1014.
48. Proft M., Struhl K. Hog1 kinase converts the Sko1-Cyc8-Tup1 repressor complex into an activator that recruits SAGA and SWI/SNF in response to osmotic stress. Mol. Cell 2002, 9:1307-1317.
49. Ragoczy T., Bender M.A., Telling A., Byron R., Groudine M. The locus control region is required for association of the murine beta-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:1447-1457.
50. Rosonina E., Duncan S.M., Manley J.L. SUMO functions in constitutive transcription and during activation of inducible genes in yeast. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:1242-1252.
51. Rosonina E., Duncan S.M., Manley J.L. Sumoylation of transcription factor Gcn4 facilitates its Srb10-mediated clearance from promoters in yeast. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:350-355.
52. Sarma N.J., Buford T.D., Haley T., Barbara-Haley K., Santangelo G.M., Willis K.A. The nuclear pore complex mediates binding of the Mig1 repressor to target promoters. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e27117.
53. Schmid M., Arib G., Laemmli C., Nishikawa J., Durussel T., Laemmli U.K. Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol. Cell 2006, 21:379-391.
54. Smith R.L., Johnson A.D. Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25:325-330.
55. Srikumar T., Lewicki M.C., Raught B. A global S. cerevisiae small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) system interactome. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9:668.
56. Sterner D.E., Nathan D., Reindle A., Johnson E.S., Berger S.L. Sumoylation of the yeast Gcn5 protein. Biochemistry 2006, 45:1035-1042.
57. Taddei A., Van Houwe G., Hediger F., Kalck V., Cubizolles F., Schober H., Gasser S.M. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 2006, 441:774-778.
58. Tan-Wong S.M., Wijayatilake H.D., Proudfoot N.J. Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2610-2624.
59. Treitel M.A., Carlson M. Repression by SSN6-TUP1 is directed byMIG1, a repressor/activator protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92:3132-3136.
60. Vinciguerra P., Iglesias N., Camblong J., Zenklusen D., Stutz F. Perinuclear Mlp proteins downregulate gene expression in response to a defect in mRNA export. EMBO J. 2005, 24:813-823.
61. Wohlschlegel J.A., Johnson E.S., Reed S.I., Yates J.R. Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J.Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:45662-45668.
62. Wong K.H., Struhl K. The Cyc8-Tup1 complex inhibits transcription primarily by masking the activation domain of the recruiting protein. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:2525-2539.
63. Wykoff D.D., O'Shea E.K. Identification of sumoylated proteins bysystematic immunoprecipitation of the budding yeast proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:73-83.
64. Zhang Z., Reese J.C. Redundant mechanisms are used by Ssn6-Tup1 in repressing chromosomal gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J.Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:39240-39250.
65. Zhao X., Wu C.Y., Blobel G. Mlp-dependent anchorage and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent clonal lethality. J.Cell Biol. 2004, 167:605-611.
66. Zhao Y., Kwon S.W., Anselmo A., Kaur K., White M.A. Broad spectrum identification of cellular small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) substrate proteins. J.Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:20999-21002.
67. Zhou W., Ryan J.J., Zhou H. Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J.Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:32262-32268.