Preferentially localized dynein and perinuclear dynactin associate with nuclear pore complex proteins to mediate genomic union during mammalian fertilization

Journal of Cell Science

Volumn 116, Issue 23, 2003, Pages 4727-4738

  Payne, Christopher ^a,b   Rawe, Vanesa ^b   Ramalho Santos, João ^b,c   Simerly, Calvin ^b   Schatten, Gerald ^b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Fertilization; Molecular motor; Nuclear envelope; Nucleoporin; Vimentin

Indexed keywords

DYNACTIN; DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; NUCLEOPORIN; PROTEIN P50; PROTEIN P62; VIMENTIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPOLYMERIZATION; ENZYME LOCALIZATION; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; GENOMICS; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; OOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL NUCLEUS; DYNEIN ATPASE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENOMICS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; OOCYTES; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; SPERMATOZOA; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALIA; ASTER; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0345375736     PISSN: 00219533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00784     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allen, T. D., Cronshaw, J. M., Bagley, S., Kiseleva, E. and Goldberg, M. W. (2000). The nuclear pore complex: mediator of translocation between nucleus and cytoplasm. J. Cell Sci. 113, 1651-1659.
2. Aris, J. P. and Blobel, G. (1989). Yeast nuclear envelope proteins cross react with an antibody against mammalian pore complex proteins. J. Cell Biol. 108, 2059-2067.
3. Asch, R., Simerly, C., Ord, T., Ord, V. A. and Schatten, G. (1995). The stages at which human fertilization arrests: microtubule and chromosome configurations in inseminated oocytes which failed to complete fertilization and development in humans. Hum. Reprod 10, 1897-1906.
4. Beaudouin, J., Gerlich, D., Daigle, N., Eils, R. and Ellenberg, J. (2002). Nuclear envelope breakdown proceeds by microtubule-induced tearing of the lamina. Cell 108, 83-96.
5. Burkhardt, J. K., Echeverri, C. J., Nilsson, T. and Vallee, R. B. (1997). Overexpression of the dynamitin (p50) subunit of the dynactin complex disrupts dynein-dependent maintenance of membrane organelle distribution. J. Cell Biol. 139, 469-484.
6. Busson, S., Dujardin, D., Moreau, A., Dompierre, J. and de Mey, J. R. (1998). Dynein and dynactin are localized to astral microtubules and at cortical sites in mitotic epithelial cells. Carr. Biol. 8, 541-544.
7. Cronshaw, J. M., Krutchinsky, A. N., Zhang, W., Chait, B. T. and Matunis, M. J. (2002). Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 158, 915-927.
8. Davis, L. I. and Blobel, G. (1987). Nuclear pore complex contains a family of glycoproteins that includes p62: glycosylation through a previously unidentified cellular pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7552-7556.
9. Echeverri, C. J., Paschal, B. M., Vaughan, K. T. and Vallee, R. B. (1996). Molecular characterization of the 50-kD subunit of dynactin reveals function for the complex in chromosome alignment and spindle organization during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 132, 617-633.
10. Eid, L. N., Lorton, S. P. and Parrish, J. J. (1994). Paternal influence on S-phase in the first cell cycle of the bovine embryo. Biol. Reprod. 51, 1232-1237.
11. Ewald, A., Zunkler, C., Lourim, D. and Dabauvalle, M. C. (2001). Microtubule-dependent assembly of the nuclear envelope in Xenopus laevis egg extract. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 80, 678-691.
12. Fujitani, Y., Higaki, S., Sawada, H. and Hirosawa, K. (1989). Quick-freeze, deep-etch visualization of the nuclear pore complex. J. Electron Microsc. 38, 34-40.
13. Gilbert, S. F. (1997). Developmental Biology, 5th edn. Sinauer Associates.
14. Gönczy, P., Pichler, S., Kirkham, M. and Hyman, A. A. (1999). Cytoplasmic dynein is required for distinct aspects of MTOC positioning, including centrosome separation, in the one cell stage Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. J. Cell Biol. 147, 135-150.
15. Helfand, B. T., Mikami, A., Vallee, R. B. and Goldman, R. D. (2002). A requirement for cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin in intermediate filament network assembly and organization. J. Cell Biol. 157, 795-806.
16. Hewitson, L. C., Simerly, C. R., Tengowski, M. W., Sutovsky, P., Navara, C. S., Haavisto, A. J. and Schatten, G. (1996). Microtubule and chromatin configurations during Rhesus intracytoplasmic sperm injection: successes and failures. Biol. Reprod. 55, 271-280.
17. Hewitson, L., Simerly, C. and Schatten, G. (2000). Cytoskeletal aspects of assisted fertilization. Semin. Reprod. Med. 18, 151-159.
18. Jones, J. C. R., Goldman, A. E., Steinert, P. M., Yuspa, S. and Goldman, R. D. (1982). Dynamic aspects of the supramolecular organization of intermediate filament networks in cultured epidermal cells. Cell Motil. 2, 197-213.
19. Karki, S. and Holzbaur, E. L. F. (1995). Affinity chromatography demonstrates a direct binding between cytoplasmic dynein and the dynactin complex. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28806-28811.
20. Karki, S. and Holzbaur, E. L. F. (1999). Cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin in cell division and intracellular transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 45-53.
21. Laurinčík, J., Hyttel, P., Baran, V., Eckert, J., Lucas-Hahn, A., Pivko, J., Niemann, H., Brem, G. and Schellander, K. (1998). A detailed analysis of pronucleus development in bovine zygotes in vitro: cell-cycle chronology and ultrastructure. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 50, 192-199.
22. Lénárt, P. and Ellenberg, J. (2003). Nuclear envelope dynamics in oocytes: from germinal vesicle breakdown to mitosis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 88-95.
23. Long, C. R., Pinto-Correia, C., Duby, R. T., Ponce de Leon, F. A., Boland, M. P., Roche, J. F. and Robl, J. M. (1993). Chromatin and microtubule morphology during the first cell cycle in bovine zygotes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 36, 23-32.
24. Morris, M. C., Depollier, J., Mery, J., Heitz, F. and Divita, G. (2001). A peptide carrier for the delivery of biologically active proteins into mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 1173-1176.
25. Navara, C. S., First, N. L. and Schatten, G. (1994). Microtubule organization in the cow during fertilization, polyspermy, parthenogenesis, and nuclear transfer: the role of the sperm aster. Dev. Biol. 162, 29-40.
26. Nomura, A., Maruyama, Y. K. and Yoneda, M. (1991). Initiation of DNA replication cycle in fertilized eggs of the starfish, Asterina pectinifera. Dev. Biol. 143, 289-296.
27. Panté, N. and Kann, M. (2002). Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of ∼39 nm. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 425-434.
28. Presley, J. F., Cole, N. B., Schroer, T. A., Hirschberg, K., Zaal, K. J. and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1997). ER-to-Golgi transport visualized in living cells. Nature 389, 81-85.
29. Quintyne, N. J. and Schroer, T. A. (2002). Distinct cell cycle-dependent roles for dynactin and dynein at centrosomes. J. Cell Biol. 159, 245-254.
30. Reinsch, S. and Gönczy, P. (1998). Mechanisms of nuclear positioning. J. Cell Sci. 111, 2283-2295.
31. Reinsch, S. and Karsenti, E. (1997). Movement of nuclei along microtubules in Xenopus egg extracts. Curr. Biol. 7, 211-214.
32. Rouvière, C., Houliston, E., Carré, D., Chang, P. and Sardet, C. (1994). Characteristics of pronuclear migration in Beroe ovata. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 29, 301-311.
33. Ryan, K. J. and Wente, S. R. (2000). The nuclear pore complex: a protein machine bridging the nucleus and cytoplasm. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 361-371.
34. Salina, D., Bodoor, K., Eckley, D. M., Schroer, T. A., Rattner, J. B. and Burke, B. (2002). Cytoplasmic dynein as a facilitator of nuclear envelope breakdown. Cell 108, 97-107.
35. Schafer, D. A., Gill, S. R., Cooper, J. A., Heuser, J. E. and Schroer, T. A. (1994). Ultrastructural analysis of the dynactin complex: an actin-related protein is a component of a filament that resembles F-actin. J. Cell Biol. 126, 403-412.
36. Schatten, G. (1982). Motility during fertilization. Int. Rev. Cytol. 79, 59-163.
37. Schatten, G. (1994). The centrosome and its mode of inheritance: the reduction of the centrosome during gametogenesis and its restoration during fertilization. Dev. Biol. 165, 299-335.
38. Sheeman, B., Carvalho, P., Sagot, I., Geiser, J., Kho, D., Hoyt, M. A. and Pellman, D. (2003). Determinants of S. cerevisiae dynein localization and activation: implications for the mechanism of spindle positioning. Curr. Biol. 13, 364-372.
39. Simerly, C. and Schatten, G. (1993). Techniques for localization of specific molecules in oocytes and embryos. Methods Enzymol. 225, 516-553.
40. Simerly, C., Wu, G. J., Zoran, S., Ord, T., Rawlins, R., Jones, J., Navara, C., Gerrity, M., Rinehart, J., Binar, Z. et al. (1995). The paternal inheritance of the centrosome, the cell's microtubule-organizing center, in humans, and the implications for infertility. Nat. Med. 1, 47-52.
41. Sirard, M. A., Parrish, J. J., Ware, C. B., Leibfried-Rutiedge, M. L. and First, N. L. (1988). The culture of bovine oocytes to obtain developmentally competent embryos. Biol. Reprod. 39, 546-552.
42. Sutovsky, P., Simerly, C., Hewitson, L. and Schatten, G. (1998). Assembly of nuclear pore complexes and annulate lamellae promotes normal pronuclear development in fertilized mammalian oocytes. J. Cell Sci. 111, 2841-2854.
43. Takizawa, C. G. and Morgan, D. O. (2000). Control of mitosis by changes in the subcellular location of Cyclin-B1-Cdk1 and Cdc25c. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 658-665.
44. Vaisberg, E. A., Koonce, M. P. and McIntosh, J. R. (1993). Cytoplasmic dynein plays a role in mammalian mitotic spindle formation. J. Cell Biol. 123, 849-858.
45. Glued. J. Cell Biol. 131, 1507-1516.
46. Glued component of the dynactin complex binds to both microtubules and the actin-related protein centractin (Arp-1). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 1634-1638.
47. Wolf, D. P., Vandevoort, C. A., Meyer-Haas, G. R., Zelinski-Wooten, M. B., Hess, D. L., Baughman, W. L. and Stouffer, R. L. (1989). In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in the rhesus monkey. Biol. Reprod. 41, 335-346.