A negative feedback loop at the nuclear periphery regulates GAL gene expression

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1367-1375

  Green, Erin M ^a,b   Jiang, Ying ^a   Joyner, Ryan ^a   Weis, Karsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAL GENE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENE INDUCTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENE REPRESSION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NONHUMAN; POSITION EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CELL NUCLEUS; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; GALACTOKINASE; GALACTOSE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, FUNGAL; GLYCEROL; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NUCLEAR PORE; RAFFINOSE; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84859386760     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: 19394586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E11-06-0547     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abruzzi KC, Belostotsky DA, Chekanova JA, Dower K, Rosbash M (2006). 3′-end formation signals modulate the association of genes with the nuclear periphery as well as mRNP dot formation. EMBO J 25, 4253-4262. (Pubitemid 44435223)
2. Ahmed S, Brickner DG, Light WH, Cajigas I, McDonough M, Froyshteter AB, Volpe T, Brickner JH (2010). DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nat Cell Biol 12, 306.
3. Akhtar A, Gasser SM (2007). The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 8, 507-517. (Pubitemid 46955211)
4. Andrulis ED, Neiman AM, Zappulla DC, Sternglanz R (1998). Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature 394, 592-595. (Pubitemid 28366836)
5. Arib G, Akhtar A (2011). Multiple facets of nuclear periphery in gene expression control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23, 346-353.
6. Berger AB, Cabal GG, Fabre E, Duong T, Buc H, Nehrbass U, Olivo-Marin JC, Gadal O, Zimmer C (2008). High-resolution statistical mapping reveals gene territories in live yeast. Nat Methods 5, 1031-1037.
7. Blobel G (1985). Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82, 8527-8529.
8. Brickner DG, Cajigas I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Ahmed S, Lee P-C, Widom J, Brickner JH (2007). H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol 5, e81.
9. Brickner JH, Walter P (2004). Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol 2, e342.
10. Cabal GG et al. (2006). SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 441, 770-773. (Pubitemid 43865225)
11. Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer MW (2010). Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 140, 372-383.
12. Casolari JM, Brown CR, Drubin DA, Rando OJ, Silver PA (2005). Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes. Genes Dev 19, 1188-1198. (Pubitemid 40696185)
13. Casolari JM, Brown CR, Komili S, West J, Hieronymus H, Silver PA (2004). Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 117, 427-439. (Pubitemid 38610229)
14. Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA (1999). Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 145, 1119-1131. (Pubitemid 29293625)
15. Dieppois G, Iglesias N, Stutz F (2006). Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol Cell Biol 26, 7858-7870. (Pubitemid 44630987)
16. Drubin D, Garakani A, Silver P (2006). Motion as a phenotype: the use of live-cell imaging and machine visual screening to characterize transcription- dependent chromosome dynamics. BMC Cell Biol 7, 19.
17. Feuerbach F, Galy V, Trelles-Sticken E, Fromont-Racine M, Jacquier A, Gilson E, Olivo-Marin J-C, Scherthan H, Nehrbass U (2002). Nuclear architecture and spatial positioning help establish transcriptional states of telomeres in yeast. Nat Cell Biol 4, 214-221. (Pubitemid 34218195)
18. Finlan LE, Sproul D, Thomson I, Boyle S, Kerr E, Perry P, Ylstra B, Chubb JR, Bickmore WA (2008). Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet 4, e1000039.
19. Fischer T, Straber K, Racz A, Roriguez-Navarro S, Oppizzi M, Ihrig P, Lechner J, Hurt E (2002). The mRNA export machinery requires the novel Sac3p-Thp1p complex to dock at the nucleoplasmic entrance of the nuclear pores. EMBO J 21, 5843-5852. (Pubitemid 35315282)
20. Fraser P, Bickmore W (2007). Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature 447, 413-417. (Pubitemid 46816747)
21. Grimaud C, Becker PB (2009). The dosage compensation complex shapes the conformation of the X chromosome in Drosophila. Genes Dev 23, 2490-2495.
22. Johnston M, Flick JS, Pexton T (1994). Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 14, 3834-3841. (Pubitemid 24160790)
23. Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma VV, Fornerod M (2010). Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 140, 360-371.
24. Kohler A, Schneider M, Cabal GG, Nehrbass U, Hurt E (2008). Yeast ataxin-7 links histone deubiquitination with gene gating and mRNA export. Nat Cell Biol 10, 707-715. (Pubitemid 351772936)
25. Kosak ST, Skok JA, Medina KL, Riblet R, Le Beau MM, Fisher AG, Singh H (2002). Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 296, 158-162. (Pubitemid 34280078)
26. Kumaran RI, Spector DL (2008). A genetic locus targeted to the nuclear periphery in living cells maintains its transcriptional competence. J Cell Biol 180, 51-65.
27. Laine JP, Singh BN, Krishnamurthy S, Hampsey M (2009). A physiological role for gene loops in yeast. Genes Dev 23, 2604-2609.
28. Lanctot C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T (2007). Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet 8, 104-115. (Pubitemid 46122840)
29. Liang Y, Hetzer MW (2011). Functional interactions between nucleoporins and chromatin. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23, 65-70.
30. Light WH, Brickner DG, Brand VR, Brickner JH (2010). Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes H2A.Z incorporation and INO1 transcriptional memory. Mol Cell 40, 112-125.
31. Longtine MS, McKenzie A 3rd, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR (1998). Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953-961. (Pubitemid 28328001)
32. Luthra R, Kerr SC, Harreman MT, Apponi LH, Fasken MB, Ramineni S, Chaurasia S, Valentini SR, Corbett AH (2007). Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J Biol Chem 282, 3042-3049. (Pubitemid 47084310)
33. Madrid AS, Mancuso J, Cande WZ, Weis K (2006). The role of the integral membrane nucleoporins Ndc1p and Pom152p in nuclear pore complex assembly and function. J Cell Biol 173, 361-371.
34. Mendjan S et al. (2006). Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell 21, 811-823. (Pubitemid 43376131)
35. Misteli T (2007). Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128, 787-800.
36. Morrissey JP, Deardorff JA, Hebron C, Sachs AB (1999). Decapping of stabilized, polyadenylated mRNA in yeast pab1 mutants. Yeast 15, 687-702. (Pubitemid 29286548)
37. Ragoczy T, Bender MA, Telling A, Byron R, Groudine M (2006). The locus control region is required for association of the murine beta-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev 20, 1447-1457. (Pubitemid 43830652)
38. Reddy KL, Zullo JM, Bertolino E, Singh H (2008). Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452, 243-247. (Pubitemid 351380248)
39. Ren B et al. (2000). Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290, 2306-2309. (Pubitemid 32041573)
40. Rodriguez-Navarro S, Fischer T, Luo M-J, Antunez O, Brettschneider S, Lechner J, Perez-Ortin JE, Reed R, Hurt E (2004). Sus1, a functional component of the SAGA histone acetylase complex and the nuclear pore-associated mRNA export machinery. Cell 116, 75-86. (Pubitemid 38156185)
41. Santangelo GM (2006). Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70, 253-282.
42. Sarma NJ, Buford TD, Haley T, Barbara-Haley K, Santangelo GM, Willis KA (2011). The nuclear pore complex mediates binding of the Mig1 repressor to target promoters. PLoS ONE 6, e27117.
43. Sarma NJ, Haley TM, Barbara KE, Buford TD, Willis KA, Santangelo GM (2007). Glucose-responsive regulators of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function at the nuclear periphery via a reverse recruitment mechanism. Genetics 175, 1127-1135. (Pubitemid 46798218)
44. Schlaich NL, Hurt EC (1995). Analysis of nucleocytoplasmic transport and nuclear envelope structure in yeast disrupted for the gene encoding the nuclear pore protein Nup1p. Eur J Cell Biol 67, 8-14.
45. Schmid M, Arib G, Laemmli C, Nishikawa J, Durussel T, Laemmli UK (2006). Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol Cell 21, 379-391. (Pubitemid 43163533)
46. Straight AF, Belmont AS, Robinett CC, Murray AW (1996). GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr Biol 6, 1599-1608. (Pubitemid 27050227)
47. Taddei A (2007). Active genes at the nuclear pore complex. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19, 305-310.
48. Taddei A, Hediger F, Neumann FR, Gasser SM (2004). The function of nuclear architecture: a genetic approach. Annu Rev Genet 38, 305-345. (Pubitemid 40013731)
49. Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Hediger F, Kalck V, Cubizolles F, Schober H, Gasser SM (2006). Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 441, 774-778. (Pubitemid 43865226)
50. Tan-Wong SM, Wijayatilake HD, Proudfoot NJ (2009). Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev 23, 2610-2624.
51. Vaquerizas JM, Suyama R, Kind J, Miura K, Luscombe NM, Akhtar A (2010). Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet 6, e1000846.
52. Vodala S, Abruzzi KC, Rosbash M (2008). The nuclear exosome and adenylation regulate posttranscriptional tethering of yeast GAL genes to the nuclear periphery. Mol Cell 31, 104-113. (Pubitemid 351905922)
53. Yoshida T et al. (2010). Actin-related protein Arp6 influences H2A.Z-dependent and -independent gene expression and links ribosomal protein genes to nuclear pores. PLoS Genet 6, e1000910.