Spindle assembly checkpoint robustness requires Tpr-mediated regulation of Mad1/Mad2 proteostasis

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 203, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 883-893

  Schweizer, Nina ^a   Ferrás, Cristina ^a   Kern, David M ^c,d   Logarinho, Elsa ^a,b   Cheeseman, Iain M ^c,d   Maiato, Helder ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b University of Porto   (Portugal)

^c WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; MAD1L1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MAD2L1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; NUCLEOPORIN; ONCOPROTEIN; PROTEIN MAD2; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; TPR PROTEIN, HUMAN; TTK PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CELL LINE; HELA CELL; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; MAD2 PROTEINS; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS;

EID: 84893406409     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201309076     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barnhart, E.L., R.K. Dorer, A.W. Murray, and S.C. Schuyler. 2011. Reduced Mad2 expression keeps relaxed kinetochores from arresting budding yeast in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:2448-2457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-01-0029
2. Campbell, M.S., G.K. Chan, and T.J. Yen. 2001. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J. Cell Sci. 114:953-963.
3. Chao, W.C., K. Kulkarni, Z. Zhang, E.H. Kong, and D. Barford. 2012. Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature. 484:208-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10896
4. Cheeseman, I.M., and A. Desai. 2005. A combined approach for the localization and tandem affinity purification of protein complexes from metazoans. Sci. STKE. 2005: p11.
5. Cheeseman, I.M., S. Niessen, S. Anderson, F. Hyndman, J.R. Yates III, K. Oegema, and A. Desai. 2004. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev. 18:2255-2268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1234104
6. Chen, R.H., D.M. Brady, D. Smith, A.W. Murray, and K.G. Hardwick. 1999. The spindle checkpoint of budding yeast depends on a tight complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:2607-2618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.8.2607
7. Chung, E., and R.H. Chen. 2002. Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:1501-1511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.02-01-0003
8. Coyle, J.H., Y.C. Bor, D. Rekosh, and M.L. Hammarskjold. 2011. The Tpr protein regulates export of mRNAs with retained introns that traffic through the Nxf1 pathway. RNA. 17:1344-1356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.2616111
9. David-Watine, B. 2011. Silencing nuclear pore protein Tpr elicits a senescentlike phenotype in cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 6: e22423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022423
10. De Antoni, A., C.G. Pearson, D. Cimini, J.C. Canman, V. Sala, L. Nezi, M. Mapelli, L. Sironi, M. Faretta, E.D. Salmon, and A. Musacchio. 2005. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 15:214-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.038
11. De Souza, C.P., S.B. Hashmi, T. Nayak, B. Oakley, and S.A. Osmani. 2009. Mlp1 acts as a mitotic scaffold to spatially regulate spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Biol. Cell. 20:2146-2159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-08-0878
12. Ding, D., S. Muthuswamy, and I. Meier. 2012. Functional interaction between the Arabidopsis orthologs of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins MAD1 and MAD2 and the nucleoporin NUA. Plant Mol. Biol. 79:203-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-012-9903-4
13. Fava, L.L., M. Kaulich, E.A. Nigg, and A. Santamaria. 2011. Probing the in vivo function of Mad1: C-Mad2 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. EMBO J. 30:3322-3336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.239
14. Galy, V., O. Gadal, M. Fromont-Racine, A. Romano, A. Jacquier, and U. Nehrbass. 2004. Nuclear retention of unspliced mRNAs in yeast is mediated by perinuclear Mlp1. Cell. 116:63-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01026-2
15. Green, D.M., C.P. Johnson, H. Hagan, and A.H. Corbett. 2003. The C-terminal domain of myosin-like protein 1 (Mlp1p) is a docking site for heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins that are required for mRNA export. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:1010-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0336594100
16. Hewitt, L., A. Tighe, S. Santaguida, A.M. White, C.D. Jones, A. Musacchio, S. Green, and S.S. Taylor. 2010. Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J. Cell Biol. 190:25-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201002133
17. Hutchins, J.R., Y. Toyoda, B. Hegemann, I. Poser, J.K. Hériché, M.M. Sykora, M. Augsburg, O. Hudecz, B.A. Buschhorn, J. Bulkescher, et al. 2010. Systematic analysis of human protein complexes identifies chromosome segregation proteins. Science. 328:593-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1181348
18. Ikui, A.E., K. Furuya, M. Yanagida, and T. Matsumoto. 2002. Control of localization of a spindle checkpoint protein, Mad2, in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. 115:1603-1610.
19. Iouk, T., O. Kerscher, R.J. Scott, M.A. Basrai, and R.W. Wozniak. 2002. The yeast nuclear pore complex functionally interacts with components of the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 159:807-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200205068
20. Kim, S., H. Sun, D.R. Tomchick, H. Yu, and X. Luo. 2012. Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:6549-6554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118210109
21. Klockenbusch, C., and J. Kast. 2010. Optimization of formaldehyde crosslinking for protein interaction analysis of non-tagged integrin beta1. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010:927585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/927585
22. Lee, S.H., H. Sterling, A. Burlingame, and F. McCormick. 2008. Tpr directly binds to Mad1 and Mad2 and is important for the Mad1-Mad2-mediated mitotic spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 22:2926-2931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1677208
23. Lince-Faria, M., S. Maffini, B. Orr, Y. Ding, Cláudia Florindo, C.E. Sunkel, A. Tavares, J. Johansen, K.M. Johansen, and H. Maiato. 2009. Spatiotemporal control of mitosis by the conserved spindle matrix protein Megator. J. Cell Biol. 184:647-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200811012
24. Luo, X., Z. Tang, G. Xia, K. Wassmann, T. Matsumoto, J. Rizo, and H. Yu. 2004. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:338-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb748
25. Maciejowski, J., K.A. George, M.E. Terret, C. Zhang, K.M. Shokat, and P.V. Jallepalli. 2010. Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 190:89-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201001050
26. Mapelli, M., L. Massimiliano, S. Santaguida, and A. Musacchio. 2007. The Mad2 conformational dimer: structure and implications for the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell. 131:730-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.049
27. Musacchio, A., and E.D. Salmon. 2007. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:379-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2163
28. Rajanala, K., and V.K. Nandicoori. 2012. Localization of nucleoporin Tpr to the nuclear pore complex is essential for Tpr mediated regulation of the export of unspliced RNA. PLoS ONE. 7: e29921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029921
29. Santaguida, S., A. Tighe, A.M. D’Alise, S.S. Taylor, and A. Musacchio. 2010. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J. Cell Biol. 190:73-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201001036
30. Scott, R.J., C.P. Lusk, D.J. Dilworth, J.D. Aitchison, and R.W. Wozniak. 2005. Interactions between Mad1p and the nuclear transport machinery in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:4362-4374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-01-0011
31. Shah, J.V., E. Botvinick, Z. Bonday, F. Furnari, M. Berns, and D.W. Cleveland. 2004. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr. Biol. 14:942-952.
32. Sironi, L., M. Mapelli, S. Knapp, A. De Antoni, K.T. Jeang, and A. Musacchio. 2002. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 21:2496-2506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.10.2496
33. Sliedrecht, T., C. Zhang, K.M. Shokat, and G.J. Kops. 2010. Chemical genetic inhibition of Mps1 in stable human cell lines reveals novel aspects of Mps1 function in mitosis. PLoS ONE. 5: e10251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010251
34. Söderberg, O., M. Gullberg, M. Jarvius, K. Ridderstråle, K.J. Leuchowius, J. Jarvius, K. Wester, P. Hydbring, F. Bahram, L.G. Larsson, and U. Landegren. 2006. Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat. Methods. 3:995-1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth947
35. Sudakin, V., G.K. Chan, and T.J. Yen. 2001. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154:925-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200102093
36. Tipton, A.R., M. Tipton, T. Yen, and S.T. Liu. 2011. Closed MAD2 (C-MAD2) is selectively incorporated into the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC). Cell Cycle. 10:3740-3750. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.21.17919
37. Vinciguerra, P., N. Iglesias, J. Camblong, D. Zenklusen, and F. Stutz. 2005. Perinuclear Mlp proteins downregulate gene expression in response to a defect in mRNA export. EMBO J. 24:813-823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600527
38. Vink, M., M. Simonetta, P. Transidico, K. Ferrari, M. Mapelli, A. De Antoni, L. Massimiliano, A. Ciliberto, M. Faretta, E.D. Salmon, and A. Musacchio. 2006. In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics. Curr. Biol. 16:755-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.057
39. Washburn, M.P., D. Wolters, and J.R. Yates III. 2001. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:242-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/85686
40. Xu, X.M., A. Rose, S. Muthuswamy, S.Y. Jeong, S. Venkatakrishnan, Q. Zhao, and I. Meier. 2007. NUCLEAR PORE ANCHOR, the Arabidopsis homolog of Tpr/Mlp1/Mlp2/megator, is involved in mRNA export and SUMO homeostasis and affects diverse aspects of plant development. Plant Cell. 19:1537-1548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.049239
41. Zhao, X., C.Y. Wu, and G. Blobel. 2004. Mlp-dependent anchorage and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent clonal lethality. J. Cell Biol. 167:605-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200405168