Teachers’ reports of learning and application to pedagogy based on engagement in collaborative peer video analysis

Teaching Education

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 349-374

  Christ, Tanya ^a   Arya, Poonam ^b   Ming Chiu, Ming ^c  

^a OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

discussion groups; literacy; pedagogical change; teacher education; teacher learning; video pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911997807     PISSN: 10476210     EISSN: 14701286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2014.920001     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Ancess, J. (2000). The reciprocal influence of teacher learning, teaching practice, school restructuring, and student learning outcomes. Teachers College Record, 102, 590–619.10.1111/tcre.2000.102.issue-3
2. Arya, P., Christ, T., & Chiu, M. M. (2014). Facilitation and teacher behaviors: An analysis of literacy teachers’ video-case discussions. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 111–127.
3. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20.10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
4. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. K. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
5. Bell, N., Grossen, M., & Perret-Clement, A. N. (1985). Sociocognitive conflict and intellectual growth. In M. W. Berkowitz (Ed.), Peer conflict and intellectual growth (pp. 41–54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M., & Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491–507.10.1093/biomet/93.3.491
7. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
8. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436.10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
9. Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Using video in teacher education. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
10. Brown, A., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychology and educational considerations (pp. 188–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Brownell, M. T., Yeager, E., Rennells, M. S., & Riley, T. (1997). Teachers working together: What teacher educators and researchers should know. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 20, 340–359.10.1177/088840649702000405
12. Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.10.1177/0013161X99355004
13. Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 520–525. Retrieved from: http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA114141062&v=2.1&u=lom_oaklandu&it=r&p=ITOF&sw=w
14. Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2012). Collaborative Peer Video Analysis: Insights about literacy assessment & instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 171–199.
15. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2000). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching & Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
16. Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39, 250–256.10.1159/000278475
17. Copeland, W., & Decker, L. (1996). Video cases and the development of meaning making in preservice teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 12, 467–481.
18. Correnti, R., & Rowan, B. (2007). Opening up the black box: Literacy instruction in schools participating in three comprehensive school reform programs. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 298–339.10.3102/0002831207302501
19. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books, Macmillan.
20. Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Free Press.
21. Doppenberg, J. J., den Brok, P. J., & Bakx, A. W. E. A. (2012). Collaborative teacher learning across foci of collaboration: Perceived activities and outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 899–910. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.00710.1016/j.tate.2012.04.007
22. van Es, E. A. (2012). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 182–192. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.00510.1016/j.tate.2011.09.005
23. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276.10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
24. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teacher thinking and practice. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 13, 155–176.
25. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171–185.10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00102-6
26. Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Understanding teaching and classroom practice in mathematics. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225–256). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
27. Gamoran, A., Anderson, C. W., Quiroz, P. A., Secada, W. G., Williams, T., & Ashmann, S. (2003). Transforming teaching in mathematics and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. Sydney: Edward Arnold.
29. Greeno, J. G. (2003). Situated research relevant to standards for school mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 304–332). Reston, VA: National Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
30. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and leaning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–45). New York, NY: McMillian.
31. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.10.1111/tcre.2001.103.issue-6
32. Gutiérrez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 495–592.10.1080/0022027980280501
33. Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1884–1892.10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.010
34. Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 3–20.10.1086/esj.2000.101.issue-1
35. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2003). The new heroes of teaching. Education Week, 23, 42–56.
36. Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 207–236.10.1207/s1532690xci2302_2
37. Huffman, D., Thomas, K., & Lawrenz, F. (2003). Relationship between professional development, teachers’ instructional practices, and the achievement of students in science and math. School Science & Mathematics, 103, 378–386.
38. Jacobs, V., Lamb, L., & Philipp, R. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169–202.
39. Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York, NY: Basic Books.
40. Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
41. Kinzer, C., Cammack, D., Labbo, L., Teale, W., & Sanny, R. (2006). The need to (re)conceptualize preservice teacher development and the role of technology in that development. In M. McKenna, L. Labbo, R. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 211–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Koc, Y., Peker, D., & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: An assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1158–1168.10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.020
43. Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193–212.10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566
44. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249–277.10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06
46. Lave, J. (2004). Stimulating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognitions (pp. 63–79). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47. Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 389–398. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.00110.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001
48. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35, 3–14.10.3102/0013189X035003003
49. Lim, D., & Kim, H. (2002–2003). Motivation and learner characteristics affecting online learning and learning application. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31, 423–439.
50. Lim, D., & Morris, M. L. (2004–2005). The effect of flexible learning delivery format on online learners’ learning, application, and instructional perception. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33, 385–397.
51. Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917–946.10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00052-5
52. Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2009). The building of pre-service primary teachers’ knowledge of mathematics teaching: Interaction and online video case studies. Instructional Science, 37, 247–271.10.1007/s11251-007-9043-4
53. Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2010). Prospective primary mathematics teachers’ learning from on-line discussions in a virtual video-based environment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 177–196.10.1007/s10857-009-9133-0
54. Lyons, C. A., & Pinnell, G. S. (2001). Systems for change in literacy education: A guide to professional development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
55. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164603
56. McGregor, D., & Gunter, B. (2001). Changing pedagogy of secondary science teachers: The impact of a two-year professional development programme. Teacher Development, 5, 59–74. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1366453970020013110.1080/13664539700200143
57. McGregor, D., & Gunter, B. (2006). Invigorating pedagogic change. Suggestions from findings of the development of secondary science teachers’ practice and cognisance of the learning process. European Journal of Teacher Education, 29, 23–48. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0261976050047849810.1080/02619760500478498
58. Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching, 13, 145–164.10.1080/13540600601152496
59. Miller, M. (2009). Talking about our troubles: Using video-based dialogue to build preservice teachers’ professional knowledge. The Teacher Educator, 44, 143–163.10.1080/08878730902954167
60. Moyle, K. P. (2008, November). Can video with professional conversations improve teacher education? Australian Association for Research in Education International Educational Research Conference, Fremantle, Australia. Retrieved February 14, 2011, from: http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/moy07560.pdf
61. Ottoson, J. (1995). Use of a conceptual framework to explore multiple influences on the application of learning following a continuing education program. The Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 9, 1–18.
62. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63. Palinscar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Reviews Psychology, 49, 345–375.
64. Parks, A. N. (2009). Collaborating about what? An instructor’s look at preservice lesson study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36, 81–97.
65. Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66. Prawat, R. S. (2000). The two faces of Deweyan pragmatism: Inductionism versus social constructivism. Teachers College Record, 102, 805–840.10.1111/tcre.2000.102.issue-4
67. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 1223–1296). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-011-4942-6
68. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.10.3102/0013189X029001004
69. Rich, P., & Hannafin, M. (2008). Capturing and assessing evidence of student teacher inquiry: A case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1426–1440. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.01610.1016/j.tate.2007.11.016
70. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (3rd ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
71. Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 230–253.
72. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
73. Selzer, E. (2008). Effectiveness of a seminary’s training and mentoring program and subsequent job satisfaction of its graduates. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 17, 25–53.10.1080/10656210801967309
74. Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
75. Sherin, M., & Han, S. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163–183.10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
76. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 475–491.
77. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
78. Smith, M. (2005). Helping preservice teachers develop habits of inquiry: Can it be done? Reading Research and Instruction, 45, 39–68.10.1080/19388070509558441
79. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258.10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
80. Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 21–32.10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00058-9
81. Tochon, F. V. (2007). From video cases to video pedagogy: A framework for video feedback and reflection in the pedagogical research praxis. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 53–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. Tochon, F. (2008). A brief history of video feedback and its role in foreign language education. CALICO Journal, 25, 420–435.
83. Tripp, T. R., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 728–739. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.01110.1016/j.tate.2012.01.011
84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of community-oriented technologies. Report to the Council of CIOs of the US Federal Government. Retrieved from Self-published: www.ewenger.com/tech
86. Westheimer, J. (1998). Among school teachers: Community, autonomy, and ideology in teachers work. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
87. Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
88. Wu, C., & Kao, H. (2008). Streaming video in peer assessment to support training pre-service teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 45–55.
89. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (1998). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America’s schools (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.