Relationship Between Professional Development, Teachers' Instructional Practices, and the Achievement of Students in Science and Mathematics

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 103, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 378-387

  Huffman, Douglas ^a   Thomas, Kelli ^a   Lawrenz, Frances ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645151476     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18123.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
2. Barnett, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching cases as a catalyst for informed strategic inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 81-93.
3. Cohen, D., & Hill, H. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Consortium for Policy Reform in Education (Issue Brief No. RB-23).
4. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on Teachers' instruction: Results of a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112.
5. Education Commission of the States. (1997). Investing in teacher professional development: A look at 16 school districts. Denver, CO: Author.
6. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-26.
7. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403-434.
8. Ferrini-Mundy, J. (1997). Common components and guiding principles for teacher enhancement programs. In G. W. Bright & S. N. Freilich (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Science Foundation.
9. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Fullan, M. G., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 744-749.
11. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Kwang, S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
12. Gerhart, M., Saxe, G. B., Seltzer, M., Schlackman, J., Ching, C. C., Nasir, N. N., Fall, R., Bennett, T., Rhine, S., & Slone, T. F. (1999). Opportunities to learn fractions in elementary mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(3), 286-315.
13. Horizon Research Incorporated. (1997). Local systemic change core evaluation data collection manual. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
14. Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Lavoie, B. (2001). The long-term effects of teacher enhancement. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
15. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798.
16. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258-271.
18. Mewborn, D. S. (2003). Teaching, teachers, knowledge, and their professional development. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter, (Eds.), A research companion to principals and standards for school mathematics (pp. 45-52). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
19. st century. Washington, DC: Author.
20. National Commission on Teaching, and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
22. National Education Goals Panel. (1994). National education goals report: Building a nation of leaders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
23. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. Newmann, F., & Associates, (1997). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
25. Riley, R. (1998, September 15). The challenge for America: A high quality teacher in every classroom. Annual back to school address by U.S. Secretary of Education, Richard W. Riley, National Press Club, Washington, DC.
26. Schifter, D. (1996). What's happening in math class? Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives (Vols. 1–2). New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Sparks, D. (2002). Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
28. Stringfield, S. (1995). Attempting to enhance students learning through innovative programs: The case for schools evolving into high reliability organizations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 67-96.
29. Third International Mathematics, and Science Study. (1996). A splintered vision: An investigation of US science and mathematics education. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
30. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.