Conditional targeting of MAD1 to kinetochores is sufficient to reactivate the spindle assembly checkpoint in metaphase

Chromosoma

Volumn 123, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 471-480

  Kuijt, Timo E F ^a   Omerzu, Manja ^a   Saurin, Adrian T ^a,b   Kops, Geert J P L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cyclin B1; Kinetochore; MAD1; Metaphase; Spindle checkpoint

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; MAD1L1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN;

CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CENTROMERE; GENETICS; HELA CELL LINE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METAPHASE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; METAPHASE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84897240500     PISSN: 00095915     EISSN: 14320886     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-014-0458-9     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Barisic M, Sohm B, Mikolcevic P et al (2010) Spindly/CCDC99 is required for efficient chromosome congression and mitotic checkpoint regulation. Mol Biol Cell 21:1968–1981. doi:10.1091/mbc.E09-04-0356
2. Basto R, Gomes R, Karess RE (2000) Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol 2:939–943. doi:10.1038/35046592
3. Brady DM, Hardwick KG (2000) Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function. Curr Biol 10:675–678
4. Burton JL, Solomon MJ (2007) Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev 21:655–667. doi:10.1101/gad.1511107
5. Chan GK, Jablonski SA, Starr DA et al (2000) Human Zw10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 2:944–947. doi:10.1038/35046598
6. Chao WCH, Kulkarni K, Zhang Z et al (2012) Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature 484:208–213. doi:10.1038/nature10896
7. Clute P, Pines J (1999) Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nat Cell Biol 1:82–87. doi:10.1038/10049
8. Collin P, Nashchekina O, Walker R, Pines J (2013) The spindle assembly checkpoint works like a rheostat rather than a toggle switch. Nat Cell Biol 15:1378–1385. doi:10.1038/ncb2855
9. Davenport J, Harris LD, Goorha R (2006) Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1. Exp Cell Res 312:1831–1842. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.02.018
10. De Antoni A, Pearson CG, Cimini D et al (2005) The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 15:214–225. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.038
11. Dick AE, Gerlich DW (2013) Kinetic framework of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling. Nat Cell Biol 15:1370–1377. doi:10.1038/ncb2842
12. Ditchfield C, Johnson VL, Tighe A et al (2003) Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J Cell Biol 161:267–280. doi:10.1083/jcb.200208091
13. Elowe S, Dulla K, Uldschmid A et al (2010) Uncoupling of the spindle-checkpoint and chromosome-congression functions of BubR1. J Cell Sci 123:84–94. doi:10.1242/jcs.056507
14. Famulski JK, Chan GK (2007) Aurora B kinase-dependent recruitment of hZW10 and hROD to tensionless kinetochores. Curr Biol 17:2143–2149. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.037
15. Famulski JK, Vos LJ, Rattner JB, Chan GK (2011) Dynein/dynactin-mediated transport of kinetochore components off kinetochores and onto spindle poles induced by nordihydroguaiaretic acid. PLoS ONE 6:e16494. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016494
16. Fang G (2002) Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol Biol Cell 13:755–766. doi:10.1091/mbc.01-09-0437
17. Foster SA, Morgan DO (2012) The APC/C Subunit Mnd2/Apc15 promotes Cdc20 autoubiquitination and spindle assembly checkpoint inactivation. Mol Cell 47:921–932. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.031
18. Gassmann R, Holland AJ, Varma D et al (2010) Removal of spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. Genes Dev 24:957–971. doi:10.1101/gad.1886810
19. Han JS, Holland AJ, Fachinetti D et al (2013) Catalytic assembly of the mitotic checkpoint inhibitor BubR1-Cdc20 by a Mad2-induced functional switch in Cdc20. Mol Cell 51:92–104. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.019
20. Hauf S, Cole RW, LaTerra S et al (2003) The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 161:281–294. doi:10.1083/jcb.200208092
21. Herzog F, Primorac I, Dube P et al (2009) Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 323:1477–1481. doi:10.1126/science.1163300
22. Howell BJ, McEwen BF, Canman JC et al (2001) Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J Cell Biol 155:1159–1172. doi:10.1083/jcb.200105093
23. Howell BJ, Moree B, Farrar EM et al (2004) Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr Biol 14:953–964. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.053
24. Jelluma N, Dansen TB, Sliedrecht T et al (2010) Release of Mps1 from kinetochores is crucial for timely anaphase onset. J Cell Biol 191:281–290. doi:10.1083/jcb.201003038
25. Kim S, Sun H, Tomchick DR et al (2012) Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:6549–6554. doi:10.1073/pnas.1118210109
26. King EMJ, van der Sar SJA, Hardwick KG (2007) Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2:e342. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000342
27. Klebig C, Korinth D, Meraldi P (2009) Bub1 regulates chromosome segregation in a kinetochore-independent manner. J Cell Biol 185:841–858. doi:10.1083/jcb.200902128
28. Kops GJPL, Shah JV (2012) Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint. Chromosoma 121:509–525. doi:10.1007/s00412-012-0378-5
29. Kops GJPL, Kim Y, Weaver BAA et al (2005) ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore. J Cell Biol 169:49–60. doi:10.1083/jcb.200411118
30. Kulukian A, Han JS, Cleveland DW (2009) Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev Cell 16:105–117. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.005
31. Lara-Gonzalez P, Scott MIF, Diez M et al (2011) BubR1 blocks substrate recruitment to the APC/C in a KEN-box-dependent manner. J Cell Sci 124:4332–4345. doi:10.1242/jcs.094763
32. Liu ST, Rattner JB, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ (2006) Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J Cell Biol 175:41–53. doi:10.1083/jcb.200606020
33. London N, Biggins S (2014) Mad1 kinetochore recruitment by Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 signals the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 28:140–152. doi:10.1101/gad.233700.113
34. Maciejowski J, George KA, Terret M-E et al (2010) Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J Cell Biol 190:89–100. doi:10.1083/jcb.201001050
35. Maldonado M, Kapoor TM (2011) Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation. Nat Cell Biol 13:475–482. doi:10.1038/ncb2223
36. Mansfeld J, Collin P, Collins MO et al (2011) APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment. Nat Cell Biol. doi:10.1038/ncb2347
37. Mapelli M, Musacchio A (2007) MAD contortions: conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:716–725. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2007.08.011
38. Martin-Lluesma S, Stucke VM, Nigg EA (2002) Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science 297:2267–2270. doi:10.1126/science.1075596
39. Meraldi P, Draviam VM, Sorger PK (2004) Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev Cell 16. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.006
40. Morrow CJ, Tighe A, Johnson VL et al (2005) Bub1 and aurora B cooperate to maintain BubR1-mediated inhibition of APC/CCdc20. J Cell Sci 118:3639–3652. doi:10.1242/jcs.02487
41. Moyle MW, Kim T, Hattersley N et al (2014) A Bub1-Mad1 interaction targets the Mad1-Mad2 complex to unattached kinetochores to initiate the spindle checkpoint. J Cell Biol 204:647–657. doi:10.1083/jcb.201311015
42. Musacchio A, Salmon ED (2007) The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:379–393. doi:10.1038/nrm2163
43. Pines J (2011) Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the APC/C. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:427. doi:10.1038/nrm3132
44. Pinsky B, Nelson C, Biggins S (2009) Protein phosphatase 1 regulates exit from the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr Biol. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.043
45. Reddy SK, Rape M, Margansky WA, Kirschner MW (2007) Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446:921–925. doi:10.1038/nature05734
46. Rivera VM, Clackson T, Natesan S et al (1996) A humanized system for pharmacologic control of gene expression. Nat Med 2:1028–1032
47. Rosenberg JS, Cross FR, Funabiki H (2011) KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 21:942–947. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.011
48. Santaguida S, Tighe A, DAlise AM et al (2010) Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J Cell Biol 190:73–87
49. Sczaniecka M, Feoktistova A, May KM et al (2008) The spindle checkpoint functions of Mad3 and Mad2 depend on a Mad3 KEN box-mediated interaction with Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). J Biol Chem 283:23039–23047. doi:10.1074/jbc.M803594200
50. Sheltzer JM, Amon A (2011) The aneuploidy paradox: costs and benefits of an incorrect karyotype. Trends Genet 27:446–453. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.07.003
51. Simonetta M, Manzoni R, Mosca R et al (2009) The influence of catalysis on Mad2 activation dynamics. PLoS Biol 7:e10. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000010
52. Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S et al (2002) Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a “safety belt” binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J 21:2496–2506. doi:10.1093/emboj/21.10.2496
53. Skoufias DA, Andreassen PR, Lacroix FB et al (2001) Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:4492–4497. doi:10.1073/pnas.081076898
54. Sliedrecht T, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Kops GJPL (2010) Chemical genetic inhibition of Mps1 in stable human cell lines reveals novel aspects of Mps1 function in mitosis. PLoS ONE 5:e10251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010251
55. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ (2001) Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J Cell Biol 154:925–936. doi:10.1083/jcb.200102093
56. Tang Z, Bharadwaj R, Li B, Yu H (2001) Mad2-independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev Cell 1:227–237
57. Taylor SS, Hussein D, Wang Y et al (2001) Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J Cell Sci 114:4385–4395
58. Teichner A, Eytan E, Sitry-Shevah D et al (2011) p31 comet promotes disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex in an ATP-dependent process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:3187–3192. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100023108
59. Tipton AR, Wang K, Link L et al (2011) BUBR1 and closed MAD2 (C-MAD2) interact directly to assemble a functional mitotic checkpoint complex. J Biol Chem 286:21173–21179. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.238543
60. Uzunova K, Dye BT, Schutz H et al (2012) APC15 mediates CDC20 autoubiquitylation by APC/C(MCC) and disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nat Struct Biol 19:1116–1123. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2412
61. Vanoosthuyse V, Hardwick K (2009) A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism. Curr Biol. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.060
62. Varetti G, Guida C, Santaguida S et al (2011) Homeostatic control of mitotic arrest. Mol Cell 44:710–720. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.014
63. Vázquez-Novelle MD, Sansregret L, Dick AE, et al. (2014) Cdk1 inactivation terminates mitotic checkpoint surveillance and stabilizes kinetochore attachments in anaphase. Curr Biol. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.034
64. Vleugel M, Hoogendoorn E, Snel B, Kops GJPL (2012) Evolution and function of the mitotic checkpoint. Dev Cell 23:239–250. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.013
65. Waters JC, Chen RH, Murray AW, Salmon ED (1998) Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J Cell Biol 141:1181–1191
66. Westhorpe FG, Tighe A, Lara-Gonzalez P, Taylor SS (2011) p31 comet-mediated extraction of Mad2 from the MCC promotes efficient mitotic exit. J Cell Sci 124:3905–3916. doi:10.1242/jcs.093286
67. Wojcik E, Basto R, Serr M et al (2001) Kinetochore dynein: its dynamics and role in the transport of the Rough deal checkpoint protein. Nat Cell Biol 3:1001–1007. doi:10.1038/ncb1101-1001
68. Yang Z, Tulu US, Wadsworth P, Rieder CL (2007) Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint. Curr Biol 17:973–980. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.056