Evolution and Function of the Mitotic Checkpoint

Developmental Cell

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 239-250

  Vleugel, Mathijs ^a   Hoogendoorn, Erik ^b   Snel, Berend ^b   Kops, Geert J P L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APC1 PROTEIN; APC11 PROTEIN; APC2 PROTEIN; AURORA B KINASE; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; CYCLIN B; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; DEAD BOX PROTEIN; ENZYME; KNL1 PROTEIN; METHIONINE; PROTEIN MAD1; PROTEIN MAD2; PROTEIN P31; PROTEIN P50; PRP4 KINASE; RZZ PROTEIN; SCAFFOLD PROTEIN; SECURIN; SPINDLY PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZW10 PROTEIN; ZWILCH PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CATALYSIS; CELL BUDDING; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL DIVISION; CELL FUNCTION; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CRYPTOSPORIDIUM PARVUM; DNA BINDING MOTIF; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENCEPHALITOZOON CUNICULI; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME INHIBITION; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTION; FUNGUS; GENE MUTATION; GENE SILENCING; HUMAN; LEISHMANIA MAJOR; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MICROMONAS PUSILLA; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MONOSIGA BREVICOLLIS; NAEGLERIA GRUBERI; NEUROSPORA CRASSA; NONHUMAN; PARALOGY; PARAMECIUM TETRAURELIA; PHYLOGENOMICS; PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; TETRAHYMENA THERMOPHILA; TETRATRICOPEPTIDE REPEAT; TRYPANOSOMA BRUCEI; UBIQUITINATION; USTILAGO MAYDIS; XENOPUS TROPICALIS; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; BIOCATALYSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84865072109     PISSN: 15345807     EISSN: 18781551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.013     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Althoff F., Karess R.E., Lehner C.F. Spindle checkpoint-independent inhibition of mitotic chromosome segregation by Drosophila Mps1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23:2275-2291.
2. Barisic M., Sohm B., Mikolcevic P., Wandke C., Rauch V., Ringer T., Hess M., Bonn G., Geley S. Spindly/CCDC99 is required for efficient chromosome congression and mitotic checkpoint regulation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:1968-1981.
3. Bolanos-Garcia V.M., Blundell T.L. BUB1 and BUBR1: multifaceted kinases of the cell cycle. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:141-150.
4. Bolanos-Garcia V.M., Lischetti T., Matak-Vinković D., Cota E., Simpson P.J., Chirgadze D.Y., Spring D.R., Robinson C.V., Nilsson J., Blundell T.L. Structure of a Blinkin-BUBR1 complex reveals an interaction crucial for kinetochore-mitotic checkpoint regulation via an unanticipated binding Site. Structure 2011, 19:1691-1700.
5. Burton J.L., Solomon M.J. Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:655-667.
6. Buschhorn B.A., Petzold G., Galova M., Dube P., Kraft C., Herzog F., Stark H., Peters J.M. Substrate binding on the APC/C occurs between the coactivator Cdh1 and the processivity factor Doc1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:6-13.
7. Chao W.C., Kulkarni K., Zhang Z., Kong E.H., Barford D. Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature 2012, 484:208-213.
8. Chase D., Serafinas C., Ashcroft N., Kosinski M., Longo D., Ferris D.K., Golden A. The polo-like kinase PLK-1 is required for nuclear envelope breakdown and the completion of meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genesis 2000, 26:26-41.
9. Cheeseman I.M., Desai A. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:33-46.
10. Chen R.H. Phosphorylation and activation of Bub1 on unattached chromosomes facilitate the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 2004, 23:3113-3121.
11. Chung E., Chen R.H. Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13:1501-1511.
12. Civril F., Wehenkel A., Giorgi F.M., Santaguida S., Di Fonzo A., Grigorean G., Ciccarelli F.D., Musacchio A. Structural analysis of the RZZ complex reveals common ancestry with multisubunit vesicle tethering machinery. Structure 2010, 18:616-626.
13. Clute P., Pines J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 1:82-87.
14. da Fonseca P.C., Kong E.H., Zhang Z., Schreiber A., Williams M.A., Morris E.P., Barford D. Structures of APC/C(Cdh1) with substrates identify Cdh1 and Apc10 as the D-box co-receptor. Nature 2011, 470:274-278.
15. De Antoni A., Pearson C.G., Cimini D., Canman J.C., Sala V., Nezi L., Mapelli M., Sironi L., Faretta M., Salmon E.D., Musacchio A. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:214-225.
16. Dou Z., von Schubert C., Körner R., Santamaria A., Elowe S., Nigg E.A. Quantitative mass spectrometry analysis reveals similar substrate consensus motif for human Mps1 kinase and Plk1. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18793.
17. Elowe S. Bub1 and BubR1: at the interface between chromosome attachment and the spindle checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:3085-3093.
18. Eme L., Trilles A., Moreira D., Brochier-Armanet C. The phylogenomic analysis of the anaphase promoting complex and its targets points to complex and modern-like control of the cell cycle in the last common ancestor of eukaryotes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2011, 11:265.
19. Espeut J., Cheerambathur D.K., Krenning L., Oegema K., Desai A. Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196:469-482.
20. Fernius J., Hardwick K.G. Bub1 kinase targets Sgo1 to ensure efficient chromosome biorientation in budding yeast mitosis. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e213.
21. Gassmann R., Holland A.J., Varma D., Wan X., Civril F., Cleveland D.W., Oegema K., Salmon E.D., Desai A. Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. Genes Dev. 2010, 24:957-971.
22. Gordon D.J., Resio B., Pellman D. Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:189-203.
23. Hagan R.S., Manak M.S., Buch H.K., Meier M.G., Meraldi P., Shah J.V., Sorger P.K. p31(comet) acts to ensure timely spindle checkpoint silencing subsequent to kinetochore attachment. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:4236-4246.
24. Haller K., Kibler K.V., Kasai T., Chi Y.H., Peloponese J.M., Yedavalli V.S., Jeang K.T. The N-terminus of rodent and human MAD1 confers species-specific stringency to spindle assembly checkpoint. Oncogene 2006, 25:2137-2147.
25. Hardwick K.G., Shah J.V. Spindle checkpoint silencing: ensuring rapid and concerted anaphase onset. F1000 Biol. Rep. 2010, 2:55.
26. Herzog F., Primorac I., Dube P., Lenart P., Sander B., Mechtler K., Stark H., Peters J.M. Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 2009, 323:1477-1481.
27. Hewitt L., Tighe A., Santaguida S., White A.M., Jones C.D., Musacchio A., Green S., Taylor S.S. Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:25-34.
28. Howell B.J., Moree B., Farrar E.M., Stewart S., Fang G., Salmon E.D. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:953-964.
29. Jelluma N., Dansen T.B., Sliedrecht T., Kwiatkowski N.P., Kops G.J. Release of Mps1 from kinetochores is crucial for timely anaphase onset. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:281-290.
30. Johnson V.L., Scott M.I., Holt S.V., Hussein D., Taylor S.S. Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:1577-1589.
31. Karess R. Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:386-392.
32. Kawashima S.A., Yamagishi Y., Honda T., Ishiguro K.I., Watanabe Y. Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science 2010, 327:172-177.
33. Khodjakov A., Pines J. Centromere tension: a divisive issue. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:919-923.
34. Kim S., Sun H., Tomchick D.R., Yu H., Luo X. Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:6549-6554.
35. Kimata Y., Kitamura K., Fenner N., Yamano H. Mes1 controls the meiosis I to meiosis II transition by distinctly regulating the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome coactivators Fzr1/Mfr1 and Slp1 in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:1486-1494.
36. Kiyomitsu T., Obuse C., Yanagida M. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell 2007, 13:663-676.
37. Kiyomitsu T., Murakami H., Yanagida M. Protein interaction domain mapping of human kinetochore protein Blinkin reveals a consensus motif for binding of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins Bub1 and BubR1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:998-1011.
38. Klebig C., Korinth D., Meraldi P. Bub1 regulates chromosome segregation in a kinetochore-independent manner. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185:841-858.
39. Krenn V., Wehenkel A., Li X., Santaguida S., Musacchio A. Structural analysis reveals features of the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1-kinetochore subunit Knl1 interaction. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196:451-467.
40. Kulukian A., Han J.S., Cleveland D.W. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev. Cell 2009, 16:105-117.
41. Lampert F., Westermann S. A blueprint for kinetochores - new insights into the molecular mechanics of cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:407-412.
42. Lan W., Cleveland D.W. A chemical tool box defines mitotic and interphase roles for Mps1 kinase. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:21-24.
43. Lara-Gonzalez P., Scott M.I., Diez M., Sen O., Taylor S.S. BubR1 blocks substrate recruitment to the APC/C in a KEN-box-dependent manner. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:4332-4345.
44. Larsen N.A., Al-Bassam J., Wei R.R., Harrison S.C. Structural analysis of Bub3 interactions in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:1201-1206.
45. Liu D., Vleugel M., Backer C.B., Hori T., Fukagawa T., Cheeseman I.M., Lampson M.A. Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188:809-820.
46. Lizé M., Pilarski S., Dobbelstein M. E2F1-inducible microRNA 449a/b suppresses cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17:452-458.
47. Logarinho E., Resende T., Torres C., Bousbaa H. The human spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3 is required for the establishment of efficient kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:1798-1813.
48. London N., Ceto S., Ranish J.A., Biggins S. Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:900-906.
49. Maciejowski J., George K.A., Terret M.E., Zhang C., Shokat K.M., Jallepalli P.V. Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:89-100.
50. Maldonado M., Kapoor T.M. Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:475-482.
51. Mansfeld J., Collin P., Collins M.O., Choudhary J.S., Pines J. APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1234-1243.
52. Meadows J.C., Shepperd L.A., Vanoosthuyse V., Lancaster T.C., Sochaj A.M., Buttrick G.J., Hardwick K.G., Millar J.B. Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and kinesin-8 motors. Dev. Cell 2011, 20:739-750.
53. Miniowitz-Shemtov S., Eytan E., Ganoth D., Sitry-Shevah D., Dumin E., Hershko A. Role of phosphorylation of Cdc20 in p31(comet)-stimulated disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:8056-8060.
54. Montembault E., Dutertre S., Prigent C., Giet R. PRP4 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein required for MPS1, MAD1, and MAD2 localization to the kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:601-609.
55. Morin V., Prieto S., Melines S., Hem S., Rossignol M., Lorca T., Espeut J., Morin N., Abrieu A. CDK-dependent potentiation of MPS1 kinase activity is essential to the mitotic checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:289-295.
56. Murray A.W. Don'T make me mad, bub!. Dev. Cell 2012, 22:1123-1125.
57. Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:379-393.
58. Nezi L., Musacchio A. Sister chromatid tension and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:785-795.
59. Nezi L., Rancati G., De Antoni A., Pasqualato S., Piatti S., Musacchio A. Accumulation of Mad2-Cdc20 complex during spindle checkpoint activation requires binding of open and closed conformers of Mad2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 174:39-51.
60. Nilsson J., Yekezare M., Minshull J., Pines J. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:1411-1420.
61. Pan J., Chen R.H. Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:1439-1451.
62. Pines J. Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the APC/C. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:427-438.
63. Pinsky B.A., Nelson C.R., Biggins S. Protein phosphatase 1 regulates exit from the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1182-1187.
64. Reddy S.K., Rape M., Margansky W.A., Kirschner M.W. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 2007, 446:921-925.
65. Rosenberg J.S., Cross F.R., Funabiki H. KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:942-947.
66. Saurin A.T., van der Waal M.S., Medema R.H., Lens S.M., Kops G.J. Aurora B potentiates Mps1 activation to ensure rapid checkpoint establishment at the onset of mitosis. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:316.
67. Schittenhelm R.B., Chaleckis R., Lehner C.F. Intrakinetochore localization and essential functional domains of Drosophila Spc105. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2374-2386.
68. Schreiber A., Stengel F., Zhang Z., Enchev R.I., Kong E.H., Morris E.P., Robinson C.V., da Fonseca P.C., Barford D. Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 2011, 470:227-232.
69. Sczaniecka M., Feoktistova A., May K.M., Chen J.S., Blyth J., Gould K.L., Hardwick K.G. The spindle checkpoint functions of Mad3 and Mad2 depend on a Mad3 KEN box-mediated interaction with Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:23039-23047.
70. Shepperd L.A., Meadows J.C., Sochaj A.M., Lancaster T.C., Zou J., Buttrick G.J., Rappsilber J., Hardwick K.G., Millar J.B. Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:891-899.
71. Steinberg G., Perez-Martin J. Ustilago maydis, a new fungal model system for cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:61-67.
72. Suijkerbuijk S.J., van Dam T.J., Karagöz G.E., von Castelmur E., Hubner N.C., Duarte A.M., Vleugel M., Perrakis A., Rüdiger S.G., Snel B., Kops G.J. The Vertebrate Mitotic Checkpoint Protein BUBR1 Is an Unusual Pseudokinase. Dev. Cell 2012, 22:1321-1329.
73. Tang Z., Shu H., Oncel D., Chen S., Yu H. Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 provides a catalytic mechanism for APC/C inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:387-397.
74. Tsuchiya D., Gonzalez C., Lacefield S. The spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates APC/C activity during prometaphase and metaphase of meiosis I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:2848-2861.
75. van Vlijmen T., Vleugel M., Evers M., Mohammed S., Wulf P.S., Heck A.J., Hoogenraad C.C., van der Sluijs P. A unique residue in rab3c determines the interaction with novel binding protein Zwint-1. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582:2838-2842.
76. Varetti G., Guida C., Santaguida S., Chiroli E., Musacchio A. Homeostatic control of mitotic arrest. Mol. Cell 2011, 44:710-720.
77. Vink M., Simonetta M., Transidico P., Ferrari K., Mapelli M., De Antoni A., Massimiliano L., Ciliberto A., Faretta M., Salmon E.D., Musacchio A. In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:755-766.
78. Warren C.D., Brady D.M., Johnston R.C., Hanna J.S., Hardwick K.G., Spencer F.A. Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13:3029-3041.
79. Westhorpe F.G., Tighe A., Lara-Gonzalez P., Taylor S.S. p31comet-mediated extraction of Mad2 from the MCC promotes efficient mitotic exit. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:3905-3916.
80. Yamagishi Y., Yang C.H., Tanno Y., Watanabe Y. MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:746-752.
81. Yamaguchi S., Decottignies A., Nurse P. Function of Cdc2p-dependent Bub1p phosphorylation and Bub1p kinase activity in the mitotic and meiotic spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 2003, 22:1075-1087.
82. Yang M., Li B., Tomchick D.R., Machius M., Rizo J., Yu H., Luo X. p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 2007, 131:744-755.
83. Yu H. Cdc20: a WD40 activator for a cell cycle degradation machine. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:3-16.
84. Zeng X., Sigoillot F., Gaur S., Choi S., Pfaff K.L., Oh D.C., Hathaway N., Dimova N., Cuny G.D., King R.W. Pharmacologic inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex induces a spindle checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest in the absence of spindle damage. Cancer Cell 2010, 18:382-395.
85. Zich J., Sochaj A.M., Syred H.M., Milne L., Cook A.G., Ohkura H., Rappsilber J., Hardwick K.G. Kinase activity of fission yeast Mph1 is required for Mad2 and Mad3 to stably bind the anaphase promoting complex. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:296-301.