A Bub1-Mad1 interaction targets the Mad1-Mad2 complex to unattached kinetochores to initiate the spindle checkpoint

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 204, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 647-657

  Moyle, Mark W ^a,b   Kim, Taekyung ^a,b   Hattersley, Neil ^a,b   Espeut, Julien ^a,b   Cheerambathur, Dhanya K ^a,b   Oegema, Karen ^a,b   Desai, Arshad ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN MAD1; PROTEIN MAD2;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CENTROMERE; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MEIOTIC SPINDLE; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

ANAPHASE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOMES; KINETOCHORES; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; MAD2 PROTEINS; MEIOSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTAGENESIS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84895743550     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201311015     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Brady, D.M., and K.G. Hardwick. 2000. Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function. Curr. Biol. 10:675-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00515-7
2. Buffin, E., C. Lefebvre, J. Huang, M.E. Gagou, and R.E. Karess. 2005. Recruitment of Mad2 to the kinetochore requires the Rod/Zw10 complex. Curr. Biol. 15:856-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.052
3. Campbell, M.S., G.K. Chan, and T.J. Yen. 2001. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J. Cell Sci. 114:953-963.
4. Carvalho, A., S.K. Olson, E. Gutierrez, K. Zhang, L.B. Noble, E. Zanin, A. Desai, A. Groisman, and K. Oegema. 2011. Acute drug treatment in the early C. elegans embryo. PLoS ONE. 6:e24656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024656
5. Cheeseman, I.M., S. Niessen, S. Anderson, F. Hyndman, J.R. Yates III, K. Oegema, and A. Desai. 2004. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev. 18:2255-2268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1234104
6. Chen, R.H., A. Shevchenko, M. Mann, and A.W. Murray. 1998. Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 143:283-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.143.2.283
7. Chen, R.H., D.M. Brady, D. Smith, A.W. Murray, and K.G. Hardwick. 1999. The spindle checkpoint of budding yeast depends on a tight complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:2607-2618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.8.2607
8. Desai, A., S. Rybina, T. Müller-Reichert, A. Shevchenko, A. Shevchenko, A. Hyman, and K. Oegema. 2003. KNL-1 directs assembly of the microtubulebinding interface of the kinetochore in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 17:2421-2435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1126303
9. Dumont, J., K. Oegema, and A. Desai. 2010. A kinetochore-independent mechanism drives anaphase chromosome separation during acentrosomal meiosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:894-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2093
10. Espeut, J., D.K. Cheerambathur, L. Krenning, K. Oegema, and A. Desai. 2012. Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 196:469-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201111107
11. Essex, A., A. Dammermann, L. Lewellyn, K. Oegema, and A. Desai. 2009. Systematic analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that the spindle checkpoint is composed of two largely independent branches. Mol. Biol. Cell. 20:1252-1267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E08-10-1047
12. Frøkjær-Jensen, C., M.W. Davis, C.E. Hopkins, B.J. Newman, J.M. Thummel, S.P. Olesen, M. Grunnet, and E.M. Jorgensen. 2008. Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Genet. 40:1375-1383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.248
13. Gassmann, R., A. Essex, J.S. Hu, P.S. Maddox, F. Motegi, A. Sugimoto, S.M. O'Rourke, B. Bowerman, I. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, et al. 2008. A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex. Genes Dev. 22:2385-2399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1687508
14. Gassmann, R., A.J. Holland, D. Varma, X. Wan, F. Civril, D.W. Cleveland, K. Oegema, E.D. Salmon, and A. Desai. 2010. Removal of Spindly from microtubuleattached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. Genes Dev. 24:957-971. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1886810
15. Gillett, E.S., C.W. Espelin, and P.K. Sorger. 2004. Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 164:535-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200308100
16. Griffis, E.R., N. Stuurman, and R.D. Vale. 2007. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 177:1005-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200702062
17. Hardwick, K.G., and A.W. Murray. 1995. Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 131:709-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.131.3.709
18. Hoyt, M.A., L. Totis, and B.T. Roberts. 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 66:507-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3
19. Iouk, T., O. Kerscher, R.J. Scott, M.A. Basrai, and R.W. Wozniak. 2002. The yeast nuclear pore complex functionally interacts with components of the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 159:807-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200205068
20. Johnson, V.L., M.I. Scott, S.V. Holt, D. Hussein, and S.S. Taylor. 2004. Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci. 117:1577-1589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01006
21. Kang, J., M. Yang, B. Li, W. Qi, C. Zhang, K.M. Shokat, D.R. Tomchick, M. Machius, and H. Yu. 2008. Structure and substrate recruitment of the human spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1. Mol. Cell. 32:394-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.017
22. Kim, S., H. Sun, D.R. Tomchick, H. Yu, and X. Luo. 2012. Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:6549-6554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118210109
23. Kitagawa, R., and A.M. Rose. 1999. Components of the spindle-assembly checkpoint are essential in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:514-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/70309
24. Klebig, C., D. Korinth, and P. Meraldi. 2009. Bub1 regulates chromosome segregation in a kinetochore-independent manner. J. Cell Biol. 185:841-858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200902128
25. Kops, G.J., Y. Kim, B.A. Weaver, Y. Mao, I. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, M. Tagaya, and D.W. Cleveland. 2005. ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 169:49-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200411118
26. Krenn, V., K. Overlack, I. Primorac, S. van Gerwen, and A. Musacchio. 2014. KI motifs of human Knl1 enhance assembly of comprehensive spindle checkpoint complexes around MELT repeats. Curr. Biol. 24:29-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.046
27. Lara-Gonzalez, P., F.G. Westhorpe, and S.S. Taylor. 2012. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22:R966-R980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.006
28. Lettman, M.M., Y.L. Wong, V. Viscardi, S. Niessen, S.H. Chen, A.K. Shiau, H. Zhou, A. Desai, and K. Oegema. 2013. Direct binding of SAS-6 to ZYG-1 recruits SAS-6 to the mother centriole for cartwheel assembly. Dev. Cell. 25:284-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2013.03.011
29. Li, R., and A.W. Murray. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 66:519-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5
30. London, N., S. Ceto, J.A. Ranish, and S. Biggins. 2012. Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 22:900-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.052
31. Luo, X., and H. Yu. 2008. Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2. Structure. 16:1616-1625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2008.10.002
32. Mapelli, M., and A. Musacchio. 2007. MAD contortions: conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17:716-725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2007.08.011
33. Martin-Lluesma, S., V.M. Stucke, and E.A. Nigg. 2002. Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science. 297:2267-2270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1075596
34. Musacchio, A., and E.D. Salmon. 2007. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:379-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2163
35. Perera, D., and S.S. Taylor. 2010. Sgo1 establishes the centromeric cohesion protection mechanism in G2 before subsequent Bub1-dependent recruitment in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 123:653-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.059501
36. Primorac, I., J.R. Weir, E. Chiroli, F. Gross, I. Hoffmann, S. van Gerwen, A. Ciliberto, and A. Musacchio. 2013. Bub3 reads phosphorylated MELT repeats to promote spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. Elife. 2: e01030. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01030
37. Ricke, R.M., K.B. Jeganathan, L. Malureanu, A.M. Harrison, and J.M. van Deursen. 2012. Bub1 kinase activity drives error correction and mitotic checkpoint control but not tumor suppression. J. Cell Biol. 199:931-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201205115
38. Roberts, B.T., K.A. Farr, and M.A. Hoyt. 1994. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8282-8291.
39. Sharp-Baker, H., and R.H. Chen. 2001. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 153:1239-1250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.153.6.1239
40. Shepperd, L.A., J.C. Meadows, A.M. Sochaj, T.C. Lancaster, J. Zou, G.J. Buttrick, J. Rappsilber, K.G. Hardwick, and J.B. Millar. 2012. Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22:891-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.051
41. Sironi, L., M. Mapelli, S. Knapp, A. De Antoni, K.T. Jeang, and A. Musacchio. 2002. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 21:2496-2506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.10.2496
42. Taylor, S.S., and F. McKeon. 1997. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell. 89:727-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80255-X
43. Umezu, K., N. Sugawara, C. Chen, J.E. Haber, and R.D. Kolodner. 1998. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics. 148:989-1005.
44. Vleugel, M., E. Hoogendoorn, B. Snel, and G.J. Kops. 2012. Evolution and function of the mitotic checkpoint. Dev. Cell. 23:239-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.013
45. Vleugel, M., E. Tromer, M. Omerzu, V. Groenewold, W. Nijenhuis, B. Snel, and G.J. Kops. 2013. Arrayed BUB recruitment modules in the kinetochore scaffold KNL1 promote accurate chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 203:943-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201307016
46. Warren, C.D., D.M. Brady, R.C. Johnston, J.S. Hanna, K.G. Hardwick, and F.A. Spencer. 2002. Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:3029-3041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E02-04-0203
47. Yamagishi, Y., C.H. Yang, Y. Tanno, and Y. Watanabe. 2012. MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:746-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2515
48. Yamamoto, T.G., S. Watanabe, A. Essex, and R. Kitagawa. 2008. SPDL-1 functions as a kinetochore receptor for MDF-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 183:187-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200805185
49. Zhang, G., T. Lischetti, and J. Nilsson. 2013. A minimal number of MELT repeats supports all functions of KNL1 in chromosome segregation. J. Cell Sci. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.139725