Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users

Hearing Research

Volumn 308, Issue , 2014, Pages 13-26

  Limb, Charles J ^a,b   Roy, Alexis T ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY STREAM SEGREGATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MESENCEPHALON; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MUSIC; MUSIC PERCEPTION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE DEGENERATION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PITCH; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOUND TRANSMISSION;

ACOUSTICS; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN STEM; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MESENCEPHALON; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84892370047     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.04.009     Document Type: Review

References (143)

1. Abdi S., Khalessi M.H., Khorsandi M., Gholami B. Introducing music as a means of habilitation for children with cochlear implants. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2001, 59(2):105-113.
2. Adunka O., Kiefer J. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006, 135(3):374-382. 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.002.
3. Alexander A.J., Bartel L., Friesen L., Shipp D., Chen J. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment. J.Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2011, 40(1):1-7.
4. American Speech Language Hearing Association Cochlear Implants 2004, [Technical Report].
5. ANSI American National Standard-Psychoacoustical Terminology S3.20 1973.
6. Anstis S.M., Saida S. Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones. J.Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1985, 11(3):257-271.
7. Arnoldner C., Kaider A., Hamzavi J. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients. Laryngoscope 2006, 116(10):1760-1765. 10.1097/01.mlg.0000228214.02606.42.
8. Bakhshaee M., Ghasemi M.M., Shakeri M.T., Razmara N., Tayarani H., Tale M.R. Speech development in children after cochlear implantation. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2007, 264(11):1263-1266. 10.1007/s00405-007-0358-1.
9. Boothroyd A. Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 2010, 21(9):601-611. 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.6.
10. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis: the Perceptual Organization of Sound 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge.
11. Brockmeier S.J., Fitzgerald D., Searle O., Fitzgerald H., Grasmeder M., Hilbig S., Arnold W. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2011, 12(1):10-20. 10.1179/146701010x12677899497236.
12. Chatterjee M., Oberzut C. Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 130(3):1567-1580. 10.1121/1.3621445.
13. Chatterjee M., Sarampalis A., Oba S.I. Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: a preliminary report. Hear. Res. 2006, 222(1-2):100-107. 10.1016/j.heares.2006.09.001.
14. Chen J.K., Chuang A.Y., McMahon C., Hsieh J.C., Tung T.H., Li L.P. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Pediatrics 2010, 125(4):e793-e800. 10.1542/peds.2008-3620.
15. Clark G.M. Personal reflections on the multichannel cochlear implant and a view of the future. J.Rehabil. R. D. 2008, 45(5):651-693.
16. Clopton B.M., Glass I. Unit responses at cochlear nucleus to electrical stimulation through a cochlear prosthesis. Hear. Res. 1984, 14(1):1-11.
17. Cooper H.R., Roberts B. Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners. Hear. Res. 2007, 225(1-2):11-24.
18. Cooper H.R., Roberts B. Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 126(4):1975-1987. 10.1121/1.3203210.
19. Cooper W.B., Tobey E., Loizou P.C. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear. 2008, 29(4):618-626. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174e787.
20. Cosetti M.K., Waltzman S.B. Outcomes in cochlear implantation: variables affecting performance in adults and children. Otolaryngol. Clin. North. Am. 2012, 45(1):155-171. 10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.023.
21. Crew J.D., Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J. Channel interaction limits melodic pitch perception in simulated cochlear implants. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 132(5):EL429-EL435. 10.1121/1.4758770.
22. Di Nardo W., Scorpecci A., Giannantonio S., Cianfrone F., Paludetti G. Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2011, 268(1):27-39. 10.1007/s00405-010-1335-7.
23. Donnelly P.J., Guo B.Z., Limb C.J. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 126(5):EL128-EL133. 10.1121/1.3239464.
24. Drennan W.R., Rubinstein J.T. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J.Rehabil. R. D. 2008, 45(5):779-789.
25. Ernfors P., Van De Water T., Loring J., Jaenisch R. Complementary roles ofBDNF and NT-3 in vestibular and auditory development. Neuron 1995, 14(6):1153-1164.
26. Fayad J., Linthicum F.H., Otto S.R., Galey F.R., House W.F. Cochlear implants: histopathologic findings related to performance in 16 human temporal bones. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1991, 100(10):807-811.
27. Firszt J.B., Koch D.B., Downing M., Litvak L. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol. Neurotol. 2007, 28(5):629-636. 10.1097/01.mao.0000281803.36574.bc.
28. Francis H.W., Koch M.E., Wyatt J.R., Niparko J.K. Trends in educational placement and cost-benefit considerations in children with cochlear implants. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1999, 125(5):499-505.
29. Fujiki N., Naito Y., Hirano S., Kojima H., Shiomi Y., Nishizawa S., Honjo I. Correlation between rCBF and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Auris Nasus Larynx 1999, 26(3):229-236.
30. Fujita S., Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1999, 108(7 Pt 1):634-640.
31. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J. Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2005, 6(3):269-279. 10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6.
32. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J. Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users. Hear. Res. 2009, 250(1-2):46-54. 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.009.
33. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.-J. Effect of bandpass filtering on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. The J. Acoust. Soc. America 2011, 129(2):EL39. 10.1121/1.3531708.
34. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear. 2007, 28(3):302-319. 10.1097/01.aud.0000261689.35445.20.
35. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Oba S.I. Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 125(3):EL98-103. 10.1121/1.3062148.
36. Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Shannon R.V. Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1169:518-533. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04551.x.
37. Gfeller K., Lansing C.R. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J.Speech Hear. Res. 1991, 34(4):916-920.
38. Gfeller K., Knutson J.F., Woodworth G., Witt S., DeBus B. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 1998, 9(1):1-19.
39. Gfeller K., Witt S., Stordahl J., Mehr M., Woodsworth G. The effects of training on melody recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant recipients. J.Acad. Rehabil. Audiol. 2000, 33:115-138.
40. Gfeller K., Turner C., Mehr M., Woodworth G., Fearn R., Knutson J.F., Stordahl J. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2002, 3(1):29-53. 10.1002/cii.50.
41. Gfeller K., Witt S., Adamek M., Mehr M., Rogers J., Stordahl J., Ringgenberg S. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 2002, 13(3):132-145.
42. Gfeller K., Witt S., Woodworth G., Mehr M.A., Knutson J. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2002, 111(4):349-356.
43. Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J., Witt S., Mehr M. The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J.Music Ther. 2003, 40(2):78-112.
44. Gfeller K., Olszewski C., Rychener M., Sena K., Knutson J.F., Witt S., Macpherson B. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear. 2005, 26(3):237-250.
45. Gfeller K., Turner C., Oleson J., Zhang X., Gantz B., Froman R., Olszewski C. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear. 2007, 28(3):412-423. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180479318.
46. Gfeller K., Oleson J., Knutson J.F., Breheny P., Driscoll V., Olszewski C. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 2008, 19(2):120-134.
47. Gfeller K., Jiang D., Oleson J.J., Driscoll V., Knutson J.F. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 2010, 21(1):28-34.
48. Gifford R.H., Shallop J.K., Peterson A.M. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol. Neurootol. 2008, 13(3):193-205. 10.1159/000113510.
49. Govaerts P.J., De Beukelaer C., Daemers K., De Ceulaer G., Yperman M., Somers T., Offeciers F.E. Outcome of cochlear implantation at different ages from 0 to 6 years. Otol. Neurotol. 2002, 23(6):885-890.
50. Greenwood D.D. Acochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1990, 87(6):2592-2605.
51. Hardie N.A., Shepherd R.K. Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem. Hear. Res. 1999, 128(1-2):147-165.
52. Heng J., Cantarero G., Elhilali M., Limb C.J. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users. Hear. Res. 2011, 280(1-2):192-200. 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.017.
53. Herzog H., Lamprecht A., Kuhn A., Roden W., Vosteen K.H., Feinendegen L.E. Cortical activation in profoundly deaf patients during cochlear implant stimulation demonstrated by H2(15)O PET. J.Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1991, 15(3):369-375.
54. Hochmair I., Arnold W., Nopp P., Jolly C., Muller J., Roland P. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003, 123(5):612-617.
55. Hochmair I., Nopp P., Jolly C., Schmidt M., Schosser H., Garnham C., Anderson I. MED-EL cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future. Trends Amplif. 2006, 10(4):201-219. 10.1177/1084713806296720.
56. Hong R.S., Turner C.W. Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120(1):360-374.
57. Hong R.S., Turner C.W. Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 126(1):291-299. 10.1121/1.3140592.
58. Hong R.S., Rubinstein J.T., Wehner D., Horn D. Dynamic range enhancement for cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 2003, 24(4):590-595.
59. Hopyan T., Gordon K.A., Papsin B.C. Identifying emotions in music through electrical hearing in deaf children using cochlear implants. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2011, 12(1):21-26. 10.1179/146701010x12677899497399.
60. Iverson P., Krumhansl C.L. Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1993, 94(5):2595-2603.
61. James C.J., Blamey P.J., Martin L., Swanson B., Just Y., Macfarlane D. Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: a preliminary study. Ear Hear. 2002, 23(1 Suppl.):49S-58S.
62. Johnson D.H. The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1980, 68(4):1115-1122.
63. Jung K.H., Won J.H., Drennan W.R., Jameyson E., Miyasaki G., Norton S.J., Rubinstein J.T. Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol. 2012, 17(3):189-197. 10.1159/000336407.
64. Kang R., Nimmons G.L., Drennan W., Longnion J., Ruffin C., Nie K., Rubinstein J. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test. Ear Hear. 2009, 30(4):411-418. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0.
65. Ketten D.R., Skinner M.W., Wang G., Vannier M.W., Gates G.A., Neely J.G. Invivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 1998, 175:1-16.
66. Kim I., Yang E., Donnelly P.J., Limb C.J. Preservation of rhythmic clocking in cochlear implant users: a study of isochronous versus anisochronous beat detection. Trends Amplif. 2010, 14(3):164-169. 10.1177/1084713810387937.
67. Koch D.B., Downing M., Osberger M.J., Litvak L. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear Hear. 2007, 28(2 Suppl.):38S-41S. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803150de.
68. Koelsch S., Wittfoth M., Wolf A., Muller J., Hahne A. Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related potential study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115(4):966-972. 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.032.
69. Kong Y.Y., Zeng F.G. Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120(5 Pt 1):2830-2840.
70. Kong Y.Y., Cruz R., Jones J.A., Zeng F.G. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear. 2004, 25(2):173-185.
71. Kong Y.Y., Mullangi A., Marozeau J., Epstein M. Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing. J.Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2011, 54(3):981-994. 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0196).
72. Kreft H.A., Donaldson G.S., Nelson D.A. Effects of pulse rate and electrode array design on intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116(4 Pt 1):2258-2268.
73. Lalwani A.K., Larky J.B., Wareing M.J., Kwast K., Schindler R.A. The Clarion Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant - surgical technique, complications, and results: a single institutional experience. Am. J. Otol. 1998, 19(1):66-70.
74. Landsberger D.M., Srinivasan A.G. Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients. Hear. Res. 2009, 254(1-2):34-41. 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.007.
75. Landsberger D.M., Padilla M., Srinivasan A.G. Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users. Hear. Res. 2012, 284(1-2):16-24. 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.009.
76. Laneau J., Wouters J., Moonen M. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol. 2006, 11(1):38-52. 10.1159/000088853.
77. Leal M.C., Shin Y.J., Laborde M.L., Calmels M.N., Verges S., Lugardon S., Fraysse B. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003, 123(7):826-835.
78. Leigh J., Dettman S., Dowell R., Briggs R. Communication development in children who receive a cochlear implant by 12 months of age. Otol. Neurotol. 2013, 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182814d2c.
79. Limb C.J. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006, 14(5):337-340. 10.1097/01.moo.0000244192.59184.bd.
80. Limb C.J., Molloy A.T., Jiradejvong P., Braun A.R. Auditory cortical activity during cochlear implant-mediated perception of spoken language, melody, and rhythm. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2010, 11(1):133-143. 10.1007/s10162-009-0184-9.
81. Linthicum F.H., Fayad J., Otto S.R., Galey F.R., House W.F. Cochlear implant histopathology. Am. J. Otol. 1991, 12(4):245-311.
82. Looi V., Radford C.J. Acomparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aids. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2011, 75(4):472-482. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.12.023.
83. Looi V., She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int. J. Audiol. 2010, 49(2):116-128. 10.3109/14992020903405987.
84. Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C., Hickson L. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear Hear. 2008, 29(3):421-434. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d0b.
85. Looi V., Gfeller K., Driscoll V.D. Music appreciation and training for cochlear implant recipients: a review. Semin. Hear. 2012, 33(4):307-334.
86. Macherey O., Delpierre A. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study. Ear Hear. 2013, 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827535f8.
87. McDermott H.J. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif. 2004, 8(2):49-82.
88. Mitani C., Nakata T., Trehub S.E., Kanda Y., Kumagami H., Takasaki K., Takahashi H. Music recognition, music listening, and word recognition by deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007, 28(2 Suppl.):29S-33S. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031547a.
89. Moore B.C.J., Gockel H. Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acustica 2002, 88(3):320-333.
90. Moore J.K., Niparko J.K., Perazzo L.M., Miller M.R., Linthicum F.H. Effect of adult-onset deafness on the human central auditory system. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1997, 106(5):385-390.
91. Nadol J.B. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1997, 117(3 Pt 1):220-228.
92. Nadol J.B., Young Y.S., Glynn R.J. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1989, 98(6):411-416.
93. Nadol J.B., Shiao J.Y., Burgess B.J., Ketten D.R., Eddington D.K., Gantz B.J., Shallop J.K. Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2001, 110(9):883-891.
94. Naito Y., Tateya I., Fujiki N., Hirano S., Ishizu K., Nagahama Y., Kojima H. Increased cortical activation during hearing of speech in cochlear implant users. Hear. Res. 2000, 143(1-2):139-146.
95. Neuman A.C., Bakke M.H., Mackersie C., Hellman S., Levitt H. The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103(5 Pt 1):2273-2281.
96. Nimmons G.L., Kang R.S., Drennan W.R., Longnion J., Ruffin C., Worman T., Rubenstien J.T. Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otol. Neurotol. 2008, 29(2):149-155.
97. Otte J., Schunknecht H.F., Kerr A.G. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1978, 88(8 Pt 1):1231-1246. 10.1288/00005537-197808000-00004.
98. Oxenham A.J., Bernstein J.G., Penagos H. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101(5):1421-1425. 10.1073/pnas.0306958101.
99. Peng S.C., Tomblin J.B., Cheung H., Lin Y.S., Wang L.S. Perception and production of mandarin tones in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2004, 25(3):251-264.
100. Peretz I., Champod A.S., Hyde K. Varieties of musical disorders. The Montreal battery of evaluation of Amusia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 999:58-75.
101. Peterson N.R., Pisoni D.B., Miyamoto R.T. Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: review and assessment of the literature. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2010, 28(2):237-250. 10.3233/rnn-2010-0535.
102. Pfingst B.E., Xu L., Thompson C.S. Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121(4):2236-2246.
103. Philips B., Vinck B., De Vel E., Maes L., D'Haenens W., Keppler H., Dhooge I. Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2012, 269(3):813-821. 10.1007/s00405-011-1718-4.
104. Ping L., Yuan M., Feng H. Musical pitch discrimination by cochlear implant users. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2012, 121(5):328-336.
105. Rahne T., Bohme L., Gotze G. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones. J.Neurosci. Meth. 2011, 199(2):290-295. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.05.022.
106. Rocca C. Adifferent musical perspective: improving outcomes in music through habilitation, education, and training for children with cochlear implants. Semin. Hear. 2012, 33(4):425-433.
107. Rose M.M., Moore B.C. The relationship between stream segregation and frequency discrimination in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Hear. Res. 2005, 204(1-2):16-28. 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.004.
108. Roy A.T., Jiradejvong P., Carver C., Limb C.J. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening. Otol. Neurotol. 2012, 33(3):319-327. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824296a9.
109. Roy A.T., Jiradejvong P., Carver C., Limb C.J. Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception. Trends Amplif. 2012, 16(4):191-200. 10.1177/1084713812465493.
110. Rubinstein J.T. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2004, 12(5):444-448.
111. Ryugo D.K., Pongstaporn T., Huchton D.M., Niparko J.K. Ultrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: morphologic alterations in endbulbs of Held. J.Comp. Neurol. 1997, 385(2):230-244.
112. Santarelli R., De Filippi R., Genovese E., Arslan E. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study. Audiol. Neurootol. 2008, 13(4):257-265. 10.1159/000115435.
113. Saoji A.A., Litvak L.M. Use of "phantom electrode" technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 2010, 31(5):693-701. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e1d15e.
114. Shannon R.V. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 1983, 11(2):157-189.
115. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270(5234):303-304.
116. Shepherd R.K., Hardie N.A. Deafness-induced changes in the auditory pathway: implications for cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol. 2001, 6(6):305-318. 10.1159/000046843.
117. Singh S., Kong Y.Y., Zeng F.G. Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes. Ear Hear. 2009, 30(2):160-168. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819342b9.
118. Smith Z.M., Delgutte B., Oxenham A.J. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 2002, 416(6876):87-90. 10.1038/416087a.
119. Snel-Bongers J., Briaire J.J., Vanpoucke F.J., Frijns J.H. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation. Ear Hear. 2012, 33(3):367-376. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234efd5.
120. Spoendlin H., Schrott A. Analysis of the human auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 1989, 43(1):25-38.
121. Stordahl J. Song recognition and appraisal: a comparison of children who use cochlear implants and normally hearing children. J.Music Ther. 2002, 39(1):2-19.
122. Sucher C.M., McDermott H.J. Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2009, 10(Suppl. 1):96-99. 10.1002/cii.398.
123. Swanson B., Dawson P., McDermott H. Investigating cochlear implant place-pitch perception with the Modified Melodies test. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2009, 10(Suppl. 1):100-104. 10.1002/cii.399.
124. Tang Q., Benitez R., Zeng F.G. Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants. J.Neural Eng. 2011, 8(4):046029. 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046029.
125. Teoh S.W., Pisoni D.B., Miyamoto R.T. Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part I. Clinical results. Laryngoscope 2004, 114(9):1536-1540. 10.1097/00005537-200409000-00006.
126. Teoh S.W., Pisoni D.B., Miyamoto R.T. Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part II. Underlying constraints that affect audiological outcomes. Laryngoscope 2004, 114(10):1714-1719. 10.1097/00005537-200410000-00007.
127. Throckmorton C.S., Selin Kucukoglu M., Remus J.J., Collins L.M. Acoustic model investigation of a multiple carrier frequency algorithm for encoding fine frequency structure: implications for cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 2006, 218(1-2):30-42. 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.020.
128. Timm L., Agrawal D.F.C.V., Sandmann P., Debener S., Buchner A., Wittfoth M. Temporal feature perception in cochlear implant users. PLoS One 2012, 7(9):e45375. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045375.
129. van Noorden P. Temporal Coherence in the Perception of Tone Sequences 1975, Doctoral thesis, University of Technology, Eindhoven.
130. Vollmer M., Snyder R.L., Leake P.A., Beitel R.E., Moore C.M., Rebscher S.J. Temporal properties of chronic cochlear electrical stimulation determine temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus. J.Neurophysiol. 1999, 82(6):2883-2902.
131. Vongpaisal T., Trehub S.E., Schellenberg E.G. Song recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implants. J.Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2006, 49(5):1091-1103. 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/078).
132. Vongpaisal T., Trehub S.E., Schellenberg E.G. Identification of TV tunes by children with cochlear implants. Music Percept. 2009, 27(1):17-24.
133. Waltzman S.B., Roland J.T., Cohen N.L. Delayed implantation in congenitally deaf children and adults. Otol. Neurotol. 2002, 23(3):333-340.
134. Weise A., Bendixen A., Muller D., Schroger E. Which kind of transition is important for sound representation? An event-related potential study. Brain Res. 2012, 1464:30-42. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.046.
135. Wong D., Miyamoto R.T., Pisoni D.B., Sehgal M., Hutchins G.D. PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and nonspeech. Hear. Res. 1999, 132(1-2):34-42.
136. Wright A., Davis A., Bredberg G., Ulehlova L., Spencer H. Hair cell distributions in the normal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 1987, 444:1-48.
137. Yucel E., Sennaroglu G., Belgin E. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2009, 73(7):1043-1052. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.04.009.
138. Yukawa K., Cohen L., Blamey P., Pyman B., Tungvachirakul V., O'Leary S. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception. Audiol. Neurootol. 2004, 9(3):163-172. 10.1159/000077267.
139. Zeng F.G. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear. Res. 2002, 174(1-2):101-106.
140. Zeng F.G. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif. 2004, 8(1):1-34.
141. Zeng F.G., Rebscher S., Harrison W., Sun X., Feng H. Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 1:115-142. 10.1109/rbme.2008.2008250.
142. Zhang F., Benson C., Cahn S.J. Cortical encoding of timbre changes in cochlear implant users. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 2013, 24(1):46-58. 10.3766/jaaa.24.1.6.
143. Zhu M., Chen B., Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J. Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L). J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 130(6):3562-3565. 10.1121/1.3658474.