Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 779-790

  Drennan, Ward R ^a,c   Rubinstein, Jay T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Deafness; Hearing; Hearing loss; Music; Perception; Psychoacoustics; Sound processing; Spectral resolution; Speech perception; Speech processing

Indexed keywords

COCHLEAR IMPLANT; DEAFNESS; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; MUSIC; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SOUND PROCESSING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AUDITION; DIGITAL FILTERS; SPECTRAL RESOLUTION;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPREHENSION; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MUSIC THERAPY; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; RHYTHM; SPEECH; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN RELATION; IMPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MUSIC; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; MUSIC; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 59649116361     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.08.0118     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(7):390-406.
2. Helmholtz HLF. Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologishe Grundlage fue die Theorie der Musik. 1st ed. Brunswick (Germany): Vieweg-Verlag; 1863.
3. Trans: On the sensation of tone. 2nd English ed. New York (NY): Dover Publications; 1954.
4. Seebeck A. Beohachtungen uber einige Bedingungen der Entstehung von Tonen = Observations about some conditions of the origin of tone. Annalen der Physik und Chemie. 1841;53:417-436 German, English.
5. Seebeck A. Uber die Sirene = About the siren. Annalen der Physik und Chemie. 1843;60:449-481 German, English.
6. Green DM. An introduction to hearing. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1976.
7. Wightman FL, Green DM. The perception of pitch. Am Sci. 1974;62(2):208-215
8. Licklider JC. Auditory frequency analysis. In: Cherry C, editor. Information theory. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1956. p. 253-268
9. Johnson DH. The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980;68(4):1115-1122
10. Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT. Sound processors in cochlear implants. In: Waltzmann SB, Roland JT, editors. Cochlear implants. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Thieme; 2006. p. 40-47.
11. Loizou PC. Mimicking the human ear. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 1998;15(5):101-130
12. Zeng FG. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif. 2004; 8(1):1-34.
13. Smith ZM, Delgutte B, Oxenham AJ. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature. 2002;416(6876):87-90.
14. Nadol JB Jr, Young YS, Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: Implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989;98(6):411-416
15. Nadol JB Jr. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: Implications for cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(3 Pt 1): 220-228
16. Nadol JB Jr, Xu WZ. Diameter of the cochlear nerve in deaf humans: Implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992;101(12):988-993
17. Shepherd RK, Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear Res. 1997;108(1-2):112-144
18. Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110(2):1150-1163
19. Dorman MF, Loizou PC, Rainey D. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102(4):2403-2411
20. Fishman KE, Shannon RV, Slattery WH. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(5):1201-1215
21. Arnoldner C, Kaider A, Hamzavi J. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(10):1760-1765
22. Handel S. Timbre perception and auditory object formation. In: Moore BC, editor. Hearing. 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1995. p. 425-461
23. Shannon R. Psychophysics. In: Tyler RS, editor. Cochlear implants: Audiological foundations. San Diego (CA): Singular Publishing, Inc; 1993. p. 357-389
24. Moxon EC. Neural and mechanical responses to electrical stimulation of the cat's inner ear [thesis]. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1971.
25. Van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hear Res. 1984;14(3):225-243
26. Kiang NY, Moxon EC, Levine RA. Auditory nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Wolstenholme GE, Knight J, editors. Sensorineural hearing loss. London (England): Churchill; 1970. p. 241-268
27. Liberman MC, Dodds LW. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates. Hear Res. 1984; 16(1):43-53.
28. Pijl S, Schwarz DW. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;98(2 Pt 1):886-895
29. McDermott HJ, McKay CM. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;101(3):1622-1631
30. Tong YC, Clark GM. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am. 1985;77(5):1881-1888
31. Moore BC, Carlyon RP. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ, Fay RR, editors. Pitch: Neural coding and perception. New York (NY): Springer; 2005. p. 234-277
32. McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;96(5 Pt 1): 2664-2673
33. McKay CM. Psychophysics and electrical stimulation. In: Zeng FG, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. Springer handbook of auditory research: Cochlear implants, auditory prostheses, and electric hearing. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 286-333.
34. Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987;82(1):106-115
35. Nelson DA, Van Tasell DJ, Schroder AC, Soli S, Levine S. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;98(4):1987-1999
36. Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson JF, Witt S, Stordahl J. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002;3(1):29-53.
37. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature. 1991;352(6332):236- 238
38. Guerts L, Wouters J. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;109(2):713-726
39. Nimmons GL, Kang RS, Drennan WR, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubenstien JT. Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otol Nuerotol. 2007;29(2):149-155
40. Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res. 1983;11(2):157-189
41. Gfeller K, Woodworth G, Robin DA, Witt S, Knutson JF. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 1997;18(3):252-260
42. Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, Calmels MN, Verges S, Lugardon S, Andrieu S, Deguine O, Fraysse B. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;123(7):826-835
43. Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear. 2004;25(2):173-185
44. McDermott HJ. Music perception with cochlear implants: A review. Trends Amplif. 2004;8(2):49-82.
45. Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson J. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111(4):349-356
46. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Rychener M, Sena K, Knutson JF, Witt S, Macpherson B. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear. 2005;26(3):237-250
47. Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear. 2007;28(3): 302-319
48. Henry BA, Turner CW, Behrens A. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quite: Normal hearing, hearing impaired and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118(2):1111-1121
49. Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolarygol. 2007;8(3):384-392
50. Won JH, Drennan WR, Kang R, Longnion J, Rubinstein JT, editors. Relationships among music perception, speech perception in noise, Schroeder phase and spectral discrimination ability in cochlear implant users. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses; 2007 Jul 15-20; Lake Tahoe, CA. Los Angeles (CA): House Ear Institute; 2007.
51. Dooling RJ, Leek MR, Gleich O, Dent ML. Auditory temporal resolution in birds: Discrimination of harmonic complexes. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112(2):748-759
52. Longnion J, Ruffin C, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT, editors. Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by cochlear implant users [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 2007; Denver, CO.
53. Drennan WR, Longnion JK, Ruffin C, Rubinstein JT. Discrimination of schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolarygol. 2008;9(1):138-149
54. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115(4):1729-1735
55. Firszt JB, Koch DB, Downing M, Litvak L. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(5):629-636
56. Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2 Suppl):38S-41S.
57. Nogueira W, Buchner A, Lenarz T, Edler B. A psychoacoustic "NofM"-type of speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. EURASIP J Appl Signal Process. 2005; 18:3044-3059
58. Laneau J, Wouters J, Moonen M. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11(1):38-52.
59. Silman S, Silverman CA, Emmer MB, Gelfand SA. Adult-onset auditory deprivation. J Am Acad Audiol. 1992;3(6): 390-396
60. Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117(3 Pt 1):1351-1361
61. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nuclear Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:63-68.
62. Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Finley CC, Abbas PJ. Pseudospontaneous activity: Stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear Res. 1999; 127(1-2):108-118
63. Kiang NY, Moxon EC. Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1972;81(5):714-730
64. Liberman MC. Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;63(2):442-455
65. Hong RS, Rubinstein JT. High-rate conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: Dynamic range measures with sinusoidal stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114(6 Pt 1): 3327-3342
66. Litvak L, Delgutte B, Eddington D. Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114(4 Pt 1): 2099-2111.
67. Litvak LM, Delgutte B, Eddington DK. Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114(4 Pt 1):2079-2098
68. Litvak LM, Smith ZM, Delgutte B, Eddington DK. Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114(4 Pt 1):2066-2078
69. Hong RS, Rubinstein JT. Conditioner pulse trains in cochlear implants: Effects on loudness growth. Otol Neurotol. 2006; 27(4):50-56.