Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners

Hearing Research

Volumn 225, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 11-24

  Cooper, Huw R ^a,b   Roberts, Brian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory grouping; Cochlear implants; Pitch discrimination; Stream segregation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 33847057300     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anstis S., and Saida S. Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 11 (1985) 257-271
2. Bregman A.S. Auditory streaming is cumulative. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 4 (1978) 380-387
3. Bregman A.S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
4. Bregman A.S., and Campbell J. Primary auditory stream segregation and the perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. J. Exp. Psychol. 89 (1971) 244-249
5. Chatterjee M., and Galvin J.J. Auditory streaming in cochlear implant listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 (2002) 2429 [abstract]
6. Chatterjee M., and Shannon R.V. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 (1998) 2565-2572
7. Cherry E.C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25 (1953) 975-979
8. Collins L.M., and Throckmorton C.S. Investigating perceptual features of electrode stimulation via a multidimensional scaling paradigm. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2000) 2353-2365
9. Cusack R., and Roberts B. Effects of similarity in bandwidth on the auditory sequential streaming of two-tone complexes. Perception 28 (1999) 1281-1289
10. Cusack R., and Roberts B. Effects of differences in timbre on sequential grouping. Percept. Psychophys. 62 (2000) 1112-1120
11. Cusack R., and Roberts B. Effects of differences in the pattern of amplitude envelopes across harmonics on auditory stream segregation. Hear. Res. 193 (2004) 95-104
12. Fu Q.-J., and Nogaki G. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otol. 6 (2004) 19-27
13. Greenwood D.D. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 (1990) 2592-2605
14. Grose J.H., Hall J.W., Buss E., and Hatch D. Gap detection for similar and dissimilar gap markers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 1587-1595
15. Hanekom J.J., and Shannon R.V. Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (1998) 2372-2384
16. Hong R.S., and Turner C.W. Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) 360-374
17. Kong Y.-Y., Cruz R., Ackland Jones J., and Zeng F.-G. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear. 25 (2004) 173-185
18. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49 (1971) 467-477
19. Miller G.A., and Heise G.A. The trill threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22 (1950) 637-638
20. Moore B.C.J., and Carlyon R.P. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: Plack C.J., and Oxenham A.J. (Eds). Springer Handbook of Auditory Research: Pitch Perception (2005), Springer, New York
21. Moore B.C.J., and Gockel H. Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acust. Acust. 88 (2002) 320-333
22. Nelson P.B., and Jin S.H. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 (2004) 2286-2294
23. Nelson D.A., van Tassell D.J., Schroder A.C., Soli S., and Levine S. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 1987-1999
24. Roberts B., Glasberg B.R., and Moore B.C.J. Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (2002) 2074-2085
25. Stainsby T.H., Moore B.C.J., and Glasberg B.R. Auditory streaming based on temporal structure in hearing-impaired listeners. Hear. Res. 192 (2004) 119-130
26. Throckmorton C.S., and Collins L.M. The effect of channel interactions on speech recognition in cochlear implant subjects: predictions from an acoustic model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (2002) 285-296
27. Van Noorden, L.P.A.S., 1975. Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Doctoral thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
28. Warren R.M., Obusek C.J., Farmer R.M., and Warren R.P. Auditory sequence: confusion of patterns other than speech and music. Science 164 (1969) 586-587