Bimodal stimulation: Benefits for music perception and sound quality

Cochlear Implants International

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages 96-99

  Sucher, Catherine M ^a   McDermott, Hugh J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bimodal stimulation; Cochlear implant; Music perception; Sound quality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MUSIC;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MUSIC;

EID: 65549092873     PISSN: 14670100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cii.398     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Ching TY (2005) The evidence call for making binaural-bimodal fittings routine. The Hearing Journal 58(11): 32-41.
2. Gfeller KE, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt SA, Murray KT, Tyler RS (2000) Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 11(7): 390-406.
3. Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG (2005) Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117(3/1): 1351-1361.
4. Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Perez-Mora R, Madero R, De Sarria J, Gavilan J (2007) Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation? Acta Otolaryngologica 127: 682-686.
5. McDermott HJ (2004) Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends in Amplification 8(2): 49-82.
6. Nardo WD, Cantore I, Cianfrone F, Melillo P, Fetoni AR, Paludetti G (2007) Differences between electrode-assigned frequencies and cochlear implant recipient pitch perception. Acta Otolaryngologica 127(4): 370-377.