Temporal Feature Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Timm, Lydia ^a   Agrawal, Deepashri ^a   Viola, C Filipa ^b   Sandmann, Pascale ^b   Debener, Stefan ^b   Büchner, Andreas ^a   Dengler, Reinhard ^a   Wittfoth, Matthias ^a,c  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^c NeuroImaging and Clinical Applications (NICA)   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MUSIC; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866659823     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045375     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC, (2008) Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear 29: 618-626.
2. Koelsch S, Wittfoth M, Wolf A, Muller J, Hahne A, (2004) Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 966-972.
3. Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, Calmels MN, Verges S, et al. (2003) Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 123: 826-835.
4. Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF, Breheny P, Driscoll V, et al. (2008) Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol 19: 120-134.
5. Limb CJ, Rubinstein JT, (2012) Current research on music perception in cochlear implant users. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45: 129-140.
6. ANSI (1973) American national standard psychoacoustical terminology. New York: American National Standard Institute.
7. McDermott HJ, (2004) Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 8: 49-82.
8. Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Oba SI (2009) Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 125: EL98-103.
9. Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT, (2008) Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev 45: 779-789.
10. Won JH, Drennan WR, Kang RS, Rubinstein JT, (2010) Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 31: 796-805.
11. Pressnitzer D, Bestel J, Fraysse B, (2005) Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1060: 343-345.
12. Heng J, Cantarero G, Elhilali M, Limb CJ, (2011) Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 280: 192-200.
13. Kong YY, Mullangi A, Marozeau J, Epstein M, (2011) Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 54: 981-994.
14. Iverson P, Krumhansl CL, (1993) Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre. J Acoust Soc Am 94: 2595-2603.
15. Berger KW, (1964) Some factors in the recognition of timbre. J Acoust Soc Am 36: 1888-1891.
16. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Rychener M, Sena K, Knutson JF, et al. (2005) Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear 26: 237-250.
17. Sandmann P, Kegel A, Eichele T, Dillier N, Lai W, et al. (2010) Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear-implant users. Clin Neurophysiol 121: 2070-2082.
18. Sandmann P, Eichele T, Buechler M, Debener S, Jancke L, et al. (2009) Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation. Brain 132: 1967-1979.
19. Giraud AL, Truy E, Frackowiak R, (2001) Imaging plasticity in cochlear implant patients. Audiol Neurootol 6: 381-393.
20. Sharma A, Dorman MF, (2006) Central auditory development in children with cochlear implants: clinical implications. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 64: 66-88.
21. Kraus N, Micco AG, Koch DB, McGee T, Carrell T, et al. (1993) The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users. Hear Res 65: 118-124.
22. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B, (2001) Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear 22: 79-90.
23. Tremblay KL, Shahin AJ, Picton T, Ross B, (2009) Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 128-135.
24. Zhang F, Hammer T, Banks HL, Benson C, Xiang J, et al. (2011) Mismatch negativity and adaptation measures of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 275: 17-29.
25. Torppa R, Salo E, Makkonen T, Loimo H, Pykalainen J, et al. (2012) Cortical processing of musical sounds in children with Cochlear Implants. Clin Neurophysiol.
26. Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR, (2005) Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Clin Neurophysiol 116: 1235-1246.
27. Duncan CC, Barry RJ, Connolly JF, Fischer C, Michie PT, et al. (2009) Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 1883-1908.
28. Naatanen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, Alho K, (2007) The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 2544-2590.
29. Pakarinen S, Lovio R, Huotilainen M, Alku P, Naatanen R, et al. (2009) Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording several mismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds. Biol Psychol 82: 219-226.
30. Naatanen R, Pakarinen S, Rinne T, Takegata R, (2004) The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 140-144.
31. Stoody TM, Saoji AA, Atcherson SR, (2011) Auditory mismatch negativity: detecting spectral contrasts in a modulated noise. Percept Mot Skills 113: 268-276.
32. Weise A, Bendixen A, Muller D, Schroger E, (2012) Which kind of transition is important for sound representation? An event-related potential study. Brain Res 1464: 30-42.
33. Aiken SJ, Picton TW, (2008) Human cortical responses to the speech envelope. Ear Hear 29: 139-157.
34. Naatanen R, Kujala T, Winkler I, (2011) Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology 48: 4-22.
35. Ollen JE (2006) A criterion-related validity test of selected indocators of music sophistication using expert ratings. Ohio: Ohio State University.
36. Zeng FG, (1994) Loudness growth in forward masking: relation to intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 96: 2127-2132.
37. Klem GH, Luders HO, Jasper HH, Elger C (1999) The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52: 3-6.
38. Delorme A, Makeig S, (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134: 9-21.
39. Debener S, Hine J, Bleeck S, Eyles J, (2008) Source localization of auditory evoked potentials after cochlear implantation. Psychophysiology 45: 20-24.
40. Viola FC, Thorne J, Edmonds B, Schneider T, Eichele T, et al. (2009) Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 868-877.
41. Viola FC, Thorne JD, Bleeck S, Eyles J, Debener S, (2011) Uncovering auditory evoked potentials from cochlear implant users with independent component analysis. Psychophysiology 48: 1470-1480.
42. Viola FC, De Vos M, Hine J, Sandmann P, Bleeck S, et al. (2012) Semi-automatic attenuation of cochlear implant artifacts for the evaluation of late auditory evoked potentials. Hear Res 284: 6-15.
43. Terhaar J, Viola FC, Franz M, Berger S, Bar KJ, et al. (2011) Differential processing of laser stimuli by Adelta and C fibres in major depression. Pain 152: 1796-1802.
44. Kiesel A, Miller J, Jolicoeur P, Brisson B, (2008) Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology 45: 250-274.
45. Caclin A, Brattico E, Tervaniemi M, Naatanen R, Morlet D, et al. (2006) Separate neural processing of timbre dimensions in auditory sensory memory. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 1959-1972.
46. Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Enghoff S, Townsend J, et al. (2002) Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science 295: 690-694.
47. Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ, Oba S (2008) Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 124: EL189-195.
48. Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, Witt S, DeBus B, (1998) Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 9: 1-19.
49. Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG, (2004) Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 25: 173-185.
50. Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Souza PE, Binns MA, (2007) Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 12: 234-246.
51. Naatanen R, Picton T, (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375-425.
52. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, et al. (2000) Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 11: 390-406.
53. Gfeller K, Witt S, Adamek M, Mehr M, Rogers J, et al. (2002) Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 13: 132-145.
54. Driscoll VD, Oleson J, Jiang D, Gfeller K, (2009) Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations. J Am Acad Audiol 20: 71-82.
55. Shahin A, Bosnyak DJ, Trainor LJ, Roberts LE, (2003) Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. J Neurosci 23: 5545-5552.
56. Naatanen R, Kujala T, Escera C, Baldeweg T, Kreegipuu K, et al. (2011) The mismatch negativity (MMN)- A unique window to disturbed central auditory processing in ageing and different clinical conditions. Clin Neurophysiol.
57. Schroger E, Paavilainen P, Naatanen R, (1994) Mismatch negativity to changes in a continuous tone with regularly varying frequencies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92: 140-147.
58. Bishop DV, Hardiman MJ, (2010) Measurement of mismatch negativity in individuals: a study using single-trial analysis. Psychophysiology 47: 697-705.
59. Naatanen R, Teder W, Alho K, Lavikainen J, (1992) Auditory attention and selective input modulation: a topographical ERP study. Neuroreport 3: 493-496.
60. Winkler I, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Reinikainen K, Sams M, et al. (1990) The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus. Psychophysiology 27: 228-235.