Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single-and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 367-376

  Snel Bongers, Jorien ^a   Briaire, Jeroen J ^a   Vanpoucke, Filiep J ^b   Frijns, Johan H M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b European Auditory Research   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84860840053     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234efd5     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbas, P. J., Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., et al. (2004). Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiol Neurootol, 9, 203-213. (Pubitemid 38812968)
2. Baskent, D. (2006). Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 2908-2925. (Pubitemid 44631725)
3. Boex, C., de Balthasar, C., Kos, M. I., et al. (2003). Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 2049-2057. (Pubitemid 37270593)
4. Bosman, A. J., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (1995). Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology, 34, 260-284. (Pubitemid 26039006)
5. Brendel, M., Buechner, A., Krueger, B., et al. (2008). Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120. Otol Neurotol, 29, 199-202. (Pubitemid 351170474)
6. Briaire, J. J., & Frijns, J. H. (2000). Field patterns in a 3D tapered spinal model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res, 148, 18-30.
7. Briaire, J. J., & Frijns, J. H. (2006). The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: A model approach. Hear Res, 214, 17-27.
8. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Gantz, B. J. (1998). Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol, 19, 320-327.
9. Buechner, A., Brendel, M., Krueger, B., et al. (2008). Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies. Otol Neurotol, 29, 203-207. (Pubitemid 351170475)
10. Busby, P. A., Battmer, R. D., Pesch, J. (2008). Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 29, 853-864.
11. Cohen, L. T., Richardson, L. M., Saunders, E., et al. (2003). Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res, 179, 72-87. (Pubitemid 36547892)
12. Cohen, L. T., Saunders, E., Clark, G. M. (2001). Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear Res, 155, 63-81. (Pubitemid 32405250)
13. Cohen, L. T., Saunders, E., Knight, M. R., et al. (2006). Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays. Hear Res, 212, 160-175. (Pubitemid 43254946)
14. de Balthasar, C., Boex, C., Cosendai, G., et al. (2003). Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear Res, 182, 77-87. (Pubitemid 37013286)
15. Donaldson, G. S., Dawson, P. K., Borden, L. Z. (2011). Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: Speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity. Ear Hear, 32, 238-250.
16. Donaldson, G. S., Kreft, H. A., Litvak, L. (2005). Place-pitch discrimination of single-versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 623-626. (Pubitemid 41129200)
17. Firszt, J. B., Holden, L. K., Reeder, R. M., et al. (2009). Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing. Otol Neurotol, 30, 146-152.
18. Firszt, J. B., Koch, D. B., Downing, M., et al. (2007). Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol, 28, 629-636. (Pubitemid 47229708)
19. Fishman, K. E., Shannon, R. V., Slattery, W. H. (1997). Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 40, 1201-1215. (Pubitemid 27422400)
20. Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., Ware, J. H. (2004). Linear mixed effects model. In G. M. Fitzmaurice, N. M. Laird, & J. H. Ware (Eds). Applied Longitudinal Analysis (pp. 187-236). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
21. Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., et al. (2001). Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1150-1163. (Pubitemid 32734748)
22. Frijns, J. H., Kalkman, R. K., Vanpoucke, F. J., et al. (2009). Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: Evidence for two neural response modalities. Acta Otolaryngol, 129, 433-439.
23. Frijns, J. H., Klop, W. M., Bonnet, R. M., et al. (2003). Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol, 123, 138-142. (Pubitemid 36359779)
24. Fu, Q. J., & Nogaki, G. (2005). Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: The role of spectral resolution and smearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 6, 19-27. (Pubitemid 40616501)
25. Fu, Q. J., Shannon, R. V., Wang, X. (1998). Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 3586-3596. (Pubitemid 29006021)
26. Hughes, M. L., & Abbas, P. J. (2006a). Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1538-1547. (Pubitemid 43326023)
27. Hughes, M. L., & Abbas, P. J. (2006b). The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1527-1537. (Pubitemid 43326022)
28. Hughes, M. L., & Goulson, A. M. (2011). Electrically evoked compound action potential measures for virtual channels versus physical electrodes. Ear Hear, 32, 323-330.
29. Hughes, M. L., & Stille, L. J. (2008). Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 29, 435-452. (Pubitemid 351652238)
30. Koch, D. B., Downing, M., Osberger, M. J., et al. (2007). Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear Hear, 28:38S-41S. (Pubitemid 46673656)
31. Kos, M. I., Boex, C., Sigrist, A., et al. (2005). Measurements of electrode position inside the cochlea for different cochlear implant systems. Acta Otolaryngol, 125, 474-480. (Pubitemid 40676886)
32. Lane, J. I., Witte, R. J., Driscoll, C. L., et al. (2007). Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: Clinical experience using 6-slice multidetector computed tomography. Otol Neurotol, 28, 658-662. (Pubitemid 47229711)
33. Nie, K., Barco, A., Zeng, F. G. (2006). Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception. Ear Hear, 27, 208-217. (Pubitemid 44378661)
34. Saoji, A. A., Litvak, L. M., Hughes, M. L. (2009). Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear, 30, 559-567.
35. Skinner, M. W., Holden, T. A., Whiting, B. R., et al. (2007). In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 197, 2-24.
36. Skinner, M. W., Ketten, D. R., Vannier, M. W., et al. (1994). Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. Am J Otol, 15, 644-651. (Pubitemid 24290150)
37. Snel-Bongers, J., Briaire, J. J., Vanpoucke, F. J., et al. (2011). Influence of widening electrode separation on current steering performance. Ear Hear, 32, 221-229.
38. Townshend, B., Cotter, N., Van, C. D., et al. (1987). Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 82, 106-115. (Pubitemid 17114943)
39. Van Weert, S., Stokroos, R. J., Rikers, M. M., et al. (2005). Effect of perimodiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: A neural response telemetry study. Acta Otolaryngol, 125, 725-731. (Pubitemid 41044318)
40. Vanpoucke, F., Zarowski, A., Casselman, J., et al. (2004). The facial nerve canal: An important cochlear conduction path revealed by Clarion electrical field imaging. Otol Neurotol, 25, 282-289. (Pubitemid 39079809)
41. Verbist, B. M., Frijns, J. H., Geleijns, J., et al. (2005). Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 26, 424-429. (Pubitemid 43073328)
42. Verbist, B. M., Joemai, R. M., Briaire, J. J., et al. (2010a). Cochlear coordinates in regard to cochlear implantation: A clinically individually applicable 3 dimensional CT-based method. Otol Neurotol, 31:738-744.
43. Verbist, B. M., Skinner, M. W., Cohen, L. T., et al. (2010). Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea. Otol Neurotol, 31:722-730.
44. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C., Lawson, D. T., et al. (1991). Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352, 236-238. (Pubitemid 21912323)