Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal battery for evaluation of amusia

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 618-626

  Cooper, William B ^a   Tobey, Emily ^a   Loizou, Philipos C ^b  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Dallas   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMUSIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MONTREAL BATTERY FOR EVALUATION OF AMNESIA; MUSIC; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEARING; HEARING TEST; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSTHESIS; REFERENCE VALUE; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REFERENCE VALUES; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 54049088972     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174e787     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bassim, M., Buss, E., Clark, M., et al. (2005). MED-EL Combi40+ cochlear implantation in adults. Laryngoscope, 115, 1568-1573. (Pubitemid 41330663)
2. Causey, G., Hood, L., Hermanson, C., et al. (1984). The Maryland CNC test: normative studies. Audiology, 23, 552-568. (Pubitemid 14023866)
3. Fujita, S. & Ito, J. (1999). Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 108(7, Pt. 1), 634-640. (Pubitemid 29331061)
4. Galvin, J., Fu, Q., and Nagaki, G. (2007). Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear, 28, 302-319. (Pubitemid 46718011)
5. Gfeller, K., Knutson, J., Woodworth, G., et al. (1998). Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 1-19.
6. Gfeller, K. & Lansing, C. (1991). Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 916-920.
7. Gfeller, K. & Lansing, C. (1992). Musical perception of cochlear implant users as measured by the Primary Measures of Music Audiation: an item analysis. J Music Ther, 29, 18-39.
8. Gfeller, K., Turner, C., Mehr, M., et al. (2002a). Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implant Int, 3, 29-53. (Pubitemid 34521078)
9. Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Adamek, M., et al. (2002b). Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 132-145. (Pubitemid 34467516)
10. Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Woodworth, G., et al. (2002c). Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111, 349-356.
11. Gfeller, K., Woodworth, G., Robin, D. et al. (1997). Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally bearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 18, 252-260. (Pubitemid 27265817)
12. Kasturi, K. & Loizou, P. (2007). Effect of frequency spacing on melody recognition: acoustic and electric hearing, J Acoust Soc Am, 122, EL29-EL34. (Pubitemid 47205553)
13. Kong, Y., Cruz, R., Jones, J., et al. (2004). Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear, 25, 173-185. (Pubitemid 38451766)
14. Kong, Y., Stickney, G., & Zeng, F.-G. (2005). Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 1351-1361. (Pubitemid 40358004)
15. Laneau, J., Moonen, M., & Wouters, J. (2004). Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 3606-3619. (Pubitemid 40029941)
16. Leal, M., Shin, Y., Laborde, M., et al. (2003). Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol, 123, 826-835. (Pubitemid 37222698)
17. McDermott, H. (2004). Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif, 8, 49-82. (Pubitemid 39435144)
18. McDermott, H. & McKay, C. (1997). Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 1622-1631. (Pubitemid 27114266)
19. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085-1099. (Pubitemid 24056373)
20. Peretz, I., Champod, A., & Hyde, K. (2003). Varieties of musical disorders: the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 999, 58-75. (Pubitemid 38064799)
21. Peretz, I. & Coltheart, M. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nat Neurosci, 6, 688-691.
22. Pijl, S. (1997). Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normal hearing subjects. Ear Hear, 18, 364-372.
23. Pijl, S. & Schwarz, D. W. (1995a). Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am, 98(2 Pt. 1), 886-895.
24. Pijl, S. & Schwarz, D. (1995b). Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes. Hear Res, 89, 203-211.
25. Qin, M. & Oxenham, A. (2005). Effects of envelope-vocoder processing on F0 discrimination and concurrent-vowel identification. Ear Hear, 26, 451-460. (Pubitemid 41510891)
26. Schulz, E. & Kerber, M. (1994). Music perception with the MED-EL implants. In I. Hochmair-Desoyer & E. C. Hochmair (Eds.), Advances in cochlear implants (pp. 326-322). Vienna, Austria: Manz.
27. Shannon, R., Zeng, F-G., Kamath, V., et al. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303-304.
28. Smith, Z., Delgutte, B., & Oxenham, A. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416, 87-90. (Pubitemid 34215405)
29. Stickney, G., Assmann, P., Chang, J. et al. (2007). Effects of implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences.J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1069-1078. (Pubitemid 47205505)
30. Vandali, A., Sucher, C., Tsang, D., et al. (2005). Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of soundprocessing strategies. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 3126-3138. (Pubitemid 40675174)
31. Zeng, F. (2004). Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif, 8, 1-34.
32. Fearn, R. (2001). Music and pitch perception of cochlear implant recipients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.