Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1567-1580

  Chatterjee, Monita ^a   Oberzut, Cherish ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION DETECTIONS; COCHLEAR IMPLANT LISTENERS; MODULATION DEPTH; MODULATION SENSITIVITY; NON-LINEAR CORRELATIONS; TASK DIFFICULTY; TEMPORAL ENVELOPES; TEMPORAL MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTIONS; TEMPORAL MODULATIONS; THRESHOLD FUNCTIONS;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; AUDITION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS;

EXPERIMENTS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PATIENT; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052552488     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3621445     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Boex, C., Baud, L., Cosendai, G., Sigrist, A., Kos, M. I., and Pelizzone M. (2006). Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing., J. Assoc. Res. Otolayngol. 7 (2), 110-124. 10.1007/s10162-005-0027-2 (Pubitemid 43800621)
2. Chatterjee, M. (2003). Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: Envelope vs. tonotopic components., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113 (4), 2042-2053. 10.1121/1.1555613 (Pubitemid 36389943)
3. Chatterjee, M., Fu, Q.-J., and Shannon, R. V. (2000). Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 (3), 1637-1644. 10.1121/1.428448 (Pubitemid 30141705)
4. Chatterjee, M., and Oba, S. I. (2004). Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5 (4), 360-375. 10.1007/s10162-004-4050-5 (Pubitemid 40248237)
5. Chatterjee, M., and Oba, S. I. (2005). Noise improves modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners at moderate carrier levels.. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118 (2), 993-1002. 10.1121/1.1929258 (Pubitemid 41129234)
6. Chatterjee, M., and Peng, S. C. (2008). Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition., Hear. Res. 235 (1-2), 143-156. 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004 (Pubitemid 50019115)
7. Chatterjee, M., and Robert, M. E. (2001). Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: Stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system? J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2 (2), 159-171. 10.1007/ s101620010079 (Pubitemid 32622737)
8. Dau, T., Kollmeier, B., and Kohlrausch, A. (1997). Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2892-2905. 10.1121/1.420344 (Pubitemid 27486267)
9. Donaldson, G. S., and Viemeister, N. F. (2002). TMTFs in cochlear implant users: The role of loudness cues., Abstracts 24th ARO Midwinter Meeting (Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Mt. Royal, NJ).
10. Dorman, M. F., Spahr, T., Gifford, R., Loiselle, L., McKarns, S., Holden, T., Skinner, M., and Finley, C. (2007). An electric place-frequency map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8 (2), 234-240. 10.1007/s10162-007-0071-1 (Pubitemid 46661565)
11. Galvin, J. J., III, and Fu, Q.-J. (2005). Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6 (3), 269-279. 10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6
12. Galvin, J. J., III, and Fu, Q.-J. (2009). Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users., Hearing Res. 250 (1-2), 46-64. 10.1016/j.heares.2009. 01.009
13. Fishman, K. E., Shannon, R. V., and Slattery, W. H. (1997). Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor., J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40 (5), 1201-1215. (Pubitemid 27422400)
14. Fu, Q.-J. (2002). Temporal processing and speech recognition by cochlear implant users., Neuroreport 13 (13), 1635-1639. 10.1097/00001756-200209160-00013
15. Fu, Q.-J., Chinchilla, S., and Galvin, J. J., III (2004). The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., 5, 253-260. 10.1007/s10162-004-4046-1 (Pubitemid 39332096)
16. Fu, Q -J., Chinchilla, S., Nogaki, G., and Galvin, J. J., III (2005). Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: The role of spectral and temporal resolution., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 1711-1718. 10.1121/1.1985024 (Pubitemid 41318598)
17. Green, D. M. (1988). Profile Analysis: Auditory Intensity Discrimination, Oxford Psychology Series No. 13. (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 19-21.
18. Green, T., Faulkner, A., and Rosen, S. (2004). Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2298-2310. 10.1121/1.1785611 (Pubitemid 39391632)
19. Harmer, G. P., Davis, B. R., and Abbott, D. (2002). A review of stochastic resonance: Circuits and measurement., IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 51 (2), 299-309. 10.1109/19.997828 (Pubitemid 34692508)
20. Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L., Clark, M., and Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3099-3111. 10.1121/1.411872
21. Jesteadt, W. (1980). An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments., Percept. Psychophys. 28 (1), 85-88. 10.3758/BF03204321 (Pubitemid 11232422)
22. Kohlrausch, A., Fassel, R., and Dau, T. (2000). The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2), 723-734. 10.1121/1.429605 (Pubitemid 30625897)
23. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467-477. 10.1121/1.1912375
24. Luo, X., Fu, Q.-J., Wei, C. G., and Cao, K. L. (2008). Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users., Ear Hear. 29 (6), 957-970. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181888f61
25. Luo, X., Galvin, J. J., and Fu, Q.-J. (2010). Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127 (2), EL23-EL29.
26. McKay, C. M., and Henshall, K. R. (2010). Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees., J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11 (1), 101-111. 10.1007/s10162-009-0188-5
27. Middlebrooks, J. C., and Snyder, R. L. (2010). Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity., J. Neurosci. 30 (5), 1937-1946. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4949-09.2010
28. Moore, B. C., Vickers, D. A., Baer, T., and Launer, S. (1999). Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105 (5), 2757-2772. 10.1121/1.426893 (Pubitemid 29218395)
29. Pfingst, B. E., Burkholder-Juhasz, R. A., Xu, L., and Thompson, C. S. (2008). Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123 (2), 1054-1062. 10.1121/1.2828051 (Pubitemid 351208314)
30. Pfingst, B. E., Xu, L., and Thompson, C. S. (2007). Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121 (4), 2236-2246. 10.1121/1.2537501 (Pubitemid 46548423)
31. Robert, M. E. (2002). House Ear Institute Nucleus Research Interface User's Guide (House Ear Institute, Los Angeles).
32. Rosen, S. (1992). Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory, and linguistic aspects., Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. 336 (1278), 367-373. 10.1098/rstb.1992.0070
33. Shannon, R. V. (1992). Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2156-2164. 10.1121/1.403807
34. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., and Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues., Science 270, 303-304. 10.1126/science.270.5234.303
35. Shannon, R. V., Jensvold, A., Padilla, M., and Robert, M. E. (1999). Consonant recordings for speech testing., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 (6), L71-L74. 10.1121/1.428150
36. Viemeister, N. F. (1979). Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1364-1380. 10.1121/1.383531 (Pubitemid 10098323)
37. Xu, L., Thompson, C. S., and Pfingst, B. E. (2005). Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117 (5), 3255-3267. 10.1121/1.1886405 (Pubitemid 40675185)
38. Zeng, F. G., and Turner, C. W. (1991). Binaural loudness matches in unilaterally impaired listeners., Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 43A, 565-583.
39. Zeng, F. G., and Zhang, C. Y. (1997). Loudness of dynamic stimuli in electric and acoustic hearing., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2925-2934. 10.1121/1.420347 (Pubitemid 27486270)