Effect of bandpass filtering on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 129, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Galvin, John J ^a   Fu, Qian Jie ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAND PASS FILTERING; COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS; FREQUENCY RANGES; FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCIES; HARMONIC COMPONENTS; PITCH PERCEPTION;

AUDITION; BANDPASS FILTERS; DIGITAL FILTERS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PATIENT; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952175118     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3531708     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Galvin, J., Fu, Q. -J., and Nogaki, G. (2007). Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners., Ear Hear. 28, 302-319. 10.1097/01.aud.0000261689.35445.20 (Pubitemid 46718011)
2. Galvin, J., Fu, Q. -J., and Oba, S. (2008). Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, EL189-EL195. 10.1121/1.2961171
3. Galvin, J., Fu, Q. -J., and Oba, S. (2009). Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, EL98-EL103.
4. Geurts, L., and Wouters, J. (2004). Better place coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 844-852. 10.1121/1.1642623 (Pubitemid 38200671)
5. Kasturi, K., and Loizou, P. (2007). Effect of filter spacing on melody recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, EL29-EL34. 10.1121/1.2749078 (Pubitemid 47205553)
6. Laneau, J., Wouters, J., and Moonen, M. (2006). Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants., Audiol. Neurootol. 11, 38-52. 10.1159/000088853 (Pubitemid 43087558)
7. Oxenham, A., Bernstein, J., and Penagos, H. (2004). Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 1421-1425. 10.1073/pnas.0306958101 (Pubitemid 38182704)
8. Shannon, R. V. (1983). Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics., Hear. Res. 11, 157-189. 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90077-1 (Pubitemid 13034055)
9. Shannon, R., Fu, Q. -J., and Galvin, J. (2004). The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation., Acta Oto-Laryngol., Suppl. 552, 50-54. 10.1080/03655230410017562 (Pubitemid 38789263)
10. Vandali, A., Whitford, L., Plant, K., and Clark, G. (2000). Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system., Ear Hear. 21, 608-624. 10.1097/00003446-200012000- 00008