Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 337-340

  Limb, Charles J ^a,b,c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Melody; Music; Pitch; Rhythm; Timbre

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY SYSTEM; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LOUDNESS; MUSIC; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND TRANSMISSION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748760605     PISSN: 10689508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000244192.59184.bd     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Rubinstein JT. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12:444-448.
2. Rubinstein JT, Hong R. Signal coding in cochlear implants: exploiting stochastic effects of electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2003; 191:14-19.
3. Bernstein L. The unanswered question. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1976.
4. Patel AD. Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6:674-681.
5. Sessions R. The musical experience of composer, performer, listener. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1950.
6. Gfeller K, Lansing CR. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34:916-920.
7. Gfeller K, Woodworth G, Robin DA, et al. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1997; 18:252-260.
8. Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123:826-835.
9. McDermott HJ. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004; 8:49-82.
10. Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 2004; 25:173-185.
11. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Rychener M, et al. Recognition of 'real-world' musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear 2005; 26:237-250.
12. Pijl S. Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects. Ear Hear 1997; 18:364-372.
13. McDermott HJ, McKay CM. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101:1622-1631.
14. Ito J, Takagi A, Kawano M, et al. Results with the currently used cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166:298-300.
15. Boex C, Baud L, Cosendai G, et al. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006; 7:110-124.
16. Pijl S. Musical pitch perception with pulsatile stimulation of single electrodes in patients implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166:224-227.
17. Pijl S, Schwarz DW. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98:886-895.
18. Pijl S, Schwarz DW. Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes. Hear Res 1995; 89:203-211.
19. Laneau J, Wouters J, Moonen M. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2006; 11:38-52.
20. Koelsch S, Wittfoth M, Wolf A, et al. Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115:966-972.
21. Gfeller K, Witt S, Adamek M, et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13:132-145.
22. Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, et al. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9:1-19.
23. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson J, et al. The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J Music Ther 2003; 40:78-112.
24. Stordahl J. Song recognition and appraisal: a comparison of children who use cochlear implants and normally hearing children. J Music Ther 2002; 39:2-19.
25. Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, et al. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111:349-356.
26. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, et al. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11:390-406.
27. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005; 115:796-802.