Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Tang, Qing ^a   Benítez, Raul ^b   Zeng, Fan Gang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY NERVES; BACKGROUND NOISE; CHANNEL INTERACTIONS; DETECTION THRESHOLD; ELECTRIC FIELD PATTERNS; EVOKED COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL; EXCITATION PATTERN; FIELD IMAGING; HALF-WIDTH; IN-PHASE; INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MULTI-CHANNEL; MUSIC PERCEPTION; NEURAL PROSTHESIS; OUT OF PHASE; PERCEPTUAL CHANNELS; PERCEPTUAL INTERACTION; PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS; PHYSIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS; SINGLE ELECTRODES; SPATIAL CHANNELS; STIMULATING ELECTRODES; STIMULUS RATES; TONAL LANGUAGES; VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION;

AUDITION; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PROSTHETICS; SUPERALLOYS; WELL STIMULATION;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS;

AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; NERVE POTENTIAL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL CHANNEL INTERACTION; ACTION POTENTIAL; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHILD; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AGED; ALGORITHMS; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEMALE; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 79960771074     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046029     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (68)

1. Abbas P J and Brown C J 1988 Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation Hear. Res. 36 153-62
2. Abbas P J, Hughes M L, Brown C J, Miller C A and South H 2004 Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential Audiol. Neurootol. 9 203-13 (Pubitemid 38812968)
3. Berenstein C K, Mens L H, Mulder J J and Vanpoucke F J 2008 Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations Ear Hear. 29 250-60 (Pubitemid 351640524)
4. Bierer J A 2007 Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121 1642-53 (Pubitemid 46555429)
5. Bierer J A 2010 Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation Trends Amplif. 14 84-95
6. Bierer J A, Faulkner K F and Tremblay K L 2010 Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration Ear Hear. 32 436-44
7. Bonham B H and Litvak L M 2008 Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics Hear. Res. 242 141-53
8. Brill S et al 2009 Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array Biomed. Eng. Online 8 40
9. Brown C J, Abbas P J, Borland J and Bertschy M R 1996 Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses J. Speech Hear. Res. 39 453-67
10. Brown C J, Abbas P J and Gantz B 1990 Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 1385-91 (Pubitemid 20324408)
11. Bruce I C, White M W, Irlicht L S, O'Leary S J and Clark G M 1999 The effects of stochastic neural activity in a model predicting intensity perception with cochlear implants: low-rate stimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 1393-404
12. Chader G J, Weiland J and Humayun M S 2009 Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis Prog. Brain Res. 175 317-32
13. Chatterjee M and Oba S I 2004 Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5 360-75 (Pubitemid 40248237)
14. Chatterjee M and Shannon R V 1998 Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 2565-72
15. Chua T E, Bachman M and Zeng F G 2011 Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms Ear Hear. at press
16. Cohen L T, Richardson L M, Saunders E and Cowan R S 2003 Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking Hear. Res. 179 72-87 (Pubitemid 36547892)
17. Cohen L T, Saunders E and Richardson L M 2004 Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients Int. J. Audiol. 43 346-55 (Pubitemid 38821612)
18. de Balthasar C, Boex C, Cosendai G, Valentini G, Sigrist A and Pelizzone M 2003 Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects Hear Res. 182 77-87 (Pubitemid 37013286)
19. Donaldson G S, Dawson P K and Borden L Z 2011 Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity Ear Hear. 32 238-50
20. Eddington D K, Dobelle W H, Brackmann D E, Mladejovsky M G and Parkin J L 1978 Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 87 1-39
21. Eisen M D and Franck K H 2004 Electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions and HiResolution programming levels in pediatric CII implant subjects Ear Hear. 25 528-38 (Pubitemid 39602241)
22. Eisen M D and Franck K H 2005 Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6 160-70 (Pubitemid 40884714)
23. Favre E and PelizzoneM1993 Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant Hear. Res. 66 150-6 (Pubitemid 23124183)
24. Fridman G Y, Davidovics N S, Dai C, Migliaccio A A and Della Santina C C 2010 Vestibulo-ocular reflex responses to a multichannel vestibular prosthesis incorporating a 3D coordinate transformation for correction of misalignment J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11 367-81
25. Frijns J H, de Snoo S L and Schoonhoven R 1995 Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea Hear. Res. 87 170-86
26. Grill W M Jr and Mortimer J T 1996 The effect of stimulus pulse duration on selectivity of neural stimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43 161-6 (Pubitemid 26055575)
27. Henry B A and Turner C W 2003 The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113 2861-73 (Pubitemid 36547360)
28. Hughes M L and Abbas P J 2006a Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 1538-47 (Pubitemid 43326023)
29. Hughes M L and Abbas P J 2006b The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 1527-37 (Pubitemid 43326022)
30. Izzo A D, Walsh J T Jr, Jansen E D, Bendett M, Webb J, Ralph H and Richter C P 2007 Optical parameter variability in laser nerve stimulation: a study of pulse duration, repetition rate, and wavelength IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 1108-14 (Pubitemid 46815115)
31. Jolly C N, Spelman F A and Clopton B M 1996 Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43 857-65 (Pubitemid 26284807)
32. Klop W M, Hartlooper A, Briare J J and Frijns J H 2004 A new method for dealing with the stimulus artefact in electrically evoked compound action potential measurements Acta Otolaryngol. 124 137-43 (Pubitemid 38375641)
33. Kuncel A M and Grill W M 2004 Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 2431-41 (Pubitemid 39304135)
34. Levitt H 1971 Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49 467-77
35. Mccreery D B 2008 Cochlear nucleus auditory prostheses Hear. Res. 242 64-73
36. Mckay C M, Mcdermott H J and Clark G M 1995 Loudness summation for two channels of stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of spatial and temporal separation Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 166 230-3
37. Middlebrooks J C and Snyder R L 2007 Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 8 258-79 (Pubitemid 46659320)
38. Moore B C 2004 Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications Ear Hear. 25 98-116 (Pubitemid 38451759)
39. Nadol J B Jr 1997 Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 117 220-8 (Pubitemid 27426275)
40. Nelson D A and Donaldson G S 2001 Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 2921-33 (Pubitemid 32545136)
41. Patterson R D, Nimmo-Smith I, Weber D L and Milroy R 1982 The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72 1788-803 (Pubitemid 13186518)
42. Peckham P H and Knutson J S 2005 Functional electrical stimulation for neuromuscular applications Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 7 327-60 (Pubitemid 41170191)
43. Pesaran B, Musallam S and Andersen R A 2006 Cognitive neural prosthetics Curr. Biol. 16 R77-80
44. Pikov V, Arakaki X, Harrington M, Fraser S E and Siegel P H 2010 Modulation of neuronal activity and plasma membrane properties with low-power millimeter waves in organotypic cortical slices J. Neural Eng. 7 045003
45. Ranck J B Jr 1975 Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review Brain Res. 98 417-40
46. Rattay F, Lutter P and Felix H 2001 A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron: I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes Hear. Res. 153 43-63 (Pubitemid 32153844)
47. Rubinstein J T 2004 An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential Int. J. Audiol. 43 Suppl 1 S3-9 (Pubitemid 40179556)
48. Rutten W L 2002 Selective electrical interfaces with the nervous system Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4 407-52 (Pubitemid 35217427)
49. Sankarasubramanian V, Buitenweg J R, Holsheimer J and Veltink P 2011 Electrode alignment of transverse tripoles using a percutaneous triple-lead approach in spinal cord stimulation J. Neural Eng. 8 016010
50. Shannon R V 1983 Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man: II. Channel interaction Hear. Res. 12 1-16 (Pubitemid 14233028)
51. Shannon R V 1985 Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants Hear. Res. 18 135-43 (Pubitemid 15003787)
52. Shannon R V, Fu Q J and Galvin J III 2004 The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 552 50-4 (Pubitemid 38789263)
53. Skinner M W, Holden L K, Whitford L A, Plant K L, Psarros C and Holden T A 2002 Speech recognition with the nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults Ear Hear. 23 207-23 (Pubitemid 34625510)
54. Smith Z M, Delgutte B and Oxenham A J 2002 Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception Nature 416 87-90 (Pubitemid 34215405)
55. Srinivasan A G, Landsberger D M and Shannon R V 2010 Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation Hear. Res. 270 89-100
56. Stickney G S, Loizou P C, Mishra L N, Assmann P F, Shannon R V and Opie J M 2006 Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions Hear. Res. 211 33-45 (Pubitemid 43112409)
57. Tykocinski M, Saunders E, Cohen L T, Treaba C, Briggs R J, Gibson P, Clark G M and Cowan R S 2001 The contour electrode array: safety study and initial patient trials of a new perimodiolar design Otol. Neurotol. 22 33-41 (Pubitemid 32184311)
58. van den Honert C and Stypulkowski P H 1984 Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: II. Single fiber recordings Hear. Res. 14 225-43 (Pubitemid 14088243)
59. van Wieringen A, Carlyon R P, Laneau J and Wouters J 2005 Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear Hear. Res. 200 73-86
60. Vanpoucke F, Zarowski A, Casselman J, Frijns J and Peeters S 2004a The facial nerve canal: an important cochlear conduction path revealed by Clarion electrical field imaging Otol. Neurotol. 25 282-9 (Pubitemid 39079809)
61. Vanpoucke F J, Zarowski A J and Peeters S A 2004b Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51 2174-83 (Pubitemid 39578013)
62. Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K and Rabinowitz W M 1991 Better speech recognition with cochlear implants Nature 352 236-8 (Pubitemid 21912323)
63. Wilson B S, Lawson D T, Muller J M, Tyler R S and Kiefer J 2003 Cochlear implants: some likely next steps Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 5 207-49 (Pubitemid 40125312)
64. Xu Y and Collins L M 2005 Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 1040-9 (Pubitemid 40813836)
65. Zeng F G 2004 Trends in cochlear implants Trends Amplif. 8 1-34
66. Zeng F G, Galvin J J III and Zhang C 1998 Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve Neuroreport 9 1845-8 (Pubitemid 28289197)
67. Zeng F G, Rebscher S, Harrison W, Sun X and Feng H H 2008 Cochlear implants: system design, integration and evaluation IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1 115-42
68. Zeng F G and Shannon R V 1994 Loudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system Science 264 564-6 (Pubitemid 24185860)