The music perception test: A novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users

Cochlear Implants International

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 10-20

  Brockmeier, S J ^a,g   Fitzgerald, Denis ^b   Searle, Oliver ^c   Fitzgerald, Heather ^b   Grasmeder, Mary ^d   Hilbig, Silke ^e   Vermiere, Katrien ^f   Peterreins, Martin ^a   Heydner, Susanne ^a   Arnold, Wolfgang ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b H and D Fitzgerald ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL CONSERVATOIRE OF SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^e GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^g Clinic for Pedaudiology   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; COMBI 40+; Dissonance; Emotion; Music perception; Normal hearing participants; Pitch perception; PULSARCI100 implants; Rhythm; Timbre perception

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUSIC; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE TESTS; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUSIC; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PITCH PERCEPTION; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 79952643501     PISSN: 14670100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/146701010X12677899497236     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Attneave F., Olson R.K. 1971. Pitch as a medium: a new approach to psychophysical scaling. American Journal of Psychology, 84(2): 147-166.
2. Balkwill L.L., ThomsonW.F. 1999. A cross-cultural investigation of the perception of motion in music: psychophysical and cultural cues. Music Perception, 17: 43-64.
3. Brockmeier S.J. 2000. Munich Music Questionnaire (MUMU), MED-EL GmbH (available at http://www.medel.com/english/50-Rehabilitation/Free-download/ munich-music-questionaire.php,accessed 11 December 2009).
4. Brockmeier S.J. 2003. Emotional response to music in combi 40/40+ users. Cochlear Implants International, 4(Suppl 1): 25-26.
5. Brockmeier S.J., Grasmeder M., Passow S., Mawmann D., Vischer M., Jappel A., Baumgartner W., Stark T., Müller J., Brill S., Steffens T., Strutz J., Kiefer J., Baumann U., Arnold W. 2007. Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies. Ear and Hearing, 28(2 Suppl): 49S-51S. (Pubitemid 46673659)
6. Brockmeier S.J., Nopp P., Vischer M., Baumgartner W., Stark T., Schoen F., Mueller J., Braunschweig T., Busch R., Getto M., Arnold W., Allum D.J. 2002. Correlation of speech and music perception in postlingually deaf Combi 40/40+ users in cochlear implants. In: TY Kubo, T Iwaki, eds. Cochlear Implants - An Update. The Hague: Kugler Publications, 459-464.
7. Busby P.A., Clark G.M. 2000. Pitch estimation by early-deafened subjects using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(1): 547-558. (Pubitemid 30039179)
8. Cazden N. 1945. Musical consonance and dissonance: a cultural criterion. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 11: 3-11.
9. Cooper W.B., Tobey E., Loizou P.C. 2008. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for evaluation of Amusia. Ear and Hearing, 29(4): 618-626.
10. Dalla B.S., Peretz I., Rousseau L., Gosselin N., Ayotte J., Lavoie A. 2001. Development of the happy-sad distinction in music appreciation. Does tempo emerge earlier than mode? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930: 436-438. (Pubitemid 32611870)
11. Dorman M.F., Basham K., McCandless G., Dove H. 1991. Speech understanding andmusic appreciation with the Ineraid cochlear implant. The Hearing Journal, 44: 34-37.
12. FellbaumK. 1984. Sprachverarbeitung und Sprachübertragung. Berlin: Springer.
13. Fitzgerald D., Fitzgerald H., Brockmeier S.J., Searle O., Grebenev L., Nopp P. 2006. Musical Sounds in Cochlear Implants (Mu.S.I.C.) Test. Innsbruck: MED-EL GmbH.
14. Fujita S., Ito J. 1999. Ability of Nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 108: 634-640. (Pubitemid 29331061)
15. Galvin III JJ, Fu Q.J., Oba S. 2008. Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(4): EL189-EL195.
16. Gfeller K., Lansing C.R. 1991. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34(4): 916-920.
17. Gfeller K., Knutson J.F., Woodworth G., Witt S., DeBus B. 1998. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9(1): 1-19.
18. Gfeller K., Olszewski C., Rychener M., Sena K., Knutson J.F.,Witt S., Macpherson B. 2005. Recognition of 'real-world' musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear and Hearing, 26(3): 237-250. (Pubitemid 40917422)
19. Gfeller K., Turner C., Mehr M.,Woodworth G., Fearn R., Knutson J.F.,Witt S., Stordahl J. 2002. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants International, 3(1): 29-53. (Pubitemid 34521078)
20. Gfeller K.,Woodworth G., Robin D.A., Witt S., Knutson J.F. 1997. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 18(3): 252-260. (Pubitemid 27265817)
21. Grasmeder M., Lutman M. 2006. The identification of musical instruments through nucleus cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, 7(3): 148-158. (Pubitemid 46564006)
22. Hevner K. 1936. Experimental studies of the elements of expression in music. American Journal of Psychology, 48: 246-268.
23. Hyde K.L., Peretz I. 2004. Brains that are out of tune but in time. Psychological Science, 15(5): 356-360. (Pubitemid 38706679)
24. JathoK.,Heck K.H. 1959. [Audiometric threshold studies on progression & characteristics of presbycusis in various stages of life; with a contribution to the pathogenesis of presbycusis]. Zeitschrift für Laryngologie, Rhinologie und Otologie, 38(2): 72-88.
25. Juslin P.N. 1997. Can results from studies of perceived expression in musical performances be generalized across response formats? Psychomusicology, 16: 77-101.
26. Krumhansl C.L. 1991. Music psychology: tonal structures in perception and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 42: 277-303.
27. Lanz M.E., Cuddy L.L. 2002. Acoustic parameters as cues to judgments of happy and sad emotions in music. Canadian Acoustics, 30: 164-165. (Pubitemid 35209493)
28. Leal M.C., Shin Y.J., Laborde M.L., Calmels M.N., Verges S., Lugardon S., Andrieu S., Deguine O., Fraysse B. 2003. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngologica, 123(7): 826-835. (Pubitemid 37222698)
29. Levitt H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2 Suppl): 467-477.
30. McDermott H.J. 2004. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends in Amplification, 8(2): 49-82. (Pubitemid 39435144)
31. McDermott H., McKay C. 1997. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(3): 1622-1631. (Pubitemid 27114266)
32. McDermott H.J., Looi V. 2004. Perception of complex signals, including musical sounds with cochlear implants. International Congress Series, 1273: 201-204.
33. Nimmons G.L., Kang R.S., Drennan W.R., Longnion J., Ruffin C., Worman T., Yueh B., Rubenstien J.T. 2008. Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otology and Neurotology, 29(2): 149-155. (Pubitemid 351170465)
34. Nobbe A., Schleich P., Zierhofer C., Nopp P. 2007. Frequency discrimination with sequential or simultaneous stimulation in MED-EL cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngologica, 127(12): 1266-1272. (Pubitemid 350175278)
35. Pankseep J. 1995. The emotional sources of 'Chills' induced by music. Music Perception, 13: 171-207.
36. Peretz I., Gagnon L., Bouchard B. 1998. Music and emotion: perceptual determinants, immediacy, and isolation after brain damage. Cognition, 68: 111-141. (Pubitemid 128426934)
37. Pijl S. 1997. Labelling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects. Ear and Hearing, 18(5): 364-372. (Pubitemid 27467599)
38. Plomb R. 1967. Pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41: 1526-1533.
39. Scherer K.R., Zentner M.R. 2001. Emotional effects of music: production rules. In: P Juslin, J Sloboda, eds. Music and Emotion: Theory and Research. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 361-392.
40. Schulz E., Kerber M. 1994. Music perception with the MED-EL implants. In: IJ Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair, eds. Advances in Cochlear Implants. Wien: Manz, pp. 326-332.
41. Shannon R.V. 1983. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hearing Research, 11(2): 157-189. (Pubitemid 13034055)
42. Smith Z.M., Delgutte B.,Oxenham A.J. 2002. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 416(6876): 87-90. (Pubitemid 34215405)
43. William D.A. 1996. A study of the internal validity of the instrument timbre preference test. Journal for Research in Music and Music Education, 44: 268-278.
44. Zeng F.G. 2004. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends in Amplification, 8(1): 1-34.