Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 302-319

  Galvin III, John J ^a   Fu, Qian Jie ^a   Nogaki, Geraldine ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYZER; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; MALE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEEDBACK; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; TEACHING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34248138954     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000261689.35445.20     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bigand, E. (2003). More about the musical expertise of musically untrained listeners. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 304-312.
2. Burns, E. M., Viemeister, N. F. (1976). Nonspectral pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 863-869.
3. Burns, E. M., Viemeister, N. F. (1981). Played-again SAM: further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 1655-1660.
4. Fishman, K., Shannon, R. V., Slattery, W. H. (1997). Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 1201-1215.
5. Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Slattery, W. H. (1999). Effects of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. American Journal of Otology, 20, 729-734.
6. Fu, Q.-J., Galvin, J. J. III, Wang, X., Nogaki, G. (2005). Moderate auditory training can improve speech performance of adult cochlear implant users. Acoustic Research Letters Online, 6, 106-111.
7. Fu, Q.-J., Nogaki, G. (2005). Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 6, 19-27.
8. Fu, Q.-J., Shannon, R. V., Galvin, J. J. III. (2002). Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1664-1674.
9. Fu, Q.-J., Shannon, R. V., Wang, X. (1998). Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 3586-3596.
10. Fujita, S., Ito, J. (1999). Ability of Nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 108, 634-640.
11. Galvin, J. J. III, Fu, Q.-J. (2005). Effects of stimulation rate, mode, and levels on modulation detection by cochlear implant users. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 6, 269-279.
12. Galvin, J. J. III, Fu, Q. J. (2004a). Place-pitch and excitation patterns in cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2385.
13. Galvin, J. J. III, Fu, Q. J. (2004b). Interactions between the frequency allocation, stimulation mode, and pitch perception on speech recognition by cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2524.
14. Gfeller, K., Lansing, C. R. (1991). Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 916-920.
15. Gfeller, K., Woodworth, G., Robin, D. A., Witt, S., Knutson, J. F. (1997). Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 18, 252-260.
16. Gfeller, K., Christ, A., Knutson, J. F., Witt, S, Murray, K. T., Tyler, R. S. (2000). Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 11, 390-406.
17. Gfeller, K., Wiit, S., Adamek, M., Mehr, M., Rogers, J, Stordahl, J., Ringgenberg, S. (2002). Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 132-145.
18. Gordon, E. E. (1979). Primary measures of music audiation. Chicago: G.I.A. Publications.
19. Hacker, M. J., Ratcliffe, R. (1979). A revised table of d' for M-alternative forced choice. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 168-170.
20. Henry, B. A., McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., Clark, G. M. (2000). The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1269-1280.
21. HoutsmaA. J., Smurzynski, J. (1990). Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 304-310.
22. Kong, Y. Y., Cruz, R., Jones, J. A., Zeng, F.-G. (2004). Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear and Hearing, 25, 173-185.
23. Kong, Y. Y., Stickney, G. S., Zeng, F.-G. (2005). Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 1351-1361.
24. Laneau, J., Moonen, M., Wouters, J. (2004). Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3606-3619.
25. Loeb, G. E. (2005). Are cochlear implant patients suffering from perceptual dissonance, Ear and Hearing, 26, 435-450.
26. Lynch, M. P., Eilers, R. E., Oller, K. D., Urbano, R. C., Wilson, P. (1991). Influences of acculturation and musical sophistication on perception of musical interval patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 467-475.
27. Madsen, C. K., Staum, M. J. (1983). Discrimination and interference in the recall of melodic stimuli. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 15-31.
28. McDermott, H. J., McKay, C. M. (1997). Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 1622-1631.
29. McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., Carlyon, R. P. (2000). Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: Are they truly independent? Acoustic Research Letters Online, 1, 25-30.
30. Nelson, D. A., Van Tasell D. J., Schroder, A. C., Soli, S., Levine, S. (1995). Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1987-1999.
31. Oxenham, A. J., Bernstein, J. G. W., Penagos, H. (2004). Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 1421-1425.
32. Pijl, S., Schwarz, D. W. F. (1995a). Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 886-895.
33. Pijl, S., Schwarz, D. W. F. (1995b). Intonation of musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes. Hearing Research, 89, 203-211.
34. Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., Wilkinson, L. (1999). Perceptual adaptation by normal listeners to upward shifts of spectral information in speech and its relevance for users of cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3629-3636.
35. Shannon, R. V. (1983). Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man, I: basic psychophysics. Hearing Research, 11, 157-189.
36. Shannon, R. V., Fu Q.-J. Galvin, J. J. (2004). The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. Acta-Otolaryngology Supplement, 552, 50-54.
37. Tong, Y. C., Clark, G. M., Blamey, P. J., Busby, P. A., Dowell, R. C. (1982). Psychophysical studies for 2 multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71, 153-160.
38. Shannon, R. V. (1992). Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2156-2164.
39. Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B., Oxenham, A. J. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416, 87-90.
40. Wright, B. A., Fitzgerald, M. B. (2001). Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 12307-12312.