Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 981-994

  Kong, Ying Yee ^a   Mullangi, Ala ^a   Marozeau, Jeremy ^a,b   Epsteina, Michael ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BIONIC EAR INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Music; Timbre

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CUES; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSIC; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79958751306     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0196)     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1973). American National Standard - Psychoacoustical Terminology (ANSIS3.20-1973). New York, NY: Author.
2. Borg, I., & Groenen, P.J.F. (1997). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer.
3. Caclin, A., McAdams, S., Smith, B.K., & Winsberg, S. (2005). Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: A confirmatory study using synthetic tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 471-482.
4. Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J.-J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319.
5. Dorman, M. F., Basham, K., McCandless, G., & Dove, H. (1991). Speech understanding and music appreciation with the Ineraid cochlear implant. The Hearing Journal, 44, 32-37.
6. Galvin, J. J., Fu, Q.-J., & Nogaki, G. (2007). Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear and Hearing, 28, 302-319.
7. Gfeller, K., & Lansing, C. R. (1991). Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 916-920.
8. Gfeller, K., Christ, A., Knutson, J. F., Witt, S., Murray, K. T., & Tyler, R. S. (2000). Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11, 390-406.
9. Gfeller, K., Knutson, J. F., Woodworth, G., Witt, S., & DeBus, B. (1998). Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9, 1-19.
10. Gfeller, K., Turner, C., Mehr, M., Woodworth, G., Fearn, R., Knutson, J. F., ... Stordahl, J. (2002). Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants International, 3, 29-53.
11. Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Adamek, M., Mehr, M., Rogers, J., Stordahl, J., & Ringgenberg, S. (2002). Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13, 132-145.
12. Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Woodworth, G., Mehr, M., & Knutson, J. (2002). Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 111, 349-356.
13. Kang, R., Nimmons, G. L., Drennan, W., Longnion, J., Ruffin, C., Nie, K., ... Rubinstein, J. (2009). Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test. Ear and Hearing, 30, 411-418.
14. Kong, Y.-Y., Cruz, R., Jones, J. A., & Zeng, F.-G. (2004). Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear and Hearing, 25, 173-185.
15. Krimphoff, J., McAdams, S., & Winsberg, S. (1994). Caractérisation du timbre des sons complexes. II: Analyses acoustiques et quantification psychophysique. Journal de Physique, 4, 625-628.
16. Krumhansl, C. L. (1989). Why is musical timbre so hard to understand? In S. Nielzen & O. Olsson (Eds.), Structure and perception of electroacoustic sound and music (pp. 43-53). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific.
17. Leal, M.C., Shin, Y.J., Laborde, M., Calmels, M.N., Verges, S., Lugardon, S., ... Fraysse, B. (2003). Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngologica, 123, 826-835.
18. Looi, V., McDermott, H., McKay, C., & Hickson, L. (2007). Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users. Ear and Hearing, 28, 59S-61S.
19. Marozeau, J., & de Cheveigne, A. (2007). The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 383-387.
20. Marozeau, J., deCheveigne, A., McAdams, S., & Winsberg, S. (2003). The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 2946-2957.
21. McAdams, S., Winsberg, S., Donnadieu, S., De Soete, G., & Krimphoff, J. (1995). Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes. Psychological Research, 58, 177-192.
22. McDermott, H. J. (2004). Music perception with cochlear implants: A review. Trends in Amplification, 8, 49-82.
23. Nimmons, G. L., Kang, R. S., Drennan, W. R., Longnion, J., Ruffin, C., Worman, T., ... Rubinstein, J. (2008). Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otology and Neurotology, 29, 149-155.
24. Peeters, G. (2004). A large set of audio features for sound description (similarity and classification) in the CUIDADO project. CUIDADO I.S.T. Project Report. Paris, France: Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique(Ircam). Retrieved from Ircam website: http://recherche.ircam.fr/equipes/analyse-synthese/peeters/ARTICLES/Peeters_2003_cuidadoaudiofeatures.pdf.
25. Peeters, G., McAdams, S., & Herrera, P. (2000). Instrument sound description in the context of MPEG-7. Proceedings of the 2000 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 166-169). San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association. Retrieved from Ircam website: http://recherche.ircam.fr/equipes/analyse-synthese/peeters/ARTICLES/Peeters_2000_ICMC_TimbreMPEG7.pdf.
26. Pressnitzer, D., Bestel, J., & Fraysse, B. (2005). Music to electric ears: Pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 343-345.
27. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995, October 13). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303-304.
28. Shannon, R. V., Jensvold, A., Padilla, M., Robert, M. E., & Wang, X. (1999). Consonant recordings for speech testing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, L71-74.
29. Schulz, E., & Kerber, M. (1994). Music perception with the Med-El implants. In I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer&E. S. Hochmair (Eds.), Advances in cochlear implants (pp. 326-332). Vienna: Manz.
30. Singh, S., Kong, Y.-Y., & Zeng, F.-G. (2009). Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes. Ear and Hearing, 30, 160-168.
31. Wessel, D. L., Bristow, D., & Settel, Z. (1987). Control of phrasing and articulation in synthesis. Proceedings of the 1987 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 108-116). San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
32. Wilson, B. S., & Dorman, M. F. (2008). Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hearing Research, 242, 3-21.
33. Won, J. H., Drennan, W. R., Kang, R. S., & Rubinstein, J. T. (2010). Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 31, 796-805.