Musical Sound Quality Impairments in Cochlear Implant (CI) Users as a Function of Limited High-Frequency Perception

Trends in Amplification

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 191-200

  Roy, Alexis T ^a   Jiradejvong, Patpong ^a   Carver, Courtney ^a   Limb, Charles J ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Peabody Conservatory of Music   (United States)

Author keywords

cochlear implants; music perception; sound quality

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PATIENT; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROSTHESIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CORRECTION OF HEARING IMPAIRMENT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PITCH PERCEPTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84871599871     PISSN: 10847138     EISSN: 19405588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1084713812465493     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berenstein C. K., Mens L. H., Mulder J. J., Vanpoucke F. J. (2008). Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: Comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations. Ear & Hearing, 29(2), 250-260.
2. Brockmeier S. J., Fitzgerald D., Searle O., Fitzgerald H., Grasmeder M., Hilbig S. et al. (2011). The MuSIC perception test: A novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants International, 12(1), 10-20.
3. Driscoll V. D., Oleson J., Jiang D., Gfeller K. (2009). Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20(1), 71-82.
4. Galvin J. J., Fu Q. J., Shannon R. V. (2009). Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 518-533.
5. Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J., Witt S., Mehr M. (2003). The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. Journal of Music Therapy, 40(2), 78-112.
6. Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J. F., Witt S., Murray K. T., Tyler R. S. (2000). Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11(7), 390-406.
7. Gfeller K., Oleson J., Knutson J. F., Breheny P., Driscoll V., Olszewski C. (2008). Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 19(2), 120-134.
8. Gfeller K., Witt S., Adamek M., Mehr M., Rogers J., Stordahl J. et al. (2002). Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13(3), 132-145.
9. Ginocchio J. (2009). The effects of different amounts and types of music training on music style preference. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 182, 7-17.
10. Hillman T., Badi A. N., Normann R. A., Kertesz T., Shelton C. (2003). Cochlear nerve stimulation with a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array. Otology & Neurotology, 24(5), 764-768.
11. International Telecommunication Union. (2003). Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate sound quality (MUSHRA; ITU-R.Recommendation.BS.1534-1). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
12. Kang R., Nimmons G. L., Drennan W., Longnion J., Ruffin C., Nie K. et al. (2009). Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test. Ear & Hearing, 30(4), 411-418.
13. Kemp A. E. (1996). The musical temerament: Pyschology and personality of musicans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Koch D. B., Downing M., Osberger M. J., Litvak L. (2007). Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear & Hearing, 28(Suppl. 2), 38-41.
15. Landsberger D. M., Srinivasan A. G. (2009). Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients. Hearing Research, 254(1-2), 34-41.
16. Lassaletta L., Castro A., Bastarrica M., Perez-Mora R., Herran B., Sanz L. et al. (2008a). Changes in listening habits and quality of musical sound after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 138(3), 363-367.
17. Lassaletta L., Castro A., Bastarrica M., Perez-Mora R., Herran B., Sanz L. et al. (2008b). Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants. Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española, 59(5), 228-234.
18. LeBlanc A. (1982). An interactive theory of musical preference. Journal of Music Theory, 19, 29-45.
19. LeBlanc A. (1991, March). Effect of maturation/aging on music listening preference: A review of the literature. Paper presented at the 9th National Symposium, on Research in Musical Behavior, Cannon Beach, OR, USA.
20. Limb C. J., Rubinstein J. T. (2012). Current research on music perception in cochlear implant users. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 45(1), 129-140.
21. Looi V., Winter P., Anderson I., Sucher C. (2011). A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation. International Journal of Audiology, 50(8), 503-518.
22. McDermott H. J. (2004). Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends in Amplification, 8(2), 49-82.
23. Migirov L., Kronenberg J., Henkin Y. (2009). Self-reported listening habits and enjoyment of music among adult cochlear implant recipients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 118(5), 350-355.
24. Mirza S., Douglas S. A., Lindsey P., Hildreth T., Hawthorne M. (2003). Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants International, 4(2), 85-95.
25. Nater U. M., Abbruzzese E., Kreb M., Elhert U. (2006). Sex differerences in emotional and psychophysiological responses to musical stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(6), 300-308.
26. Roy A. T., Jiradejvong P., Carver C., Limb C. J. (2012). Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening. Otology & Neurotology, 33(3), 319-327.
27. Schuessler K. F. (1948). Social background and musical taste. American Sociological Review, 13(3), 330-335.
28. Snow W. B. (1931). Audible frequency ranges of music, speech and noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 3, 616-627.
29. Vincent E. (2005). MUSHRAM: A MATLAB interface for MUSHRA listening tests. Retrieved from http://www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/people/emmanuelv/mushram