From fragments to the whole: A comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-7

  Alexander, Ashlin J ^a   Bartel, Lee ^a   Friesen, Lendra ^a   Shipp, David ^a   Chen, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PERCEPTION; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951889898     PISSN: 19160216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2010.090085     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Faber CE, Grontved AM. Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 2000;543:151-3. (Pubitemid 34098610)
2. Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, et al. Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:267-70, doi:10.1007/s00405-005-0987-1.
3. Gstoettner W, Hamzavi J, Czerny C. Rehabilitation of patients with hearing loss by cochlear implants. Radiologe 1997;37:991-4, doi:10.1007/ s001170050312. (Pubitemid 28051775)
4. Wilson B. Sixth quarterly progress report, speech processors for auditory prostheses. Research Triangle Park (NC): Research Triangle Park; 2000.
5. Kou BS, Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM. Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users. J Otolaryngol 1994;23:8-14. (Pubitemid 24107352)
6. Orabi AA, Mawman D, Al-Zoubi F, et al. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:116-22, doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01156.x.
7. Haensel J, Engelke JC, Ottenjann W, Westhofen M. Long-term results of cochlear implantation in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:456-8, doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.021. (Pubitemid 40326700)
8. Beadle EA, McKinley DJ, Nikolopoulos TP, et al. Long-term functional outcomes and academic-occupational status in implanted children after 10 to 14 years of cochlear implant use. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:1152-60, doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000180483.16619.8f. (Pubitemid 41697370)
9. Geers AE, Nicholas JG, Sedey AL. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2003;24:46-58, doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000051689. 57380.1B.
10. McDermott H. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004;8:49-82, doi:10.1177/108471380400800203. (Pubitemid 39435144)
11. Zeng F. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 2004;8:1-34, doi:10.1177/108471380400800102. (Pubitemid 38900436)
12. Ito J, Takagi A, Kawano M, Honjo I. Studies of currently used and experimental cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1995; 115:493-6, doi:10.3109/00016489509139354.
13. Tyler RS, Gfeller K, Mehr MA. A preliminary investigation comparing one and eight channels at fast and slow rates on music appraisal in adults with cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2000;1:82-7, doi:10.1002/cii.31.
14. Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, et al. Changes in listening habits and quality of musical sound after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:363-7, doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2007.11.028. (Pubitemid 351288438)
15. Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, et al. Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation? Acta OtoLaryngol (Stockh) 2007;127:682-6, doi:10.1080/00016480601002112.
16. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effectiveness of an attention-training program. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1987;9:117-30, doi:10.1080/01688638708405352. (Pubitemid 17034462)
17. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, et al. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:390-406.
18. Gfeller K, Witt S, Adamek M, et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:132-45. (Pubitemid 34467516)
19. Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, et al. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1998;9:1-19.
20. Gfeller K, Woodworth G, Robin DA, et al. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1997;18:252-60, doi:10.1097/00003446-199706000-00008. (Pubitemid 27265817)
21. Gfeller K, Lansing CR. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:916-20.
22. Pijl S, Schwarz DW. Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes. Hear Res 1995;89:203-11, doi:10.1016/0378-5955(95)00138-9.
23. Pijl S, Schwarz DW. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 982 Pt 1:886-95, doi:10.1121/1.413514.
24. Fugita S, Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108(7 Pt 1):634-40. (Pubitemid 29331061)
25. Limb C. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14:337-40, doi:10.1097/01.moo.0000244192.59184. bd. (Pubitemid 44410400)
26. Bartel L, Ostroff J, Bodmer D, et al. Qualitative case studies of five cochlear implant recipients' experience with music. Cochlear Implants Int. [Submitted]
27. Spitzer JB, Mancuso D, Cheng MY. Development of a clinical test of musical perception: Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI). J Am Acad Audiol 2008;19:56-81, doi:10.3766/jaaa.19.1.6. (Pubitemid 351836186)