Integrating phylogenetics, phylogeography and population genetics through genomes and evolutionary theory

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1172-1185

  Cutter, Asher D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Coalescent theory; Genome evolution; Phylogeography; Speciation; Species trees

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COALESCENT THEORY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME EVOLUTION; GENOMICS; INHERITANCE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION GENETICS; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES TREES;

COALESCENT THEORY; GENOME EVOLUTION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SPECIATION; SPECIES TREES;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOMICS; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84884588405     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.06.006     Document Type: Review

References (174)

1. Achaz G. Frequency spectrum neutrality tests: one for all and all for one. Genetics 2009, 183:249-258.
2. Ai B., Wang Z.S., Ge S. Genome size is not correlated with effective population size in the Oryza species. Evolution 2012, 66:3302-3310.
3. Allendorf F.W., Hohenlohe P.A., Luikart G. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:697-709.
4. Andersen E.C., Gerke J.P., Shapiro J.A., Crissman J.R., Ghosh R., Bloom J.S., Felix M.A., Kruglyak L. Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:285-290.
5. Andolfatto P. Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila. Nature 2005, 437:1149-1152.
6. Arbogast B.S., Kenagy G.J. Comparative phylogeography as an integrative approach to historical biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 2001, 28:819-825.
7. Arbogast B.S., Edwards S.V., Wakeley J., Beerli P., Slowinski J.B. Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33:707-740.
8. Avise J.C., Arnold J., Ball R.M., Bermingham E., Lamb T., Neigel J.E., Reeb C.A., Saunders N.C. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial-DNA bridge between population-genetics and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987, 18:489-522.
9. Ballard J.W.O., Whitlock M.C. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:729-744.
10. Balloux F. The worm in the fruit of the mitochondrial DNA tree. Heredity 2010, 104:419-420.
11. Becquet C., Przeworski M. Learning about modes of speciation by computational approaches. Evolution 2009, 63:2547-2562.
12. Begun D.J., Aquadro C.F. African and North American populatoins of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature 1993, 365:548-550.
13. Begun D.J., Holloway A.K., Stevens K., Hillier L.W., Poh Y.P., Hahn M.W., Nista P.M., Jones C.D., Kern A.D., Dewey C.N., Pachter L., Myers E., Langley C.H. Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e310.
14. Boussau B., Szollosi G.J., Duret L., Gouy M., Tannier E., Daubin V. Genome-scale coestimation of species and gene trees. Genome Res. 2013, 23:323-330.
15. Brito P.H., Edwards S.V. Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica 2009, 135:439-455.
16. Butlin R.K. Recombination and speciation. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:2621-2635.
17. Campbell M.C., Tishkoff S.A. The evolution of human genetic and phenotypic variation in Africa. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R166-R173.
18. Carneiro M., Ferrand N., Nachman M.W. Recombination and speciation: loci near centromeres are more differentiated than loci near telomeres between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genetics 2009, 181:593-606.
19. Carstens B., Lemmon A.R., Lemmon E.M. The promises and pitfalls of next-generation sequencing data in phylogeography. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:713-715.
20. Charlesworth B. Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15:538-543.
21. Charlesworth B. The effect of life-history and mode of inheritance on neutral genetic variability. Genet. Res. 2001, 77:153-166.
22. Charlesworth B. Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:195-205.
23. Charlesworth B. Molecular population genomics: a short history. Genet. Res. 2010, 92:397-411.
24. Charlesworth B., Coyne J.A., Barton N.H. The relative rates of evolution of sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 1987, 130:113-146.
25. Corl A., Ellegren H. Sampling strategies for species trees: the effects on phylogenetic inference of the number of genes, number of individuals, and whether loci are mitochondrial, sex-linked, or autosomal. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 67:358-366.
26. Coyne J.A. Genetics and speciation. Nature 1992, 355:511-515.
27. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
28. Crisci J.L., Poh Y.P., Bean A., Simkin A., Jensen J.D. Recent progress in polymorphism-based population genetic inference. J. Hered. 2012, 103:287-296.
29. Cutler D.J., Jensen J.D. To pool, or not to pool?. Genetics 2010, 186:41-43.
30. Cutter A.D., Payseur B.A. Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14:262-274.
31. Cutter A.D., Dey A., Murray R.L. Evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26:1199-1234.
32. Cutter A.D., Wang G.-X., Ai H., Peng Y. Influence of finite-sites mutation, population subdivision and sampling schemes on patterns of nucleotide polymorphism for species with molecular hyperdiversity. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:1345-1359.
33. Cutter A.D., Jovelin R., Dey A. Molecular hyperdiversity and evolution in very large populations. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22:2074-2095.
34. De Wit P., Pespeni M.H., Ladner J.T., Barshis D.J., Seneca F., Jaris H., Therkildsen N.O., Morikawa M., Palumbi S.R. The simple fool's guide to population genomics via RNA-Seq: an introduction to high-throughput sequencing data analysis. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2012, 12:1058-1067.
35. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:e68.
36. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:332-340.
37. Der R., Epstein C., Plotkin J.B. The dynamics of neutral and selected alleles when the offspring distribution is skewed. Genetics 2012, 191:1331-1344.
38. DeSalle R., Egan M.G., Siddall M. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2005, 360:1905-1916.
39. Dey A., Jeon Y., Wang G.-X., Cutter A.D. Global population genetic structure of Caenorhabditis remanei reveals incipient speciation. Genetics 2012, 191:1257-1269.
40. Dey, A., Chan, C.K.-W., Thomas, C.G., Cutter, A.D., in press. Nucleotide hyperdiversity defines populations of Caenorhabditis brenneri. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
41. Drummond A.J., Suchard M.A., Xie D., Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1969-1973.
42. Dunn C.W., Hejnol A., Matus D.Q., Pang K., Browne W.E., Smith S.A., Seaver E., Rouse G.W., Obst M., Edgecombe G.D., Sorensen M.V., Haddock S.H.D., Schmidt-Rhaesa A., Okusu A., Kristensen R.M., Wheeler W.C., Martindale M.Q., Giribet G. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 2008, 452:745-749.
43. Duret L. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2002, 12:640-649.
44. Eckert A.J., Carstens B.C. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49:832-842.
45. Edwards S.V. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?. Evolution 2009, 63:1-19.
46. Edwards S.V., Beerli P. Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 2000, 54:1839-1854.
47. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:5936-5941.
48. Ekblom R., Galindo J. Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity 2011, 107:1-15.
49. Eldon B., Wakeley J. Coalescent processes when the distribution of offspring number among individuals is highly skewed. Genetics 2006, 172:2621-2633.
50. Ellegren H. A selection model of molecular evolution incorporating the effective population size. Evolution 2009, 63:301-305.
51. Eriksson A., Manica A. Effect of ancient population structure on the degree of polymorphism shared between modern human populations and ancient hominins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:13956-13960.
52. Ewing G., Ebersberger I., Schmidt H., von Haeseler A. Rooted triple consensus and anomalous gene trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:118.
53. Excoffier L., Foll M. Fastsimcoal: a continuous-time coalescent simulator of genomic diversity under arbitrarily complex evolutionary scenarios. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:1332-1334.
54. Excoffier L., Heckel G. Computer programs for population genetics data analysis: a survival guide. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7:745-758.
55. Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Crawford N.G., Harvey M.G., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:717-726.
56. Feder J.L., Gejji R., Yeaman S., Nosil P. Establishment of new mutations under divergence and genome hitchhiking. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2012, 367:461-474.
57. Frankham R. Effective population-size/adult-population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genet. Res. 1995, 66:95-107.
58. Garland T., Harvey P.H., Ives A.R. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 1992, 41:18-32.
59. Gattepaille L.M., Jakobsson M., Blum M.G.B. Inferring population size changes with sequence and SNP data: lessons from human bottlenecks. Heredity 2013, 110:409-419.
60. Gayral P., Melo-Ferreira J., Glemin S., Bierne N., Carneiro M., Nabholz B., Lourenco J.M., Alves P.C., Ballenghien M., Faivre N., Belkhir K., Cahais V., Loire E., Bernard A., Galtier N. Reference-free population genomics from next-generation transcriptome data and the vertebrate-invertebrate gap. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9.
61. Geraldes A., Basset P., Smith K.L., Nachman M.W. Higher differentiation among subspecies of the house mouse (Mus musculus) in genomic regions with low recombination. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:4722-4736.
62. Glenn T.C. Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2011, 11:759-769.
63. Gossmann T.I., Keightley P.D., Eyre-Walker A. The effect of variation in the effective population size on the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in eukaryotes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2012, 4:658-667.
64. Gutenkunst R.N., Hernandez R.D., Williamson S.H., Bustamante C.D. Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional SNP frequency data. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000695.
65. Hahn M.W. Toward a selection theory of molecular evolution. Evolution 2008, 62:255-265.
66. Haldane J.B.S. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 1922, 12:101-109.
67. Harvey P.H., Pagel M.D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology 1991, Oxford University Press, New York.
68. Hazzouri K.M., Escobar J.S., Ness R.W., Killian Newman L., Randle A.M., Kalisz S., Wright S.I. Comparative population genomics in Collinsia sister species reveals evidence for reduced effective population size, relaxed selection, and evolution of biased gene conversion with an ongoing mating system shift. Evolution 2013, 67:1263-1278.
69. Hedgecock D. Does variance in reproductive success limit effective population sizes of marine organisms?. Genetics and Evolution of Aquatic Organisms 1994, 122-134. Chapman & Hall, London. A.R. Beaumont (Ed.).
70. Hein J., Schierup M.H., Wiuf C. Gene Genealogies, Variation and Evolution: A Primer in Coalescent Theory 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
71. Heled J., Drummond A.J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:570-580.
72. Heled J., Bryant D., Drummond A. Simulating gene trees under the multispecies coalescent and time-dependent migration. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13:44.
73. Hershberg R., Petrov D.A. Selection on codon bias. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2008, 42:287-299.
74. Hey J. Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:905-920.
75. Hey J., Machado C.A. The study of structured populations - new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:535-543.
76. Hittinger C.T., Johnston M., Tossberg J.T., Rokas A. Leveraging skewed transcript abundance by RNA-Seq to increase the genomic depth of the tree of life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:1476-1481.
77. Hohenlohe P.A., Bassham S., Etter P.D., Stiffler N., Johnson E.A., Cresko W.A. Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000862.
78. Hudson R.R. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1983, 23:183-201.
79. Hudson R.R. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:337-338.
80. Hudson R.R., Kaplan N.L. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA-sequences. Genetics 1985, 111:147-164.
81. Hudson R.R., Turelli M. Stochasticity overrules the "three-times rule": genetic drift, genetic draft, and coalescence times for nuclear loci versus mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 2003, 57:182-190.
82. Hurst G.D.D., Jiggins F.M. Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts. Proc. R. Soc. B 2005, 272:1525-1534.
83. Huson D.H., Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:254-267.
84. Huson D.H., Scornavacca C. A survey of combinatorial methods for phylogenetic networks. Genome Biol. Evol. 2011, 3:23-35.
85. Ilut D.C., Coate J.E., Luciano A.K., Owens T.G., May G.D., Farmer A., Doyle J.J. A comparative transcriptomic study of an allotetraploid and its diploid progenitors illustrates the unique advantages and challenges of RNA-seq in plant species. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99:383-396.
86. Jennings W.B., Edwards S.V. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees. Evolution 2005, 59:2033-2047.
87. Jovelin R. Rapid sequence evolution of transcription factors controlling neuron differentiation in Caenorhabditis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26:2373-2386.
88. Keinan A., Reich D. Human population differentiation is strongly correlated with local recombination rate. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000886.
89. Kimura M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution 1983, Cambridge University Press, New York.
90. Kingman J.F.C. On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Probab. 1982, 19A:27-43.
91. Knowles L.L. Statistical phylogeography. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:593-612.
92. Knowles L.L., Carstens B.C. Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:887-895.
93. Knowles L.L., Maddison W.P. Statistical phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:2623-2635.
94. Kofler R., Pandey R.V., Schlotterer C. PoPoolation2: identifying differentiation between populations using sequencing of pooled DNA samples (Pool-Seq). Bioinformatics 2011, 27:3435-3436.
95. Kryazhimskiy S., Plotkin J.B. The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000304.
96. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:17-24.
97. Kubatko L.S., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:971-973.
98. Kuhner M.K. Coalescent genealogy samplers: windows into population history. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:86-93.
99. Kulathinal R.J., Stevison L.S., Noor M.A.F. The genomics of speciation in Drosophila: diversity, divergence, and introgression estimated using low-coverage genome sequencing. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5.
100. Langley C.H., Stevens K., Cardeno C., Lee Y.C.G., Schrider D.R., Pool J.E., Langley S.A., Suarez C., Corbett-Detig R.B., Kolaczkowski B., Fang S., Nista P.M., Holloway A.K., Kern A.D., Dewey C.N., Song Y.S., Hahn M.W., Begun D.J. Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2012, 192:533-598.
101. Lanier H.C., Knowles L.L. Is recombination a problem for species-tree analyses?. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:691-701.
102. Laporte V., Charlesworth B. Effective population size and population subdivision in demographically structured populations. Genetics 2002, 162:501-519.
103. Lartillot N., Poujol R. A phylogenetic model for investigating correlated evolution of substitution rates and continuous phenotypic characters. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:729-744.
104. Lawson D.J., Hellenthal G., Myers S., Falush D. Inference of population structure using dense haplotype data. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002453.
105. Leffler E.M., Bullaughey K., Matute D.R., Meyer W.K., Segurel L., Venkat A., Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species?. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001388.
106. Lemmon A.R., Lemmon E.M. High-throughput identification of informative nuclear loci for shallow-scale phylogenetics and phylogeography. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:745-761.
107. Lemmon A.R., Emme S.A., Lemmon E.M. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:727-744.
108. Liu L. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2542-2543.
109. Liu L., Pearl D.K. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:504-514.
110. Liu L., Yu L.L., Pearl D.K., Edwards S.V. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:468-477.
111. Liu L.A., Yu L.L., Edwards S.V. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:302.
112. Lynch M. The Origins of Genome Architecture 2007, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
113. Lynch M. Estimation of allele frequencies from high-coverage genome-sequencing projects. Genetics 2009, 182:295-301.
114. Lynch M., Conery J.S. The origins of genome complexity. Science 2003, 302:1401-1404.
115. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
116. Mamanova L., Coffey A.J., Scott C.E., Kozarewa I., Turner E.H., Kumar A., Howard E., Shendure J., Turner D.J. Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:111-118.
117. Manel S.P., Schwartz M.K., Luikart G., Taberlet P. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:189-197.
118. Masly J.P., Presgraves D.C. High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e243.
119. McCormack J.E., Faircloth B.C., Crawford N.G., Gowaty P.A., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. Ultraconserved elements are novel phylogenomic markers that resolve placental mammal phylogeny when combined with species-tree analysis. Genome Res. 2012, 22:746-754.
120. McCormack J.E., Hird S.M., Zellmer A.J., Carstens B.C., Brumfield R.T. Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 66:526-538.
121. McVicker G., Gordon D., Davis C., Green P. Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in Hominid evolution. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000471.
122. Messer P.W., Petrov D.A. Frequent adaptation and the McDonald-Kreitman test. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110:8615-8620.
123. Myers S., Fefferman C., Patterson N. Can one learn history from the allelic spectrum?. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2008, 73:342-348.
124. Nachman M.W., Payseur B.A. Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2012, 367:409-421.
125. Neher, R.A., 2013. Genetic draft, selective interference, and population genetics of rapid adaptation. arXiv:1302.1148 [q-bio.PE].
126. Niedringhaus T.P., Milanova D., Kerby M.B., Snyder M.P., Barron A.E. Landscape of next-generation sequencing technologies. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83:4327-4341.
127. Nielsen R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2005, 39:197-218.
128. Nielsen R., Hubisz M.J., Hellmann I., Torgerson D., Andres A.M., Albrechtsen A., Gutenkunst R., Adams M.D., Cargill M., Boyko A., Indap A., Bustamante C.D., Clark A.G. Darwinian and demographic forces affecting human protein coding genes. Genome Res. 2009, 19:838-849.
129. Nordborg M. Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. Genetics 2000, 154:923-929.
130. Nordborg M., Hu T.T., Ishino Y., Jhaveri J., Toomajian C., Zheng H., Bakker E., Calabrese P., Gladstone J., Goyal R., Jakobsson M., Kim S., Morozov Y., Padhukasahasram B., Plagnol V., Rosenberg N.A., Shah C., Wall J.D., Wang J., Zhao K., Kalbfleisch T., Schulz V., Kreitman M., Bergelson J. The pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e196.
131. Nosil P., Funk D.J., Ortiz-Barrientos D. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:375-402.
132. Obbard D.J., Welch J.J., Kim K.W., Jiggins F.M. Quantifying adaptive evolution in the Drosophila immune system. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5.
133. Olson-Manning C.F., Wagner M.R., Mitchell-Olds T. Adaptive evolution: evaluating empirical support for theoretical predictions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:867-877.
134. Orr H.A. Haldane's rule. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1997, 28:195-218.
135. Palstra F.P., Ruzzante D.E. Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: what can they tell us about the importance of genetic stochasticity for wild population persistence?. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:3428-3447.
136. Pamilo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1988, 5:568-583.
137. Pinho C., Hey J. Divergence with gene flow: models and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2010, 41:215-230.
138. Pool J.E., Nielsen R. Population size changes reshape genomic patterns of diversity. Evolution 2007, 61:3001-3006.
139. Pool J.E., Nielsen R. The impact of founder events on chromosomal variability in multiply mating species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1728-1736.
140. Pool J.E., Nielsen R. Inference of historical changes in migration rate from the lengths of migrant tracts. Genetics 2009, 181:711-719.
141. Posada D., Crandall K.A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:817-818.
142. Prasad A.B., Mullikin J.C., Green E.D., Progra N.C.S. A scalable and flexible approach for investigating the genomic landscapes of phylogenetic incongruence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 66:1067-1074.
143. Presgraves D.C. Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 2008, 24:336-343.
144. Pulquerio M.J.F., Nichols R.A. Dates from the molecular clock: how wrong can we be?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:180-184.
145. Rocha E.P.C., Smith J.M., Hurst L.D., Holden M.T.G., Cooper J.E., Smith N.H., Feil E.J. Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 239:226-235.
146. Rosenberg N.A. The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2002, 61:225-247.
147. Salichos L., Rokas A. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 2013, 497:327-331.
148. Schierup M.H., Hein J. Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. Genetics 2000, 156:879-891.
149. Slowinski J.B. Molecular polytomies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001, 19:114-120.
150. Smith T.B., Wayne R.K., Girman D.J., Bruford M.W. A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 1997, 276:1855-1857.
151. Sousa V., Hey J. Understanding the origin of species with genome-scale data: modelling gene flow. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14:404-414.
152. Stadler T., Haubold B., Merino C., Stephan W., Pfaffelhuber P. The impact of sampling schemes on the site frequency spectrum in nonequilibrium subdivided populations. Genetics 2009, 182:205-216.
153. Storfer A., Murphy M.A., Spear S.F., Holderegger R., Waits L.P. Landscape genetics: where are we now?. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3496-3514.
154. Strasburg J.L., Rieseberg L.H. How robust are "Isolation with Migration" analyses to violations of the IM model? A simulation study. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:297-310.
155. Sung W., Ackerman M.S., Miller S.F., Doak T.G., Lynch M. Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:18488-18492.
156. Swanson W.J., Vacquier V.D. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:137-144.
157. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989, 123:585-595.
158. Tavare S. Line-of-descent and genealogical processes, and their applications in population-genetics models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1984, 26:119-164.
159. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, 2010. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature vol. 467, pp. 1061-1073.
160. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, 2012. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature vol. 491, pp. 56-65.
161. Ting C.T., Tsaur S.C., Wu C.I. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:5313-5316.
162. Voight B.F., Kudaravalli S., Wen X.Q., Pritchard J.K. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:446-458.
163. Wakeley J. Nonequilibrium migration in human history. Genetics 1999, 153:1863-1871.
164. Wakeley J. Inferences about the structure and history of populations: coalescents and intraspecific phylogeography. Evolution of Population Biology 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R.S. Singh, M.K. Uyenoyama (Eds.).
165. Wakeley J. Coalescent theory: an introduction 2009, Roberts and Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, CO.
166. Wakeley J., Aliacar N. Gene genealogies in a metapopulation. Genetics 2001, 159:893-905.
167. Wakeley J., Hey J. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 1997, 145:847-855.
168. Wakeley J., King L., Low B.S., Ramachandran S. Gene genealogies within a fixed pedigree, and the robustness of Kingman's coalescent. Genetics 2012, 190:1433-1445.
169. Whitney K.D., Garland T. Did genetic drift drive increases in genome complexity?. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001080.
170. Whitney K.D., Baack E.J., Hamrick J.L., Godt M.J.W., Barringer B.C., Bennett M.D., Eckert C.G., Goodwillie C., Kalisz S., Leitch I.J., Ross-Ibarra J. A role for nonadaptive processes in plant genome size evolution?. Evolution 2010, 64:2097-2109.
171. Wilson D.J., Hernandez R.D., Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. A population genetics-phylogenetics approach to inferring natural selection in coding sequences. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002395.
172. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 1931, 16:97-159.
173. Yang Z.H. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1997, 13:555-556.
174. Yang Z.H., Rannala B. Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:9264-9269.