The Probability of Topological Concordance of Gene Trees and Species Trees

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 225-247

  Rosenberg, Noah A ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalescence; Consistency; Human evolution; Phylogeny; Population divergence; Reciprocal monophyly; Speciodendricity; Trichotomy

Indexed keywords

GENETICS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; HAPLOIDY; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

EVOLUTION; HAPLOIDY; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036515730     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1568     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chen F.-C., Li W.-H. Genomic divergences between humans and other Hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68:2001;444-456.
2. Dobzhansky T. On types, genotypes, and the genetic diversity in populations. Spuhler J. N. Genetic Diversity and Human Behavior. 1967;1-18 Aldine, Chicago.
3. Doyle J. J. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:1992;144-163.
4. Fitch W. M. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 19:1970;99-113.
5. Fitch W. M. Homology: A personal view on some of the problems. Trends Genet. 16:2000;227-231.
6. Griffiths R. C. Transient distribution of the number of segregating sites in a neutral infinite-sites model with no recombination. J. Appl. Probab. 18:1981;42-51.
7. Griffiths R. C. Asymptotic line-of-descent distributions. J. Math. Biol. 21:1984;67-75.
8. Hudson R. R. Testing the constant-rate neutral allele model with protein sequence data. Evolution. 37:1983;203-217.
9. Hudson R. R. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:1990;1-44.
10. Hudson R. R. Gene trees, species trees and the segregation of ancestral alleles. Genetics. 131:1992;509-512.
11. Maddison W. P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;523-536.
12. Moore W. S. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution. 49:1995;718-726.
13. Moritz C. Defining "evolutionary significant units" for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:1994;373-375.
14. Mountain J. L., Cavalli-Sforza L. L. Multilocus genotypes, a tree of individuals, and human evolutionary history. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61:1997;705-718.
15. Nei M. Stochastic errors in DNA evolution and molecular phylogeny. Gershowitz H., Rucknagel D. L., Tashian R. E. Evolutionary Perspectives and the New Genetics. 1986;133-147 A. R. Liss, New York.
16. Neigel J. E., Avise J. C. Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. Karlin S., Nevo E. Evolutionary Processes and Theory. 1986;515-534 Academic Press, New York.
17. Nichols R. Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;358-364.
18. Nordborg M. Coalescent theory. Balding D. J., Cannings C., Bishop M. Handbook of Statistical Genetics. 2001;179-212 Wiley, Chichester.
19. Ouzounis C. Orthology: Another terminology muddle. Trends Genet. 15:1999;445.
20. Pamilo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:1988;568-583.
21. Rosenberg N. A., Feldman M. W. The relationship between coalescence times and population divergence times. Slatkin M., Veuille M. Modern Developments in Theoretical Population Genetics. 2002;130-164 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
22. Ruvolo M. Molecular evolutionary processes and conflicting gene trees: The Hominoid case. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94:1994;89-113.
23. Ruvolo M. Molecular phylogeny of the Hominoids: Inferences from multiple independent DNA sequence data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;248-265.
24. Saitou N., Nei M. The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species, with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergence. J. Mol. Evol. 24:1986;189-204.
25. Satta Y., Klein J., Takahata N. DNA archives and our nearest relative: The trichotomy problem revisited. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14:2000;259-275.
26. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 105:1983;437-460.
27. Takahata N. Gene genealogy in three related populations: Consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics. 122:1989;957-966.
28. Takahata N., Nei M. Gene genealogy and variance of interpopulational nucleotide differences. Genetics. 110:1985;325-344.
29. Takahata N., Satta Y. Pre-speciation coalescence and the effective size of ancestral populations. Slatkin M., Veuille M. Modern Developments in Theoretical Population Genetics. 2002;52-71 Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
30. Takahata N., Slatkin M. Genealogy of neutral genes in two partially isolated populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 38:1990;331-350.
31. Tavaré S. Line-of-descent and genealogical processes, and their applications in population genetics models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 26:1984;119-164.
32. Ting C.-T., Tsaur S.-C., Wu C.-I. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene. Odysseus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;5316-5316.
33. Wakeley J. The effects of subdivision on the genetic divergence of populations and species. Evolution. 54:2000;1092-1101.
34. Wiens J. J. Polymorphism in systematics and comparative biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:1999;329-362.
35. Wu C.-I. Inferences of species phylogeny in relation to segregation of ancient polymorphisms. Genetics. 127:1991;429-435.