Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics

Systematic Biology

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 727-744

  Lemmon, Alan R ^a   Emme, Sandra A ^a   Lemmon, Emily Moriarty ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anchor regions; anchored enrichment; anchored phylogenomics; highly conserved regions; hybrid enrichment; phylogenetics; phylogeography; sequence capture; ultraconserved elements

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA PROBE; DNA SEQUENCE; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; GENETICS; GENOME; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; DNA PROBES; GENOME; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 84865266483     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys049     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Albert T.J., Molla M.N., Muzny D.M., Nazareth L., Wheeler D., Song X., Richmond T.A., Middle C.M., Rodesch M.J., Packard C.J., Weinstock G.M., Gibbs R.A. 2007. Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization. Nat. Methods. 4:903-905.
2. Ané C., Larget B., Baum D.A., Smith S.D., Rokas A. 2007. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:412-426.
3. Archer M.J., Long N., Lin B. 2010. Effect of probe characteristics on the subtractive hybridization efficiency of human genomic DNA. BMC Res. Notes 3:109.
4. Bader D., Roshan U., Stamatakis A. 2006. Advances in computers. Computational grand challenges in assembling the tree of life: problems and solutions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
5. Bashiardes S., Veile R., Helms C., Mardis E.R., Bowcock A.M., Lovett M. 2005. Direct genomic selection. Nat. Methods. 2:63-69.
6. Bejerano G., Pheasant M., Makunin I., Stephen S., Kent W.J., Mattick J.S., Haussler D. 2004. Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science 304:1321-3125.
7. Cracraft J., Donoghue M.J. 2004. Assembling the tree of life. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Donoghue M.J. 2004. Immeasurable progress on the tree of life. In: Cracraft J. and Donoghue M.J., editors. Assembling the tree of life. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 548-552.
9. Drummond A.J., Ashton B., Buxton S., Cheung M., Cooper A., Heled J., Kearse M., Moir R., Stones-Havas S., Sturrock S., Thierer T., Wilson A. 2010. Geneious v5.5.1. Available from http://www.geneious.com.
10. Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 1792-1797.
11. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D. K. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104: 5936-5941.
12. Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Crawford N.G., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. 2012. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers for target enrichment spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 61:717-726.
13. Fu Y., Springer N.M., Gerhardt D.J., Ying K., Yeh C-T., Wu W., Swanson-Wagner R., D'Ascenzo M., Millard T., Freeberg L., Aoyama N., Kitzman J., Burgess D., Richmond T., Albert T.J., Barbazuk W.B., Jeddeloh J.A., Schnable P.S. 2010. Repeat subtraction-mediated sequence capture from a complex genome. Plant J. 62:898-909.
14. Fujita P.A., Rhead B., Zweig A.S., Hinrichs A.S., Karolchik D., Cline M.S., Goldman M., Barber1 G.P., Clawson H., Coelho A., Diekhans M., Dreszer T.R., Giardine B.M., Harte R.A., Hillman-Jackson J., Hsu F., Kirkup V., Kuhn R.M., Learned K., Li C.H., Meyer L.R., Pohl A., Raney B.J., Rosenbloom K.R., Smith K.E., Haussler D., Kent W.J. 2011. The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D876-D882.
15. Genome 10K Community of Scientists. 2009. A proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10, 000 vertebrate species. J Hered. 100:659-674.
16. Glazov E.A., Pheasant M., McGraw E.A., Bejerano G., Mattick J. S. 2005. Ultraconserved elements in insect genomes: a highly conserved intronic sequence implicated in the constrol of homothorax mRNA splicing. Genome Res. 15:800-808.
17. Gnirke A., MelnikovA., MaguireJ., Rogov P., LeProustE.M., Brockman W., Fennell T., Giannoukos G., Fisher S., Russ C., Gabriel S., Jaffe D.B., Lander E.S., Nusbaum C. 2009. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 27:182-189.
18. Goin O.B., Goin C.J., Bachmann K. 1968. DNA and amphibian life history. Copeia. 1968:532-540.
19. Gregory T.R., Nicol J.A., Tamm H., Kullman B., Kullman K., Leitch I.J., Murray B.G., Kapraun D.F., Greilhuber J., Bennett M.D. 2006. Eukaryotic genome size databases. Nucleic Acids Res. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl828.
20. Hedges S.B., Dudley J. Kumar S. 2006. TimeTree: a public knowledgebase of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics 22:2971-2972.
21. Huang H., He Q., Kubatko L.S., Knowles L.L. 2010. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of muational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods. Syst. Biol. 59:573-583.
22. Janes D.E., Chapus C., Gondo Y., Clayton D.F., Sinha S., Blatti C.A., Organ C.L., Fujita M.K., Balakrishnan C.N., Edwards S.V. 2010. Reptiles and mammals have differentially retained long conserved noncoding sequences fromtheamniote ancestor. Genome Biol. Evol. 3:102-113.
23. Keeling P.J., Burger G., Durnford D.G., Lang B.F., Lee R.W., Pearlman R.E., Roger A.J., Gray M.W. 2005. The tree of eukaryotes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:670-676.
24. Kircher M., Sawyer S., Meyer M. 2011. Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011:1-8.
25. Lane C.E., Archibald J.M. 2008. The eukaryotic tree of life: endosymbiosis takes its TOL. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:268-275.
26. Langmead B., Trapnell C., Pop M., Salzberg S.L. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10:R25.
27. Leaché A.D., Rannala B. 2011. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods. Syst. Biol. 60:126-137.
28. Liu L. 2008. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics. 24:2542-2543.
29. Liu L., Yu L. 2011. Estimating species trees from unrooted gene trees. Syst. Biol. 60:661-667.
30. Lutzoni F., Kauff F., Cox C.J., McLaughlin D., Celio G., Dentinger B., Padamsee M., Hibbett D., James T.Y., Baloch E., Grube M., Reeb V., Hofstetter V., Schoch C., Arnold A.E., Miadlikowska J., Spatafora J., Johnson D., Hambleton S., Crockett M., Shoemaker R., Hambleton S., Crockett M., Shoemaker R., Sung G.H., Lucking R., Lumbsch T., O'Donnell K., Binder M., Diederich P., Ertz D., Gueidan C., Hansen K., Harris R.C., Hosaka K., Lim Y.W., Matheny B., Nishida H., Pfister D., Rogers J., Rossman A., Schmitt I., Sipman H., Stone J., Sugiyama J., Yahr R., Vilgalys R. 2004. Assembling the fungal tree of life: progress, classification and evolution of subcellular traits. Amer. J. Bot. 91:1446-1480.
31. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
32. Maddison D.R., Maddison W.P. 2005. MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.08a. http://macclade.org.
33. Mamanova L., CoffeyA.J., Scott C.E., Kozarewa I., Turner E.H., Kumar A., Howard E., Shendure J., Turner D.J. 2010. Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods. 7:111-118.
34. McCormack J.E., Faircloth B.C., Crawford N.G., Gowaty P.A., Brumfield B.T., Glenn T.C. 2012. Ultraconserved elements are novel phylogenomic markers that resolve placental mammal phylogeny when combined with species tree analysis. Genome Res. 22:746-754.
35. Meyer M. and Kircher M. 2010. Illumina sequencinglibrary preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5448.
36. Nylander J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
37. Pace N.R. 2009. Mapping the tree of life: progress and prospects. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73:565-576.
38. Palmer J.D., Soltis D.E., Chase M.W. 2004. The plant tree of life: an overview and some points of view. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1437-1445.
39. Parfrey L.W., Grant J., Tekle Y.I., Lasek-Nesselquist E., Morrison H.G., Sogin M.L., Patterson D.J., Katz L.A. 2010. Broadly sampled multigene analyses yield a well-resolved eukaryotic tree of life. Syst. Biol. 59:518-533.
40. Posada D., Crandall K.A.2001. Selecting the best-fit modelofnucleotide substitution. Syst. Biol. 50:580-601.
41. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. [Internet]. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: URL http://www.R-project.org.
42. Robinson G.E., Hackett K.J., Purcell-Miramontes M., Brown S.J., Evans J.D., Goldsmith M.R., Lawson D., Okamuro J., Robertson H.M., and Schneider D.J. 2011. Creating a buzz about insect genomes. Science. 331:1386.
43. Rokas A., and Carroll S.B. 2006. Bushes in the tree of life. PLoS Biol. 4:e352.
44. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J. P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19: 1572-1574.
45. Siepel A., Bejerano G., Pedersen J.S., Hinrichs A.S., Hou M., Rosenbloom K., Clawson H., Spieth J., Hillier L.W., Richards S., Weinstock G.M., Wilson R.K., Gibbs R.A., Kent W.J., Miller W., Haussler D. 2005. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 15:1034-1050.
46. Soltis D.E., Moore M.J., Burleigh J.G., Bell C.D., Soltis P.S. 2010. Assembling the angiosperm tree of life: progress and future prospects. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 97:514-526.
47. Stephen S., Pheasant M., Makunin I.V., Mattick J.S. 2008. Large-scale appearance of ultraconserved elements in tetrapod genomes and slowdown of the molecular clock. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:402-408.
48. Thomson R.C., Shaffer H.B. 2010. Rapid progress on the vertebrate tree of life. BMC Biol. 8:19.
49. Townsend J.P. 2007. Profiling phylogenetic informativeness. Syst. Biol. 56:222-231.
50. Townsend J.P., Leuenberger C. 2011. Taxon sampling and the optimal rates of evolution for phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 60:358-365.
51. Townsend J.P., López-Giráldez F. 2010. Optimal selection of gene and ingroup taxon sampling for resolving phylogenetic relationships. Syst. Biol. 59:446-457.
52. Townsend J.P., López-Giráldez F., Friedman R. 2008. The phylogenetic informativeness of nucleotide and amino acid sequences for reconstructing the vertebrate tree. J. Mol. Evol. 67:437-447.
53. Wang, J., Lee A.P., Kodzius R., Brenner S., Venkatesh B. 2009. Large number of ultraconserved elements were already present in the jawed vertebrate ancestor. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:487-490.
54. Zwickl D.J., Hillis D.M. 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51:588-598.