Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-19

  Edwards, Scott V ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fossil; Genome; Macroevolution; Neanderthal; Phylogeography; Polytomy

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NOTE; PHYLOGENY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

CLASSIFICATION; GENES; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 58249100073     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00549.x     Document Type: Note

References (148)

1. Alfaro, M. E., and M. T. Holder. 2006. The posterior and the prior in Bayesian phylogenetics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37 : 19 42.
2. Anderson, C. N. K., U. Ramakrishnan, Y. L. Chan, and E. A. Hadly. 2005. Serial SimCoal: a population genetics model for data from multiple populations and points in time. Bioinformatics 21 : 1733 1734.
3. Ané, C., B. Larget, D. A. Baum, S. D. Smith, and A. Rokas. 2007. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 : 412 426.
4. Avise, J. C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.
5. Avise, J. C. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of Species. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Avise, J. C., and R. M. J. Ball. 1990. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Oxford Sur. Evol. Biol. 7 : 45 67.
7. Avise, J. D., and T. J. Robinson. 2008. Hemiplasy: A new term in the lexicon of phylogenetics. Syst. Boil. 57 : 503 507.
8. Avise, J. C., and K. Wollenberg. 1997. Phylogenetics and the origin of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 : 7748 7755.
9. Avise, J. C., J. Arnold, R. M. Ball, E. Bermingham, T. Lamb, J. E. Neigel, C. A. Reeb, and N. C. Saunders. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18 : 489 522.
10. Baker, R. H., X. B. Yu, and R. DeSalle. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9 : 427 436.
11. Bapteste, E., E. Susko, J. Leigh, D. MacLeod, R. L. Charlebois, and W. F. Doolittle. 2005. Do orthologous gene phylogenies really support tree-thinking? BMC Evol. Biol. 5 : 33.
12. Baum, D. A. 2007. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon. 56 : 417 426.
13. Becquet, C., and M. Przeworski. 2007. A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes. Genome Res. 17 : 1505 1519.
14. Beerli, P. 2006. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood inference of population genetic parameters. Bioinformatics 22 : 341 345.
15. Belfiore, N. M., L. Liu, and C. Moritz. 2008. Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Syst. Biol. 57 : 294 310.
16. Braun, E. L., and R. T. Kimball. 2001. Polytomies, the power of phylogenetic inference, and the stochastic nature of molecular evolution: a comment on Walsh et al. (1999). Evolution 55 : 1261 1263.
17. Brito, P., and S. Edwards. 2008. Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica. doi :.
18. Bull, J. J., J. P. Huelsenbeck, C. W. Cunningham, D. L. Swofford, and P. J. Waddell. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42 : 384 397.
19. Carling, M. D., and R. T. Brumfield. 2007. Gene sampling strategies for multi-locus population estimates of genetic diversity (theta). PLoS One 2 : e160.
20. Carstens, B. C., and L. L. Knowles. 2007. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from melanoplus grasshoppers. Syst. Biol. 56 : 400 411.
21. Carstens, B. C., J. D. Degenhardt, A. L. Stevenson, and J. Sullivan. 2005. Accounting for coalescent stochsticity in testing phylogeographical hypotheses: modelling Pleistocene population structure in the Idaho giant salamander Dicamptodon aterrimus. Mol. Ecol. 14 : 255 265.
22. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. 1964. Population structure and human evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 164 : 362 379.
23. Charlesworth, B., R. Lande, and M. Slatkin. 1982. A neo-Darwinian commentary on macroevolution. Evolution 36 : 474 498.
24. Chen, F. C., and W. H. Li. 2001. Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68 : 444 456.
25. Cummings, M. P., S. P. Otto, and J. Wakeley. 1995. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 : 814 822.
26. Cummings, M. P., M. C. Neel, and K. L. Shaw. 2008. A genealogical approach to quantifying lineage divergence. Evolution 62 : 2411 2422.
27. Degnan, J. H., and N. A. Rosenberg. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2 : 762 768.
28. Degnan, J. H., and N. A. Rosenberg. 2008. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference, and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. in press.
29. Degnan, J. H., and L. Salter. 2005. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution 59 : 24 37.
30. Degnan, J. H., M. DeGiorgio, D. Bryant, and N. A. Rosenberg. 2008. Coalescent consequences for consensus cladograms. Syst. Biol. in press.
31. Delsuc, F., H. Brinkmann, and H. Philippe. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6 : 361 375.
32. Delsuc, F., H. Brinkmann, D. Chourrout, and H. Philippe. 2006. Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 439 : 965 968.
33. de Queiroz, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42 : 368 372.
34. de Queiroz, K. 2005. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 6600 6607.
35. de Queiroz, A., M. J. Donoghue, and J. Kim. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26 : 657 681.
36. Doolittle, W. F., and E. Bapteste. 2007. Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 : 2043 2049.
37. Douady, C. J., F. Delsuc, Y. Boucher, W. F. Doolittle, and E. J. P. Douzery. 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 : 248 254.
38. Doyle, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17 : 144 163.
39. Doyle, J. J. 1997. Trees within trees: genes and species, molecules and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46 : 537 553.
40. Driskell, A. C., C. Ane, J. G. Burleigh, M. M. McMahon, B. C. O'Meara, and M. J. Sanderson. 2004. Prospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. Science 306 : 1172 1174.
41. Drummond, A. J., and A. Rambaut. 2003. BEAST v1.0.
42. Dunn, C. W., A. Hejnol, D. Q. Matus, K. Pang, W. E. Browne, S. A. Smith, E. Seaver, G. W. Rouse, M. Obst, G. D. Edgecombe, et al. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452 : 745 749.
43. Eckert, A. J., and B. C. Carstens. 2008. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performances of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 49 : 832 842.
44. Edwards, S. V., and P. Beerli. 2000. Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54 : 1839 1854.
45. Edwards, S. V., S. B. Kingan, J. D. Calkins, C. N. Balakrishnan, W. B. Jennings, W. J. Swanson, and M. D. Sorenson. 2005. Speciation in birds: genes, geography, and sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (Supp 1 6550 6557.
46. Edwards, S. V., L. Liu, and D. K. Pearl. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 : 5936 5941.
47. Erwin, D. H. 2000. Macroevolution is more than repeated rounds of microevolution. Evol. Develop. 2 : 78 84.
48. Estes, S., and S. J. Arnold. 2007. Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am. Nat. 169 : 227 244.
49. Ewing, G. B., I. Ebersberger, H. A. Schmidt, and A. von Haeseler. 2008. Rooted triple consensus and anomalous gene trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 8 : 118.
50. Falush, D., M. Stephens, and J. K. Pritchard. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164 : 1567 1587.
51. Falush, D., M. Stephens, and J. K. Pritchard. 2007. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7 : 574 578.
52. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from gene-frequencies and quantitative characters - finding maximum-likelihood estimates. Evolution 35 : 1229 1242.
53. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Ann. Rev. Genet. 22 : 521 565.
54. Felsenstein, J. 2003. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
55. Felsenstein, J. 2006. Accuracy of coalescent likelihood estimates: do we need more sites, more sequences, or more loci? Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 : 691 700.
56. Gadagkar, S. R., M. S. Rosenberg, and S. Kumar. 2005. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. J. Exp. Zool. Mol. Dev. Evol. 304 : 64 74.
57. Gatesy, J., and R. H. Baker. 2005. Hidden likelihood support in genomic data: can forty-five wrongs make a right? Syst. Biol. 54 : 483 492.
58. Geuten, K., T. Massingham, P. Darius, E. Smets, and N. Goldman. 2007. Experimental design criteria in phylogenetics: where to add taxa. Syst. Biol. 56 : 609 622.
59. Gould, S. J. 1980. Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6 : 119 130.
60. Graybeal, A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problems? Syst. Biol. 47 : 9 17.
61. Hedtke, S. M., T. M. Townsend, and D. M. Hillis. 2006. Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling. Syst. Biol. 55 : 522 529.
62. Hey, J., and C. A. Machado. 2003. The study of structured populations - new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4 : 535 543.
63. Hillis, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18 : 23 42.
64. Hillis, D. M., M. W. Allard, and M. M. Miyamoto. 1993. Analysis of DNA sequence data: phylogenetic inference. Meth. Enzymol. 224 : 456 487.
65. Hobolth, A., O. F. Christensen, T. Mailund, and M. H. Schierup. 2007. Genomic relationships and speciation times of human, chimpanzee, and gorilla inferred from a coalescent hidden Markov model. PLoS Genet 3 : e7.
66. Holland, B., F. Delsuc, and V. Moulton. 2005. Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods. Syst. Biol. 54 : 66 76.
67. Holland, B. R., L. S. Jermiin, and V. Moulton. 2006. Improved consensus network techniques for genome-scale phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 : 848 855.
68. Hudson, R. R. 1992. Gene trees, species trees and the segregation of ancestral alleles. Genetics 131 : 509 512.
69. Hudson, R. R., and M. Turelli. 2003. Stochasticity overrules the "three-times rule": genetic drift, genetic draft, and coalescence times for nuclear loci versus mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 57 : 182 190.
70. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 : 754 755.
71. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, R. E. Miller, and F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51 : 673 688.
72. Janes, D. E., T. Ezaz, J. A. Marshall Graves, and S. V. Edwards. 2008. Recombination and nucleotide diversity in the sex chromosomal pseudoautosomal region of the Emu, Dromaius novaehollandiae. J. Hered. doi: "10.1093/ jhered/esn065".
73. Jennings, W. B., and S. V. Edwards. 2005. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from 30 gene trees. Evolution 59 : 2033 2047.
74. Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst Zool 38 : 7 25.
75. Kluge, A. G. 1983. Cladistics and the classification of great apes. Pp. 151 177 in R. L. Ciochan, and R. S. Coruccini, eds. New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry. Plenum, New York.
76. Kluge, A. G. 2004. On total evidence: for the record. Cladistics 20 : 205 207.
77. Kolaczkowski, B., and J. W. Thornton. 2004. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431 : 980 984.
78. Kolaczkowski, B., and J. W. Thornton. 2006. Is there a star tree paradox? Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 : 1819 1823.
79. Kolaczkowski, B., and J. W. Thornton. 2008. A mixed branch length model of heterotachy improves phylogenetic accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25 : 1054 1066.
80. Kubatko, L. S., and J. H. Degnan. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56 : 17 24.
81. Kuhner, M. K. 2006. LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics 22 : 768 770.
82. Laval, G., and L. Excoffier. 2004. SIMCOAL 2.0: a program to simulate genomic diversity over large recombining regions in a subdivided population with a complex history. Bioinformatics 20 : 2485 2487.
83. Lee, J. Y., and S. V. Edwards. 2008. Divergence across Australia's Carpentarian barrier: statistical phylogeography of the Red-backed Fairy Wren (Malurus melanocephalus). Evolution 62 : 3117 3134.
84. Lewis, P. O., M. T. Holder, and K. E. Holsinger. 2005. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 54 : 241 253.
85. Liu, L., and S. V. Edwards. 2008. Phylogenetic analysis in the anomaly zone. Manuscript, Cambridge, MA.
86. Liu, L., and D. K. Pearl. 2006. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Pp. 24. Mathematical Biosciences Institute Technical Report #53. Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
87. Liu, L., and D. K. Pearl. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56 : 504 514.
88. Liu, L., D. K. Pearl, R. T. Brumfield, and S. V. Edwards. 2008. Estimating species trees using multiple-allele DNA sequence data. Evolution 2080 2091.
89. Lynch, M., and P. E. Jarrell. 1993. A method for calibrating molecular clocks and its application to animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 135 : 1197 1208.
90. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46 : 523 536.
91. Maddison, W. P., and L. L. Knowles. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55 : 21 30.
92. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2008. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.5 http://mesquiteproject.org
93. Matsen, F. A., and M. Steel. 2007. Phylogenetic mixtures on a single tree can mimic a tree of another topology. Syst. Biol. 56 : 767 775.
94. Misawa, K., and M. Nei. 2003. Reanalysis of Murphy et al.'s data gives various mammalian phylogenies and suggests overcredibility of Bayesian trees. J. Mol. Evol. 57 : S290 S296.
95. Mossel, E., and S. Roch. 2007. Incomplete lineage sorting: consistent phylogeny estimation from multiple loci. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0710. 0262.
96. Mossel, E., and E. Vigoda. 2005. Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees. Science 309 : 2207 2209.
97. Nei, M., and S. Kumar. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
98. Neigel, J. E., and J. C. Avise. 1986. Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. Pp. 515 534 in S. Karlin, and E. Nevo, eds. Evolutionary processes and theory. Academic Press, New York.
99. Nielsen, R. 1998. Maximum likelihood estimation of population divergence times and population phylogenies under the infinite sites model. Theor. Pop. Biol. 53 : 143 151.
100. Nielsen, R., J. L. Mountain, J. P. Huelsenbeck, and M. Slatkin. 1998. Maximum-likelihood estimation of population divergence times and population phylogeny in models without mutation. Evolution 52 : 669 677.
101. Nylander, J. A. A., F. Ronquist, J. P. Huelsenbeck, and J. L. Nieves-Aldrey. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53 : 47 67.
102. O'Meara, B. C. 2008. Using trees: myrmecocystus phylogeny and character evolution and new methods for investigating trait evolution and species delimitation (Ph.D. Dissertation). Available from Nature Proceedings http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2261.1.
103. Otto, S. P., M. P. Cummings, and J. Wakeley. 1996. Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequence data: the effects of sampling. Pp. 103 115 in P. H. Harvey, A. J. Leigh Brown, J. Maynard Smith, and S. Nee, eds. New Uses for new Phylogenies. Oxfore University Press, New York.
104. Page, R., and M. A. Charleston. 1997. From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7 : 231 240.
105. Pamilo, P., and M. Nei. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5 : 568 583.
106. Patterson, N., D. J. Richter, S. Gnerre, E. S. Lander, and D. Reich. 2006. Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees. Nature 441 : 1103 1108.
107. Pigliucci, M. 2007. Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution 61 : 2743 2749.
108. Pollard, D. A., V. N. Iyer, A. M. Moses, and M. B. Eisen. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. Plos Genet. 2 : 1634 1647.
109. Pollock, D. D., D. J. Zwickl, J. A. McGuire, and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 51 : 664 671.
110. Rambaut, A., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13 : 235 238.
111. Rannala, B., and Z. Yang. 2003. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164 : 1645 1656.
112. Rasmussen, M. D., and M. Kellis. 2007. Accurate gene-tree reconstruction by learning gene- and species-specific substitution rates across multiple complete genomes. Genome Res. 17 : 1932 1942.
113. Rokas, A., B. Williams, N. King, and S. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425 : 798 804.
114. Rosenberg, N. A. 2003. The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 57 : 1465 1477.
115. Rosenberg, N. A. 2007. Statistical tests for taxonomic distinctiveness from observations of monophyly. Evolution 61 : 317 323.
116. RoyChoudhury, A., J. Felsenstein, and E. A. Thompson. 2008. A two-stage pruning algorithm for likelihood computation for a population tree. Genetics 180.
117. Sanderson, M. J., and M. M. McMahon. 2007. Inferring angiosperm phylogeny from EST data with widespread gene duplication. BMC Evol Biol 7 (Suppl 1 S3.
118. Satta, Y., J. Klein, and N. Takahata. 2000. DNA archives and our nearest relative: the trichotomy problem revisited. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14 : 259 275.
119. Seo, T. K. 2008. Calculating bootstrap probabilities of phylogeny using multilocus sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25 : 960 971.
120. Seo, T. K., H. Kishino, and J. L. Thorne. 2005. Incorporating gene-specific variation when inferring and evaluating optimal evolutionary tree topologies from multilocus sequence data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 4436 4441.
121. Simmons, M. P., K. M. Pickett, and M. Miya. 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 : 188 199.
122. Slatkin, M., and J. L. Pollack. 2006. The concordance of gene trees and species trees at two linked loci. Genetics 172 : 1979 1984.
123. Slowinski, J. B. 2001. Molecular polytomies. Mol Phylogenet Evol 19 : 114 120.
124. Slowinski, J., and R. D. M. Page. 1999. How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data? Syst. Biol. 48 : 814 825.
125. Smith, J. M. 1983. The genetics of stasis and punctuation. Ann. Rev. Genet. 17 : 11 25.
126. Steel, M., and F. A. Matsen. 2007. The Bayesian "star paradox" persists for long finite sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 : 1075 1079.
127. Steel, M., and A. Rodrigo. 2008. Maximum likelihood supertrees. Syst. Biol. 57 : 243 250.
128. Steel, M., A. W. Dress, and S. Bocker. 2000. Simple but fundamental limitations on supertree and consensus tree methods. Syst. Biol. 49 : 363 368.
129. Suzuki, Y., G. V. Glazko, and M. Nei. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 16138 16143.
130. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pp. 407 514 in D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds. Molecular Systematics, 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
131. Takahata, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122 : 957 966.
132. Taylor, D. J., and W. H. Piel. 2004. An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 : 1534 1537.
133. Thomson, R. C., A. M. Shedlock, S. V. Edwards, and H. B. Shaffer. 2008. Developing markers for multilocus phylogenetics in non-model organisms: a test case with turtles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. doi :.
134. Waddell, P. J., H. Kishino, and R. Ota. 2001. A phylogenetic foundation for comparative mammalian genomics. Genome Informatics 12 : 141 154.
135. Waddell, P. J., H. Kishino, and R. Ota. 2002. Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data. Genome Informatics 13 : 82 92.
136. Wakeley, J., and J. Hey. 1997. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 145 : 847 855.
137. Walsh, H. E., M. G. Kidd, T. Moum, and T. Friesen. 1999. Polytomies and the power of phylogenetic inference. Evolution 53 : 932 937.
138. Wiens, J. J. 1998. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst. Biol. 47 : 568 581.
139. Wiens, J. J. 1999. Polymorphism in systematics and comparative biology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30 : 327 362.
140. Wilson, A. C., R. L. Cann, S. M. Carr, M. George, U. B. Gyllensten, K. M. Helm-Bychowski, R. G. Higuchi, S. R. Palumbi, E. M. Prager, R. D. Sage, et al. 1985. Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 26 : 375 400.
141. Wong, A., J. D. Jensen, J. E. Pool, and C. F. Aquadro. 2007. Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43 : 1138 1150.
142. Wu, C. I. 1991. Inferences of species phylogeny in relation to segregation of ancient polymorphisms. Genetics 127 : 429 435.
143. Yang, Z. 1997. On the estimation of ancestral population sizes of modern humans. Genetical Research 69 : 111 116.
144. Yang, Z. 2002. MCMCcoal: Markov Chain Monte Carlo Coalescent Program, version 1.0. Pp. 8, Oxford.
145. Yang, Z., and B. Rannala. 2005. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 54 : 455 470.
146. Zink, R. M. 2006. Rigor and species concepts. Auk 123 : 887 891.
147. Zink, R. M., and G. F. Barrowclough. 2008. Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 17 : 2107 2121.
148. Zwickl, D. J., and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51 : 588 598.