Delimiting species without monophyletic sene trees

Systematic Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 887-895

  Knowles, L Lacey ^a   Carstens, Bryan C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalescence; Gene trees; Genealogical discord; Genealogical species concept; Incomplete lineage sorting

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 34447620474     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150701701091     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Agapow, P. M., O. R. P. Bininda-Edmonds, K. A. Crandall, J. L. Gittleman, G. M. Mace, J. G Marshall, and A. Purvis. 2004. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q. Rev. Biol. 79:161-179.
2. Avise, J. C., and M. R. Ball, Jr. 1990. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Pages 45-67 in Oxford survey evolutionary biology (D. J. Futuyma and J. Antonovics, eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Balakrishnan, R. 2005. Species concepts, species boundaries and species identification: A view from the tropics. Syst. Biol. 54:689-693.
4. Baum, D. A., and K. L. Shaw. 1995. Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. Pages 289-303 in Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics (P. C Hoch and A. G. Stephenson, eds.). Missouri Botanical Gardens, St. Louis, Missouri.
5. Carstens, B. C., and L. L. Knowles. 2007a. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: An example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Syst. Biol., 56:400-411.
6. Carstens, B.C., and L. L. Knowles. 2007b. Shifting distributions and speciation: species divergence during rapid climate change. Mol. Ecol. 16:619-627.
7. DeChaine, E. G., and A. P. Martin. 2004. Historic cycles of fragmentation and expansion in Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae) inferred using mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 58:113-127.
8. Degnan, J. H., and L. A. Salter. 2005. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution 59:24-37.
9. de Queiroz, K. 2005a. Different species problems and their solution. BioEssays 26:67-70.
10. de Queiroz, K. 2005b. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6600-6607.
11. DeSalle, R., M. G. Egan, and M. Siddal. 2005. The unholy trinity: Taxonomy, species delimitation, and DNA barcoding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 360:1905-1916.
12. Dettman, J. R., D. J. Jacobson, and J. W Taylor. 2003a. A multilocus genealogical approach to phylogenetic species recognition in the model eukaryote Neurospora. Evolution 57:2703-2720.
13. Dettman, J. R, D. J. Jacobson, E. Turner, A. Pringle, and J. W Taylor. 2003b. Reproductive isolation and phylogenetic divergence in Neurospora: Comparing methods of species recognition in a model eukaryote. Evolution 57:2721-2741.
14. Donnely, P., and S. Tavaré. 1995. Coalescents and genealogical structure under neutrality. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29:401-421.
15. Edwards, S. V., L. Liu, and D. K. Pearl. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenatioin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:5936-5941.
16. Felsenstein J. 2006. Accuracy of coalescent likelihood estimates: Do we need more sites, more sequences, or more loci? Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:691-700.
17. Gavrilets, S. 2003. Models of speciation: What have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 57:2197-2215.
18. Gompert, Z., G G Nice, J. A. Fordyce, M. L. Forister, and A. M. Shapiros. 2006. Identifying units for conservation using molecular systematics: The cautionary tale of the Karnerblue butterfly. Mol. Ecol. 15:1759-1768.
19. Hebert, P. D. N., A. Cywinska, S. L. Ball, and J. R. DeWaard. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:313-321.
20. Hey, J., R. S. Waples, M. L. Arnold, R. K. Butlin, and R. G. Harrison. 2003. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:597-603.
21. Hickerson, M. J., G P. Meyer, and G Moritz. 2006. DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space. Syst. Biol. 55:729-739.
22. Hudson, R. R. 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Pages 1-44 in Oxford survey evolutionary biology (D. J. Futuyma and J. Antonovics, eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Hudson, R. R. 1992. Gene trees, species trees and the segregation of ancestral alleles. Genetics 131:509-512.
24. Hudson, R. R., and J. A. Coyne. 2002. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 56:1557-1565.
25. Hudson, R. R., and M. Turelli. 2003. Stochasticity overrules the "three-times" rule: Genetic drift, genetic draft, and coalescence times for nuclear loci versus mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 57:182-190.
26. Janzen, D. H. 2004. Now is the time. Phil Trans. Royal. Soc. Lond. B 359:731-732.
27. Jennings, W. B., and S. V. Edwards. 2005. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees. Evolution 59:2033-2047.
28. Kingman, J. F. G 1982. The coalescent. Stochastic Process. Appl. 13: 235-248.
29. Knowles, L. L. 2004. The burgeoning field of statistical phylogeography, J. Evol. Biol., 17:1-10.
30. Knowles, L. L., and B. G Carstens. 2007. Inferring a population- divergence model for statistical-phylogeographic tests in montane grasshoppers. Evolution 61:477-493.
31. Knowles, L. L., and W. P. Maddison. 2002. Statistical phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 11:2623-2635.
32. Kubatko, L. S., and J. H. Degnan. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56:17-24.
33. Liu, L., and D. K. Pearl. 2006. Species trees from gene trees: Reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Technical report #53, Ohio State University.
34. Maddison, W P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
35. Maddison, W P., and L. L. Knowles. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting, Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
36. Maddison, W P., and D. R. Maddison. 2004. MESQUITE: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.01. http://mesquiteproject.org.
37. Marshall, J. C., E. Arevalo, E. Benavides, J. L. Sites, and J.W Sites. 2006. Delimiting species: Comparing methods for Mendelian characters using lizards of the Sceloporus grammicus (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae) complex. Evolution 60:1050-1065.
38. Masta, S. E., and W. P. Maddison. 2002. Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:4442-4447.
39. Matz, M. V., and R. Nielsen. 2005. A likelihood ratio test for species membership based on DNA sequence data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360:1969-1974.
40. Mayden, R. L. 1997. A heirarchy of species concepts: The denouement in the saga of the species problem. Pages 381-422 In The units of biodiversity (M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, eds). Chapman and Hall, New York.
41. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
42. Meier, R., K. Shiyang, G. Vaidya, and P. K. L. Ng. 2006. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: A tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst. Biol. 55:715-728.
43. Mendelson, T. C., B. D. Inouye, and M. D. Rausher. 2004. Quantifying patterns in the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 58:1424-1433.
44. Mendelson, T. C., and K. L. Shaw. 2005. Rapid speciation in an arthropod: The likely force behind an explosion of new Hawaiian cricket species revealed. Nature 433:375-376.
45. Milot, E., Gibbs, H. L. and K. A. Hobson. 2000. Phylogeography and genetic structure of northern populations of the yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia). Mol. Ecol. 9:677-681.
46. Moritz, C., and G Cicero. 2004. DNA barcoding: Promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2:1529-1531.
47. Moritz, C., C. J. Schneider, and D. B. Wake. 1992. Evolutionary relationships within the Ensatina eschscholtzii comples confirm the ring species interpretation. Syst. Biol. 41:273-291.
48. Moyle, L. C., M. S. Olson, and P. Tiffin. 2004. Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera. Evolution 58:1195-1208.
49. Omland, K. E., J. M. Baker, and J. L. Peters. 2006. Genetic signatures of intermediate divergence: Population history of Old and New World holarctic ravens (Corvus corax). Mol. Ecol. 15:795-805.
50. Orr, H. A., and L. H. Orr. 1996. Waiting for speciation: The effect of population subdivision on the time to speciation. Evolution 50:1742-1749.
51. Pamilo, P., and M. Nei. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
52. Panchal, M., and M. A. Beaumont. 2007. The automation and evaluation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Evolution 61:1466-1480.
53. Payne, R. B., and M. D. Sorenson. 2007. Integrative systematics at the species level: Plumage, songs, and molecular phylogeny of quailfinches Ortygospiza. Bull. Brit. Orn. Club 217:4-26.
54. Pons, J., T. G. Barraclough, J. Gomez-Zurita, A. Cardoso, D. P. Duran, S. Hazell, S. Kamoun, W. D. Sumlin, and A. P. Vogler. 2006. Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst. Biol. 55:595-609.
55. Rannala, B., and Z. Yang. 2003. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164:1645-1656.
56. Rieseberg, L. H., T. E. Wood, and E. J. Baack. 2006. The nature of plant species. Nature 440:524-527.
57. Rokas, A., B. L. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804.
58. Rosenberg, N. A. 2002. The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61:225-247.
59. Rosenberg, N. A. 2003. The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: Probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evolution 57:1465-1477.
60. Ross, K. G., and D. D. Shoemaker. 2005. Species delimitation in native South American fire ants. Mol. Ecol. 14:3419-3438.
61. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
62. Sites, J. W and K. A. Crandall. 1997. Testing species boundaries in biodiversity studies. Conserv. Biol. 11:1289-1297.
63. Sites, J. W., and J. G Marshall. 2004a. Empirical criteria for delimiting species. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35:199-227.
64. Sites, J. W., and J. G Marshall. 2004b. Delimiting species: A renaissance issue in systematic biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:462-470.
65. Sorenson, M. D., K. M. Sefc, and R. B. Payne. 2003. Speciation by host switch in brood parasitic indigobirds. Nature 424:928-931.
66. Starrett, J., and M. Hedin. 2006. Multilocus genealogies reveal multiple cryptic species and biogeographic complexity in the California turret spider Antrodiaetus riversi (Mygalomorphae, Antrodieatidae). Mol. Ecol. 16:583-604.
67. Takahata, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: Consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122:957-966.
68. Takahata, N., and M. Nei. 1985. Gene genealogy and variance of interpopulational nucleotide differences. Genetics 110:325-344.
69. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:330-343.
70. Turner, G. F. 1999. Explosive speciation of African cichlid fishes. Pages 113-129 in Evolution of biological diversity (A. E. Magurran and R. M. May, eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
71. Wakeley, J. 2006. Coalescent theory: An introduction. Roberts & Co., Greenwood Village, Colorado.
72. Wiens, J. J. 2004. What is speciation and how should we study it? Am. Nat. 163:914-923.
73. Wiens, J. J., and T. A. Penkrot. 2002. Delimiting species using DNA and morphological variation and discordant species limits in spiny lizards (Sceloporus). Syst. Biol. 51:69-91.
74. Won, Y.-J., A. Sivasunder, Y. Wang, and J. Hey. 2005. On the origin of Lake Malawi cichlid species: A population genetic analysis of divergence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6581-6586.
75. Zigler, K. S., M. A. McCartney, D. R. Levitan, and H. A. Lessios. 2005. Sea urchin bindin divergence predicts gamete compatibility. Evolution 59:2399-2404.